New Articles

The Post-COVID Playbook: Shockproof Your Supply Chain — Now

supply chain

The Post-COVID Playbook: Shockproof Your Supply Chain — Now

There’s more turmoil ahead, but artificial intelligence and machine learning will cut through the noise for faster solutions.

Around the world, supply chains are in the spotlight like never before. When COVID-19 struck, chaos often ensued, much of it supply chain related. Governments weren’t able to source essential medical supplies, and shoppers were left staring helplessly at empty shelves.

In 2020, countless businesses discovered they were reliant on one another in ways they had never realized. Globalization has left all of us interconnected through supply chains too complex for traditional methodologies – annual surveys and manual checklists – to manage.

Even after the pandemic subsides, there will be severe and lasting economic turmoil that will require companies to continually scrutinize their global supply chains. At the same time, it’s very likely that COVID-19 will not be the last shock of this decade, but one of many. In the 2020s, global supply chains will have to contend with everything from climate change and natural disasters, to the rise of protectionism and the threats posed by cyberwarfare and security breaches.

In recognition of the growing importance of supply chain resilience, U.S. President Joe Biden has issued an executive order to launch a 100-day review of supply chains critical to national security, public health, public safety and job creation. This is an important step toward ensuring operational resilience for both the public and private sectors, but there is more work to be done.

The sole supply chain question used to be: “Are we as cost-efficient as we can be?” Now it is: “Where in the world should I be doing business and with whom?” And, if something adverse is happening: “Where else should I be doing business so that I have some agility and operational resilience?”

Yet help is at hand: artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can enable companies to better understand their supply chains in weeks, rather than months or years. Often these technologies expose a matrix of previously unknown vulnerabilities. By combining the right capabilities with insight and experience, you can shockproof your supply chain now and survive the challenges ahead.

Global supply chains in the time of coronavirus

In early 2020, as the deadly virus was quietly spreading in China, the first sign that international business operations were about to take a hit came in mid-February, when Apple announced it would miss its quarterly revenue target of $63 billion–$67 billion. As China took steps to contain the virus, affecting Apple’s supply chain, the company’s stock fell 11.7 percent.  Clearly when Wuhan shut down, there were ripple effects—and some affected companies were unaware of their dependency on China until that moment.

We are still feeling the ripple effects of those early COVID-driven supply chain shocks today. Early COVID outbreaks redirected consumer demand for silicon chips from automakers to consumer electronics. Now that demand has started to swing back, automakers have found themselves in the midst of a silicon shortage, with research firm IHS Markit estimating that 672,000 fewer vehicles will be produced in Q1 2021 as a result.

Businesses that relied on spreadsheets and manual checking systems to track their cross-border supply chain relationships struggled to assess their exposure to the knock-on effects of the virus. Few companies had the necessary technologies in place or knew where to get them.

Before COVID, most companies knew who their prime suppliers were and had some knowledge of their suppliers’ suppliers. But supply chains in the age of optimization are vastly more complex. With globalization have come third- and fourth-tier linkages and beyond, spanning to hundreds and thousands of intricate and complex connections that extend all over the world. The loss of a single component low down the chain can create disruption and prolonged chaos at the top.

This is how the closing of a factory in China leads to a sudden shortage of iPhones, which may be manufactured in another country, and how the fragility of the global supply chain—unnoticed for a quarter of a century—was exposed for all to see.

Looking back a few decades, the intricate interconnectedness of cross-border supply chains became systemic in the 1990s. Offshoring was a new global trend and “just-in-time” methods pioneered by Japan were adopted worldwide. As supply chains straddled more and more borders, business leaders should have been asking: “Who are we doing business with, where are we doing it, what resources are we ultimately reliant upon, and what does that mean for me and my business?”

Now’s the time to learn some lessons from the pandemic. To ensure the continuity of their operations, businesses need to make themselves aware of—and understand how to respond to—the potential shocks to come. As threats evolve and change, constant vigilance is required.

For most multinational companies, discerning supply chain risks can be as perplexing as staring at a Monet painting close up. But AI and ML can help them focus: these technologies can resolve the patterns in the many millions of dots—the intimate connections between companies in a complex supply chain. However, you still need human insight to interpret the patterns and understand how to adapt. In the uncertain years ahead, with the help of AI and business intelligence, it’s possible to turn these threats into opportunities and gain an edge on competitors

Future-proofing: a how-to guide

Supply chain threats are manifold and, as COVID has taught us, can cut deeper than anyone anticipated. Here are some of the larger global risk themes to consider for future-proofing:

Second and third waves. To date, COVID-19 has claimed over 2 million lives worldwide, caused severe economic damage, and made it harder to transport goods across borders. Many countries are now experiencing second and third waves of the virus, potentially causing a resurgence of global supply chain problems. Businesses need to put emergency planning in place now.

Natural disasters and national emergencies. COVID-19 is the latest in a series of unforeseen shocks. The global financial crisis of 2008 caused havoc in the markets, the 2010 volcanic ash cloud in Iceland grounded air travel worldwide, and the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami of 2011 caused disruption to businesses reliant on Japan. Last year, companies linked to Lebanon were affected by the explosion in Beirut and in Australia by the devastating bushfires. The list goes on.

Climate change. Rapid melting of ice caps, rising sea levels, and prolonged periods of drought may make some areas uninhabitable, prompting the movement of peoples and affecting production in industries such as food, fisheries, and agriculture.

Even before COVID-19, some governments were starting to view their reliance on China as an issue, particularly in the context of the US-China trade wars. The U.S. had vowed to bring production “back home” and introduced legislation to ban 5G technology company Huawei, affecting at least a dozen industries, including aerospace, technology, and auto manufacturing—all of which count the federal government as a customer. The new U.S. defense law encompasses all global subsidiaries and service providers deep within a firm’s supply chain.

Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG). Companies are being held accountable for the actions of their far-flung suppliers, of which they are often unaware. Businesses need to ensure suppliers at all levels of their supply chain align with their own values and commitments.

Cyberattacks and data theft. In the Internet age, many supply chains are digital, but this doesn’t make them any more resistant to sudden shocks. Cybercrimes such as hacking and phishing are at least as prolific now as before the pandemic, possibly more so because the attention on them has been redirected elsewhere. The global financial industry, for example, relies on thousands of card-based applications that require different access controls and are the constant target of cyberattack. It’s practically impossible to track such vulnerabilities without incorporating AI and ML into a comprehensive risk management strategy.

Managing concentration risk

An overly concentrated supply chain — one reliant on a handful of suppliers or many suppliers located in the same geographic area – exposes a business to risk. All manner of events can take place without warning, with almost overnight repercussions.

Even if you seemingly have no relationship to a particular area, your second- and third-tier connections might. The only way to track and trace potential sources of problems—and start building resilience toward them—is to make concentration risk a key part of your strategic thinking.

In some industries, such as technology, there’s now so much specialization that a supply chain could be sourcing hundreds of thousands of components produced in hundreds of different places – or even more precariously, in just a few locations. An incident in a far-flung corner of the globe you know little about could have major implications for your profit forecasts.

To determine where the potential problems are and address them, having AI capability is paramount—followed by skillful, nuanced, and complex analysis of the data. This process can help identify alternative sources of supply and begin to develop a strategic roadmap with a view to achieving uninterrupted operational resilience.

Protecting your brand and reputation

The consequences of failing to analyze, stave off, or sidestep concentration risks are hard to overstate. The short-term risks are immediately evident: customers won’t be able to buy products they need because interruptions in the supply chain mean businesses can’t produce, supply, or sell them. Long-term, there could be grave consequences for the brand and reputation.

This is why maintaining a robust supply chain must remain a top priority post-COVID for any company with a strategic mindset. The pandemic has clearly demonstrated the importance of understanding where your weaknesses lie, preparing contingency plans, and preventing supply chain breakdown. A situation that develops overnight can leave a CEO on the hook with shareholders and stakeholders the next morning, unless a plan is already in place for immediate deployment.

Now is the time to start investing in advanced technological capabilities—to uncover potential risks, to formulate the most effective coping strategies and to optimally position your company for new opportunities with competitive advantage. It’s a sort of high-tech sleuthing exercise. That said, we live in an age of unprecedented technological advancement. Human wisdom must be brought to bear in order to understand what needs to change—and that starts with a dynamic and proactive leadership mentality. “No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man,” wrote the Greek philosopher Heraclitus. Exactly the same can be said of businesses and their extended supply chains.

_____________________________________________________________________

Ryan Elliott is a Partner at Kearney, a leading global management consulting partnership in more than 40 countries.

Jennifer Bisceglie is the CEO of Interos, the first and only business relationship intelligence platform to protect enterprise ecosystems from financial, operations, governance, geographic, and cyber risk in every tier of enterprise supply chains, continuously.

manufacturing

The New Normal in Manufacturing – A Digitized Future

We can learn a lot from history. In the face of a global pandemic that has upended the business world, the measures taken in the short-term will lead to significant shifts that will last for decades.

We saw how the Great Depression dramatically changed the role of government within financial markets. Likewise, how the Great Recession of 2007-08 created a shift in value from ownership to experiences.

The global pandemic has already introduced and accelerated several trends that will likely become entrenched into our daily lives for years to come. We see a virtual shift happening with consumer trends like work-from-home, video communication, online purchasing, e-learning, streaming services, and more taking hold.

This is the new normal in which we live, work, and trade. And it’s here to stay. For manufacturers, the new normal is an opportunity to address short-term challenges and lay the groundwork for future resilience.

Acceleration of Industry 4.0

COVID-19 created immediate challenges for manufacturers.

1. Consumer demand shocks in both volume and variety of manufactured goods

2. Workforce shifts with social distancing regulations, hygiene mandates, and employee health-related absences

3. Supply chain fragility resulting in raw material and finished good shortages, impacts to just-in-time production processes, and stockouts

To address these short-term issues, manufacturers undertook various initiatives to build supply chain resiliencies to improve visibility, diversify their supply chains through reshoring, and deploying innovative technologies.

It’s fair to say that the pandemic is the catalyst that pushed the smart factory vision (Industry 4.0) forward faster.

Manufacturers are now able to gain a competitive advantage by adapting and building on this new normal. According to Bain & Company, “For companies willing to take the right actions during this critical recovery phase: the rewards may prove transformative, propelling them into the ranks of true performance leaders.”

The Future of Manufacturing Looks Digitized

A McKinsey survey of manufacturers found that:

-93% of manufacturing and supply-chain leaders plan to focus on the resilience of their supply chain

-39% have already implemented a nerve-center/control-tower approach to increase end-to-end transparency in their supply chain

-A quarter are fast-tracking automation programs to address worker shortages

-90% plan to invest in talent for digitization

As manufacturers look to advance their long-term strategies of building supply chain resiliency, reshoring production, introducing new distribution strategies, and implementing Industry 4.0 technologies, the key to success will be creating a digital muscle.

Supply chain resiliency – manufacturers must establish end-to-end visibility of the supply chain to improve resiliency. Enhanced visibility is made possible through technology, such as manufacturing execution systems, that can deliver network agility and visibility, digital collaboration, insights for decision-making, and team empowerment.

Reshoring – to reshore production, effective inventory management and supply chain tools that provide tracking and authentication are necessary. Automation of manufacturing processes will also be essential to make reshoring economical and attract technology-savvy workers.

New Distribution Strategies – direct-to-consumer (D2C) strategies have proven valuable during the pandemic. While it will take a cultural change to implement D2C in manufacturing, it will also require integrating technology systems, such as warehouse management systems and manufacturing execution systems.

Industry 4.0 technologies – manufacturers have rapidly deployed technologies that have better positioned them in the new normal. These technologies include 5G connectivity, IoT sensors, advanced automation, AI-powered analytics, and robotics solutions. With many of these rollouts completed in record time, manufacturers need to keep their eye on the big picture and look to further optimize these systems to increase efficiencies and transform capabilities across the supply chain.

A Partner for Your Digital Journey

At Generix Group North America, we are experts in creating efficiencies across the entire supply chain. With over 20 years of experience and a global team of 600+ experts, our series of solutions within our Supply Chain Hub product suite can help build the resilience and visibility your organization needs across your manufacturing operations and supply chain.

Our solutions are in use around the world by more than 6,000 customers and our experience is second-to-none. We invite you to contact us to learn more.

You can also read our eBook, Manufacturing and the New Normal: Moving Forward from 2020, to learn more about how digitization will prepare your manufacturing organization for the future.

___________________________________________________________________

Doug Mefford has more than 25 years experience in the Supply Chain industry.  His diverse background includes roles across many operational functions, from inventory control to operational leadership within an Omni Channel distribution operation.  Additionally, within the software space he has held roles including quality and business analyst, design lead and product management.  He brings his cross functional experience in supply chain operations and software product delivery to bear in helping define the direction for Generix Group North America’s Solochain WMS. Prior to his time at Generix, Mefford was the operations manager for the Dallas Cowboys for eight years, overseeing their warehouse operations, retail distribution, silk screen manufacturing and direct-to-consumer order fulfillment. Doug studied at Northern Illinois University, and is greatly involved in the Illinois Special Olympics

tea market

Tea Market to Reach US$20.0 Billion By the End of 2025

A large number of companies operate in the global tea market rendering it highly competitive. They primarily compete on the basis of product quality, service, brand image, innovation, price, and distribution. While the market exhibits the presence of several prominent players such as Tata Global Beverages, Kusmi Tea, Davids Tea, and Unilever Plc. and Unilever Plc., small and medium-scale suppliers are also present in plenty, finds Transparency Market Research (TMR) in a new study.

TMR pegs the global tea market to reach US$20.0 bn by the end of 2025, from US$12.8 bn in 2017. If these figures hold true, the global tea market will exhibit a CAGR of 5.7% between 2017 and 2025. Based on type, the demand for crush, tear, curl (CTC) tea is expected to remain considerably high through the course of the forecast period. Regionally, Asia Pacific emerged dominant in the global market. Between 2017 and 2025, the Asia Pacific tea market is likely to rise at a CAGR of 6.8%.

Interpret a Competitive outlook Analysis Report with PDF Brochure – https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=4187

Rising Knowledge about Help Benefits Tea Offers will Fuel its Consumption

As per TMR, the global tea market is likely to remain steady in the forthcoming years. The rising demand for tea around the world will enable the market to sustain growth through the forecast period. TMR finds that traditional tea will remain popular among tea lovers worldwide. Besides its cost-efficiency, the steadily increasing consumption of traditional tea will enable it to secure a significant share in the global tea market. Meanwhile, the rising popularity of premium tea such as oolong tea, yellow tea, and white tea will create considerable growth opportunities for the market. The demand for premium tea varieties is expected to rise in the coming years and consumers’ willingness to spend increases in response to their increasing disposable income.

The growing awareness about health benefits offered by tea will also push its demand worldwide. The flavonoids, antioxidants, and phytochemicals present in tea help improving various functions in the human body. The rising knowledge about the benefits of drinking tea for patients suffering from combat arthritis, cardiovascular diseases, and high blood pressure will pave way for the market’s growth in the coming years.

More Trending Reports by Transparency Market Research – https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/coconut-syrup-market-to-reach-valuation-of-us-354-mn-by-2029-demand-for-organic-food-in-us-shall-propel-the-dominance-of-north-america-in-global-market-finds-tmr-301027365.html

Increasing Coffee Consumption Pose Threat to Market

In the coming years, the market is likely to gain significantly from the rising popularity of herbal and organic tea. Their infusion with a wide range of flavors and fragrances will also favor growth in the market. On the downside, changes in consumer preference and fluctuating wages of labor may hinder the market’s growth. Also, the increasing consumption of coffee will act as a key restraint for the market.

Other factors such as resource constraints and climate change may adversely impact the market. Nonetheless, tea consumption is forecast to rise around the world. Furthermore, the increasing availability of various flavors and types of tea at a reasonable price will boost the market over the forecast period.

This review is based on a TMR report, titled “Tea Market (Product – Leaf Tea and CTC Tea; Type – Premium/Specialty Tea and Mass Tea) – Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends and Forecast 2017 – 2025.

Request for covid19 Impact Analysis – https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=4187

The report segments the global tea market as:

Global Tea Market: By Product

-Leaf Tea

-CTC Tea

Global Tea Market: By Type

-Premium/Specialty Tea

-Mass Tea

Global Tea Market: By Geography

North America

-U.S.

-Canada

Europe

-Spain

-Italy

-France

-Belgium

-Germany

-U.K.

-Netherlands

-Rest of Europe

Asia Pacific (APAC)

-India

-China

-Hong Kong

-Singapore

-Japan

-Thailand

-Australia

-Rest of APAC

Middle East and Africa (MEA)

-Saudi Arabia

-A.E.

-South Africa

-Rest of MEA

South America

-Brazil

-Rest of South America

__________________________________________________________________

Transparency Market Research is a next-generation market intelligence provider, offering fact-based solutions to business leaders, consultants, and strategy professionals.

Our reports are single-point solutions for businesses to grow, evolve, and mature. Our real-time data collection methods along with the ability to track more than one million high growth niche products are aligned with your aims. The detailed and proprietary statistical models used by our analysts offer insights for making the right decision in the shortest span of time. For organizations that require specific but comprehensive information, we offer customized solutions through ad-hoc reports. These requests are delivered with the perfect combination of the right sense of fact-oriented problem-solving methodologies and leveraging existing data repositories.

TMR believes that the unison of solutions for client-specific problems with the right methodology of research is the key to help enterprises reach the right decision.

Contact: Transparency Market Research

State Tower, 90 State Street, Suite 700, Albany NY – 12207United States

USA – Canada Toll-Free: 866-552-3453

Email: sales@transparencymarketresearch.com

Website: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com

supply chain

Rethinking the Supply Chain During COVID-19

For decades, labor cost differences have been a primary influence in the continuous shift of manufacturing production from the U.S. to China. In 1980, the cost of labor in the U.S. was more than 30 times of that in China. As China became less agrarian and more of its population migrated to large cities to work in new factories, wages rose dramatically. By 2018, the U.S.-China wage gap had closed to only four times, rising approximately 200% in the U.S. but over 2,000% in China over nearly 40 years. Yet, despite the sharp rise in Chinese manufacturing wages over the last 20 years, offshoring continued. The U.S. manufacturing industry suffered, including millions of lost jobs, stagnant inflation-adjusted wages and a decline of the middle class.

Change in wages in U.S. and China from 1980-2018

Predictable wage increases in China do not tell the whole story of America’s declining status as a factory for the world. The establishment of special, quasi-free market Special Economic Zones, seemingly endless supply of relatively inexpensive labor, and fully globalized shipping networks allowed China to capitalize on the high cost of manufacturing in the U.S., but perhaps a more important development was the world’s relentless march toward automation and robotics.

The replacement of manual labor by machines and software may have had just as much influence on the decline of the American manufacturing industry as foreign labor costs, domestic labor unions, and international trade policy. Whether attributable to man or machine, parts of the American manufacturing industry have struggled for decades to be competitive and relevant, leading the industry to focus the remaining competitive advantages on the manufacture of niche, value-add, or raw material-dependent products.

Despite a steady increase in their workers’ productivity, most American manufacturers have not been able to automate or reduce logistics costs enough to remain competitive—and offshoring, primarily to Asia, became an unfortunate reality for corporations of all sizes. When any company established a manufacturing presence in China and built a global supply chain, pressure was applied to its remaining competitors in the U.S. to either innovate or follow suit. Among some of the first U.S. manufacturers to offshore en masse were labor-intensive sectors, such as furniture and textiles, followed by manufacturers with relatively low transportation costs, such as pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.

Approximately a decade ago, several institutions in the U.S. converged on a theory that significant changes in U.S. manufacturers’ cost-benefit analysis were occurring and could create a tipping point toward reshoring certain products. The average hourly wages for reliable, competent labor in China and the cost of transporting manufactured goods safely and efficiently to consumers had shifted to such an extent that American manufacturers could potentially reshore their operations to the U.S. or near-shore them to Latin America. Their tipping point theory, predicated on higher Chinese production wages and increasingly complex and expensive global transportation and logistics costs, asserted that over a dozen manufacturing sectors showed formulaic probability of reshoring.

Today, nearly 10 years after the tipping point theory was first publicized, the American manufacturing industry may be on the precipice of another large surge in activity. Through the Great Recession and recovery, American manufacturing was kept buoyant by high-margin, low-volume products. Factoring in the current public health emergency and the current Administration’s response, the U.S. manufacturing sector could regain some of its prior job losses in impacted industries.

The U.S. manufacturing industry is at a unique and unprecedented crossroads. Of the dozen or so manufacturing sectors that previously showed potential for being reshored by rising labor costs and comparatively steep transportation and logistics costs, the tipping point has further shifted, and justification for domestic manufacturing appears stronger. As the world struggles to contain the coronavirus and understand its long-term implications on our social, medical, educational and economic systems, Duff & Phelps has created a new analysis of the prior tipping point theory and integrated several key strategic factors that carry more (or at least equal) weight in a post-COVID-19 world.

To refresh the study, Duff & Phelps adjusted for new global economic conditions, plotted current data for all major production categories and determined a new tipping point for sectors across the manufacturing industry. We began our analysis by identifying, measuring, and weighting key metrics for companies with manufacturing operations in China, including cost (labor + logistics), automation (labor productivity), innovation (R&D, IP, patents, etc.), quality and safetysustainability (environmental regulations and pollution), and national security (critical/essential designations). Specifically, our “reshoring analysis” used six objective criteria to analyze 28 sectors of the American manufacturing industry, identified by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes, which were ultimately ranked according to which showed the greatest potential for re-shoring

The following six criteria and circumstantial factors show the highest probability of a given sector to reshore:

Cost: sectors with low labor costs and high logistics costs

Level of Automation: sectors that have seen a major increase in labor productivity

Innovation and Intellectual Property: sectors with relatively high R&D spending, particularly valuable intellectual property embedded within the manufacturing process or significant patent applications

Product Quality and Safety: sectors with stricter quality and safety regulations (e.g., food, drugs)

Essential Business Designation: businesses, sectors or products officially designated as critical or essential by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security or other governmental authority

Environmental Regulations: sectors whose cost of capital justifies capital investment in real or personal property improvements that allow production to meet or exceed U.S. emissions or pollution regulations

In our analysis of the six primary criteria and 28 sectors, a composite of the eight highest-scoring production categories emerged as the most probable candidates to reshore to the U.S. They share the characteristics of relatively low labor and high transportation costs and feature some of the most advanced robotics, automation and manufacturing techniques across all technology-enabled industries.  Their manufacturing processes are more compliant with and conducive to U.S. environmental regulations, labor laws, intellectual property protections and consumer safety standards. Their profit margins and global demand also tend to alleviate concerns associated with reshoring investment costs. Given the U.S. government’s renewed focus on homeland security and essential goods and services in the wake of COVID-19, the following industry sectors will have to reevaluate their manufacturing costs, supply chain reliability and risk of significant business interruption even while the pandemic is still ongoing:

-Automobiles, bodies, trailers and parts

-Other transportation equipment (e.g., boats, rail)

-Navigational, measuring, electromedical and control instruments

-Basic chemicals

-Semiconductor and electronic components

-Medical equipment and supplies

-Communications equipment

-Aerospace products and parts.

U.S.-China trade flows and top candidates for reshoring

Today, cost isn’t the only significant factor influencing U.S. corporations’ manufacturing footprint. Based on the following factors, manufacturing in the U.S. may become economically feasible for more sectors and the U.S. may experience active and passive reshoring effects as companies consider these variables:

Economic

-Rising cost of labor in China

-Increasing transparency into foreign working conditions and safety measures

-Rising logistics costs

-Corporate supply chain risk mitigation and the identification of critical supplies

-Internet/information-driven consumer awareness and sentiment

-Cost and threat of intellectual property theft

Environmental

-Enforcement of environmental laws and regulations in China’s manufacturing sector

-Sustainability and a global shift away from fossil-fuels power

-Reduced consumerism among millennials and younger generations with increased spending power for durable and non-durable goods

Geopolitical

-U.S.-China trade war and tariff impacts

-Anti-globalization and nationalist political, social and cultural trends across the world

-Consumers’ increasing demands for transparency of product content and origin

-The Trump administration’s calls for U.S. companies to reduce China-centric supply chains, even before COVID-19

-U.S.-China tensions over democracy protests in Hong Kong, origins of COVID-19, military escalation along the Indian border and in the South China Sea

-Human rights abuses of millions of ethnic Uyghurs in Chinese detention camps

Domestic Policy

-U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement ratification

-COVID-19 related essential business, industry and product designations by various U.S. agencies

-Potential for new legislation, regulation or designation of previously outsourced or offshored products and services that are now deemed critical to the U.S. economy or economic infrastructure

Regardless of COVID-19’s impact to the global economic structure, many large American manufacturing operations will likely remain anchored in China since production in the U.S. continues to be labor-intensive and/or global distribution is still so cost=efficient. However, our analysis suggests that additional factors beyond economic ones are being weighted more heavily and that many products historically made in China and destined for U.S. consumers or other markets around the world show high potential for being reshored.

__________________________________________________________________

Gregory Burkart is managing director and global leader of Duff & Phelps’ Site Selection and Incentives Advisory practice. Kurt Steltenpohl is a managing director in Duff & Phelps’ Transaction Advisory Services practice and leader of Operations Consulting.

Duff & Phelps’ Danielle Dipietra, Meegan Spicer, Anthony Schum and Wesley Michael also contributed to this article.

A version of this article was previously published in IndustryWeek.

wooden furniture

Poland Strengthens its Leadership in the European Wooden Bedroom Furniture Exports

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Wooden Furniture Of A Kind Used In The Bedroom – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The EU wooden bedroom furniture market amounted to $5.1B in 2019, which is down by -12.8% against the previous year. This figure reflects the total revenues of producers and importers (excluding logistics costs, retail marketing costs, and retailers’ margins, which will be included in the final consumer price). Over the period under review, the market hit record highs at $6.1B in 2014; however, from 2015 to 2019, consumption stood at a somewhat lower figure.

Consumption by Country

The countries with the highest volumes of wooden bedroom furniture consumption in 2019 were France (14M units), the UK (11M units) and Germany (10M units), together comprising 56% of total consumption. Spain, Lithuania, Poland, the Netherlands, Romania, the Czech Republic, Portugal and Denmark lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 32%.

From 2013 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of wooden bedroom furniture consumption, amongst the main consuming countries, was attained by Spain, while wooden bedroom furniture consumption for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the UK ($1.1B), Germany ($1B) and France ($707M) were the countries with the highest levels of market value in 2019, with a combined 55% share of the total market. These countries were followed by Spain, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Romania, Poland, the Czech Republic, Denmark and Portugal, which together accounted for a further 31%.

In 2019, the highest levels of wooden bedroom furniture per capita consumption was registered in Lithuania (1,619 units per 1000 persons), followed by France (209 units per 1000 persons), the UK (169 units per 1000 persons) and Denmark (167 units per 1000 persons), while the world average per capita consumption of wooden bedroom furniture was estimated at 123 units per 1000 persons.

Production in the EU

In 2019, the amount of wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom produced in the European Union totaled 77M units, surging by 7.4% against the previous year. The total output volume increased at an average annual rate of +1.5% from 2013 to 2019; the trend pattern remained relatively stable, with only minor fluctuations being observed in certain years. As a result, production reached the peak volume and is likely to continue growing in the immediate term.

Production by Country

The countries with the highest volumes of wooden bedroom furniture production in 2019 were Poland (16M units), France (12M units) and Germany (11M units), with a combined 50% share of total production. Lithuania, Spain, the UK, Italy, Denmark and Portugal lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 35%.

From 2013 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of wooden bedroom furniture production, amongst the main producing countries, was attained by Spain, while wooden bedroom furniture production for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Exports in the EU

In 2019, the amount of wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom exported in the European Union soared to 48M units, growing by 38% against the previous year. The total export volume increased at an average annual rate of +5.6% from 2013 to 2019; however, the trend pattern indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded in certain years. In value terms, wooden bedroom furniture exports contracted to $3.5B (IndexBox estimates) in 2019.

Exports by Country

In 2019, Poland (13M units), distantly followed by Germany (8.4M units), Italy (5.4M units), Denmark (3.4M units) and Lithuania (2.8M units) represented the major exporters of wooden furniture of a kind used in the bedroom, together creating 69% of total exports. France (1.7M units), the Czech Republic (1.6M units), Portugal (1.5M units), the Netherlands (1.4M units), Romania (1.1M units), Sweden (1M units) and Austria (1M units) followed a long way behind the leaders.

From 2013 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of shipments, amongst the leading exporting countries, was attained by Austria, while exports for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Poland ($897M), Germany ($576M) and Italy ($470M) were the countries with the highest levels of exports in 2019, together accounting for 56% of total exports. These countries were followed by Denmark, Lithuania, France, the Czech Republic, Portugal, Austria, the Netherlands, Romania and Sweden, which together accounted for a further 32%.

Export Prices by Country

The wooden bedroom furniture export price in the European Union stood at $73 per unit in 2019, reducing by -27.7% against the previous year.

Average prices varied somewhat amongst the major exporting countries. In 2019, major exporting countries recorded the following prices: in Austria ($101 per unit) and Italy ($87 per unit), while Sweden ($69 per unit) and France ($69 per unit) were amongst the lowest.

From 2013 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by the Czech Republic, while the other leaders experienced a decline in the export price figures.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

IoT

IoT For Manufacturing: Everything You Should Know

The Internet of Things (IoT) has become increasingly popular in both households and workplaces. From having a virtual essay writer, to fitness trackers and thermostats for smart homes, the proliferation of smart things has reached a peak. Reports have shown that up to 79 percent of US consumers have at least one smart device in their homes.

With IoT’s rising popularity, it comes as no surprise that the manufacturing industry has started to utilize and harness its benefits. In the past decade, manufacturing companies have had to struggle to adapt to the evolution of the economic landscape. Fortunately, IoT gave these companies the tools needed for modernization.

However, despite the ongoing digital transformation in the manufacturing industry, not every company has utilized and harnessed the benefits of industrial IoT.

Whether you fall into this category or not, this article will tell you everything you need to know about IoT manufacturing and its applications.

IoT for Manufacturing

Today, several companies within the manufacturing industry are integrating IoT into production and supply. In what is described by some as the 4th industrial revolution in the industry, IoT and robotics are changing the way things work. A large percentage of manufacturers are convinced that the integration of digital facilities into production will be beneficial and even mitigate risks.

This only goes to show that IoT is an extremely profitable market for manufacturers and employers who want to hop on this train.

What Objectives Can be Reached with Industrial IoT?

With Industrial IoT, manufacturers and manufacturing companies can achieve a wide range of objectives. Here are a few objectives that can be reached when Industrial IoT is utilized:

1. Predictive maintenance

Each year, manufacturing companies all over the world pump millions of dollars into operational and maintenance costs. Most manufacturers are accustomed to scenarios where a piece of equipment breaks down mid-production. To avoid these instances, it is advisable to carry out equipment maintenance on time.

But how can companies do this if they can’t even predict downtime before it comes knocking? It’s simple.

With the aid of industrial IoT facilities like sensors, data, and analytics in equipment, manufacturers can easily detect and predict failure before it occurs.

 

 

 

2.  Monitoring in real-time

IoT allows manufacturing companies to monitor their assets in real-time. Through the use of communication channels and virtual assistants, everyone involved in the production process can stay abreast of any incidences or occurrences.

By enhancing communication within the production chain, it speeds up the manufacturing pace and, of course, saves time.

3. Remote management

Previously, manufacturers had to be physically present to assess the state of machines and equipment. However, with the aid of connected sensors, any manufacturer can now oversee and assess equipment remotely.

4.  Gathering consumer insight

The Internet of Things helps manufacturers and companies to track usage and demand patterns. With this, a manufacturer can easily detect user complaints and subsequently, remodel the product to enhance customer satisfaction.

Major Applications of IoT in Manufacturing

It is predicted that by 2025, there will be 22 billion IoT devices in use. This is a glaring pointer to the IoT future. Businesses need to align themselves with the accompanying transformation in how work is going to be done if they are to remain relevant. Many companies in the manufacturing industry already use IoT in areas such as:

1. Production

The production floor is one of the most important areas of a manufacturing company. Forward-thinking companies install IoT devices into their latest equipment. This connection of IoT to equipment affords operation managers the rare privilege of monitoring production operations as they occur.

This is very handy for planning and project management as it helps these managers easily adjust plans and reassign manpower to make the production process more efficient. The fact that IoT devices can also be installed on older equipment makes it even more appealing. It extends the relevance of these machines and saves costs.

2. Quality control

IoT is applied in the quality control processes of manufacturing companies at the product development stage. Here, data is analyzed and the results are used to tweak product designs. This can directly address quality concerns that may have arisen over time.

Preprogrammed criteria are also observed and fine-tuned automatically. This gives quality control officers an edge. The automation that IoT brings is a huge leap from the traditional method of adjusting parameters after sampling.

3. Supervising machine utilization

IoT is being used to observe the rate at which equipment is being used in manufacturing. This gives businesses data in real-time about how these equipment are used. Operational staff can also see what goes on at every point in production in detail.

This can directly challenge manufacturing norms. The data gathered about these machines is sent to the cloud and processed. After analysis, results are digitally displayed in apps for the workers to look at.

Benefits of IoT in Manufacturing

The implementation of IoT technology is still thought to be some distant dream. However, smart companies observe the IoT future and see the benefits of investing in IoT. Sustainability is key for companies in the manufacturing industry and any one of the following benefits can guarantee long-term success:

1. Cost-cutting edge

Companies have seen the opportunity for maximizing profits by cutting down costs when they adopt IoT. Breakdowns can be reduced by a whopping 70% by IoT. Additionally, 12% of the money that would have been spent on repairs can be saved and channeled into other aspects of manufacturing.

Another way that IoT can help reduce costs for manufacturing companies is in the aspect of employing labor. The traditional method of hiring many workers to handle manual tasks is expensive. Adopting IoT can automate these processes, bring about predictive maintenance, and reduce the need for a good portion of staff resources.

2. Reliability

More automation means improved reliability. This gives manufacturing firms the edge while planning that a lot of risks – usually from human errors – that would have been factored into the plan can be left out altogether. This makes for greater efficiency during production and reduces the wastage of resources.

3. Reduced accidents

IoT tracking equipment use is going to help make manufacturing safer. A lot of workplace accidents are a result of machines malfunctioning. However, with the volume of data processed by IoT about the equipment, it will be easier to identify defective machines and work on them before they pose health risks.

4. Reduced time to market

Faster production and supply time will reduce the time it takes for the product to hit the market. This means that more products can be in circulation at any given point in time as consumers have supply meeting demands. This way, companies that use IoT in their machinery and processes stand to gain greater market share.

Conclusion

The manufacturing industry is one that is fully equipped to harness the potentials and benefits of IoT. Fortunately, many companies have recognized this fact and are utilizing cutting-edge technology in their production and supply chain. So what are you waiting for?

_____________________________________________________________

James Baxter is a professional ghostwriter, editor at write my essay  and blogger, who loves sharing his experience and knowledge with readers. He is especially interested in marketing, blogging, and IT. James is always happy to visit different places and meet new people there.

supermarkets

From Physical Retail to Online Business: Marketing and Logistics Principles for Supermarkets

Supermarkets and retailers around the world began distributing goods via order channels over a decade ago, often as a future-oriented addition to a minor business segment, complementing standard services. As such, ordering online and receiving groceries via delivery is nothing new. Caught off-guard by the COVID-19 outbreak, however, supermarkets and food-retailers today are facing the challenge of switching their business model from physical retail to online order and delivery with unprecedented urgency. With physical distancing measures in place across entire countries, people increasingly prefer to avoid purchasing their groceries as walk-in customers to safeguard their health and well-being.

In this situation, the supermarket industry finds itself in a fundamentally altered market environment. The changes required from them are profound. Their typical infrastructure, such as buildings and storage centers, was strategically designed to walk customers through a supermarket, positioning products on shelves as per marketing and product placement logic, factors that become obsolete in an online retail world. What matters now is safe, reliable, and fast supply of customers’ online orders via dedicated distribution services. Logistics is at the core of addressing these challenges and the interface between marketing and logistics indeed becomes vital for fast implementation in the current scenario.

For a swift short-term switch, the prerequisites are two-fold: On the one hand, the supply of selected products needs to be covered either through local production or through available imports. On the other, a functioning online ordering front-end needs to be made available to customers. Yet, especially for supermarkets, it is the seamless and efficient operation of the “pick and packing” functionality that has now become the bottleneck.

This has several consequences that can be addressed: First, online supermarkets cannot provide the full portfolio of goods to their customers, at least for the time being. Sales analysis is required to meaningfully reduce the portfolio of products available online, and hence decrease the complexity of assembling orders later on. Amid the current circumstances, food and canned products will have higher importance than non-food items, and any of the latter to be upheld would need to be chosen sensibly. While customers may have less choice, portfolio reduction will help significantly in maintaining capacity for faster, more reliable physical delivery.

Second, shortened product portfolios can be divided into two categories: High runners and low runners. High runners are regularly purchased in high volumes, and their turnaround is quick. Low runners might be appealing in the physical retail world, but have less meaning in the current landscape. Third, high-running products within a simplified offering need to be stored differently for now. Usually, they would be placed decentralized along strategic points throughout the supermarket to attract attention. In a recalibrated setup, identified high runners need to be stored centrally in a dedicated area of the market where employees have unhindered access for fast “pick and packing”. Fourth, the commissioning time needed for workers to assemble an incoming order, needs to be kept as low as possible by minimizing physical distances required to walk.

Fifth, in packing the online orders received and getting them ready for dispatch, standardized package box sizes can be used to further reduce complexity. Just like in a game of “Tetris”, utilizing uniform cubic sizes will allow for packages to be stored in delivery vehicles in the most effective fashion. This is particularly relevant for food retailers that do not rely on third-party logistics providers for reasons of quality and food safety assurance.

Sixth, physical delivery of the commissioned orders should be prioritized and planned in a calculated way. Typical linear concepts such as “first order in, first delivery out,” will not be efficient under the current circumstances. Seventh, because of the reduced product portfolio, the products offered should not be static, but optimized on a regular basis. In other words, the now required short-term shift should not limit the industry to short-term thinking. Requiring customers to order in excess of minimum order amounts, imposing high delivery charges, expecting customers to accept long delivery times, accepting the jamming of orders, amongst others pitfalls – all of which we are currently witnessing internationally, can be avoided by emphasizing the outlined marketing and logistics principles.

While it is clear that supermarkets are at the heart of consumer goods supply during the current pandemic, it would not be reasonable to compare them with established online giants such as Amazon and others. Their business model and logistical setups are different, from the outset. This naturally calls for customers to exercise patience and good-will with their supermarkets for a while. Supermarkets are logistical hubs, run by people, for people, through people, even if for the time being, they may appear as an anonymous online screen only.

____________________________________________________________

Frank Himpel is a faculty member of the Engineering Management and Decision Sciences division at College of Science and Engineering at Hamad Bin Khalifa University in Qatar. Prior to moving to Qatar with his family in 2018, Frank served as a professor of business administration and logistics in Germany, where he also received his academic degrees. His research into aviation and air transportation management has taken him to several countries around the world.

 About Hamad Bin Khalifa University

Innovating Today, Shaping Tomorrow

Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU), a member of Qatar Foundation for Education, Science, and Community Development (QF), was founded in 2010 as a research-intensive university that acts as a catalyst for transformative change in Qatar and the region while having global impact. Located in Education City, HBKU is committed to building and cultivating human capacity through an enriching academic experience, innovative ecosystem, and unique partnerships. HBKU delivers multidisciplinary undergraduate and graduate degrees through its colleges, and provides opportunities for research and scholarship through its institutes and centers. For more information about HBKU, visit www.hbku.edu.qa.

food supply chain

Reusable Plastics: The Unsung Heroes Of The Food Supply Chain

When you think of plastic, you probably think of piles of landfill products that don’t decompose organically, and as a result, end up languishing in the ground leaching toxic chemicals into the soil.

Modern technology has meant that plastics are more than just the straws you put in your milkshake or the wrapper on your lunchtime snack. Today’s plastics come in all shapes and sizes, including reusable, durable products used across the food supply chain market.

These products make food supply chain management more cost and time-efficient, allowing consumers to enjoy fresh, delicious produce and products quickly, and at a price they can afford.

Growing And Harvesting

In the early stages of food production, agricultural reusable plastic containers are used to grow fruits and vegetables in a safe and sanitary environment. Plastic trays are used to grow seedlings, and these are often watered using reusable plastic irrigation systems. Greenhouse covers, also made from reusable plastic, make growing plants that need climate-controlled housing, such as tomatoes or citrus fruits, safe and hygienic.

When it comes to harvesting product, plastic containers make it easier for farmers to store and transport their crops safely. Cardboard or wooden pallets can be hard to sanitize and are prone to absorbing moisture, while plastic is non-porous and can easily be cleaned after each use.

Processing and Distributing

Processing fresh produce, including fruits, vegetables and other crops, involves sorting them ready to be shipped off for use in various products such as ready meals, sauces and canned goods. Some will be sold whole, but the majority will meet customers in various different forms, so they are sorted and stored in a selection of reusable plastic food handling containers, such as IBCs, prior to being distributed to factories and stores.

Distribution is the part of the supply chain where single-use plastics get involved. The products can be transported on plastic pallets and crates, which are reusable, but they are delivered to customers in single-use packaging. As DeMaso of Lipman Family Farms explains:

“Single-use plastic is hard to get rid of when sending to consumers in the produce industry. We need to make sure food safety and sanitation are on-point, so we’re not trading contaminants. Disposable plastic is a problem, [so] it’s a matter of making sure we are using as little as possible.”

Making the Food Supply Chain More Sustainable

As this article highlights, the main issue the food supply chain faces when it comes to sustainability is its reliance at the end of the process on single-use plastic packaging. Justin Bean, the Business Development and Sales Manager at Reusable Transport Packaging, believes that reusable food packaging is the future, and that food producers should embrace it throughout their supply chain. This approach will help to reduce the food supply chain’s reliance on single-use plastics.

“Farmers still spend a lot of money on single-use corrugated and or single-use plastics for distribution to retailers. Our pay per use or milkman model allows users to cut out single-use packaging waste, save money, and use a better RTP (Reusable Transport Package).”

A move towards reusable plastic packaging throughout the food supply chain will allow the market to reduce its impact on the environment and still keep food fresh and affordable. It’s safe to say that these revolutionary products are the future of the food supply chain.

___________________________________________________________________

Reusable Transport Packaging is a re-seller, master distributor, and custom manufacturer of the broadest range of returnable and reusable plastic packaging available today. We carry thousands of products and boast an inventory that is readily available, with national and international coverage.

production

The Countries Leading the Way in the Future of Production

The First Industrial Revolution dates back to the 18th century, with the manufacturing and production process evolving significantly to improve efficiency. Since then, the world has gone through a series of changes with the present-day seeing us in full swing of the world’s Fourth Industrial Revolution. 

Using data from the World Economic Forum’s ‘Readiness for the Future of Production’ report, RS Components have taken a look at the countries that are leading the way when it comes to driving production forward. The six main drivers are ‘Technology & Innovation’, ‘Human Capital’, ‘Global Trade & Investment’, ‘Institutional Framework’, ‘Sustainable Resources’, and ‘Demand Environment’. See how each country compares when it comes to being ready to produce more products, technologies, and goods here.

The 21st century is a truly digital age, with technology now intertwined and cemented into both our personal and professional lives. Over the last two decades, in particular, technology has become increasingly advanced and has seen the emergence of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Complicated and impressive technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), robotics, the Internet of Things (IoT), 3D printing, genetic engineering, and quantum computing have all emerged and are being used across the globe in a variety of industries, businesses and processes.

As a result of the new technological age, the speed, efficiency, and accuracy of production levels have improved astronomically, with less room for human error as machinery takes over, making production levels much faster and hassle-free.  

With the rise of these advancements, it is important for countries and businesses across all industries to be tapping into these changes to keep up with the future of production. But which countries are leading the way?

RS Components have produced a graphic analyzing data from the World Economic Forum’s Readiness for the Future of Production report, to reveal the countries leading the way when it comes to driving production forward. With each country analyzed by a series of metrics including global trade and investment, institutional framework, sustainable resources, demand environment, and emerging technologies, the top 10 countries leading production levels forward have been scored out of 10.

The top 10 countries driving the future of production include:

The US takes the crown as the leading country in the world driving the future of production forward. Scoring at the top of the leaderboard across all metrics excluding Sustainable Resources and Institutional Framework, the US holds an overall score of 8.16 out of 10. The US is renowned for its innovation and holds an advanced, connected and secure technological platform that allows production to drive forward in the most efficient way possible.

Singapore ranks as the second country driving the future of production and the UK sits at fourth place with a score of 7.84. Singapore sits as one of the world’s leading chemical manufacturing sites, with over 100 global petroleum, petrochemical and specialty chemical companies situated on 12 square miles of land. Singapore today sits as the world’s fifth-largest refinery export hub and amongst the top 10 global chemical hubs by export volume. Involved in these systems includes advancements in manufacturing from robots, to predictive analytics and artificial intelligence. Singapore, like the US, is a key driver in testing, experimenting and trialing the latest technologies. In addition, manufacturing continues to contribute around 20% to Singapore’s GDP.

The importance of having the right technological foundations 

In order for production levels to thrive, it is crucial that technological foundations are cemented in supply chains across the globe. For example, in a warehouse, the speed and availability of the internet is crucial when the Internet of Things is being adopted on the factory floor. In addition, it is also greatly important for businesses and industries to have strong, connected cybersecurity systems to ensure digital security is maintained to a high standard. Having the technological foundations of this, like the US, allows the nation to drive forward technologies to increase production levels.

In addition, in order to ensure these new innovations are implemented effectively, it is crucial that employees have a good understanding of the technology they are interacting with on a daily basis, as the skills required of workers will evolve with the new advancements.

Combined, industries and countries will be able to adapt rapidly emerging technologies into their production lives, which will have a global impact on both businesses and consumers across the world.

maker

The Maker Movement can Flourish Thanks to Trade

The Maker Movement

Life is pretty cushy. We long ago stopped having to make everything we need: forging tools, handcrafting shoes from hides and weaving textiles for clothing. Manufacturers eventually specialized where they had comparative advantage and produced at scale. Specialization led to more trade in goods and services. Today, anything we need can be obtained at the push of a computer button from almost anywhere in the world.

While much attention is being paid to the potential for new technologies to displace manufacturing workers, there’s an interesting phenomenon afoot. Bits and bytes are bringing us back to our “maker” roots by making information and technologies more accessible to everyone. The smallest inventors and producers can integrate into globally distributed production chains and sell into global markets. Basically, trade is providing us the luxury of producing again at a small scale, and it’s the art of inventing nimbly and producing small that just might help us stay globally competitive.

Re-Making our Workforce

“Makerspaces,” TechShops and FabLabs are popping up in cities all over the country and they are playing an increasingly vital role in education, workforce development, entrepreneurship and even revolutionizing advanced manufacturing.

Memberships give hobbyists, tinkerers, students and entrepreneurs alike access to tools, machines and materials to gain experience with 3D printing, CAD/CAM, electronics, robotics, plastics and composites, fabrication, welding, coding and programming, woodworking and more. Students and young workers can be exposed to industrial careers in a relatively low-cost, low-risk environment, picking up skills in weeks — not months and years. They can create portfolios to demonstrate competency in the skills employers require.

By partnering with local colleges and employers, training in Makerspaces can culminate in recognized and portable credentials that prove mastery of a specific skill or set of equipment, enabling companies to develop talent pipelines with less direct investment. Meanwhile, students are not just gaining experience working with materials and machines. They are also putting math and measurement into practice, reading blueprints, and using design software — the knowledge skills associated with modern manufacturing and foundational competencies for a wide variety of jobs that lie in between traditional “blue collar” and executive levels.

TradeVistas- Maker movement graphic

Small Batch Production

“Making” can create new pathways to working at established manufacturing companies, but it is also spawning a resurgence of custom fabricators who are positioned for small-batch or on-demand manufacturing. The current trend of “niche consumerism” is responding to demand for tailored products in small lots, even by the big brands.

Makers can iterate quickly in response to consumer feedback or engage in rapid prototyping to optimize product design. Makers can offer these services to larger firms or they can leverage the resources of Makerspaces to keep costs down and retain control during product development, iteration and initial production of their own invention. The difficulty of communicating well with manufacturers or visiting facilities in China is a common refrain for small entrepreneurs.

Reverse Engineering

Makers and Makerspaces are attracting the attention of major corporations. GE and National Instruments were among the first to emulate Makerspaces to support open innovation on their corporate campuses. Ford Motor Company worked with a company called TechShop to build a world-class Makerspace for Detroit, becoming the facility’s anchor tenant. Affording their engineers the opportunity to cross-pollinate with other inventors and have a freer hand in direct and more rapid prototyping, Ford says that within one year, the company doubled the number of patents the company produced.

Large companies recognize that good ideas can come from anywhere, from hobbyists to amateur scientists and roboticists. Some Makerspaces cater more to small designers and inventors, but others are more like modern-day Edison workshops hosting sophisticated “experiments” employing biotechnology, nanotechnology and additive manufacturing. As such, they have become ecosystems of innovation where individuals, small businesses and large corporations can come together to incubate and accelerate ideas in a decentralized and agile network — emulating the same set of activities and interactions that were once only housed inside the corporation.

Manufacturing Renaissance?

Putting compact versions of industrial tools in the hands of millions more people means that inventors can get a “minimum viable product” out in the world faster and at much lower cost. Small and growing manufacturers can take smaller bets on the market with lower volume commitments or put a wider variety of products out for testing consumer preferences.

Specialty manufacturers that can re-tool quickly are filling an increasingly important role offering “manufacturing-as-a-service.” The Maker Movement encourages innovation through co-creation and crowdsourced designs, rapid prototyping and experimentation with new production processes. Maker facilities enable micro-factories that can service orders from anywhere in the world. Some notable inventions in Makerspaces have even transformed commerce itself. For example, millions of small businesses now use Square to take payments.

Join the Movement

Makers aren’t likely to replace mass production anytime soon, but they are an important source for training the next generation of inventors and manufacturing workers. Makerspaces are poised to drive real economic benefits for cities that embrace and support them. For example, the Brooklyn Navy Yard brings together makers, artisans, and manufacturers. The more than 10,000 people working within the complex generate some $390 million in economic output, supporting an estimated $2 billion in indirect earnings and an additional 15,500 jobs in 2011. According to the Pratt Center for Community Development, it’s a model producing similar results from across the country from Chicago to Minden, Nevada.

The famed Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has supported a TechShop in Pittsburgh and provides membership for thousands of veterans. With funding from the Department of Labor, the AFL-CIO and Carnegie Mellon University partnered with TechShop Pittsburgh to create apprenticeship programs for workers and to encourage startups to manufacture locally. As Brooking’s Mark Muro has written, the Maker Movement is “a deeply American source of decentralized creativity for rebuilding America’s thinning manufacturing ecosystems…hacking the new industrial revolution one town at a time.”

#Thankstrade

Makers are able to access the materials and tools they need because of trade. Take the 3D printer, for example. The global market for 3D printers, plastics and related services have exploded in recent years. And perhaps one could even be so bold as to say that it’s the expansion of global trade that affords us the opportunity to rediscover and reinvent the art of “making” itself, which could in turn profoundly impact what we make and what we trade.

_________________________________________________________

Andrea Durkin is the Editor-in-Chief of TradeVistas and Founder of Sparkplug, LLC. Ms. Durkin previously served as a U.S. Government trade negotiator and has proudly taught international trade policy and negotiations for the last fourteen years as an Adjunct Professor at Georgetown University’s Master of Science in Foreign Service program.

This article originally appeared on TradeVistas.org. Republished with permission.