New Articles

Rapeseed Oil Market in Asia-Pacific Reached $19B, Boosted By Rising Demand In China and India

rapeseed oil

Rapeseed Oil Market in Asia-Pacific Reached $19B, Boosted By Rising Demand In China and India

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘Asia-Pacific – Rapeseed Oil – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The revenue of the rapeseed oil market in Asia-Pacific amounted to $19.1B in 2018, rising by 6.2% against the previous year. This figure reflects the total revenues of producers and importers (excluding logistics costs, retail marketing costs, and retailers’ margins, which will be included in the final consumer price). The market value increased at an average annual rate of +4.6% from 2007 to 2018; however, the trend pattern indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded in certain years. Over the period under review, the rapeseed oil market reached its peak figure level in 2018 and is expected to retain its growth in the immediate term.

Consumption By Country

China (7.5M tonnes) remains the largest rapeseed oil-consuming country in Asia-Pacific, accounting for 59% of total volume. Moreover, rapeseed oil consumption in China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest consumer, India (2.8M tonnes), threefold. The third position in this ranking was occupied by Japan (1.2M tonnes), with a 9.3% share.

From 2007 to 2018, the average annual growth rate of volume in China amounted to +4.3%. In other countries, the average annual rates were as follows: India (+1.6% per year) and Japan (+1.8% per year).

In value terms, China ($9.4B), India ($5.8B) and Japan ($2.5B) appeared to be the countries with the highest levels of market value in 2018, with a combined 93% share of the total market. Pakistan and Australia lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 4.4%.

The countries with the highest levels of rapeseed oil per capita consumption in 2018 were Australia (16,769 kg per 1000 persons), Japan (9,202 kg per 1000 persons) and China (5,144 kg per 1000 persons).

Market Forecast to 2030

Driven by increasing demand for rapeseed oil in Asia-Pacific, the market is expected to continue an upward consumption trend over the next decade. Market performance is forecast to decelerate, expanding with an anticipated CAGR of +2.4% for the period from 2018 to 2030, which is projected to bring the market volume to 17M tonnes by the end of 2030.

Production in Asia-Pacific

In 2018, the amount of rapeseed oil produced in Asia-Pacific totaled 11M tonnes, jumping by 3.2% against the previous year. The total output volume increased at an average annual rate of +2.9% over the period from 2007 to 2018; the trend pattern remained consistent, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations being recorded in certain years.

Production By Country

China (6.6M tonnes) constituted the country with the largest volume of rapeseed oil production, accounting for 59% of total volume. Moreover, rapeseed oil production in China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest producer, India (2.6M tonnes), threefold. The third position in this ranking was occupied by Japan (1.2M tonnes), with a 10% share.

In China, rapeseed oil production increased at an average annual rate of +3.9% over the period from 2007-2018. The remaining producing countries recorded the following average annual rates of production growth: India (+1.0% per year) and Japan (+1.9% per year).

Exports in Asia-Pacific

In 2018, the amount of rapeseed oil exported in Asia-Pacific totaled 267K tonnes, going up by 4.7% against the previous year. The total exports indicated temperate growth from 2007 to 2018: its volume increased at an average annual rate of +2.8% over the last eleven years. The trend pattern, however, indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded throughout the analyzed period. Based on 2018 figures, rapeseed oil exports increased by +20.2% against 2016 indices. In value terms, rapeseed oil exports totaled $282M (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Exports by Country

Australia represented the major exporter of rapeseed oil exported in Asia-Pacific, with the volume of exports accounting for 167K tonnes, which was approx. 63% of total exports in 2018. It was distantly followed by Malaysia (71K tonnes), constituting a 27% share of total exports. Singapore (10,498 tonnes) and  China (5,643 tonnes) took small shares of total exports.

Australia was also the fastest-growing in terms of the rapeseed oil exports, with a CAGR of +8.8% from 2007 to 2018. Malaysia experienced a relatively flat trend pattern. Singapore (-5.6%) and China (-10.4%) illustrated a downward trend over the same period. From 2007 to 2018, the share of Australia increased by +38% percentage points, while Singapore (-3.5 p.p.), and China (-4.9 p.p.) saw their share reduced. The shares of the other countries remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period.

In value terms, Australia ($161M), Malaysia ($81M) and Singapore ($13M) were the countries with the highest levels of exports in 2018, with a combined 91% share of total exports.

Export Prices by Country

In 2018, average rapeseed oil export price in Asia-Pacific amounted to $1,054 per tonne, rising by 5.1% against the previous year. Over the period under review, the export prices for rapeseed oil attained their peak figure at $1,321 per tonne in 2012; however, from 2013 to 2018, export price stood at somewhat lower figures.

Average prices varied somewhat amongst the major exporting countries. In 2018, major exporting countries recorded the following prices: in Singapore ($1,249 per tonne) and China ($1,212 per tonne), while Australia ($964 per tonne) and China, Hong Kong SAR ($1,021 per tonne) were amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Singapore, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Imports in Asia-Pacific

In 2018, approx. 1.6M tonnes of rapeseed oil were imported in Asia-Pacific; surging by 15% against the previous year. Overall, rapeseed oil imports continue to indicate a prominent increase. Over the period under review, rapeseed oil imports reached their maximum at 1.8M tonnes in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2018, imports failed to regain their momentum. In value terms, rapeseed oil imports totaled $1.3B (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Imports by Country

China represented the major importer of rapeseed oil imported in Asia-Pacific, with the volume of imports amounting to 817K tonnes, which was approx. 52% of total imports in 2018. India (221K tonnes) held a 14% share (based on tonnes) of total imports, which put it in second place, followed by South Korea (10%), China, Hong Kong SAR (5.4%) and Malaysia (5%). The following importers – New Zealand (63K tonnes) and the Philippines (30K tonnes) – together made up 6% of total imports.

Imports into China increased at an average annual rate of +7.2% from 2007 to 2018. At the same time, the Philippines (+20.3%), India (+17.9%), South Korea (+13.2%), China, Hong Kong SAR (+12.1%), New Zealand (+8.3%) and Malaysia (+7.2%) displayed positive paces of growth. Moreover, the Philippines emerged as the fastest-growing importer imported in Asia-Pacific, with a CAGR of +20.3% from 2007-2018.

In value terms, China ($680M) constitutes the largest market for imported rapeseed oil in Asia-Pacific, comprising 50% of total rapeseed oil imports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by India ($178M), with a 13% share of total imports. It was followed by South Korea, with a 10% share.

Import Prices by Country

The rapeseed oil import price in Asia-Pacific stood at $862 per tonne in 2018, stabilizing at the previous year. In general, the rapeseed oil import price continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern.

Average prices varied somewhat amongst the major importing countries. In 2018, major importing countries recorded the following prices: in the Philippines ($1,117 per tonne) and New Zealand ($998 per tonne), while China, Hong Kong SAR ($798 per tonne) and India ($805 per tonne) were amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Malaysia, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

decaffeinated coffee

The Growth of the EU Decaffeinated Coffee Market Lost its Momentum

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Decaffeinated Coffee (Not Roasted) – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The revenue of the decaffeinated coffee market in the European Union amounted to $1.6B in 2018, going down by -2.5% against the previous year. This figure reflects the total revenues of producers and importers (excluding logistics costs, retail marketing costs, and retailers’ margins, which will be included in the final consumer price). Overall, decaffeinated coffee consumption continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern.

Consumption By Country in the EU

The countries with the highest volumes of decaffeinated coffee consumption in 2018 were the UK (59K tonnes), Germany (49K tonnes) and France (45K tonnes), with a combined 47% share of total consumption. These countries were followed by Spain, Poland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, Austria, Portugal, Italy and Finland, which together accounted for a further 42%.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of decaffeinated coffee consumption, amongst the main consuming countries, was attained by Spain, while decaffeinated coffee consumption for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the UK ($449M) led the market, alone. The second position in the ranking was occupied by France ($174M). It was followed by Germany.

The countries with the highest levels of decaffeinated coffee per capita consumption in 2018 were Belgium (1,201 kg per 1000 persons), Austria (1,159 kg per 1000 persons) and Sweden (1,133 kg per 1000 persons).

Production in the EU

In 2018, the amount of decaffeinated coffee (not roasted) produced in the European Union totaled 433K tonnes, flattening at the previous year. Overall, decaffeinated coffee production continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2016 with an increase of 5.5% against the previous year.

Production By Country in the EU

The country with the largest volume of decaffeinated coffee production was Germany (208K tonnes), accounting for 48% of total volume. Moreover, decaffeinated coffee production in Germany exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest producer, the UK (55K tonnes), fourfold. France (42K tonnes) ranked third in terms of total production with a 9.7% share.

In Germany, decaffeinated coffee production remained relatively stable over the period from 2007-2018. The remaining producing countries recorded the following average annual rates of production growth: the UK (+1.0% per year) and France (-0.4% per year).

Exports in the EU

In 2018, the exports of decaffeinated coffee (not roasted) in the European Union stood at 180K tonnes, going up by 3.1% against the previous year. The total export volume increased at an average annual rate of +1.5% from 2007 to 2018; the trend pattern remained consistent, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations being observed over the period under review. Over the period under review, decaffeinated coffee exports reached their peak figure at 187K tonnes in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2018, exports remained at a lower figure. In value terms, decaffeinated coffee exports totaled $596M (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Exports by Country

Germany dominates decaffeinated coffee exports structure, resulting at 161K tonnes, which was approx. 89% of total exports in 2018. It was distantly followed by Spain (15K tonnes), committing an 8.2% share of total exports.

Exports from Germany increased at an average annual rate of +1.5% from 2007 to 2018. At the same time, Spain emerged as the fastest-growing exporter exported in the European Union, with a CAGR of +3.4% from 2007-2018. While the share of Germany (+13 p.p.) and Spain (+2.5 p.p.) increased significantly, the shares of the other countries remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period.

In value terms, Germany ($503M) remains the largest decaffeinated coffee supplier in the European Union, comprising 84% of total decaffeinated coffee exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Spain ($74M), with a 12% share of total exports.

Export Prices by Country

In 2018, the decaffeinated coffee export price in the European Union amounted to $3,303 per tonne. Overall, the decaffeinated coffee export price, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern.

There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major exporting countries. In 2018, the country with the highest price was Spain ($4,989 per tonne), while Germany amounted to $3,134 per tonne.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Spain.

Imports in the EU

The imports stood at 69K tonnes in 2018, rising by 12% against the previous year. The total import volume increased at an average annual rate of +2.8% from 2007 to 2018; however, the trend pattern indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded over the period under review. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2015 when imports increased by 13% year-to-year. The volume of imports peaked in 2018 and are likely to see steady growth in the immediate term. In value terms, decaffeinated coffee imports totaled $185M (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Imports by Country

Spain represented the major importer of decaffeinated coffee (not roasted) imported in the European Union, with the volume of imports finishing at 31K tonnes, which was near 45% of total imports in 2018. The Netherlands (11,908 tonnes) took a 17% share (based on tonnes) of total imports, which put it in second place, followed by Italy (9.7%), the UK (6.8%) and Belgium (6.7%). The following importers – France (2,912 tonnes) and Portugal (2,540 tonnes) – each accounted for a 7.9% share of total imports.

Spain was also the fastest-growing in terms of the decaffeinated coffee (not roasted) imports, with a CAGR of +12.1% from 2007 to 2018. At the same time, the UK (+3.2%), Portugal (+2.0%) and France (+1.7%) displayed positive paces of growth. The Netherlands experienced a relatively flat trend pattern. By contrast, Italy (-1.4%) and Belgium (-4.1%) illustrated a downward trend over the same period.

In value terms, the largest decaffeinated coffee importing markets in the European Union were Spain ($59M), the Netherlands ($36M) and Italy ($22M), with a combined 63% share of total imports.

Import Prices by Country

In 2018, the decaffeinated coffee import price in the European Union amounted to $2,698 per tonne, waning by -11.6% against the previous year. Over the period under review, the decaffeinated coffee import price continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. The import prices for decaffeinated coffee (not roasted) attained their peak level of $4,621 per tonne in 2011. From 2012 to 2018, the growth in terms of the import prices for decaffeinated coffee (not roasted) remained at a somewhat lower figure.

There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major importing countries. In 2018, the country with the highest price was France ($4,154 per tonne), while Spain ($1,926 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by France, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

bread

Fresh Bread And Miscellaneous Bakery Market in the EU Stands at $68.7B

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Bakers’ Wares (No Added Sweetening) – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The revenue of the market for fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery in the European Union amounted to $68.7B in 2018, standing approx. at the previous year. This figure reflects the total revenues of producers and importers (excluding logistics costs, retail marketing costs, and retailers’ margins, which will be included in the final consumer price). Over the period under review, consumption of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern.

Consumption By Country in the EU

The countries with the highest volumes of consumption of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery in 2018 were the UK (4.8M tonnes), Germany (4.6M tonnes) and Spain (3M tonnes), with a combined 44% share of total consumption. These countries were followed by France, Italy, Poland, the Netherlands, Romania, Ireland, the Czech Republic, Portugal and Austria, which together accounted for a further 44%.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of consumption of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery, amongst the main consuming countries, was attained by Ireland, while consumption of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Germany ($15.7B), the UK ($11.9B) and Italy ($9.8B) constituted the countries with the highest levels of market value in 2018, together accounting for 54% of the total market. France, Spain, the Netherlands, Poland, Austria, Portugal, Romania, Ireland and the Czech Republic lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 36%.

The countries with the highest levels of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery per capita consumption in 2018 were Ireland (154 kg per person), the Netherlands (81 kg per person) and the UK (72 kg per person).

Market Forecast 2019-2025 in the EU

Driven by increasing demand for fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery in the European Union, the market is expected to continue an upward consumption trend over the next decade. Market performance is forecast to retain its current trend pattern, expanding with an anticipated CAGR of +0.5% for the period from 2018 to 2030, which is projected to bring the market volume to 30M tonnes by the end of 2030.

Production in the EU

The volume of production of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery amounted to 28M tonnes in 2018, going down by -1.9% against the previous year. Over the period under review, production of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. Over the period under review, production of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery attained its peak figure volume at 29M tonnes in 2017, and then declined slightly in the following year.

Production By Country in the EU

The countries with the highest volumes of production of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery in 2018 were Germany (5.1M tonnes), the UK (4.3M tonnes) and Spain (3.1M tonnes), together comprising 44% of total production. France, Italy, Poland, the Netherlands, Romania, Ireland, the Czech Republic, Portugal and Belgium lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 44%.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of production of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery, amongst the main producing countries, was attained by Ireland, while production of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Exports in the EU

In 2018, the amount of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery exported in the European Union totaled 4.7M tonnes, surging by 5% against the previous year. The total exports indicated a buoyant increase from 2007 to 2018: its volume increased at an average annual rate of +5.3% over the last eleven years. The trend pattern, however, indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded throughout the analyzed period. Over the period under review, exports of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery reached their peak figure in 2018 and are expected to retain its growth in the near future. In value terms, exports of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery amounted to $13.5B (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Exports by Country

In 2018, Germany (1.1M tonnes), distantly followed by France (596K tonnes), Belgium (479K tonnes), Italy (379K tonnes), Poland (356K tonnes), the Netherlands (333K tonnes), Spain (314K tonnes) and the UK (228K tonnes) represented the main exporters of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery, together comprising 80% of total exports.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of exports, amongst the main exporting countries, was attained by Poland, while exports for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Germany ($2.8B), France ($1.9B) and Belgium ($1.6B) were the countries with the highest levels of exports in 2018, together accounting for 47% of total exports. Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the UK lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 36%.

Export Prices by Country

In 2018, the export price for fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery in the European Union amounted to $2,881 per tonne, jumping by 7.1% against the previous year. In general, the export price for fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern.

There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major exporting countries. In 2018, the country with the highest price was Italy ($4,130 per tonne), while Poland ($2,294 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by France, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Imports in the EU

In 2018, the imports of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery in the European Union totaled 4.2M tonnes, increasing by 5.4% against the previous year. The total imports indicated a strong increase from 2007 to 2018: its volume increased at an average annual rate of +4.8% over the last eleven years. The trend pattern, however, indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded throughout the analyzed period. Based on 2018 figures, imports of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery increased by +67.7% against 2007 indices. In value terms, imports of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery stood at $11.4B (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Imports by Country

The UK (706K tonnes), Germany (574K tonnes), France (449K tonnes), the Netherlands (334K tonnes), Belgium (304K tonnes), Italy (225K tonnes), Austria (175K tonnes), Spain (173K tonnes), Ireland (159K tonnes), Sweden (124K tonnes), the Czech Republic (111K tonnes) and Denmark (111K tonnes) represented roughly 82% of total imports of fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery in 2018.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of imports, amongst the main importing countries, was attained by the Czech Republic, while imports for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the largest fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery importing markets in the European Union were the UK ($1.9B), Germany ($1.6B) and France ($1.4B), together comprising 43% of total imports. The Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Spain, Austria, Ireland, Sweden, Denmark and the Czech Republic lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 40%.

Import Prices by Country

The import price for fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery in the European Union stood at $2,701 per tonne in 2018, growing by 5.5% against the previous year. Over the period under review, the import price for fresh bread and miscellaneous bakery, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern.

Average prices varied somewhat amongst the major importing countries. In 2018, major importing countries recorded the following prices: in France ($3,132 per tonne) and Spain ($3,107 per tonne), while the Czech Republic ($2,191 per tonne) and Ireland ($2,258 per tonne) were amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by the Czech Republic, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

melon

Global Melon Market Reached $27B, Driven By Rising Demand in China

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Melons – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The global melon market revenue amounted to $27.4B in 2018, increasing by 2.2% against the previous year. This figure reflects the total revenues of producers and importers (excluding logistics costs, retail marketing costs, and retailers’ margins, which will be included in the final consumer price). The market value increased at an average annual rate of +2.1% over the period from 2007 to 2018; the trend pattern remained relatively stable, with only minor fluctuations being recorded in certain years. Over the period under review, the global melon market attained its peak figure level in 2018 and is expected to retain its growth in the near future.

Consumption By Country

The country with the largest volume of melon consumption was China (17M tonnes), comprising approx. 53% of total volume. Moreover, melon consumption in China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest consumer, Turkey (1.8M tonnes), tenfold. Iran (1.6M tonnes) ranked third in terms of total consumption with a 4.8% share.

In China, melon consumption increased at an average annual rate of +1.9% over the period from 2007-2018. In the other countries, the average annual rates were as follows: Turkey (+0.9% per year) and Iran (-2.3% per year).

In value terms, China ($15.1B) led the market, alone. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Turkey ($1.3B). It was followed by Egypt.

In 2018, the highest levels of melon per capita consumption was registered in Kazakhstan (50 kg per person), followed by Turkey (22 kg per person), Iran (19 kg per person) and Morocco (15 kg per person), while the world average per capita consumption of melon was estimated at 4.25 kg per person.

Market Forecast 2019-2025

Driven by increasing demand for melon worldwide, the market is expected to continue an upward consumption trend over the next decade. Market performance is forecast to retain its current trend pattern, expanding with an anticipated CAGR of +0.9% for the period from 2018 to 2030, which is projected to bring the market volume to 36M tonnes by the end of 2030.

Production 2007-2018

Global melon production totaled 33M tonnes in 2018, going up by 1.6% against the previous year. Over the period under review, melon production continues to indicate a modest growth. The general positive trend in terms of melon output was largely conditioned by a modest expansion of the harvested area and a mild increase in yield figures.

Production By Country

China (17M tonnes) constituted the country with the largest volume of melon production, comprising approx. 53% of total volume. Moreover, melon production in China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest producer, Turkey (1.8M tonnes), tenfold. The third position in this ranking was occupied by Iran (1.6M tonnes), with a 4.7% share.

In China, melon production expanded at an average annual rate of +1.9% over the period from 2007-2018. The remaining producing countries recorded the following average annual rates of production growth: Turkey (+0.9% per year) and Iran (-2.3% per year).

Harvested Area 2007-2018

In 2018, the global melon harvested area amounted to 1.2M ha, therefore, remained relatively stable against the previous year. Overall, the melon harvested area, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern.

Yield 2007-2018

In 2018, the global average yield of melons amounted to 27 tonne per ha, therefore, remained relatively stable against the previous year. The yield figure increased at an average annual rate of +1.3% from 2007 to 2018; the trend pattern remained consistent, with only minor fluctuations being observed over the period under review.

Exports 2007-2018

In 2018, the global exports of melons stood at 2.3M tonnes, rising by 8.6% against the previous year. Over the period under review, melon exports continue to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. The pace of growth appeared the most rapid in 2018 when exports increased by 8.6% y-o-y. In that year, global melon exports reached their peak and are likely to continue its growth in the immediate term. In value terms, melon exports stood at $1.9B (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Exports by Country

In 2018, Spain (405K tonnes) and Guatemala (397K tonnes) were the largest exporters of melonsin the world, together accounting for approx. 34% of total exports. Honduras (254K tonnes) occupied an 11% share (based on tonnes) of total exports, which put it in second place, followed by Brazil (10%), the U.S. (8.7%), the Netherlands (6.8%), Costa Rica (5.7%) and Mexico (5.7%).

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of exports, amongst the main exporting countries, was attained by the Netherlands, while exports for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the largest melon supplying countries worldwide were Spain ($361M), Guatemala ($236M) and Honduras ($189M), with a combined 42% share of global exports.

Export Prices by Country

The average melon export price stood at $800 per tonne in 2018, lowering by -4.4% against the previous year. Over the period from 2007 to 2018, it increased at an average annual rate of +1.6%. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2017 when the average export price increased by 12% year-to-year. In that year, the average export prices for melons reached their peak level of $838 per tonne, and then declined slightly in the following year.

There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major exporting countries. In 2018, the country with the highest price was the Netherlands ($1,155 per tonne), while Guatemala ($594 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Costa Rica, while the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Imports 2007-2018

In 2018, the amount of melons imported worldwide amounted to 2.1M tonnes, stabilizing at the previous year. Overall, melon imports, however, continue to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. In value terms, melon imports stood at $1.8B (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Imports by Country

The U.S. represented the main importer of melons imported in the world, with the volume of imports recording 655K tonnes, which was approx. 30% of total imports in 2018. The Netherlands (205K tonnes) ranks second in terms of the total imports with a 9.5% share, followed by France (8.5%), the UK (8%), Canada (7.4%) and Germany (6.2%). Spain (86K tonnes), Portugal (62K tonnes), Belgium (40K tonnes), Switzerland (33K tonnes), Italy (33K tonnes) and Mexico (33K tonnes) occupied minor shares of total imports.

The U.S. experienced a relatively flat trend pattern with regard to volume of imports of melons imports. At the same time, Mexico (+7.1%), Switzerland (+3.2%), France (+2.7%), Spain (+2.3%), the Netherlands (+1.8%) and Portugal (+1.3%) displayed positive paces of growth. Moreover, Mexico emerged as the fastest-growing importer imported in the world, with a CAGR of +7.1% from 2007-2018. Italy and Canada experienced a relatively flat trend pattern. By contrast, Germany (-1.3%), the UK (-1.9%) and Belgium (-2.5%) illustrated a downward trend over the same period.

In value terms, the U.S. ($403M) constitutes the largest market for imported melons worldwide, comprising 22% of global imports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by France ($197M), with a 11% share of global imports. It was followed by the Netherlands, with a 10% share.

Import Prices by Country

The average melon import price stood at $857 per tonne in 2018, picking up by 5.5% against the previous year. Over the last eleven years, it increased at an average annual rate of +1.6%.

Prices varied noticeably by the country of destination; the country with the highest price was Belgium ($1,461 per tonne), while the U.S. ($615 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Mexico, while the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

Special Report: How to Keep Shipments Moving Forward During a Global Health Emergency

Delayed start to the new year
The coronavirus outbreak has prompted an official global health emergency that is severely affecting business operations not only in China but also around the globe. With any kind of widespread health outbreak, global importers and exporters are dealing with unpredictable logistics concerns that require a proactive approach to keep business running as usual.

It’s important to note that any cargo from the Wuhan, Hubei Province (the origin of the outbreak), and other quarantine zones, are restricted from leaving the province, which includes full container loads (FCL), less than container loads (LCL), as well as air freight. There will also be delays in factories re-opening, and a reduction of exports from China due to Wuhan residents not returning to work until February 17th, 2020 and other municipalities extending Chinese New Year until February 9th, 2020, including:

-Shanghai Municipality

-Chongqing Municipality

-Jiangsu Province

-Zhejiang Province

-Guangdong Province

-Fujian Province

The latest in air and ocean travel

In general, there has been an increased reduction in travel in and out of China. In areas where travel is permitted, strict health checks are causing significant delays at main air and ocean terminals, to ensure the safety of all travelers and workers. While the Wuhan port is closed, the other ports continue to operate. We also continue to see several airlines canceling flights in and out of China which can have an impact on cargo capacity.

Below are important considerations that will help keep your supply chain moving and better navigate any shipping challenges associated with the latest travel restrictions and schedule shifts.

Assessment of inventory levels

Having an accurate assessment of your inventory is expected, but it’s important to understand how restrictions on imports from China will impact your current inventory and regular shipping cadence. Look ahead to determine if the demand for your product may change in the next few weeks and if you have a need for expedited shipping. Starting those conversations now and establishing a plan are important as air capacity falls due to canceled passenger flights and higher demand.

Planning ahead in production

There are numerous variables to consider when planning for production. Working through these with a supply chain expert will help you be prepared and proactive as the uncertainty around the virus continues.

-What will production look like and has there been any discussion with the vendors and factories?

-How are existing inventories compared to sales projections?

-What plans are in place in case there is a shortage of workers in China or the demands are not being met within a specific window of time?

-Has there been a discussion about how the backlog will be addressed?

Backup sourcing options

When there is any kind of delayed start to production, keeping up with the workload poses a challenge, and so you may need to consider backup sources. Backup sourcing options are not always easy to find and keeping up with the sheer demand and quality controls can be a challenge. Connecting with a global supply chain expert to vet reliable options is important to ensure success.

While we may not know how long this global health emergency will last, C.H. Robinson’s global network of experts are dedicated to helping you get your shipments where they need to be. We continue to closely monitor the situation and provide updates through our client advisories as needed.

NTG

NTG Slides Between Old Guard and Freight-Forwarding Disruptors

If there is one common theme among newish freight-forwarding disruptors, it is that they seek to replace an old guard that relies on paper, clipboards, and telephones with a brave new world that relies on cloud software, analytics platforms, and smartphones.

The stakes are high: tracking and handling freight is a $1 trillion industry. And so, the business media falls all over itself to profile the likes of Qwyk, Flexport and Zencargo. It’s a small wonder that established players have moved into the freight forwarding “startup” space, as evidenced by Twill, a so-called “Maersk innovation.” Amazon is also breaking into the freight-forwarding market, as is another well-known disruptor, Uber, which launched Uber Freight in 2017 and expanded into Europe last year.

Falling somewhere between the newbies and the established players is Nolan Transportation Group (NTG), a multimodal freight brokerage firm that was founded in Atlanta in 2005. Featuring parcel, truckload, less-than-truckload and intermodal transportation services for more than 7,000 customers across the U.S., Canada, and Mexico—as well as a carrier base with over 30,000 independent transportation/trucking companies that aid in facilitating the movement of clients’ products—NTG has mostly been in the news lately due to industry consolidation.

After Gryphon Investors injected capital into third party logistics company Transportation Insight in September, the private equity firm and the 3PL together acquired NTG three months later. Then, in January, NTG announced it had acquired Eagle Transportation LLC, a Mississippi-based freight brokerage specializing in temperature-controlled shipping. Out of the deal, NTG added Eagle’s expertise in cold-chain logistics and brokerage of refrigerated equipment, and Eagle received access to NTG’s vast pool of carrier representatives.

But NTG Freight is now seeking to turn industry heads with its new portal for carriers and shipping customers that went live for the public on Jan. 18, after months of beta testing. Those who log in 24/7 get real-time access “to every available shipment we have as a company,” says Garrett McDaniel, NTG’s vice president of Software Project Management. “Carriers like it because available loads are not on public boards where you have to beat out the competition to find lanes you are interested in running. The second a shipment is created, it shows up on our system as available.”

Previously, NTG communicated with its more than 8,000 companies and 100,000 trucking companies via fax, email, and phone. The portal makes that process communications and booking loads faster and easier, with bidding and rate confirmation handled automatically—and via a smartphone.

“We have created a few access levels for our preferred carriers, who not only see the loads available but the offer rate for that load as well,” McDaniel explains. “It’s created a bidding system that is pretty different than the eBay-style bidding that our competitors are doing.” With the latter, a bid amount is entered and after other bids are made, a “winning bid” is selected. But with the NTG portal, a carrier submits a couple of different amounts and is automatically chosen without having to debate.

Asked whether the new portal came about based on what customers were seeking or what NTG saw needed refinement, McDaniel answered, “A little bit of both. The platform was originally created based on some specific needs of carriers.”

You might assume here that NTG’s answer to those needs came in June 2019, when the 3PL deployed Descartes Systems Group’s MacroPoint, a cloud-based freight visibility solution. After all, Perry Falk, senior vice president of NTG’s Carrier Operations, said at the time: “Our customers can opt to get real-time visibility on every shipment we move. The drivers for our carriers can provide location updates with minimal interactions while in-transit, leaving us with happier carriers who can focus on driving safely.”

However, McDaniel corrects that the new portal’s inception actually stretches back a couple of years before that, when carriers were telling NTG as far back as 2017 that they needed online access to their payment information. “One thing they wanted was access to payments in real-time. Paperwork was missing on some loads, and they wanted to see information on available loads. Over time, as we grew as a development team, along with the experience of the users, things were refined internally.

“One of the very first versions that rolled out showed the payment status. You’d log in to see when you were being paid if you were paid already what the check number was and when it was mailed. Really within the last year, we rolled out a lot more core functionality, including bidding on loads, rate confirmation, as well as some of the customer-focused functionality as well.”

McDaniel considers all of this to be part of NTG’s mission “to improve the carrier partnership.” Relationships with loyal carriers and customers were already in place during the NTG portal’s beta phase. “We’ve received a ton of positive feedback, especially among the smaller carriers that have one to five trucks,” McDaniel says. “It’s been a great tool for them to be able to keep their trucks completely filled with loads purely by using the system.” Carriers “with thousands of trucks” also participated in the beta phase, he adds. “They were able to get in, play around with it and give us their feedback. We’ve taken a lot of the feedback and been able to implement changes.”

The live version features a redesigned front end, more user-friendliness and a more modern-feeling than the beta tester, according to McDaniel, who credits Gryphon Investors with steadfastly supporting his company’s high-tech vision. “They have been a really incredible partner in developing this application,” he says.

However, while new freight forwarding disruptors scramble to build new customer bases, McDaniel is also quick to applaud the NTG network with continuing to push his company to refine with the digital times.

“We have been around for 15 years,” he notes. “In that amount of time, we’ve grown a deep network of carriers and shipper partners. These were not acquired overnight as a tech startup disruptor.”

Which, McDaniel believes, gives NTG a competitive edge over the upstarts. “We have a pretty dedicated group of users. This is something we view as an enhancement for our carrier partners. You don’t ever want to replace human relationships. Rather, this is something that quite frankly helps strengthen that relationship with us.”

sweet corn

Preserved Sweet Corn Market in the EU To Continue Moderate Growth

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Sweet Corn Prepared Or Preserved – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The revenue of the preserved sweet corn market in the European Union amounted to $465M in 2018, remaining relatively unchanged against the previous year. This figure reflects the total revenues of producers and importers (excluding logistics costs, retail marketing costs, and retailers’ margins, which will be included in the final consumer price). The market value increased at an average annual rate of +2.2% from 2007 to 2018; the trend pattern remained relatively stable, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations being observed over the period under review.

Consumption By Country in the EU

The countries with the highest volumes of preserved sweet corn consumption in 2018 were the UK (69K tonnes), France (67K tonnes) and Germany (66K tonnes), with a combined 59% share of total consumption. Spain, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands, Poland, Denmark, Austria, Belgium and Romania lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 33%.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of preserved sweet corn consumption, amongst the main consuming countries, was attained by Italy, while preserved sweet corn consumption for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the largest preserved sweet corn markets in the European Union were the UK ($95M), France ($91M) and Germany ($82M), with a combined 58% share of the total market. Spain, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Denmark, Austria, Belgium and Romania lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 34%.

The countries with the highest levels of preserved sweet corn per capita consumption in 2018 were Sweden (1,781 kg per 1000 persons), Denmark (1,267 kg per 1000 persons) and the UK (1,028 kg per 1000 persons).

Market Forecast 2019-2025 in the EU

Driven by increasing demand for preserved sweet corn in the European Union, the market is expected to continue an upward consumption trend over the next seven-year period. Market performance is forecast to retain its current trend pattern, expanding with an anticipated CAGR of +1.8% for the period from 2018 to 2025, which is projected to bring the market volume to 392K tonnes by the end of 2025.

Production in the EU

In 2018, the production of sweet corn prepared or preserved in the European Union stood at 369K tonnes, surging by 1.8% against the previous year. The total output volume increased at an average annual rate of +3.0% over the period from 2007 to 2018; however, the trend pattern indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded in certain years. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2013 when production volume increased by 13% year-to-year. Over the period under review, preserved sweet corn production attained its maximum volume in 2018 and is expected to retain its growth in the near future.

Exports in the EU

In 2018, the preserved sweet corn exports in the European Union stood at 411K tonnes, rising by 13% against the previous year. The total export volume increased at an average annual rate of +2.9% from 2007 to 2018; however, the trend pattern indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded in certain years. In value terms, preserved sweet corn exports amounted to $522M (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Exports by Country

Hungary represented the major exporter of sweet corn prepared or preserved exported in the European Union, with the volume of exports finishing at 203K tonnes, which was near 49% of total exports in 2018. France (132K tonnes) occupied the second position in the ranking, distantly followed by Spain (26K tonnes) and Belgium (20K tonnes). All these countries together took approx. 43% share of total exports. Germany (10K tonnes) followed a long way behind the leaders.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of exports, amongst the main exporting countries, was attained by Spain, while exports for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Hungary ($228M), France ($171M) and Spain ($43M) were the countries with the highest levels of exports in 2018, with a combined 85% share of total exports.

Export Prices by Country

The preserved sweet corn export price in the European Union stood at $1,268 per tonne in 2018, remaining constant against the previous year. Over the period under review, the preserved sweet corn export price continues to indicate a slight reduction.

Prices varied noticeably by the country of origin; the country with the highest price was Belgium ($1,692 per tonne), while Hungary ($1,125 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Germany, while the other leaders experienced a decline in the export price figures.

Imports in the EU

In 2018, approx. 387K tonnes of sweet corn prepared or preserved were imported in the European Union; picking up by 13% against the previous year. The total import volume increased at an average annual rate of +2.3% from 2007 to 2018; the trend pattern remained consistent, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations over the period under review. In value terms, preserved sweet corn imports amounted to $510M (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Imports by Country

The imports of the three major importers of sweet corn prepared or preserved, namely Germany, the UK and Spain, represented more than half of total import. France (32K tonnes) occupied the next position in the ranking, followed by Belgium (26K tonnes), Italy (24K tonnes), the Netherlands (19K tonnes), Sweden (18K tonnes) and Poland (18K tonnes). All these countries together occupied near 35% share of total imports. Denmark (7,702 tonnes) followed a long way behind the leaders.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of imports, amongst the main importing countries, was attained by the Netherlands, while imports for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the largest preserved sweet corn importing markets in the European Union were the UK ($97M), Germany ($94M) and Spain ($68M), together accounting for 51% of total imports. These countries were followed by Belgium, Italy, France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Poland and Denmark, which together accounted for a further 38%.

Import Prices by Country

The preserved sweet corn import price in the European Union stood at $1,318 per tonne in 2018, rising by 3.4% against the previous year. Overall, the preserved sweet corn import price, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. Over the period under review, the import prices for sweet corn prepared or preserved attained their peak figure at $1,525 per tonne in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2018, import prices remained at a lower figure.

There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major importing countries. In 2018, the country with the highest price was Sweden ($1,624 per tonne), while France ($1,017 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Sweden, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

culture

Maximizing the Mixed Culture of In-House and Remote Workers.

Your business has employees.  You might have 5, or you might have 5,000.  Regardless of what size your business may be, every business has the same challenge; how do you maximize productivity? One important way of doing so is to make sure you are maximizing the output of your employees. To do that, it is important that you are aligning them with the goals of the business while providing them an environment that supports and fosters their growth. This gets lumped into the concept of culture.

Fostering the proper kind of culture is an important way to maintain a motivated workforce and increase productivity. Too often business owners and managers look at culture as intangible or amorphous or as something that HR should deal with. Culture is easier to address than that. Culture is the direct result of creating an environment that fosters a positive attitude. It delivers an efficient approach and arms employees with the right tools while supporting a balanced workforce. Some businesses look at culture through the lens of perks, like offering snacks in the breakroom. More often employees value perks in terms of flexibility. Employees value being encouraged, or at least given the chance, to work flexible hours, work remotely, and more.

This kind of flexibility is enabled through technology. The workplace is transforming, and the future of work is here. It is no longer a fantasy or a future opportunity. Video conferencing, connected messaging apps, document sharing and mobile access to information are making the remote, connected, “always-on” workforce a reality. These innovations and the explosion of their adoption in the modern workplace are making it easier for employees to balance their work and personal lives, interweaving the two together. The shackles of being tied to a desk are gone and people are free to intermingle their personal and professional lives. Video creates the chance to see who you are engaging with, no matter where they are. Looking someone in the eye always establishes a better rapport. As a result, businesses see stronger inter-personal collaboration, better sharing of information and insights and an increase in productivity.

Your best employees appreciate this and balance better. They will work later knowing they were able to take an hour to drop their kids at school or attend a school meeting. They can get a work-out in at lunch knowing they can do a conference call remotely. They take pride in their work because they feel there is a reciprocal value exchange between them and their employer. They realize their employer wants them to feel empowered and treated fairly while they develop a sense of ownership and pride in the place where they work. That sense of pride can translate to better use of their time and less “corner cutting” (i.e. taking short cuts in meetings to get on with the rest of your day).

Beyond that sense of pride and confidence in an employer, there are more tangible results of providing the tools to enable flexible work schedules.

People can respond faster to issues and questions and create “durable” threads of related content. Messaging and collaboration apps enable you to ping co-workers and exchange ideas, ask questions and seek information quickly and less intrusively, but are accessible remotely. Expectations on messaging apps are different than that for phone calls, email or text and they are more useful after the fact. Messaging apps allow for thoughtful responses, with attachments and key information included, and saved in a thread for later use. This aggregation of information is valuable for extended teams and the information is collected quicker than it would have been over text or phone.  As a broader team gets involved, there is a record of conversation and relevant information that can be used to increase productivity.

I briefly mentioned this benefit, but employees can respond from anywhere and with video conferencing. Just because someone isn’t in the office doesn’t mean the project can’t move forward. Being connected through mobile video means information can be exchanged regardless of location, with clear body language in addition to audio. Remote workers and out-of-office employees can always be reached instantly and provide quick responses to important, time-sensitive inquiries.

This “always on” and interconnected approach creates an environment where collaboration can happen on the fly and innovation can spark from anywhere. One of the things I have always heard and understood is that the best ideas can come from the least expected places. A great idea may surface when you aren’t in the office, but if you can’t share the idea then it may never see the light of day. As inspiration arises, it can be shared with team members and built upon quickly, resulting in a potentially new and important initiative.

The best thing about these technology tools is that no person feels as though they are operating on an island. In the past, businesses have been hesitant to hire the right person if they can’t physically be on site. In some cases, amazing candidates are disregarded because they are not local. With the new era of technology tools, you can always hire the best person no matter where they are located. If that person is on video, it’s as good as them being in the office. As a result, no person is on an island and your business ends up with the highest qualified, best talent for the job.

Technology is also not expensive anymore. Whether your business is 5 people or 5,000, you can afford to act like a 50,000 person company and leverage cloud-based tools to increase productivity and balance the in-house people with a remote workforce for maximum results.

C.H. Robinson

C.H. Robinson Names Thomas Schoett Vice President of Latin America

C.H. Robinson, one of the world’s largest logistics platforms, is proud to announce Thomas Schoett as vice president, Latin America (LATAM), Global Forwarding. He will report to Mike Short, president of Global Forwarding at C.H. Robinson.

Thomas joined C.H. Robinson in May 2017 as the regional director of South America. In his time with the company, he has improved global alignment and increased our presence on regional trade lanes that are important to our customer base. His efforts continue to add to our global suite of services and the ability for customers to work with one provider for all their logistics and technology needs.

“Thomas brings a deep knowledge of the region, logistics expertise and leadership skills to this role,” Short said. “He will focus on creating synergy within the region and further develop global trade lanes to and from LATAM.”

Latin America is an important part of the company’s Global Forwarding growth strategy, and focused strategic alignment and strong partnerships are critical for continued success.

“I am delighted to be leading the LATAM team,” Schoett said. “Through our network of experts in LATAM and around the globe, we continue to act as an extension of our customer’s teams and drive personalized solutions according to their needs in the region. Additionally, our technology built by and for supply chain experts offers market-leading solutions and real-time visibility to drive better outcomes for our customers’ supply chains.”

portugal

Portugal and Italy Remain the Largest Carob Markets Worldwide

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Carob – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The global carob market revenue amounted to $111M in 2018. This figure reflects the total revenues of producers and importers (excluding logistics costs, retail marketing costs, and retailers’ margins, which will be included in the final consumer price). Overall, carob consumption, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. Over the period under review, the global carob market reached its maximum level at $116M in 2014; however, from 2015 to 2018, consumption failed to regain its momentum.

Consumption By Country

The countries with the highest volumes of carob consumption in 2018 were Portugal (38K tonnes), Italy (34K tonnes) and Turkey (14K tonnes), with a combined 60% share of global consumption.

From 2012 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of carob consumption, amongst the main consuming countries, was attained by Portugal, while carob consumption for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Italy ($34M) led the market, alone. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Spain ($14M). It was followed by Portugal.

The countries with the highest levels of carob per capita consumption in 2018 were Portugal (3,679 kg per 1000 persons), Cyprus (2,688 kg per 1000 persons) and Greece (1,121 kg per 1000 persons).

Market Forecast 2019-2025

Driven by increasing demand for carob, the market is expected to continue an upward consumption trend over the next seven-year period. Market performance is forecast to retain its current trend pattern, expanding with an anticipated CAGR of +0.8% for the seven-year period from 2018 to 2025, which is projected to bring the market volume to 152K tonnes by the end of 2025.

Production 2007-2018

In 2018, the global carob production stood at 165K tonnes, increasing by 1.8% against the previous year. The total output volume increased at an average annual rate of +1.7% over the period from 2012 to 2018; the trend pattern remained consistent, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations over the period under review. In 2014, global carob production attained its peak volume of 191K tonnes, thanks to the high yields in Portugal, which remains major carob producer. From 2015 to 2018, global carob production growth, however, remained at a somewhat lower figure. The general positive trend in terms of carob output was largely conditioned by a modest expansion of the harvested area and a temperate increase in yield figures.

Production By Country

The countries with the highest volumes of carob production in 2018 were Portugal (43K tonnes), Italy (29K tonnes) and Spain (23K tonnes), together accounting for 58% of global production. Morocco, Turkey, Greece and Algeria lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 35%.

Harvested Area 2007-2018

In 2018, approx. 42K ha of carob were harvested worldwide; therefore, remained relatively stable against the previous year. In general, the carob harvested area, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. The pace of growth appeared the most rapid in 2017 with an increase of 1.6% against the previous year. The global carob harvested area peaked at 43K ha in 2012; however, from 2013 to 2018, harvested area stood at a somewhat lower figure.

Yield 2007-2018

In 2018, the global average carob yield stood at 4 tonne per ha, jumping by 1.5% against the previous year. The yield figure increased at an average annual rate of +2.1% over the period from 2012 to 2018; the trend pattern remained consistent, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations being observed in certain years.

Exports 2007-2018

In 2018, the amount of carob exported worldwide totaled 56K tonnes, picking up by 11% against the previous year. The total export volume increased at an average annual rate of +5.9% from 2012 to 2018; however, the trend pattern indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded in certain years. The global exports peaked in 2018 and are expected to retain its growth in the near future. In value terms, carob exports amounted to $27M (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Exports by Country

In 2018, Morocco (20K tonnes) and Spain (15K tonnes) represented the main exporters of carob in the world, together amounting to near 63% of total exports. It was distantly followed by Algeria (7,538 tonnes) and Portugal (5,452 tonnes), together comprising a 23% share of total exports. Cyprus (2,348 tonnes), Turkey (1,487 tonnes) and Italy (1,121 tonnes) followed a long way behind the leaders.

From 2012 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of exports, amongst the main exporting countries, was attained by Morocco, while exports for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Morocco ($6.7M), Spain ($6.2M) and Algeria ($4.4M) appeared to be the countries with the highest levels of exports in 2018, together accounting for 65% of global exports.

Export Prices by Country

In 2018, the average carob export price amounted to $474 per tonne, waning by -3.6% against the previous year. In general, the carob export price, however, continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. Over the period under review, the average export prices for carob attained their maximum at $572 per tonne in 2016; however, from 2017 to 2018, export prices stood at a somewhat lower figure.

Prices varied noticeably by the country of origin; the country with the highest price was Italy ($1,126 per tonne), while Morocco ($332 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

From 2012 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Italy, while the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Imports 2007-2018

In 2018, the amount of carob imported worldwide totaled 34K tonnes, picking up by 3.4% against the previous year. The total import volume increased at an average annual rate of +1.4% over the period from 2012 to 2018; however, the trend pattern indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded over the period under review. In value terms, carob imports amounted to $29M (IndexBox estimates) in 2018.

Imports by Country

In 2018, Italy (6.5K tonnes), distantly followed by Switzerland (3,758 tonnes), Thailand (3,343 tonnes), Egypt (2,530 tonnes), Belgium (2,349 tonnes), Spain (2,018 tonnes), France (1,909 tonnes), the U.S. (1,837 tonnes), the Czech Republic (1,608 tonnes) and Germany (1,556 tonnes) were the main importers of carob, together comprising 80% of total imports.

From 2012 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of imports, amongst the main importing countries, was attained by the U.S., while imports for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Switzerland ($9.9M) constitutes the largest market for imported carob worldwide, comprising 34% of global imports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Spain ($3.9M), with a 14% share of global imports. It was followed by Italy, with a 9.7% share.

Import Prices by Country

The average carob import price stood at $844 per tonne in 2018, going up by 15% against the previous year. Over the period from 2012 to 2018, it increased at an average annual rate of +2.7%.  The global import price peaked in 2018 and is likely to see steady growth in the immediate term.

There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major importing countries. In 2018, the country with the highest price was Switzerland ($2,644 per tonne), while France ($357 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

From 2012 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Spain, while the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform