New Articles

Supporting Women at Sea – The Critical Role of the Updated Maritime Labour Convention in Modern Maritime Workplaces

global trade maritime

Supporting Women at Sea – The Critical Role of the Updated Maritime Labour Convention in Modern Maritime Workplaces

As the maritime industry faces rising pressures – from workforce shortages to evolving safety expectations and the drive for long‑term sustainability – diversity has become an essential pillar of progress. This is especially true in the ongoing effort to support more women entering and advancing in seafaring careers. With the release of the Guidelines on the Application of the ILO Maritime Labour Convention (Fifth Edition), the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) is shining a renewed spotlight on the lived realities of women at sea and the practical measures shipowners can take to foster safer, more inclusive workplaces.

Read also: Trailblazers of the Supply Chain: Honoring Women Who Transform Logistics

Findings from the IMO–WISTA Women in Maritime Survey 2024 show modest progress ashore, with women now accounting for around 19 per cent of employment across surveyed maritime organisations within IMO Member States. However, this improvement contrasts sharply with conditions at sea. According to the BIMCO/ICS Seafarer Workforce Report 2021, women represent just over one per cent of the global active seafarer workforce, while separate maritime education and training data cited by the IMO and WISTA suggests that only around five per cent of seafaring students are female. For Sarah Lovell, Technical Content Development Manager at ICS and a former seafarer, these figures highlight why diversity must remain central to the maritime agenda: “A diverse workforce is essential if the maritime industry is to keep improving and remain competitive. Diversity enables us to adapt, innovate, and progress in step with other sectors.”

Lovell’s perspective is rooted in her early career, when women were scarce within training cohorts and almost absent from senior roles. A defining influence came when she sailed with one of the UK’s first female Captains, an experience that offered guidance and set an enduring example. Today, she sees encouraging signs: more female cadets, more women progressing into officer ranks, and a growing online presence that highlights women’s achievements at sea. That visibility, she believes, plays a powerful role in reassuring and inspiring those considering a seafaring career. Alongside this, the emergence of support networks – largely absent when she began her training – has created spaces where women can share experiences, build confidence, and strengthen resilience.

Despite this progress, daily challenges remain, often rooted in the practical realities of working and living on board. One major area addressed in ICS’s new guide is menstrual hygiene provision. Lovell highlights situations many women face but seldom articulate: being caught without sanitary products while on watch, relying on shared bathrooms that lack sanitary disposal facilities, or feeling reluctant to request a brief break during a night watch to access essential items that might not be to hand.

Some companies have already adopted proactive approaches, such as discreetly placing sanitary products in bridge or engine control room first-aid boxes, or installing sanitary bins in shared washrooms. However, Lovell stresses that such provisions should become standard practice across the industry. “Companies providing sanitary bins in female seafarers’ cabins and shared bathrooms is not a luxury. It is something that is much needed if we want to retain and recruit female seafarers.”

As with every new edition, the ICS guide highlights updates to the Maritime Labour Convention, reflecting the MLC’s core purpose of safeguarding dignity, comfort and operational safety on board. Within this context, the latest guidance includes revised provisions on shipboard sanitary supplies. Lovell recalls cadets asking practical questions about how many sanitary products to pack, where to store them, or how to manage unexpected situations while on watch. Addressing these concerns through appropriate shipboard provisioning removes a significant source of stress, particularly for those new to the industry, and reduces reliance on shore leave to access essential supplies. Ensuring menstrual products are available in ship’s stores is a relatively minor operational measure, but one that can deliver meaningful improvements in wellbeing and retention.

Beyond these practical considerations, Lovell emphasises broader cultural and safety issues that continue to shape women’s experiences at sea. Many feel a pressure to outperform male colleagues to validate their competence. Safety concerns, including the risk of violence, harassment or sexual assault, also influence decisions about remaining in the profession. Strengthened requirements within the updated Maritime Labour Convention, reflected clearly in the Guidelines on the Application of the ILO Maritime Labour Convention (Fifth Edition), set out clear expectations for shipowners to implement anti‑harassment and anti‑bullying policies, alongside robust victim safeguarding procedures. For Lovell, this represents a critical milestone. ICS and the ITF have long advocated for these measures through their joint free Guidance on Eliminating Shipboard Harassment and Bullying, and seeing its principles reflected within the formal MLC framework marks a significant step forward.

These updates build on previous improvements. The 2022 MLC amendments introduced the requirement for properly fitting PPE, including clothing and footwear designed specifically for women. Lovell recalls the safety risks associated with ill‑fitting gear and the improvisation often used by female seafarers when smaller sizes were unavailable. Recognising and addressing these needs signalled an important cultural shift, one that the MLC continues to reinforce. Together, these developments demonstrate that diversity is not an optional add‑on but a core component of a modern, professional maritime workforce.

However, long‑term retention will depend on more than regulatory updates. Lovell points to the importance of flexible working arrangements, supportive maternity and parental leave policies, and career pathways that allow women (like men) to combine family life with senior roles at sea. She notes encouraging examples where companies have introduced phased return‑to‑sea options following maternity leave and strengthened inclusive recruitment practices guided by the Diversity and Inclusion Toolkit for Shipping. Meanwhile, improved digital connectivity reduces the isolation that has historically driven some seafarers away from long‑term maritime careers.

Today, the business case for diversity is widely recognised. A broader talent pool supports sustainable workforce pipelines, enhances decision‑making on board and contributes to safer operations. Increasingly, shipowners acknowledge that diverse crews offer not only social value but commercial benefits, especially amid global officer shortages.

Looking ahead, Lovell’s vision of an inclusive shipboard environment is simple: one where women feel safe, respected and equipped to perform their roles without being treated as exceptions.

When asked what final message she would like to share, her response is unambiguous: provision for women at sea must be strengthened, implemented and enforced. “These aren’t optional extras,” she says. “This is how we attract and retain the diverse workforce our industry needs for the future.”

global trade

Iran Seizes Two Ships in Strait of Hormuz, Escalating Maritime Standoff with US

On Wednesday, Iran opened fire on three vessels navigating the Strait of Hormuz and commandeered two of them, escalating its campaign in this crucial maritime corridor. These actions occurred less than 24 hours after US President Donald Trump renewed a delicate ceasefire while keeping a US naval blockade of Iranian ports in effect.

Read also: US-Israel-Iran Conflict Reshapes African Economy in 2026

The ongoing standoff between Washington and Tehran has effectively halted nearly all cargo movement through the strait, which in peacetime carries 20% of the world’s traded oil, and there appears to be no resolution in sight. According to Iranian state outlets, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) was escorting the two captured ships to Iran, representing a notable intensification.

Iranian media identified the seized vessels as the MSC Francesca and the Epaminondas. The US had previously taken control of two Iranian ships just as ceasefire discussions were scheduled in Pakistan, leading Tehran to withdraw from the second round of those high-stakes talks. Technomar, the firm managing the Liberian-flagged Epaminondas, reported that the vessel was approached and fired upon by a manned gunboat off Oman’s coast, sustaining damage to its bridge.

Several hours later, a second cargo vessel was targeted by gunfire; no damage was reported, but the ship was subsequently halted on the water. No crew members on either ship were hurt. Panama denounced what it termed an unlawful seizure of a vessel flying its flag, describing the incident as a grave assault on maritime safety. Iranian media also reported that the IRGC struck a third ship, the Euphoria, which ended up stranded along Iran’s coastline, though no further details were provided.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated that the seizures did not breach the ceasefire terms because the ships were neither American nor Israeli. Since the US and Israel initiated hostilities on 28 February with an unexpected assault on Iran, more than 30 maritime attacks have occurred in the Middle East. Prior to that date, the strait was completely open to all shipping.

The conflict has driven fuel prices sharply higher well beyond the immediate region and increased costs for food and numerous other goods. Brent crude, the global benchmark, surged past $100 per barrel, roughly 40% above pre-war levels, though stock markets have largely shrugged off the increase. European Union Energy Commissioner Dan Jorgensen cautioned about enduring consequences for consumers and businesses, comparing the situation to major energy disruptions of the past half-century. He noted that the turmoil is costing Europe approximately EUR500 million daily.

Iran’s capacity to impede traffic through the strait, which connects the Persian Gulf to the open sea, has become a significant strategic asset. Although the ceasefire has halted American and Israeli airstrikes on Iran and ended Tehran’s missile launches against Israel and the broader region, the maritime confrontation persists and may worsen. Without a diplomatic accord, these attacks are likely to discourage ships from attempting to transit the waterway, further constricting global energy supplies.

Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, Iran’s parliamentary speaker and lead negotiator who met with US Vice President JD Vance in Pakistan earlier this month, argued that a full ceasefire is only meaningful if Washington does not violate it by blockading Iranian ports. He posted on X that reopening the Strait of Hormuz is unattainable given such a clear breach of the truce. Iranian authorities have demanded the complete removal of the US Navy’s blockade for talks to resume, but Trump reiterated on Wednesday that the blockade will stay until Iran ends its restrictions on maritime movement through the vital waterway.

The US president continues to assert wartime successes. Late Wednesday, Trump claimed that Iran had heeded his request and halted the planned executions of eight Iranian women arrested for participating in anti-government protests in January. Tehran dismissed the matter as a fabrication and a desperate effort to save face, insisting the women were never slated for execution. Iran’s judiciary news agency, Mizan, stated on Wednesday that Trump’s lack of battlefield gains has driven him to invent achievements from false reports.

In southern Lebanon, three separate Israeli strikes killed at least six people and wounded several others, according to local officials, even though both nations had agreed to a 10-day ceasefire. Israel denied involvement in one of the strikes and did not immediately address the others. These attacks occurred as Israeli and Lebanese ambassadors prepared for another meeting in Washington on Thursday to prolong the fragile truce that began last week, which had created an opportunity for Iran and the US to move toward ending the broader conflict.

Lebanon’s health ministry reported that two Israeli strikes on the village of al-Tiri killed three people, including a newspaper correspondent, and injured another journalist. The ministry added in a statement that Israeli forces fired at an ambulance, preventing emergency responders from reaching the victims. Israel claimed that individuals in al-Tiri had violated the ceasefire and endangered its troops, and denied blocking rescue teams or targeting journalists. The ministry also said a separate Israeli strike on the village of Yohmor killed two people and wounded two others. According to the latest government figures, Israeli attacks across Lebanon have killed nearly 2,300 people and displaced over 1.2 million.

Source: IndexBox Market Intelligence Platform  

surcharges chatcgp trucking DHL AI dollar fedex iran LTL imo hormuz blockade fedex maersk court maritime strait dollar trade AI fedex port trade maritime shippers rail chassis china lease tariff supply chainreactor cargo maersk global trade MySavant.ai container supply chain container CMA CGM shipping rates port india crude u.s import shipping freight cargo maersk fedex carrier strait of hormuz oil strait grant houthi market logistics food imo images shipping freight

US to Begin Maritime Blockade of Iranian Ports in Gulf Region

According to Bloomberg, US Central Command has stated that American forces will start blockading all maritime traffic moving in and out of Iranian ports. The action follows an announcement by the current President of the United States, which came after discussions between the US and Iran concluded without a deal.

Read also: Maritime Workforce Crisis: Outdated Systems Threaten Operations in 2026

The military command indicated the blockade will be applied without bias to ships from any country that are accessing or leaving Iranian ports and coastal regions. This includes all Iranian facilities situated on the Arabian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. However, US forces will not interfere with the right of passage for vessels traveling through the Strait of Hormuz to ports not affiliated with Iran.

Source: IndexBox Market Intelligence Platform 

global trade maritime TIA

MARAD Seeks Proposals for First U.S. Center for Maritime Innovation

The Maritime Administration (MARAD) has announced a request for proposals (RFP) to establish the United States Center for Maritime Innovation. This initiative, part of MARAD’s Maritime Environmental and Technical Assistance (META) program, aims to foster research, development, and deployment of new marine technologies to address the environmental challenges faced by the maritime transportation system.

Read also: MARAD Announces $4.8 Million Funding Opportunity for U.S. Marine Highway Program

MARAD is inviting organizations to submit proposals to establish and operate the center, which will function as a virtual hub for innovation. The chosen organization will also serve as the center’s secretariat. Funding for the center is available through a competitive cooperative agreement under the META program, which focuses on advancing maritime environmental sustainability and technical advancements.

Applications for this RFP must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. EST on July 17, 2024. For additional information click here.

israel

Israel-Palestine Conflict Set to Create Challenges in Maritime Industry while Trade Continues with Caution

The Israel-Palestine conflict, marked by recent violence between Israel and Hamas, has sent ripples through the shipping and maritime industry, leading international companies to issue cautionary advisories and adapt their operations in the region.

“In light of recent developments in the Middle East, including the outbreak of war in Israel and its vulnerability to missile attacks and the incursion of opposing militias, the security of transporting goods through the port of Haifa has become uncertain. The transit of containers, especially hazardous materials, and the arrival of commercial vessels greatly emphasize the importance of security on this route. Such insecurity or potential terrorist attacks could lead to a shift in the transportation of goods,” said Hossein Norouz Fashkhami, a senior marketing expert from Middle East.

Shipping industry’s resilience amidst Israel-Palestine conflicts

Maersk, a major player in the industry, reassured stakeholders by announcing that its port operations across Israel’s key terminals are functioning without disruption. MSC echoed this sentiment, asserting that Israel’s major terminals are operational, enabling them to facilitate cargo delivery.

However, the maritime industry is aware of the security situation, and companies such as MSC remain vigilant, pledging to monitor the situation closely and heed government guidance. This underscores the industry’s adaptability and resilience in the face of geopolitical tensions.

The specific impact on individual ports tells a compelling story:

  • Port of Ashdod: This port, situated a mere 50 kilometers from the Gaza border, operates in an ’emergency mode’ only, subject to potential missile attacks. Furthermore, restrictions on vessels carrying Hazardous Materials (“HAZMAT”) remain in effect.
  • Port of Haifa: In contrast, the port of Haifa, encompassing the Haifa Bay port and Israel shipyard, continues with business as usual, undeterred by the conflict.
  • Port of Ashkelon: Located just 15 kilometers from the Gaza border, the Port of Ashkelon is severely impacted, rendering it incapable of normal operations due to missile threats. Vessels can only discharge cargo while moored at sea buoys, highlighting the risk and necessity for adaptive measures.
  • Port of Hadera: The port of Hadera, in comparison, carries on without disruption, maintaining its regular functions.
  • Port of Eilat: The port of Eilat similarly remains operational, showcasing the industry’s commitment to ensuring the flow of maritime trade.

Beyond the ports, several global companies with a presence in Israel have been forced to adjust their operations. Chevron, the second-largest U.S. oil and gas producer, was directed by Israel’s energy ministry to shut down the Tamar natural gas field off the country’s northern coast. Adani Ports, operator of the Haifa Port, assured stakeholders of operational readiness while closely monitoring the situation and having a business continuity plan in place.

The Israel-Palestine conflict serves as a testament to the shipping and maritime industry’s ability to adapt, demonstrating that despite challenges and disruptions, trade and operations can persist, albeit with the necessary caution and vigilance.

Global trade relationships hang in the balance, with disruptions, diplomacy, and dollars at stake

Israel’s trade with China is characterized by a notable trade imbalance, with China being a major importer of Israeli goods. While Israel’s exports to China are substantial at $4.68 billion, the conflict may disrupt trade flows, particularly concerning Israel’s high-tech exports. The disruption could affect Israel’s exports and potentially hinder access to China’s vast market.

The United States is a critical trade partner for Israel, with a strong focus on exports. Israel exports goods worth $18.67 billion to the U.S., including high-tech products and defense-related items. The conflict may strain diplomatic relations between the two countries, potentially impacting Israeli exports to the U.S.

Germany is a key European trade partner for Israel. The conflict might impact Israel’s exports to Germany, valued at $1.88 billion. As Israel navigates regional instability, German imports from Israel could be affected.

India is another crucial trading partner for Israel, with $3.94 billion in Israeli exports. The conflict could have an impact on bilateral trade, potentially leading to disruptions in Israel’s exports to India.

Uncertainties surrounding ambitious trade initiatives

“The Israel-Palestinian conflict serves as a reminder of the uncertainties facing ambitious trade projects like the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), positioned as a Western counterpart to China’s Belt and Road” said Christian Roeloffs, cofounder and CEO, Container xChange. 

IMEC, involving railways, ports, and green energy, aligns with the G7’s plans to mobilize $600 billion by 2027 for global infrastructure investments. India’s trade with Saudi Arabia has doubled in two years, reaching $53 billion in 2023, but the corridor’s true potential lies in strengthening Indian-European trade ties.

To fully realize IMEC, a reliable link between Saudi Arabia and Israel is essential. However, the ongoing regional complexities make it riskier for Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to normalize diplomatic relations with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

In the near term, the Suez Canal remains the primary route for goods from India to Europe. This conflict underscores the enduring complexities of reshaping global trade and financial routes, highlighting the unpredictable nature of such endeavors.

Geopolitical conflicts and global health crises, unfortunate as they are, often lead to unintended consequences, boosting profits in specific sectors. Wars tend to inflate returns for defense contractors, while the pandemic brought substantial gains for select pharmaceutical companies. The maritime industry is not immune to these dynamics, with shipowners reaping unexpected benefits from both types of crises.

Christian Roeloffs added – “In the case of the conflict in Israel, any expansion of the hostilities beyond the country’s borders could introduce risks to two vital shipping choke points. The Suez Canal, a critical waterway for various commercial vessels, including container ships, may face disruptions. Similarly, the Strait of Hormuz, a backbone for oil and gas shipping, could be affected. However, the extent of these effects will largely depend on the conflict’s expansion and duration.”

It’s worth noting that Israel itself represents a relatively small market for container shipping, with its primary ports of Ashdod and Haifa accounting for just 0.4% of global throughput. Consequently, the threat of disruptions to container trade flow through the Mediterranean region remains limited.

Additional Information

India-Israel exports, costs, and risk management amid conflict

Key Indian exports to Israel include diesel, cut and unpolished diamonds, electronics, and telecom components like integrated circuits and photovoltaic cells. Conversely, India’s imports from Israel consist mainly of rough diamonds, fertilizers, and herbicides. This evolving trade relationship extends beyond traditional sectors, encompassing electronic machinery, high-tech products, communication systems, and medical equipment.

Higher costs for Indian exporters: The Israel-Hamas conflict has raised concerns about increased costs for Indian exporters, such as higher insurance premiums and elevated shipping expenses. These expenses stem from the heightened risk associated with shipping goods to regions experiencing geopolitical unrest.

Limited impact on trade volumes but financial strain on exporters: While the conflict may result in higher expenses for Indian exporters, the impact on trade volumes is expected to be limited unless the war escalates significantly. The primary concern is the financial burden on exporters, which may reduce their profit margins.

Risk Premiums from ECGC to Safeguard Indian Businesses: To protect Indian businesses from potential losses due to geopolitical uncertainties, India’s Export Credit Guarantee Corporation (ECGC) may introduce higher risk premiums for firms exporting to Israel. This is a standard risk management practice in regions facing increased instability.

While the Israel-Hamas conflict has the potential to increase shipping costs and insurance premiums for Indian exporters, it is essential to emphasize that the impact on trade volumes remains relatively limited at this stage. The bilateral trade relationship between India and Israel has diversified in recent years, encompassing various sectors beyond diamonds and petroleum products.

blue maritme battery Entrepreneurs are shaking up industry that carries ocean shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

Balancing Ambitious IMO Targets with Available Solutions 

Examining responsibility shift, cost-effective alternatives, and innovative battery tech in shipping 

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has significantly changed its emissions reduction targets, shifting towards a more ambitious goal of achieving net-zero emissions as close to 2050 as possible. By 2030, member nations have committed to sourcing 5% to 10% of the energy used to power ships from zero to near-zero emission fuels and technologies. These changes vary based on each country’s development classification and economic impact of the maritime sector. 

While these revised targets demonstrate a stronger commitment to emissions reduction, they also raise concerns about the availability and feasibility of alternative fuels. And as the responsibility for decarbonization shifts to member participants and shipowners, there is a growing realization that there are few cost-effective tools and practical solutions for reducing emissions in the shipping industry. To gain momentum in reducing shipping-sector emissions, a collaborative, multi-faceted approach is needed to prioritize research and development of low-cost and accessible technologies. 

Reassigning the Burden 

The shift of responsibility from the IMO to individual nations and shipowners has raised concerns regarding the effectiveness of global rules in achieving emissions reduction targets. While differentiated responsibilities based on development and the economic importance of shipping may provide flexibility, critics argue that this moves away from a stringent global rule and poses challenges to keeping global warming below the critical threshold of 1.5 degrees Celsius. It calls into question the level of commitment and consistency among associated participants in implementing robust measures to decarbonize their shipping sectors. 

Improving hydrodynamics, enacting energy efficiency measures, and lowering cruising speeds can reduce fuel consumption, but cost-effective alternative fuels are essential to making real progress. The options currently under consideration, such as ammonia, methanol, and hydrogen, still face challenges regarding availability, safe implementation, and carbon-neutral production. These alternatives also require significant production capacity before they can be widely adopted as viable solutions for carbon reduction. Liquid natural gas has been proposed as an interim solution, but that still leaves the industry reliant on fossil fuels and requires shipowners to install emission scrubbing systems. 

Inexpensive Tools for Decarbonization 

One potential avenue for partial emissions reduction is battery storage, which offers a range of benefits. Battery systems can be used for peak shaving at sea, kicking in when more power is needed than can be provided by one engine, but less than generated by two. Battery power can be used for low-speed arrival and departure, reducing the need for ships to switch fuels when approaching port. And batteries can also be used for hotel loads, eliminating the need for diesel generators. 

But what batteries are suitable? Lithium-ion batteries, despite their widespread use, have certain drawbacks related to cost, flammability, and toxicity. Recent high-profile battery fires on ro-ros and cargo ships are making shipowners and insurers reassess the risks posed by these batteries, highlighting the need for alternative technologies that offer improved safety, environmental sustainability, and performance. Safer options such as flow batteries are too bulky for use on ships, taking away from available cargo space. Fortunately, startups and researchers are working on options that combine safety with high energy densities, and with investment, commercializing these alternatives will allow the shipping industry to accelerate its transition toward net-zero emissions while mitigating the concerns associated with lithium-ion. 

Striking the Balance 

There’s an axiom that goes “don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good,” meaning it’s better to do something useful now rather than wait for a perfect solution that may never arrive. With that in mind, the shipping industry should look to strike a balance between its 2050 aspirations and the availability of realistic solutions. While the urgency to combat climate change necessitates bold goals, waiting until a perfect solution is available could put decarbonization efforts further behind schedule. Implementing smaller, incremental changes as they become available will help reduce emissions sooner than later. 

 The shipping industry must allocate resources to support the simultaneous exploration of alternative fuels, advanced propulsion systems, and battery energy storage solutions to bridge the gap between 2023 and 2050. By investing in research and development, the industry can unlock new possibilities and pave the way for innovative technologies that can revolutionize the sector’s decarbonization efforts. These investments will contribute to meeting ambitious targets and foster economic growth and competitiveness in the evolving clean energy landscape. 

Mukesh Chatter is the CEO of Alsym Energy, a technology company developing a low-cost, high-performance rechargeable battery chemistry that is free of lithium and cobalt. 

 

ship

The Future of Ship Systems to be Smarter with Ship Bridge Simulators

The maritime industry is not new to the simulation technique and has, in reality, been using this technique in automation as well as numerous other applications. The rising implementation of advanced technologies & automation in the maritime sector has surged the need for ship bridge simulators. The Asia-pacific region has rising passenger traffic and massive import & export businesses; as a result, the region is likely to be in major need of marine systems equipped with ship bridge simulators.

The maritime sector is transiting toward autonomy by enabling assistance in navigation and decision support systems using simulations. At some point in time, if two autonomous vessels crafted by different producers come across each other, how will these vessels communicate? How intricate will the navigation be? Will the ships discuss intricate navigational maneuvers? Will the two autonomous systems be able to communicate in a proper way? Simulation or formulating mathematical models to impersonator trustworthy real-world effects can offer numerous solutions to these questions.

The marine industry is not new to the simulation technique and has, in reality, been using this technique in automation as well as numerous other applications. For example, simulation is used for coaching squads for new vessels before these vessels delivered for crane management and towing in seaports to check loopholes in ship systems and other purposes. For years, simulators are extensively used in training and certification mainly in the Maritime Education and Training (MET). They are used in numerous areas of the marine sector including cargo handling, crane operations, system control, offshore operation training on ships, bridge operations, and towing & anchor handling. Such a wide range of applications of simulators has propelled their demand in recent years. A report by Research Dive reveals that the global ship bridge simulator market growth is expected to skyrocket and the market is anticipated to garner significant revenue in the upcoming years.

Alexander Ozersky, the Deputy Director-Intellectual Systems at Wärtsilä Voyage Solutions, believes that simulation is a technique that permits to do mistakes without triggering any severe outcomes in the real world. A vessel can need nearly ten years to develop or redesign its system. However, by making use of simulation techniques one is able to do it more quickly, more safely, and at a reasonable price. This is why a simulation-based method was used to attest to the functionality of COLREGS (Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea) in Wärtsilä Navi-Harbour vessel traffic management system with ClassNK, a global leader in ship classification.

Panorama of the Ship Bridge Simulator Market:

There is a tremendous need for skilled ship operators or watch captains on a vessel for directing navigation, map plotting, weather monitoring, fire management, observation, search, and operation rehearsals. Also, there has been significant development in war systems and technologies; for example, electronic as well as network-centric wars use ship bridge simulators for testing systems. In addition, the rising implementation of advanced technologies & automation in the marine sector has surged the need for ship bridge simulators. Moreover, strict rules issued by maritime lawmakers for proficient coaching of electronic war workforces have propelled the demand for ship bridge simulators in recent years. All these factors portray that the global ship bridge simulator market is accelerating at a rapid pace and is expected to reach significant heights in the coming years.

In the past few years, ship makers have observed that the virtual reality simulation is considerably more proficient than conventional marine simulator training. In virtual simulation devices, a helmet is used that shows a video and is assimilated with sound effects and simulation sensor systems. With these sensors, the virtual simulation helmet can detect activities of the user’s extremities. The incorporation of such advanced technologies is opening doors to lavishing opportunities for market growth.

The Asia-pacific region has rising passenger traffic and massive import & export businesses. As a result, the region is likely to be in major need of marine systems and hence, be a major revenue contributor for the market growth. On the other hand, the North American region is projected to stand at a second position in terms of growth in the ship bridge simulator market. This is majorly owing to the stringent regulations issued by the governments in the region for upholding standard security. The LAMEA region is foreseen to witness continuous growth due to the evolving marine trades in these regions.

The Lookout of the Market during the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has struck the maritime industry with various unprecedented challenges that hampered its supply chain and compelled quicker implementation of digital technologies in numerous areas of maritime operations, including the area of MET. As the virus was capable to multiply at a rapid pace with person-to-person interaction, several processes that need the physical presence of working personnel have been either postponed or limited for averting human mobility, as a protection measures against the COVID-19 virus. The termination of physical training programs, lockdown, and travel restrictions have triggered several difficulties for seafarers to obtain or uphold their certificates of proficiency. As the MET industry is also experiencing various challenges in ensuring the endurance of the MET activities, and in coping and adapting to the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic, the ship bridge simulator market growth is expected to decline to a certain extent until the pandemic relaxes.

______________________________________________________________________

Aishwarya Korgaonkar holds a bachelor’s degree in Information Technology from the esteemed Mumbai University. Being creative and artistic, she leaped into the field of digital marketing and content writing. Her love for words makes her write creative and spellbinding content that adds colors to the world.

canal

The Suez Canal Crisis: Some Lasting Ripples Aren’t Making Headlines

It came down to physics: a sandstorm, shipping containers stacked too high (believe it or not, they acted like a sail), and a ship too big to spin around.

At the time of this article’s publication, it’s still unclear whether human error by the Ever Given’s captain is also partially responsible for the global shipping crisis caused by the 20,000 TEU container ship’s weeklong “vacation” in the Suez Canal.

Also at the time of publication, the crisis — which ended more than two weeks ago — continues to result in global shipping delays averaging five to six weeks.

I see two main areas where the ripples of the disaster will continue the strongest:

Increased pricing, decreased supply: The carriers are taking advantage of the situation and North American shippers are suffering as their equipment is being sent out empty to regions where the carrier can take a financial position and move those containers at greater profits.

In 2019, shipping industry profits came in at about a dismal -$12 billion. In 2020, they managed to flip it to +$14 billion — that’s not a trend they’re going to let go of easily.

Compounding obstacles: Shippers were stretched even before the Ever Given headed down the canal that fateful day, so adding capacity isn’t a viable solution. The previous problems hampering shippers are now exacerbated.

-The global shortage of shipping containers continues to cause a ripple effect of its own.

-Travel restrictions stemming from the pandemic continue to result in reduced air cargo opportunities.

-The above factors and more continue to overwhelm trucking companies, who face employee shortages and rising expenses.

North American recovery is also hampered by a lack of awareness on the global stage. Many companies headquartered abroad don’t understand the hurdles American vendors continue to face — for example, the price gouging. The United States is one of the only countries where the  government doesn’t oversee or own lines of transportation — in most others, it controls or owns at least cargo shipping and airlines — so vendors and logistics companies are dealing with rate hikes. On the other hand, those countries are also at risk of delays caused due to slow-acting governments entrenched in bureaucracy.

CTOs should be concentrating on finding other viable ways for customers to move freight. Plan for a delay of 5-7 weeks compared to your usual shipping estimates, for the foreseeable future. Air freight — despite the delays caused by the pandemic-crippled air travel industry — is probably your best bet for now. You might have to get your CPO and/or client to make some tough decisions based on how eager they are to get their product to market.

Your next priorities are forecasting and having your product line in order. Take note from restaurants and doctor’s offices and build healthy amounts of downtime and lead time into your shipments. At this point in the recovery stage, a strong enough hiccup can still cause a significant backtrack to the progress.

Even though everything is “fixed,” we’re not going back to normal in the near future. In our industry, the pendulum normally has a five-year swing for the upper hand between shippers and vendors. When it comes back down in our favor, it won’t be anywhere near the levels we enjoyed the last time it was our turn.

___________________________________________________________________

As Chief Transportation Officer, Carmen Gerace oversees all aspects of global transportation for BDP International, including the implementation of new transport solutions and product offerings while also developing future transport strategy. Throughout his 25+ career in the industry, he has held varying managerial and executive positions at BDP. Carmen is based in Philadelphia, PA, and can be reached at carmen.gerace@bdpint.com. 

UK container

UK Ports Suffering Post-Brexit Container Logjams

Post-Brexit trade disruption and ongoing congestion are causing critical build-ups of containers at UK ports, according to the latest data from Container xChange.

The UK’s leading container terminals struggled to cope with the pandemic-driven surge of imports last year resulting in lengthy delays for haulers and vessels and an excess of containers building up in ports. 

Since the UK departed the European Union on January 1 and started trading under a post-Brexit customs and regulatory regime, the latest data from Container xChange, the world’s leading online platform for buying, selling, and leasing shipping containers, indicates the situation has worsened.

Under Container xChange’s Container Availability Index (CAx), an index reading of 0.5 describes a balanced market. Below 0.5 means there is a shortage of containers. Above 0.5 means there is an excess of containers.

At the port of Felixstowe, the average reading of the CAx so far in 2021 for a 40 ft container is 0.95, up from 0.79 in 2020. The CAx for a 20 ft box has increased from an average of 0.78 in 2020 to 0.90 this year.

A similar picture is apparent at the port of Southampton where the CAx reading for a 40 ft container is 0.86 in 2021, up from an average of 0.71 last year. For a 20 ft container, the CAx reading is 0.85, up from an average of 0.72 in 2020.

“The UK’s leading gateway terminals for container traffic suffered congestion for much of 2020 prompting carriers to cut some calls and ship cargo in from European hubs via the Channel Tunnel, ferry services, and feeder services instead,” said Dr. Johannes Schlingmeier, CEO of Container xChange.  

“Based on the build-up of containers at ports in 2021, it seems the situation has further deteriorated. We are now seeing critical levels of boxes building up at Southampton and Felixstowe. Post-Brexit cross-Channel shipments are more complicated under dual Customs regimes and this could be a factor in logistics bottlenecks.”

Efforts by container lines to avoid Brexit disruption and delays at southern terminals by launching new services into the port of Liverpool are also now coming unstuck, with the port struggling to handle increased volumes. This is reflected in an accelerating excess of containers at the port.

In 2020 the average CAx reading at the port of Liverpool for a 40 ft container was 0.59. In 2021 this has climbed to 0.75. For a 20 ft container, the CAx reading in 2021 is 0.82, up from an average of 0.68 last year.

European gateway ports have also suffered disruptions and delays due to pandemic-driven container traffic surges. However, container availability at leading hubs is currently better balanced than in the UK.

At the port of Rotterdam, the CAx average reading for a 40 ft container this year is 0.51, compared to an average of 0.40 in 2020. At Antwerp, shortages have been a problem, with an average reading for a 40 ft container of 0.21 in 2020 improving to a more balanced 0.41 this year. 

Similarly, in Hamburg, the average CAx reading for a 40 ft container in 2020 was 0.27 suggesting critical shortages. This year the average reading has improved to 0.49.

__________________________________________________________________

About Container xChange: Container xChange operates the leading online platform for the leasing and trading of shipping containers. More than 600 shipping companies including Kuehne+Nagel, Seaco and Sarjak rely on its platform to increase flexibility and simplify the operational handling of SOC Containers. http://container-xchange.com/

ocean

An Ocean of Potential in the Blue Economy

The Blue Economy

The ocean has always been an essential part of life on this blue planet. Oceans cover over 70 percent of the Earth’s surface and contain 97 percent of the world’s water. We rely on its resources to sustain and improve our lives.

The World Bank created a definition for this “blue economy” that encompasses “sustainable use of ocean resources for economic growth, improved livelihoods and jobs, and ocean ecosystem health.”

Economic activities associated with the ocean include traditional sectors such as commercial fishing, coastal tourism and maritime transport to support global commerce. Increasingly, the ocean has been tapped for energy sources and generation of off-shore renewable energies like wind and tidal energy. Marine life is explored for applications to pharmaceuticals, desalination offers an opportunity to meet demand for freshwater, and the ocean can be used for carbon sequestration to mitigate climate impacts.

World Bank Definition of Blue Economy

Vital to Livelihoods and Growth

In one form or another, trade in ocean resources contributes between $3-6 trillion to global GDP, supporting the livelihoods of over 3 billion people on the planet.

Recognizing the importance of measuring the economic impact of the ocean, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) partnered with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) in 2019 to develop prototype statistics to measure the ocean’s contribution to the U.S. economy. From aquaculture to shipbuilding, offshore mining and power generation, marine-related activities contributed some $373 billion to U.S. GDP in 2018.

Tourism and recreation generated the most, bringing in just shy of $143 billion in wages, profits, and tax revenue for coastal communities in the U.S. in 2018. The new data also showed that between 2014 and 2018, the American blue economy grew faster than the overall U.S. economy.

SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis

U.S. Ocean Economy

value added by activity in 2018 (millions of dollars)

Tourism and recreation – 38%

National defense and public administration – 33%

Living marine resources – 3%

Marine transportation – 1%

Offshore minerals and utilities – 15%

Deeper Dive into the Ocean Economy

Fisheries and Aquaculture

The ocean delivers a vital and primary source of protein in the diets of over 3 billion people. Marine fisheries employ over 200 million people either directly or indirectly. Expanded global availability of refrigerated storage and transportation has extended access to all kinds of fresh fish.

Overfishing, exacerbated by heavy government subsidies, has become a key concern, putting nearly 90 percent of the world’s fish stocks are at risk. Both the UN and the WTO have made removing these subsidies a priority to help protect vulnerable coastal communities who rely on fish for their own consumption and the local economy.

One-half of all fish we eat is farmed rather than captured. Aquaculture is the fastest growing food sector in the world. China produces a huge amount of the world’s farmed fish and is the top producer by value of carp, tilapia, catfish, shrimp, oysters and many other types. Norway leads in salmon, trout and smelt with Chile a close second.

Tourism

Tourism has long been vital to many coastal economies. Overall, tourism employs 1 out of every 11 people around the world. It is fast becoming one of the world’s biggest industries, making up 10 percent of global GDP. International tourism is an invisible export. Visitors spend money on transportation, housing and entertainment using income earned in their home country.

From scuba diving and surfing to cruises and all-inclusive beach resorts, coastal tourism comes in many flavors. It is particularly important for less-developed nations, as it creates jobs, promotes economic growth, and brings in money that is spent in local businesses like restaurants, shops, and tour services.

Tourism is the economic lifeblood of many Least Developed Countries and small island developing states such as those in the Caribbean and southeast Asia that collectively host 41 million visitors visit every year. These states are focused on delivering services to bring in more tourists while preserving the natural beauty and resources that attract visitors to their islands.

Shipping

Over 80 percent of goods traded internationally such as raw materials, food, consumer goods, and energy products were transported by sea in 2015. Despite reaching a record high of 11 billion tonnes shipped that year, world maritime trade growth decelerated to 2.7 percent in 2018, below the historical average of 3.0, reflecting a range of risks that intensified at the time including global trade tensions, protectionism, and the ‘Brexit’ decision.

Issues surrounding maritime transport are often intertwined with other global economic, environmental and political trends. Security conflicts occur over country ownership of key shipping routes and global discussions are active over the environmental impacts of fuel-guzzling container ships.

The world’s ports can often act as a weather vane for the economy as a whole. Dockworkers feel the effects of tariffs, disasters, and other trade policy changes before farmers, truckers, distributors and retailers do. Effects of the recent U.S.-China trade war and of the COVID-19 pandemic were experienced by dockers who saw the vast reductions in imports before the economic effects rippled throughout the economy.

As supply chains continue to shift and we watch for reshoring, the maritime transport sector may start to look different over the next few years, but will undoubtedly remain an essential part of the global economy.

Stats how we rely on the ocean

Preserving Our Oceans

Sustainability is a key aspect of the blue economy. Although there is an emphasis on environmental stewardship and protection in all parts of the, nowhere is this more apparent than when it comes to our oceans, a finite and critical resource.

Overfishing or pollution could deplete fish stocks and cause a severe food crisis. Environmental degradation caused by the tourism industry could ruin the economies of coastal communities. Waste and pollution from shipping could cause accumulated damage to our air and water.

According to Conservation International eight million metric tonnes of plastic is dumped into the ocean every year. At this rate, by 2050, plastic would outweigh fish in the ocean. Other concerns cited include the runoff of harmful nutrients from agriculture into the ocean, warming temperatures that are bleaching and destroying coral reefs, and even noise pollution from shipping that is killing creatures such as jellyfish.

International governmental cooperation and advances in technology can combat these problems. Conservation and sustainable use form one of the five pillars used by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) as part of their Ocean’s Economy and Trade Strategy project. This effort aims to mitigate damage while maintaining the important economic benefits of the blue economy that supports billions of people.

It seems no aspect of economic life has been spared disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic, including many parts of the blue economy and related livelihoods. UNCTAD released a report to chart the waters of re-opening the blue economy to become more resilient post-pandemic. It proposes enhanced coordination and communication between fisheries and distributors to cut down on food waste, exercising restraint in sanitary protectionism, and closely monitoring shipping to prevent bottlenecks and delays. UNCTAD also suggests removing fishing subsidies to tackle wasteful overfishing; developing a “2.0 approach” to coastal tourism that showcases local sustainability efforts; and digitizing maritime trade procedures to achieve efficiencies and reduce CO2 emissions.

Untapped Potential

There is still a lot we don’t know about the world’s oceans, so embracing science and discovery will play an important role as we continue to draw on its precious resources and develop new markets. Untapped economic potential includes the capture of carbon, supporting the existence of a rich oceanic biodiversity, waste disposal, and the protection of coasts.

The blue economy is as diverse as its land-based counterpart – perhaps even more so. Sustainability will continue to be extremely important both for its own sake and for the preservation of the resources we rely on every day. With careful stewardship, the blue economy can continue to support billions of people and enrich all of our lives.

______________________________________________________________

Alice Calder received her MA in Applied Economics at GMU. Originally from the UK, where she received her BA in Philosophy and Political Economy from the University of Exeter, living and working internationally sparked her interest in trade issues as well as the intersection of economics and culture.

This article originally appeared on TradeVistas.org. Republished with permission.