New Articles

AI in Freight Forwarding: Starboard’s Approach to Smarter Quoting

oil economy operational rail america port surcharges chatcgp trucking DHL AI dollar fedex iran LTL imo hormuz blockade fedex maersk court maritime strait dollar trade AI fedex port trade maritime shippers rail chassis china lease tariff supply chainreactor cargo maersk global trade MySavant.ai container supply chain container CMA CGM shipping rates port india crude u.s import shipping freight cargo maersk fedex carrier strait of hormuz oil strait grant houthi market logistics food imo images shipping freight

AI in Freight Forwarding: Starboard’s Approach to Smarter Quoting

The freight forwarding industry is full of artificial intelligence demonstrations. The true test is whether the technology can cope with the daily disorder of the quote desk: emails, PDFs, spreadsheets, carrier portals, agent responses, and rates that change before anyone can clean the data. That is where Sumeet Trehan, the founder of Starboard, sees the market heading. His argument is not that AI will eliminate small and mid-sized forwarders. Rather, it is that these forwarders are too crucial to global commerce and too connected to their clients to be pushed aside simply because larger players have superior tools.

Read also: How Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Global Supply Chains

Trehan reached this conclusion after a career at Maersk, BCG, and Flexport, where he helped establish the company’s Canadian operations. At Flexport, he said he started to wonder whether digital freight was tackling the right issue. Trehan stated that small and mid-size freight forwarders are indispensable for global trade, and their operational know-how cannot be replicated by a digital freight forwarder. Starboard’s proposal is that local forwarders should maintain the customer relationship and operational expertise, while the platform gives them some of the benefits usually linked to larger rivals: better technology, stronger procurement, and eventually financial infrastructure.

Forwarding remains a business driven by relationships, local presence, and exceptions. The person who knows which carrier office to contact or which route will break down still matters. However, the strain on smaller forwarders is significant. In developed markets, Trehan noted, forwarding has become a low-margin business, often running on net margins of 1-2%. After the freight rate itself, labor is the largest expense. He described this as nearly an existential crisis for many freight forwarders, asking how they can reduce costs, and stressed that it is not a five-year strategic plan but something that needs to be done immediately for many of their customers.

Starboard’s initial product focuses on quoting. In spot-heavy forwarding markets, importers and exporters may send the same request to multiple forwarders at once. A small or mid-sized forwarder might get 20-30 quote requests per day, Trehan said, with each taking one to two hours to prepare. Average response times can extend to 24-48 hours. That delay can cause lost business. The customer wants to know the cost to move cargo from point A to point B, and the forwarder that responds first often has the edge.

Starboard connects to the inbox of a forwarder’s sales or pricing team. When a request for quote arrives, its AI agent reads the request, extracts the cargo and routing details, splits the job into legs, searches contract and spot rates, and can contact agents or co-loaders for missing information. The company says users have cut response times from a day or two to roughly one or two hours in many cases.

Trehan argues the advantage is not just speed. Forwarders often get rates from many sources in different formats. A human might rely on memory, assuming yesterday’s best option is still today’s best option. In volatile markets, that assumption can be costly. He said the goal is not only to quote quickly but also to always quote at the cheapest and best rate available to customers.

The industry’s data problem is long-standing. Freight has spent decades trying to digitize around documents and messages that rarely align neatly between parties. Electronic data interchange may be common, but standardization remains inconsistent. Trehan sees AI as valuable because it can convert messy inputs into structured data that systems can use, without requiring forwarders to replace every legacy system first.

He is also wary of AI hype. Starboard spent over two years working with about 25 design partners in the US and Canada to train its agents on real quoting workflows. He said that while one can show magic in a demo, actually having something that can begin replacing human work takes years of effort. For forwarders evaluating AI, Trehan’s advice is to start with the business problem, not the technology. Faster quote turnaround, better win rates, higher profitability per quote, and less manual work are measurable. A vague AI pilot is not.

Trehan said customers have typically seen air quote response times drop to about an hour and ocean quotes to two or three hours. He also claimed average quoted rates can fall by around 5% when the system finds better options within the forwarder’s own rate sources. Starboard does not name those customers publicly, citing confidentiality agreements. His final advice is to choose the partner carefully. He noted that at this stage the technology is so nascent and early that one needs to invest in the team over the brand or the company. For smaller forwarders, the useful AI story may not be a future where the local operator disappears, but one where the operator responds faster and prices more intelligently.

 

https://www.indexbox.io/blog/ai-in-freight-forwarding-starboards-approach-to-smarter-quoting/

oil economy operational rail america port surcharges chatcgp trucking DHL AI dollar fedex iran LTL imo hormuz blockade fedex maersk court maritime strait dollar trade AI fedex port trade maritime shippers rail chassis china lease tariff supply chainreactor cargo maersk global trade MySavant.ai container supply chain container CMA CGM shipping rates port india crude u.s import shipping freight cargo maersk fedex carrier strait of hormuz oil strait grant houthi market logistics food imo images shipping freight

Global Railway Supply Chain Round-Up: Partnerships, Innovation, and Expansion

A round-up of recent developments in the global railway supply chain has been published by Railway Gazette.

Read also: Railway Supply Chain News: ETCS Installation, Acquisitions, & Leadership Updates

Indian Partnerships and Filtration Innovation Skylark Drones and e2E Rail, both based in India, have signed a Memorandum of Understanding. The agreement covers the potential use of AI-powered asset intelligence, geospatial technologies, and digital infrastructure monitoring for railway projects. The companies plan to assess aerial surveillance and corridor monitoring to enhance infrastructure visibility across rail networks and construction sites. They will also examine LiDAR and photogrammetry-based mapping for high-accuracy infrastructure intelligence.

IMI’s Industrial Automation manufacturing facility in Noida, India, has created a three-stage air filtration system. The system was developed in response to a customer request and is designed to protect sensitive locomotive equipment from water, dust, and debris while maintaining reliability and ease of maintenance. A test rig was built to simulate real locomotive airflow, allowing testing to ISO 5011 standards. IMI reports that the system offers a 20% lower pressure drop than competing products, a design life exceeding 30 years, and durability against salt spray for 960 hours.

German Electrification Expansion

German electrification contractor Rail Power Systems has established a wholly-owned subsidiary named TwinRail. TwinRail acquired all assets and staff of Road & Rail Service, effective June 1. This move expands Rail Power Systems’ portfolio to include rail transport of construction materials to and from sites, shunting operations at worksites, stations, and industrial sidings, as well as consultancy services in railway operations. TwinRail’s fleet consists of three road-rail Unimogs and a three-way aerial work platform.

Alstom and EDC Renew Agreement

Alstom and Export Development Canada have renewed their 2023 Sustainable Corporate Partnership agreement for an additional three years. The partners plan to support projects in both developed and emerging markets. They will explore opportunities for Alstom to invest in large-scale contracts that maximize Canadian content and support economic growth by addressing working capital needs and scaling-up opportunities for local suppliers. On June 8, Minister of International Trade Maninder Sidhu commented that the agreement unlocks export opportunities and supports Canadian suppliers, including Indigenous procurement, while bringing Canadian expertise to the global stage.

Door Manufacturer Merger

Train door manufacturer Bode and bus door counterpart Ventura Systems have merged. The deal is backed by Waterland Private Equity, which acquired Bode from the Schaltbau Group. Ventura Systems was advised by Altum Corporate Finance, which noted that original equipment manufacturers and public transport operators increasingly prefer specialist partners with financial strength, technical depth, and a global service network for multi-year programs. The combination of Bode and Ventura is a direct response to that trend.

Source: IndexBox Market Intelligence Platform  

container china u.s rate port high-tech global trade dock tariffs market shipping

Descartes Releases Global Shipping Report on Strait of Hormuz Disruption

U.S. Imports from Hormuz-Affected Ports Collapse in May as Strait Closure Hits Key Commodity Flows

Read also: Descartes: U.S. Imports Stay Strong in August Despite Falling China Volumes and Tariff Uncertainty

Descartes Systems Group, the global leader in uniting logistics-intensive businesses in commerce, released a special June Global Shipping Report examining the impact of the Strait of Hormuz disruption on U.S. maritime imports. Total U.S. imports departing from Hormuz-affected ports1 fell from 1.5M metric tons in May 2025 to just 100,591 metric tons in May 2026, a decline of 93.2% year over year. The decline was far larger than the typical monthly swings observed over the prior 12 months. From May 2025 through February 2026, year-over-year changes ranged from a decline of 27.7% to an increase of 26.2%. March and April showed deeper declines of 33.0% and 34.7%, respectively, suggesting that import flows may have already been weakening before the full impact of the closure appeared in the data.

Figure 1. Total U.S. Maritime Imports Departing Hormuz-Affected Ports (Metric Tons)

image.png
Source: Descartes Datamyne™

Mineral fuels were largest source of lost volume.

The Harmonized System (HS) category most affected was Mineral Fuels, Mineral Oils and Products of Their Distillation (HS27), the primary trade category for energy-related commodities (including crude oil and refined petroleum products, as well as petroleum gases such as LNG and propane, petroleum coke, bitumen, lubricating oils, and other mineral fuel products). HS27 imports from Hormuz-affected ports fell from 1.1M metric tons in May 2025 to 80,878 metric tons in May 2026, a decline of 92.8% (see Figure 2). This represented the largest volume decline among the major HS2 categories analyzed, accounting for more than 1.0M metric tons of lost import volume.

During the same month, total U.S. HS27 imports declined from 19.3 million metric tons in May 2025 to 16.4 million metric tons in May 2026, a decrease of 15.2%, representing nearly 3 million metric tons of lost import volume. Given the simultaneous 92.8% collapse in imports departing from Hormuz-affected ports, the data suggests the Strait of Hormuz disruption had a measurable impact on U.S. fuel import volumes. Although the decline in total U.S. imports was less severe than the decline observed through Gulf ports, the reduction was still substantial and highlights the strategic importance of the region to global energy supply chains.

Figure 2: Year-over-year HS27 U.S. Imports for Hormuz-Affected Ports

image.png
Source: Descartes Datamyne™

“May 2026 import data offers the clearest evidence so far of the impact of the Strait of Hormuz closure on U.S. trade flows,” said Jackson Wood, Director of Industry Strategy at Descartes. “While the decline was broad-based across mineral fuels, fertilizers, refined petroleum products, crude oil, and aluminum transiting the Strait, the broader U.S. import impact varied by product category. For supply chain professionals, trade data provides an important lens to monitor the situation as it evolves in order to better understand routing risk, supplier exposure, and the potential downstream impact of maritime disruptions.”

To learn more about the analysis and its implications for global supply chains, visit Descartes’ Global Shipping Resource Center.

operations global trade supply chain container shipping red sea panama canal

Hormuz Reopening May Take Months to Restore Global Shipping Confidence

The announcement of a preliminary agreement between the United States and Iran has sparked optimism across energy markets, with expectations that the Strait of Hormuz could soon reopen to commercial shipping. However, industry analysts caution that restoring normal trade and energy flows through one of the world’s most important maritime chokepoints could take far longer than markets anticipate.

Read also: US and Iran Announce Agreement to Reopen Strait of Hormuz

While the deal may reduce immediate supply concerns and ease pressure on oil prices, experts warn that months of disruption have fundamentally altered shipping patterns, procurement strategies, and risk assessments across global supply chains.

Many importers, refiners, and energy buyers have already adapted by securing alternative suppliers, building inventories, and developing new transportation routes. As a result, the return of vessels to Hormuz may not automatically translate into a return to pre-crisis trading volumes.

“The reopening of a waterway and the normalization of trade are not the same thing,” said Haris Khurshid, Chief Investment Officer at Karobaar Capital. He noted that while physical shipments could resume relatively quickly, rebuilding confidence among shipowners, insurers, and cargo interests will likely be a much slower process.

Market participants across the energy sector echoed similar concerns. Analysts say the months-long disruption has left lasting effects, ranging from elevated transportation costs and strained inventories to uncertainty surrounding damaged infrastructure and future geopolitical stability.

According to Priyanka Sachdeva of Phillip Nova, the economic consequences of the crisis cannot be reversed overnight. Countries that relied heavily on Gulf energy exports have spent months coping with higher fuel costs and supply uncertainty, creating challenges that will persist even after shipping lanes reopen.

Others point to practical obstacles that could slow the recovery. Charu Chanana of Saxo Markets said operational challenges such as mine-clearing efforts, insurance restrictions, port congestion, and ongoing security concerns could continue to limit vessel movements even if political agreements are reached.

Oil prices may also remain supported despite the diplomatic breakthrough. Analysts at IG Australia believe many nations are likely to replenish strategic petroleum reserves and rebuild stockpiles once access through Hormuz improves, potentially sustaining demand in the near term.

At the same time, some market observers remain cautious about the durability of the agreement itself. Linh Tran of XS.com warned that negotiations have not yet produced a fully tested long-term framework, leaving room for renewed volatility if implementation difficulties emerge.

Chris Weston of Pepperstone Group also questioned whether unresolved issues between Washington and Tehran could create additional hurdles before a lasting settlement is achieved.

Beyond the immediate market reaction, experts believe the crisis may leave a permanent mark on global energy logistics.

Sara Vakhshouri, President of SVB Energy International, said governments and importers are likely to continue diversifying supply sources and transportation routes to reduce future dependence on a single chokepoint. These adjustments could reshape global energy trade long after the current tensions subside.

Shipping specialists are also urging caution. Anoop Singh of Oil Brokerage said many vessel owners are still waiting for greater clarity before committing ships back to the region. Risk appetite varies significantly among shipping companies, and insurers are expected to play a major role in determining how quickly traffic returns.

Data and analytics firm Vortexa noted that even after vessels begin returning, the recovery process will likely unfold in stages. Tankers would first resume ballast voyages into the region, followed by a gradual increase in crude exports, refinery operations, and broader commercial activity.

Meanwhile, economists at OCBC say production recovery timelines will depend heavily on the condition of facilities affected by the conflict and how quickly operators can restore full output.

For now, market sentiment has improved, but analysts agree that the path to normal operations remains uncertain. While a reopening of the Strait of Hormuz would mark a significant milestone, the global energy and shipping industries are preparing for a gradual recovery rather than an immediate return to business as usual.

As one of the most significant supply disruptions in recent history begins to ease, the focus is now shifting from diplomacy to execution—and whether confidence can return as quickly as the headlines suggest.

global trade supply federation maritime

Washington Halts Port Fees in U.S.–China Maritime Truce, Easing Pressure on Global Shipping

The White House has confirmed a one-year suspension of U.S. port fees and other measures imposed under the Section 301 investigation targeting China’s dominance in global shipbuilding, logistics, and maritime sectors. The move, effective November 10, 2025, marks a major de-escalation in the trade tensions that have unsettled global shipping markets throughout the year.

Read also: Xeneta: U.S.–China Truce Offers Relief, But Container Rates Set to Sink Deeper Into 2026

Announced as part of a broader trade accord between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping last week in Busan, South Korea, the suspension covers all “responsive actions” tied to the Section 301 probe, while both sides negotiate a longer-term maritime framework.

“The United States will suspend for one year the implementation of the responsive actions taken pursuant to the Section 301 investigation on China’s Targeting the Maritime, Logistics, and Shipbuilding Sectors for Dominance,” the White House said in its fact sheet. “During this time, the U.S. will continue negotiations with China while deepening cooperation with Korea and Japan to revitalize American shipbuilding.”

Reciprocal Steps from China

In exchange, China will roll back its own retaliatory measures, including sanctions on several shipping entities—believed to include units of Korean shipbuilder Hanwha—and suspend counter-fees on U.S.-linked vessels for one year.

The port fees had their origin in a Section 301 petition filed in March 2024 by the United Steelworkers (USW) and a coalition of labor unions. The petition accused Beijing of using state subsidies and non-market practices to dominate global shipbuilding. Following that complaint, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) ruled in January 2025 that China’s maritime and shipbuilding policies were “unreasonable” under U.S. trade law.

“Today, the U.S. ranks 19th globally in commercial shipbuilding, producing fewer than five ships a year, while China builds over 1,700,” said Katherine Tai, former USTR under the Biden administration. “China’s dominance in this sector undermines fair competition and remains the biggest obstacle to reviving U.S. shipbuilding.”

Suspension Covers Broad Maritime Actions

The White House said the suspension applies not only to the port fees on China-linked ships—introduced October 14—but also to potential tariffs on Chinese-built cranes and cargo-handling equipment, fees on foreign-built car carriers, and rules tied to LNG shipping incentives.

While the move relieves immediate financial strain on shipping operators, it also raises questions about the future direction of U.S. industrial maritime policy.

Industry Divided on Impact

Labor representatives expressed mixed reactions. Roy Houseman, Legislative Director for the United Steelworkers, called the suspension a “truce with loose ends,” warning that Washington still lacks a coherent plan to rebuild domestic shipyard capacity.

“Fifty-three percent of all global ship orders by tonnage in the first eight months of 2025 went to China,” Houseman said. “That level of concentration is unhealthy. We need policies that genuinely reinvigorate U.S.-based shipbuilding.”

Shipping industry groups, however, broadly welcomed the decision. The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) described the suspension as “a positive and stabilizing step,” noting that the earlier fee regime had already “posed significant challenges and disruptions” to global trade.

World Shipping Council President Joe Kramek echoed the sentiment:

“Global trade flows best when it flows freely. The suspension of ship fees by both the U.S. and China is a win for exporters, importers, and consumers alike.”

Next Steps: Regulatory Details Still Pending

Despite the White House confirmation, maritime legal experts cautioned that the details still hinge on upcoming regulatory filings.

“The administration’s fact sheet sets the timeline, but the formal regulatory language will define the true scope of the suspension,” said Brian Maloney, partner at Seward & Kissel’s Maritime & Transportation Group. “The USTR’s public comment period for the Section 301 probe closes November 10, so final regulatory action will likely follow shortly after.”

For now, the temporary suspension offers a welcome reprieve for shippers caught between dueling trade measures—but with only a one-year window, industry observers say the truce may simply postpone deeper policy battles over how to rebuild U.S. shipbuilding competitiveness in the face of China’s global maritime dominance.

global trade container goods compliance import

Pressure Points: How Geopolitical Tension and Economic Flux Are Reshaping the Global Shipping Container Market

Container prices have eased slightly, but UK demand is rising. Orders for new one-trip containers have tripled since Q1, as companies try to stay ahead of rising freight costs and potential delays.

Read also: Container Shipping Profits Sink 56% in Q2 as US Tariffs Cloud Outlook

Red Sea diversions are still adding time and cost. In the Strait of Hormuz, tensions are affecting oil prices and shipping activity. These global issues are now starting to influence UK supply.

Here, we’ll look at what that could mean for availability, pricing, and procurement decisions in the months ahead.

Longer wait times for stock

Some carriers are now quoting up to £232 per 20ft unit to reposition empty containers into the UK, a cost they previously absorbed. It’s part of a wider shift: global volumes might be softening, but UK delivery, depot space, and timing pressures are pushing buyers to act early.

That’s especially true in time-critical sectors like construction, infrastructure, and retail, where the risk of delay outweighs the potential savings from holding off.

“A few years ago, buyers could afford to wait for prices to settle,” says Andrew Thompson. Chief Executive Officer at Cleveland Containers. “Now, they’re planning further ahead to make sure stock arrives when it’s needed, without extra surcharges or hold-ups.”

Availability is no longer guaranteed just because demand is lower overall. Preferred formats, such as new 20fts or high cubes, are getting booked out faster, and once delivery windows tighten, even small changes in availability or spec can cause real disruption.

Rising production costs

Global freight rates have eased, but container prices aren’t following. That’s because the real pressure is now happening further upstream, where production costs are climbing.

Key materials like steel, marine plywood, and hardware fittings have all gone up over the past quarter. Chinese and Southeast Asian manufacturers are already pricing these increases into forward orders for Q3 and Q4.

Steel is the biggest factor, as prices for hot-rolled coil, the base material used in container walls and frames, are up year-on-year and remain volatile due to energy costs and regional supply constraints. Plywood used for container flooring has also jumped, as export restrictions limit supply.

For UK buyers, this means current factory quotes are already 8-12% higher than last year, and that’s before port charges, rerouting costs, or warehousing are added.

“We’re seeing the impact start at the factory,” says Thompson. “Costs are up on new builds, and that’s now feeding through to used units too. It’s not freight driving prices this time, it’s what it costs to produce the container in the first place.”

Geopolitics

Tensions in the Strait of Hormuz are disrupting main shipping routes, affecting oil prices. Frontline’s suspension of freight contracts in the region shows how seriously carriers are treating the risk.

China remains a major importer of Iranian oil, so any disruption affects energy costs for manufacturers, especially for steel, paint, and plywood. That’s already feeding into container pricing.

“Oil volatility is showing up in supplier quotes,” says Thompson. “It’s not just freight, anything with an energy cost is going up.”

Red Sea diversions continue, but the bigger concern is how quickly these pressures spread. As with the 2021 Suez blockage, local disruption can have a global impact.

What UK Buyers should be watching now

UK container supply held steady through early 2025, but that’s already changing. Forward orders for one-trip 20fts have jumped, and depot turnover is accelerating. Stock is still available, but the units buyers want most, such as newbuilds, high-cubes, and CSC-certified containers, are booking out earlier and moving faster.

Pricing pressure is coming from both ends. Factory quotes are rising due to raw material costs and energy volatility, while rerouting and port delays continue to feed into landed prices. That’s pushing more buyers to act early, especially in sectors where timing and spec can’t be compromised.

Leasing is also trending up, particularly on projects with uncertain timeframes or tight budgets. But even here, availability is narrowing. For used stock, rising newbuild costs are quietly lifting replacement value, and that’s already starting to show in pricing.

What matters now is how these pressures interact. A shift in oil prices, a change in freight routing, or even a regional supply gap can push up costs quickly. And most buyers won’t feel it until the quoting stage, when timelines are fixed and flexibility is gone.

If you’re waiting for prices to drop or supply to catch up, you may already be behind the curve. Decisions made now, on spec, timing, or procurement route, will determine how exposed your business is heading into Q4.

u.s shipping global trade shipment GTM tariffs tariff freight forwarding container circle logistics forwarder

5 Risk Mitigation Strategies for High-Value International Shipments

A single error on a customs form or a momentary lapse in security at a port are everyday occurrences. However, for those transporting high-value international shipments, they can be the difference between a successful delivery and a fortune in losses. Professionals shouldn’t accept them as the cost of doing business. Risk mitigation strategies can insulate them from damage.

Read also: Digital Freight Platforms: Revolutionizing Global Shipping Operations

Understanding the Risks: What’s at Stake?

Most logistics professionals are used to supply chain disruptions. Around every four years, businesses experience delays lasting one to two months, which can cause losses equivalent to 30% of their annual earnings.

Severe weather and geopolitical events can cause delays along key trade routes. They may be unpredictable, but they are manageable with the right approach. Aside from typical disruptions, common risks include stolen, lost and damaged goods. Cyber threats also are happening more frequently, resulting in inflated freight costs and frustrated customers.

While regulatory issues don’t present an immediate danger, preventing them helps companies mitigate costly consequences. Managing documentation, import restrictions, and taxes is essential for preventing delays at customs and avoiding potential seizures of high-value international shipments.

Cargo Theft Tactics and Trends at a Glance

Decision-makers should prioritize theft prevention when developing risk mitigation plans. Amid the rise of e-commerce and expansion of international trade, cargo theft has evolved from disorganized, scattered incidents into a coordinated criminal enterprise. It can occur at truck stops, distribution centers, rail yards, rest areas or ports, so they must be vigilant.

According to the American Trucking Association, cargo theft causes over $200,000 in losses per incident on average. Annually, it costs the United States economy $35 billion. Strategic theft is more common than pilferage or straight theft — it increased by 1,500% from Q1 2024 to Q1 2025.

Bad actors often pose as brokers by using deception to intercept high-value loads. The legitimate receiver deals with the fallout, fielding calls from frustrated trucking companies. Some criminal groups even run warehouses and online marketplaces to move stolen goods more easily. Tracing them is challenging since they use domain spoofing and virtual private networks.

Even simple operations can be costly. In May 2025, four men stole $3 million in televisions, which they planned to smuggle. Electronics comprise a significant portion of cargo thefts due to their high resale value. The thieves used semitrucks to steal trailers from a truck park and were only identified because a security guard recognized one of the vehicles.

Risk Mitigation Strategies for High-Value Goods

Since the global logistics environment is vast and complex, avoiding risk entirely is impossible. Instead, decision-makers should focus on reducing its likelihood or impact.

Secure Packaging and Handling Protocols

Sensitive and high-value international shipments require specialized packaging to withstand environmental conditions and impacts. Even with a significant upfront investment into custom solutions, companies should see a positive return on investment. Spending a few more cents per unit is more cost-effective than writing off inventory and paying for reshipping.

Paper and cardboard are lightweight but lack durability and provide poor protection. Unlike these conventional materials, polyethylene provides repeatable shock absorption and prevents static buildup. Packaging suppliers can cut or mold the foam cushioning to fit any high-value product to ensure it arrives at its destination safely.

Advanced Tracking and Monitoring Tools

Internet of Things sensors, blockchain technology, geofencing and artificial intelligence tools enhance traceability. They enable advanced data analytics for exhaustive visibility into the supply chain. Smaller fleets may be unable to upgrade every truck, but these tools are becoming more affordable as technology advances.

Continuous Driver and Vehicle Logging

Comprehensive preemployment screening and thorough credential verification are fundamental for mitigating insider threats. Businesses can guard against fictitious pickups with continuous location logs and unique pickup codes. Even if thieves convincingly impersonate drivers, they won’t be able to steal the load.

Shifting Financial Liability for Loss or Damage

External risk mitigation involves lessening the impact of threats beyond the organization’s control. As a bonus, it may shift financial liability, as other entities absorb the losses.

Transferring Risk to Insurance Providers

Coverage beyond limited liability is valuable when moving shipments exceeding tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. Business leaders who get high-quality insurance shift financial liability to their carrier, taking the pressure off contingency planning. Of course, stopping potential threats is still crucial since claims may increase insurance premiums.

Strategic Partnerships and Vendor Vetting

Cargo thefts may originate as inside jobs, so thorough vetting is essential when establishing strategic partnerships. Moreover, working with an experienced freight forwarder can mitigate customs and regulatory compliance risks.

Due diligence and ongoing performance monitoring are key international shipping risk management strategies. Enforcing chain-of-custody documentation and tamper-evident solutions can help eliminate insider threats. When supply chain disruptions or crises occur, partners who communicate quickly and effectively will recover sooner.

The Art of Proactive Contingency Planning

International shipping risk management involves contingency planning. Business leaders and fleet owners who take a forward-thinking approach can respond effectively to challenges. Mastering it can help them maintain continuity and minimize product losses.

Data is the core component of any successful strategy. Where are thieves likely to strike? What high-value products are most commonly damaged during shipping? Do specific trade routes pose more problems than others? Combining historical and real-time information will generate accurate answers.

Developing incident management and crisis response plans is relatively easy. Those who can follow through demonstrate true mastery of the art of contingency planning. A strategy that looks good on paper doesn’t always translate well to real-world scenarios, so management should run simulations and source feedback to close gaps.

The Growing Volume of High-Stakes Freight

Thanks to the flourishing e-commerce sector, luxury goods, electronics and pharmaceuticals are constantly moving across borders. According to Grand View Research, the global freight transport market size will reach an estimated $72.97 billion in 2030 — up from $26.77 billion a decade prior. The export of sensitive and high-value goods will drive its value up.

As the volume and value of international shipments grow, logistics professionals and fleet owners are increasingly exposed to regulatory risks, in-transit damage and cargo theft. Risk mitigation strategies are becoming exponentially valuable, especially as trucking and marine cargo insurance premiums rise.

Protecting High-Value International Shipments

Even if everything works out, having a million-dollar shipment stolen or stuck in customs can be stressful. A proactive, technology-enabled risk mitigation strategy can help professionals avoid such headaches. Nothing is 100% effective, but that’s what insurance is for.

jansen global trade hapag-lloyd

Hapag-Lloyd Delivers Strong H1 2025 Results Amid Global Shipping Challenges

Hapag-Lloyd posted solid results for the first half of 2025, reporting a Group EBITDA of USD 1.9 billion despite trade volatility, port congestion, and security risks in the Red Sea.

Read also: Hapag-Lloyd Confident Amid U.S.-China Tariff Challenges

The German container carrier’s Liner Shipping segment handled 6.7 million TEU in the first six months of the year, up 11% from 2024, with revenues rising to USD 10.4 billion. Freight rates remained stable at around USD 1,400 per TEU, supported by growth on major East-West routes.

CEO Rolf Habben Jansen highlighted the company’s resilience:
“In a volatile market, we significantly increased our transport volume and ended the first half on a strong note. Our Gemini network has started very successfully, setting new standards in schedule reliability.”

Launched in February with Maersk, the Gemini Cooperation achieved 90% schedule reliability on key East-West trades in its first months. Optimization of the network is expected to continue through the second half of the year.

Hapag-Lloyd’s Terminal & Infrastructure division also posted growth, with EBITDA reaching USD 79 million and EBIT USD 37 million. In March, the company expanded its European footprint by acquiring a majority stake in CNMP LH in Le Havre, France.

For 2025, Hapag-Lloyd forecasts Group EBITDA of USD 2.8 to 3.8 billion and EBIT of USD 0.25 to 1.25 billion but warns that geopolitical tensions and volatile freight rates could impact results.

“In the second half, we’ll stay focused on quality, growth, and cost optimization,” Habben Jansen said. “We aim to help customers navigate uncertainty and hope new trade agreements will bring greater supply chain predictability.”

red sea global trade, houthi attacks, red sea attacks, red sea crisis, houthi rebels

Global Shipping Faces Historic Climate Turning Point as IMO Considers Emissions Tax

The global shipping industry is on the brink of a historic transformation as the United Nations’ International Maritime Organization (IMO) holds pivotal talks this week in London to hammer out binding regulations aimed at cutting the sector’s climate impact.

Read also: Port of Long Beach Launches $57M Green Tech Push to Cut Emissions

At the heart of the negotiations is a proposal for the world’s first global emissions levy, which—if adopted—would mark a landmark commitment in the fight against climate change. The shipping sector, responsible for roughly 3% of global carbon emissions, has long evaded hard emissions rules. That could soon change.

The IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) is reviewing a “basket” of measures, including a global marine fuel standard and a long-debated carbon pricing mechanism—ranging from a direct carbon levy to market-based schemes such as carbon credits.

Climate advocates are calling the talks “historic.”
“This would be an absolute game-changer,” said Sara Edmonson, global advocacy head at mining company Fortescue. “No other industry has made a global commitment of this size. Most countries haven’t either.”

But obstacles remain. The concept of a levy is politically sensitive, particularly in the U.S., Australia, and China. Some nations favor “levy-like structures”—economic measures that avoid the controversial term but achieve similar outcomes.

John Maggs of the Clean Shipping Coalition emphasized the stakes:
“It’s not a question of if we get agreement, but how ambitious and how effective it is—and how many unhappy countries are left in its wake.”

Small island nations—among the most vulnerable to climate change—are leading the charge. Fiji, the Marshall Islands, Vanuatu, Barbados, and others have pushed hard for a meaningful carbon price. Meanwhile, countries like Brazil, China, and Saudi Arabia have voiced strong opposition, citing concerns over trade competitiveness and economic inequality.

For Pacific Island leaders like Vanuatu’s Minister Ralph Regenvanu, the IMO talks offer a critical path forward, especially as broader UN climate negotiations under the UNFCCC are seen as too slow.
“This is a great opportunity,” he said. “A global measure adopted by a UN body with real teeth.”

The shipping industry, which moves 90% of the world’s trade, is one of the most difficult to decarbonize due to its heavy reliance on fossil fuels. Yet momentum is building.

Angie Farrag-Thibault of the Environmental Defense Fund said success hinges on two key outcomes: a global fuel standard and a decisive economic signal.
“These steps must include a fair financing structure to help vulnerable countries,” she said, “while pushing the industry toward zero-carbon fuels at the pace we urgently need.”

As the MEPC wraps up talks on Friday, all eyes are on whether the IMO can deliver a deal that balances ambition, equity, and enforcement—potentially setting the tone for international climate policy for years to come.

rate TT club terminal operations global trade shipping trade red sea houthi Hapag-Lloyd shipping leasing season ammonia shippers import shipping u.s rates

Trump’s Tariff Blitz Adds to Global Shipping Turmoil

The global ocean shipping industry, responsible for moving 80% of world trade, is bracing for intensified uncertainty as President Donald Trump escalates trade tensions with allies and rivals alike.

Read also: The Impact of Tariffs on American Consumers & Businesses

This comes as major players in the container shipping and supply chain industries gather at the S&P Global TPM conference in Long Beach, California, where carriers like MSC, Maersk, and Hapag-Lloyd—alongside logistics firms such as DSV and DHL—are set to navigate a shifting trade landscape. With protectionist measures on the rise, these companies face potential disruptions that could weaken container ship owners’ negotiating power and dent long-standing profit margins.

Tariffs and Trade Barriers Reshape Global Logistics

Trump has already imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese imports and is pushing for a steep $1.5 million entry fee on Chinese-built vessels docking at U.S. ports. Further trade restrictions loom, including:

  • A potential 25% tariff on Mexican and Canadian exports such as avocados, tequila, beef, lumber, and oil.
  • Additional tariffs on steel and aluminum.
  • Proposed 25% duties on select European Union imports.

Such moves have heightened concerns over trade flow disruptions, impacting businesses reliant on global supply chains. According to Peter Sand, chief analyst at Xeneta, “Unprecedented uncertainty is all around.”

Geopolitical Risks, Climate Challenges, and Inflationary Pressures

The world’s largest importer, the U.S., is shifting away from free trade at a time when global supply chains are already contending with higher costs due to extreme weather events and geopolitical instability. Attacks on commercial vessels in the Red Sea by Iran-backed Houthi militants have forced carriers to reroute away from the Suez Canal, adding further strain to global shipping.

While U.S. container imports have surged ahead of expected tariff hikes, analysts warn of a looming slowdown once higher import taxes take effect, retaliation from trade partners ensues, and inflation-hit consumers absorb the rising costs. The Drewry World Container Index, a key freight rate benchmark, stood at $2,629 for a 40-foot container as of Thursday—75% below its pandemic-era peak of $10,377 in September 2021 and at its lowest level since May 2024.

“The geopolitical landscape has of course become more complex, which could lead to wild swings for freight rates in either direction, but our base case is for a moderation throughout 2025,” noted Jefferies analysts.

Shipping Fee Proposals Shake the Industry

Adding to the uncertainty, the U.S. Trade Representative has proposed significant entry fees on Chinese-built vessels. Under this plan:

  • Chinese maritime operators, including state-owned COSCO, could face fees of up to $1 million per vessel.
  • Non-Chinese operators using Chinese-built ships could see port entry fees as high as $1.5 million.

While this measure may benefit South Korean and Taiwanese shipping firms, experts warn it could have far-reaching consequences for global supply chains and U.S. consumers, potentially driving up prices for everything from clothing and electronics to food and fuel.

“The economic burden on U.S. exporters and importers will be huge,” said container shipping expert Lars Jensen.

As the Biden administration’s protectionist trade agenda unfolds, the shipping industry is left navigating uncharted waters, with the potential for significant disruptions in global trade and logistics.