New Articles

Belgium Strengthens Leadership in European Frozen Vegetable Exports

vegetables

Belgium Strengthens Leadership in European Frozen Vegetable Exports

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Frozen Vegetable – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Frozen vegetable exports in the EU fell by -6.5% y-o-y to $8.4B in 2020. Belgium, the largest European exporter of frozen vegetables, strengthened its position in terms of total exports despite reducing its supplies. The average frozen vegetable export price in the EU remained relatively unchanged from the previous year. 

Frozen Vegetable Exports in the EU

Frozen vegetable exports reduced to 8.6M tonnes in 2020, dropping by -7.3% compared with the previous year’s figure. In value terms, frozen vegetable exports contracted to $8.4B (IndexBox estimates), falling by -6.5% y-o-y in 2020.

In value terms, Belgium ($3.3B), the Netherlands ($1.9B) and Spain ($818M) constituted the countries with the highest levels of exports in 2020, together accounting for 72% of total exports. In 2020, Belgium (3.9M tonnes) represented the largest exporter of frozen vegetables, generating 45% of total exports. The Netherlands (1,896K tonnes) ranks second in terms of total exports with a 22% share, followed by Spain (8.5%), Poland (7%), France (6.8%) and Germany (5.1%).

Exports from Belgium decreased by -2.3% y-o-y in 2020. Spain (-1.7%), Germany (-6.1%), Poland (-9.5%), France (-11.4%) and the Netherlands (-15.4%) also illustrated the same downward trend.

The frozen vegetable export price in the EU stood at $974 per tonne in 2020, almost unchanged from the previous year. Average prices varied somewhat amongst the major exporting countries. In 2020, major exporting countries recorded the following prices: in France ($1,181 per tonne) and Germany ($1,127 per tonne), while Poland ($831 per tonne) and Belgium ($867 per tonne) were amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Spain, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox Platform

hardboard exports

Construction Boom Keeps Global Hardboard Exports Solid

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Hardboard – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Global hardboard exports increased by +1.1% y-o-y to 3.6M cubic meters last year. Germany heads the list of the largest hardboard exporters worldwide, supplying 45% of its export volume to the U.S., France and Poland. In 2020, Brazil, Thailand, Romania, Turkey, Spain, Belgium and Canada recorded the most prominent export growth. 

Hardboard Exports by Country

In 2020, the amount of hardboard exported worldwide grew by +1.1% to 3.6M cubic meters. In value terms, hardboard exports accounted for $2B (IndexBox estimates) last year.

Germany (959K cubic meters), distantly followed by France (426K cubic meters), Belgium (398K cubic meters), and Poland (394K cubic meters) were the largest exporters of hardboard, together comprising 60% of total exports. The following exporters – China (140K cubic meters), Brazil (138K cubic meters), Russia (108K cubic meters), Belarus (103K cubic meters), Canada (92K cubic meters), Thailand (74K cubic meters), Turkey (68K cubic meters), Spain (67K cubic meters) and Romania (64K cubic meters) – together made up 24% of total exports.

In 2020, Brazil, Thailand, Romania, Turkey, Spain, Belgium and Canada displayed the highest paces of growth. Last year, Brazil emerged as the fastest-growing exporter worldwide. Russia experienced a relatively flat trend pattern. By contrast, France, Poland, Belarus and China illustrated a downward trend over the same period.

In value terms, Germany ($815M) remains the largest hardboard supplier worldwide, comprising 40% of global exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Poland ($239M), with a 12% share of global exports. It was followed by France, with a 7% share.

In 2020, the average hardboard export price amounted to $561 per cubic meter, waning by -1.9% against the previous year. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Turkey, while the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Major Markets for Hardboard Supplied from Germany

The U.S. (224K cubic meters), France (114K cubic meters) and Poland (90K cubic meters) were the main destinations of hardboard exports from Germany, together accounting for 45% of total exports. In 2020, the highest increase in supplied volume was in the U.S., while shipments for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the U.S. ($191M) remains the key foreign market for hardboard exports from Germany, comprising 23% of total exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by France ($94M), with a 12% share of total exports. It was followed by Poland, with a 7.4% share.

Source: IndexBox Platform

fitness

Fitness Equipment Imports in the EU Grow Despite the Pandemic

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Gym and Fitness Equipment – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

A spike in the fitness equipment imports in the EU has been recorded during the pandemic year, driven by growing demand from retail consumers while fitness clubs’ activity was limited. In 2020, the import value rose by +9.6% y-o-y to $3.4B. Germany, France and the Netherlands remain the largest importers of gym and fitness equipment in the EU.

Gym and Fitness Equipment Imports in the EU

In 2020, the amount of gym and fitness equipment imported in the EU surged to 762K tonnes, picking up by 25% against the previous year’s figure. In value terms, gym and fitness equipment imports totaled $3.4B (IndexBox estimates), rising by +9.6% y-o-y in 2020. While the demand from fitness clubs was limited due to lockdowns, it was offset by soaring retail sales of equipment for home use.

The largest gym and fitness equipment importing markets in the EU were Germany ($659M), the Netherlands ($496M) and France ($467M), with a combined 47% share of total imports. These countries were followed by Spain, Poland, Italy, Sweden, Austria, Denmark, Finland, Belgium, the Czech Republic and Hungary, which together accounted for a further 44%.

In 2020, the gym and fitness equipment import price in the EU amounted to $4,493 per tonne, reducing by -12.2% against the previous year. There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major importing countries. In 2020, the country with the highest price was Austria ($8,510 per tonne), while the Czech Republic ($3,554 per tonne) was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Denmark, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox Platform

Frozen Crustaceans

Spain, France and Italy Comprise Over a Half of $4.6B European Frozen Crustacean Imports

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Frozen Crustaceans – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The pandemic-related restrictions insignificantly affected the EU trade of frozen crustaceans. In 2020, imports in the EU countries decreased by -6% y-o-y to $4.6B due to supply chain disruptions and limitations of the HoReCa segment. Spain, France and Italy remain the largest importers of frozen crustaceans in the EU, with a combined share of over 50% of the total value. Germany, Netherlands and France increased their imports in 2020, while most other importers experienced slight declines in supplies. 

Frozen Crustaceans Imports in the EU

In 2020, frozen crustaceans imports in the European Union reduced to 601K tonnes, which is down by -2.7% on the year before. In value terms, frozen crustaceans imports dropped to $4.6B in 2020 (IndexBox estimates).

The countries with the highest levels of frozen crustaceans imports in 2020 were Spain (163K tonnes), France (112K tonnes) and Italy (80K tonnes), together amounting to 59% of total import. The Netherlands (53K tonnes) ranks next in terms of total imports with an 8.8% share, followed by Denmark (8.8%) and Germany (6.8%). Belgium (25K tonnes) held a relatively small share of total imports.

In 2020, Germany (+10.7% y-o-y), Netherlands (+6.6% y-o-y) and France (+5.2% y-o-y) increased their imports, while in most other countries they experienced a negative dynamic.

Over the period from 2012 to 2020, the biggest increases were in the Netherlands, while purchases for the other leaders experienced a decline in the imports figures.

In value terms, Spain ($1.1B), France ($907M) and Italy ($578M) were the countries with the highest levels of imports in 2020, together accounting for 57% of total imports. The Netherlands, Germany, Denmark and Belgium lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 31%.

The frozen crustaceans import price in the European Union stood at $7,653 per tonne in 2020, falling by -2.6% against the previous year. Over the period from 2012 to 2020, it increased at an average annual rate of +1.0%.

There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major importing countries. In 2020, the country with the highest price was Germany ($9,845 per tonne), while Denmark ($5,919 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

Source: IndexBox Platform

chestnut

China Dominates the Global Chestnut Market While European Countries Increase Imports Gradually

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Chestnut – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

China remains an unrivaled leader in global chestnut consumption with a share of 81% of the total market. Chestnuts are widely used there in cooking, roasted with sugar, or for processing. The vast majority of chestnuts in China are produced domestically. Italy acts as the major importer of chestnuts worldwide, while Turkey, Portugal and France feature the highest pace of import growth. 

Consumption by Country

China (1.9M tonnes) remains the largest chestnut-consuming country worldwide, accounting for 81% of total volume. The majority of chestnuts in the country are sourced domestically – China also features as a top global chestnut producer. The volume of consumption in China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest consumer, Bolivia (89K tonnes), more than tenfold. The third position in this ranking was occupied by Turkey (61K tonnes), with a 2.7% share.

In China, chestnut consumption expanded at an average annual rate of +1.2% over the period from 2012-2020. In the other countries, the average annual rates were as follows: Bolivia (+5.2% per year) and Turkey (+1.9% per year).

In value terms, China ($4B) led the market, alone. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Bolivia ($259M). It was followed by Turkey.

Imports by Country

In 2020, the volume of chestnuts imported worldwide dropped to 93K tonnes, with a decrease of -13.9% against the previous year. In value terms, chestnut imports contracted to $250M (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

Italy was the largest importing country with an import of about 24K tonnes, which resulted at 26% of total imports. France (7.7K tonnes) occupied an 8.3% share (based on tonnes) of total imports, which put it in second place, followed by Switzerland (5.9%) and Thailand (5.1%). Taiwan (Chinese) (3.8K tonnes), China (3.5K tonnes), Germany (3.5K tonnes), Turkey (3.2K tonnes), Spain (3K tonnes), the U.S. (2.8K tonnes), South Korea (2.6K tonnes), Austria (2.4K tonnes) and Portugal (2.2K tonnes) held a minor share of total imports.

Imports into Italy increased at an average annual rate of +4.1% from 2012 to 2020. At the same time, Turkey (+44.8%), Portugal (+7.8%), France (+6.4%), Germany (+4.5%), South Korea (+3.3%), Spain (+2.6%) and Taiwan (Chinese) (+1.3%) displayed positive paces of growth.

In value terms, Italy ($64M) constitutes the largest market for imported chestnuts worldwide, comprising 26% of global imports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Germany ($18M), with a 7.1% share of global imports. It was followed by Switzerland, with a 6.3% share.

Source: IndexBox Platform

sweet potato

The European Sweet Potato Market Features Record Import Growth

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Sweet Potato – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Sweet potato imports in the Netherlands, Germany and Spain are gaining momentum. From 2018 to 2020, imports to Germany increased by 20% and reached 47.4K tonnes. Over the same period, supplies to Spain tripled from 3.8K to 15.3K tonnes, while imports to the Netherlands rose by 44% and peaked at 174K tonnes. In 2020, the Netherlands overcame the UK and emerged as the top sweet potato importer. 

Global Sweet Potato Imports

In 2020, approx. 755K tonnes of sweet potato were imported worldwide; picking up by 6.9% on 2019 figures. Over the period under review, imports saw a buoyant expansion. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2016 with an increase of 28% y-o-y (IndexBox estimates). Global imports peaked in 2020 and are expected to retain growth in the immediate term.

In value terms, sweet potato imports expanded significantly to $687M in 2020. In general, imports posted a prominent increase. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2014 with an increase of 26% year-to-year. Over the period under review, global imports hit record highs in 2020 and are expected to retain growth in the near future.

Sweet Potato Imports by Country

The Netherlands (174K tonnes) and the UK (159K tonnes) were the major importers of sweet potato in 2020, recording near 23% and 21% of total imports, respectively. Canada (76K tonnes) took a 10% share (based on tonnes) of total imports, which put it in second place, followed by France (7.1%), Germany (6.3%) and Belgium (5.7%). The following importers – Spain (15K tonnes), the U.S. (15K tonnes), Italy (15K tonnes), Malaysia (15K tonnes), Japan (13K tonnes) and Lao People’s Democratic Republic (12K tonnes) – each reached an 11% share of total imports.

In value terms, the largest sweet potato importing markets worldwide were the Netherlands ($152M), the UK ($119M) and Canada ($65M), together comprising 49% of global imports. These countries were followed by Germany, France, Belgium, Japan, the U.S., Spain, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia and Italy, which together accounted for a further 32%.

In 2020, the average sweet potato import price amounted to $909 per tonne, almost unchanged from the previous year. Over the period from 2012 to 2020, it increased at an average annual rate of +1.4%. There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major importing countries. In 2020, the country with the highest price was Germany ($1,337 per tonne), while Italy ($582 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

Source: IndexBox Platform

egg

Global Chicken Egg Market Is Soaring Despite the Pandemic

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Hen Eggs – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The global chicken egg market continues to expand and is forecast to reach 138M tonnes by 2030 thanks to an increase in demand, driven by population growth. During the pandemic, sales to the HoReCa sector crashed, however, this was offset by heightened demand from the retail market. With a 50% global market share, China remains the absolute leader in egg consumption. The diminishing use of preventative antibiotics within livestock emerges as a market trend. This potentially causes the safer form of medication, immunotherapy, to become an attractive sector for investments.

Key Trends and Insights

The size of the global chicken egg market continues to climb due to heightened demand from growing populations, particularly in Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Northern Africa. According to IndexBox, global production in 2020 surpassed 2019 levels by 2.7%, reaching 116M tonnes. Another factor strengthening consumption could be the use of eggs in the production of flu and COVID vaccines. These aspects are expected to continue impacting the demand in the midterm and heading into 2030, the global chicken egg market will reach 138M tonnes (IndexBox estimates).

In the global consumption of chicken eggs, China has a massive lead over all other countries. At 58.6M tonnes in 2020, Chinese consumption was almost 9 times higher than the US, which ranked second in production and consumption. China also is the first in the world for per capita consumption (40kg per year per person).

Demand for eggs in the HoReCa segment worldwide fell sharply during the pandemic. Producers quickly adapted to the changing conditions and diverted deliveries away from the foodservice industry and toward the retail sector to meet the rapidly growing demand from households. Another option is to offer pre-boiled and otherwise prepared eggs to those consumers who work remotely and thus cook and eat at home.

In the past few years, the use of antibiotics has been diminishing because of concerns that target bacteria will develop a resistance to them. The World Health Organization called on producers to cease using preventative medicines and strictly limit the use of specific antibiotics. Besides that, consumer behavior has changed with heightened attention to healthy eating habits, and in response, the use of antibiotics has been unwelcome. Immunotherapies are more and more often used in livestock and could potentially become a safer alternative to antibiotics. In the long-run, this trend could make immunotherapies an attractive sector for investment.

Bird infection outbreaks constitute the main hindrance for the market, as it leads to supply cuts and losses for producers. In the long-term, climate change and global warming will also negatively affect the market because warmer weather conditions decrease chickens’ egg production abilities and increase their susceptibility to disease.

Egg Production by Country

For the ninth consecutive year, the global market recorded growth in the production of chicken eggs, which increased by 2.7% to 116M tonnes in 2020. The total output volume increased at an average annual rate of +2.9% from 2012 to 2020. In value terms, chicken egg production stood at $291.4B in 2020 estimated in export prices.

The country with the largest volume of chicken egg production was China (59M tonnes), comprising approx. 51% of total volume. Moreover, chicken egg production in China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest producer, the U.S. (6.8M tonnes), ninefold. India (6.1M tonnes) ranked third in terms of total production with a 5.3% share.

In China, chicken egg production increased at an average annual rate of +2.4% over the period from 2012-2020. In the other countries, the average annual rates were as follows: the U.S. (+1.8% per year) and India (+5.8% per year).

Egg Exports by Country

In 2020, approx. 2M tonnes of chicken eggs were exported worldwide; approximately mirroring 2019 figures. In value terms, chicken egg exports shrank modestly to $3.5B in 2020.

In 2020, the Netherlands (409K tonnes), Turkey (281K tonnes), Poland (196K tonnes), the U.S. (145K tonnes), Germany (109K tonnes), Ukraine (107K tonnes), Spain (92K tonnes), Belgium (87K tonnes), China (75K tonnes) and Malaysia (74K tonnes) represented the major exporter of chicken eggs in the world, creating 78% of total export. The following exporters – Belarus (44K tonnes) and Russia (39K tonnes) – each amounted to a 4.1% share of total exports.

In value terms, the largest chicken egg supplying countries worldwide were the Netherlands ($734M), the U.S. ($427M) and Turkey ($298M), with a combined 42% share of global exports. These countries were followed by Poland, Germany, Belgium, Spain, Malaysia, China, Ukraine, Russia and Belarus, which together accounted for a further 36%.

The average chicken egg export price stood at $1,725 per tonne in 2020, stabilizing at the previous year’s level. Over the period under review, export price indicated a pronounced expansion from 2007 to 2020: its price increased at an average annual rate of +4.1% over the last thirteen-year period. Prices varied noticeably by the country of origin; the country with the highest price was the U.S. ($2,945 per tonne), while Belarus ($727 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

aircraft

US-EU Suspend Large Civil Aircraft Tariffs and Take Aim at China in Framework Addressing Non-Market Practices

The United States and European Union (“EU”) announced a “cooperative framework” to address and potentially resolve their long-running dispute over large civil aircraft subsidies, also commonly known as the BoeingAirbus or Large Civil Aircraft disputes. Originally initiated in 2004 when the U.S. filed a case at the World Trade Organization (“WTO”) against the EU alleging illegal subsidies to Airbus SE, the Large Civil Aircraft dispute is the longest running dispute at the WTO. As part of the new understanding, the U.S. and EU will suspend their respective WTO-authorized tariff countermeasures, which affected a total value of $11.5 billion in trade. The U.S.-EU’s announcement is a major step towards potentially resolving the 17-year transatlantic dispute over aircraft subsidies.

As previously reported, the initial duties occurred in October 2019 when the U.S. imposed 15 percent tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 on imports of civil aircraft and aircraft parts (under the HTSUS codes 8802.40.0013, 8802.40.0015, 8802.40.0017, 8802.40.0019, and 8802.40.0021). A rate of 25 percent was adopted by the U.S. for all other listed EU-origin imports, covering agricultural products, spirits, and luxury goods among other products. The EU retaliated in November 2020 with tariffs on approximately $4 billion worth of U.S. imports, with matching rates of 15 percent for civil aircraft and aircraft parts and 25 percent for all other U.S.-origin imports, covering agricultural products and industrial and finished goods.

As part of the Understanding on a cooperative framework for Large Civil Aircraft, the US and EU expressed their intention to:

-Establish a Working Group on Large Civil Aircraft led by each side’s respective Minister responsible for Trade, which will meet every 6 months or on request,

-Provide financing to large civil aircraft producers only on market terms,

-Provide R&D funding through an open and transparent process and make the results of fully government-funded R&D widely available, to the extent permitted by law,

-Not to provide R&D funding as well as specific support (such as specific tax breaks) to their own producers that would harm the other side,

-Collaborate on addressing non-market practices of third parties that may harm their respective large civil aircraft industries,

-Continue to suspend application of their countermeasures, for a period of 5 years, avoiding billions of euros in duties for importers on both sides of the Atlantic.

According to statements made by U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) Katherine Tai, the tariffs would remain suspended as long as the terms of the agreement are upheld and while they work on addressing issues including outstanding subsidies already paid.

The U.S.-EU cooperative framework also includes an “Annex on Cooperation on Non-Market Economies” to “more effectively address the challenge posed by non-market economies” in the civil aircraft sector. These cooperative steps include coordinating and exploring information-sharing regarding cybersecurity and other concerns, screening of inward and outward investments, and “joint analysis of non-market practices,” especially China’s, in the large civil aircraft sector. USTR Tai described the agreement as “a model we can build on for other challenges” related to “the threat from China’s non-market practices.”

_________________________________________________________________

Emily Lyons is an attorney in Husch Blackwell LLP’s Washington, D.C. office.

pesticide market

Environmental Issues Affect The Rapidly Developing Pesticide Market

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Pesticides – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The global pesticide market is expanding steadily, but the use of modern pesticides that are safe for vertebrates, are now harming pollinating insects. As areas under cultivation continue to increase worldwide, thereby enhancing the potential further use of pesticides, the market may yet encounter environmental constraints in the future. 

Key Trends and Insights

According to IndexBox estimates, the global pesticide market increased from 8.5M tonnes to 11.5M tonnes from 2008 to 2020 (with a CAGR of 2.6%). China appeared as the largest consumer of pesticides (2.3M tonnes), followed by the U.S. (1.3M tonnes) and India (911K tonnes).

Agricultural development and the expansion of areas under cultivation, against an increasing worldwide population and the heightened demand for food products will further boost the pesticide market, set to reach 14М tonnes by 2030.

According to the FAO estimates Brazil demonstrated the most prominent growth in pesticide consumption over the past 25 years (+770%) owing to the rapidly developing agriculture sector. In 2020, the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture approved 290 new substances, including fipronil and glyphosate, which are both banned in the European Union. In this regard, further expansion of the Brazilian pesticide market is expected in the coming years.

The USA is currently seeing a trend that indicates reduced amounts of pesticides used. Instead, more powerful chemicals like imidacloprid, which is one of the most widely applied pesticide treatments worldwide, are now being applied. In comparison with the organophosphate and carbamate-base pesticides that were used previously, contemporary alternatives are proving to be 95% less toxic to mammals and birds, but more harmful to insects. Presumably, this was one of the reasons for the declines in the population of bees in the United States over the 2018-2020 period. This mass decline in the bee population was also being observed in other countries, such as Brazil and Russia.

A declining bee population threatens to reduce the harvest yield of key crops worldwide (including berries, apples, cacao, sunflowers, rapeseed, coconuts, cotton, and oil palms). This potentially may lead to food shortages and become a hampering factor for increased use of pesticides.

The European Union maintains the most stringent control over pesticide use: here the use of pesticides that have proved toxic to insects (such as imidacloprid, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam) is restricted or banned. The toxicity issue will be a constraint in terms of the European pesticide market in the medium term; a moderate increase, therefore, in the consumption of these products in the EU is forecast.

Global Pesticide Production

In 2020, global pesticide production reached 11M tonnes, standing approx. at 2019. The total output volume increased at an average annual rate of +2.7% over the period from 2012 to 2020. In value terms, pesticide production amounted to $65.9B in 2020 estimated at export prices. The total output value increased at an average annual rate of +1.7% from 2012 to 2020; the trend pattern remained relatively stable, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations being observed in certain years.

China (3.8M tonnes) constituted the country with the largest volume of pesticide production, accounting for 34% of the total volume. Moreover, pesticide production in China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest producer, the U.S. (1.6M tonnes), twofold. India (1.2M tonnes) ranked third in terms of total production with a 10% share.

In China, pesticide production expanded at an average annual rate of +4.3% over the period from 2012-2020. The remaining producing countries recorded the following average annual rates of production growth: the U.S. (+1.3% per year) and India (+5.4% per year).

Global Pesticide Imports

In 2020, supplies from abroad of pesticides decreased by -2% to 5M tonnes, falling for the third consecutive year after two years of growth. The total import volume increased at an average annual rate of +2.9% from 2012 to 2020. In value terms, pesticide imports dropped to $28.8B in 2020. Overall, imports, however, continue to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern.

The purchases of the twelve major importers of pesticides, namely Brazil, Canada, Australia, France, the U.S., Nigeria, India, the UK, Italy, Spain, Germany and Indonesia, represented more than a third of total import. Belgium (105K tonnes) followed a long way behind the leaders.

In value terms, the largest pesticide importing markets worldwide were Brazil ($2.9B), France ($1.6B) and Canada ($1.4B), together accounting for 21% of global imports. The U.S., Spain, India, Italy, Germany, Australia, the UK, Belgium, Indonesia and Nigeria lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 26%.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

biodiesel

The Global Biodiesel Market Retains Robust Growth Despite the Pandemic and Low Oil Prices

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Biodiesel – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Neither the pandemic nor the low oil prices succeeded in slowing the growth of the global biodiesel market. As economies worldwide start to recover from the Covid crisis, and environmental concerns increase, the demand is set to remain robust in 2021. 

Key Trends and Insights

In 2020, the demand for biodiesel declined to 39.5M tonnes after five years of solid growth, largely a result of reduced transport activity during the pandemic. In 2021, global biodiesel consumption started to recover robustly. Despite the low prices for conventional types of fuel, the global energy market is striving to adhere to the Paris Agreement by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and making a shift towards using sustainable forms of energy, which is to promote the use of biofuels.

The European market became especially attractive for Asian exporters in the first half of 2021: local biofuel producers were forced to cut output against high prices in the EU for vegetable oils. The biofuel shortage in Europe could be offset by supplies of palm oil from Indonesia and Malaysia, but in 2019, the European Union intended to secure the gradual phasing out of palm oil as a viable fuel. This is spurred by the concern regarding tropical rainforests destroyed while expanding palm plantations, which depreciates any positive effect for the environment that could be achieved from the use of biofuel.

In 2021, American biofuel producers initiated a rapid rise in production but faced the risk of a shortage of raw materials. Assuming the demand for biodiesel to increase, the USA plans to see a fivefold increase in biofuel production capacity by 2024.

The global demand for fuels is set to increase along with the recovery of the global economy from the pandemic. Rising environmental concerns worldwide become a new powerful trend transforming the global energy market. Since biodiesel meets the green agenda, it should enjoy accelerated market growth in the medium term. It is forecast that the biodiesel market is set to develop at an average annual rate of +4.9% through to 2030, to approx. 63М tonnes.

Biodiesel Consumption by Country

The countries with the highest volumes of biodiesel consumption in 2020 were Indonesia (6.2M tonnes), the U.S. (5.6M tonnes) and Brazil (5.4M tonnes), together comprising 44% of global consumption.

In value terms, Brazil ($5.8B), Indonesia ($5B) and the U.S. ($4.7B) constituted the countries with the highest levels of market value in 2020, together accounting for 42% of the global market.

The countries with the highest levels of biodiesel per capita consumption in 2020 were the Netherlands (55 kg per person), France (40 kg per person) and Spain (34 kg per person).

Biodiesel Exports and Imports by Country

In 2020, overseas shipments of biodiesel decreased by -11.8% to 16M tonnes for the first time since 2015, thus ending a four-year rising trend. In value terms, biodiesel exports fell to $15.9B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

In 2020, the Netherlands (4.7M tonnes), distantly followed by Germany (2.3M tonnes), Belgium (1.6M tonnes), Spain (1.5M tonnes) and Argentina (0.8M tonnes) were the key exporters of biodiesel, together comprising 66% of total exports. The following exporters – China (665K tonnes), Malaysia (564K tonnes), Bulgaria (494K tonnes), the U.S. (476K tonnes), Canada (397K tonnes), France (397K tonnes), Poland (365K tonnes) and Italy (265K tonnes) – together made up 22% of total exports.

Among the main exporting countries, China (+51.3% per year) saw the highest growth rate of the value of exports, over the period under review, while shipments for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In 2020, after five years of growth, there was a significant decline in supplies from abroad of biodiesel, when their volume decreased by -7.4% to 16M tonnes. In value terms, biodiesel imports contracted modestly to $15.9B in 2020.

In 2020, the Netherlands (3.9M tonnes), distantly followed by Belgium (1.8M tonnes), Germany (1.5M tonnes), Spain (1.2M tonnes), the UK (1.1M tonnes), France (1.1M tonnes), Italy (1.1M tonnes) and China (0.8M tonnes) were the key importers of biodiesel, together making up 77% of total imports. The U.S. (674K tonnes), Canada (518K tonnes), Poland (319K tonnes) and Bulgaria (276K tonnes) took a little share of total imports.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform