New Articles

Turkey’s Marble and Travertine Exports Slump as China and India Reduce Purchases

travertine

Turkey’s Marble and Travertine Exports Slump as China and India Reduce Purchases

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘Turkey – Marble And Travertine – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Turkey’s marble and travertine exports fell from $865M in 2019 to $663M in 2020. In physical terms, exports shrank by -23% y-o-y to 3.5M tonnes. China and India, the key importers of marble and travertine from Turkey, rapidly decreased the volume of purchases by -22% y-o-y and 28% y-o-y, respectively. The supplies to China comprise 76% of Turkish exports of marble and travertine.

Turkey’s Marble and Travertine Exports

In 2020, marble and travertine exports from Turkey declined rapidly to 3.5M tonnes, reducing by -22.7% against the year before. In value terms, marble and travertine exports dropped from $865M in 2019 to $663M (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

China (2.6M tonnes) was the leading destination for marble and travertine exports from Turkey, with a 76% share of total exports. Moreover, marble and travertine exports to China exceeded the volume sent to the second major destination, India (341K tonnes), eightfold.

In 2020, Turkish supplies to China fell by -21.8% y-o-y. Exports to India and Egypt dropped by -28.1% y-o-y and -9.6% y-o-y, respectively.

In value terms, China ($538M) remains the key foreign market for marble and travertine exports from Turkey, comprising 81% of total exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by India ($60M), with a 9% share of total exports.

In 2020, the average marble and travertine export price amounted to $191 per tonne, remaining relatively unchanged against the previous year. Prices varied noticeably by the country of destination; the country with the highest price was China ($203 per tonne), while the average price for exports to Egypt ($76 per tonne) was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable growth rate in terms of prices was recorded for supplies to Egypt, while the prices for the other significant destinations experienced a decline.

Source: IndexBox Platform

fish

European Fish Fat and Oil Exports Surge with Growing Supplies from Denmark

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Fish Fats And Oils – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights‘. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

European fish fat and oil exports increased by +23% y-o-y to $541M in 2020. In physical terms, exports rose +12% y-o-y to 251K tonnes. Denmark remains the most significant European fish fat supplier, accounting for 60% of total export volume in the EU, followed by France and the Netherlands. All these countries increased their export value last year. The average fish fat and oil export price in the EU spiked by +10% y-o-y to $2,155 per tonne in 2020.

European Fish Fat and Oil Exports

Fish fat and oil exports expanded remarkably to 251K tonnes in 2020, picking up by +12% compared with the previous year’s figure. In value terms, fish fat and oil exports skyrocketed by +23.4% y-o-y to $541M (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

In 2020, Denmark (150K tonnes) represented the largest exporter of fish fats and oils, constituting 60% of total exports. France (26K tonnes) held an 11% share (based on tonnes) of total exports, which put it in second place, followed by the Netherlands (8.6%), Germany (6.3%) and Spain (4.7%). The following exporters – Latvia (8.4K tonnes) and Poland (6.4K tonnes) – each accounted for a 5.9% share of total exports.

In value terms, Denmark ($297M) remains the most prominent fish fat and oil supplier in the EU, comprising 55% of total exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by the Netherlands ($69M), with a 13% share, followed by France, with a 10% share.

In Denmark, fish fat and oil exports increased by +21.8% y-o-y in 2020. Exports from the Netherlands jumped by +64.0% y-o-y, while France recorded a +12.7%-increase in exports.

In 2020, the average export price for fish fat and oil in the EU grew by 10% y-o-y to $2,155 per tonne. Prices varied noticeably by the country of origin; the country with the highest price was the Netherlands ($3,194 per tonne), while Latvia ($1,057 per tonne) was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Denmark, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox Platform

vaccine

EU Veterinary Vaccine Trade to Surpass Last Year’s $1.7B

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Vaccines For Veterinary Medicine – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Over the first half of 2021, total EU veterinary vaccine exports amounted to $758M, increasing by 13 percent compared with last year’s same period. Given this increase, supplies may overcome the $1.7B figure of 2020 by the year-end. The key veterinary vaccine exporters are Spain, France, Belgium, Hungary, Italy, the Czech Republic and Germany, providing 95 percent of the total supplies in the EU. Belgium recorded the most notable increase in the volume of exports last year. 

Veterinary Vaccine Exports in the EU

In the first half of 2021, veterinary vaccine export value in the EU estimated at $758M, a 13 percent-surge compared to the same period of the previous year. In 2020, 15K tonnes of vaccines were exported worth $1.7B (IndexBox estimates).

Spain (3.8K tonnes), France (2.9K tonnes), Belgium (2.4K tonnes), Hungary (1.8K tonnes), Italy (1.3K tonnes), the Czech Republic (1K tonnes), and Germany (0.7K tonnes) supplied roughly 95 percent of the total volume in 2020.

Belgium experienced the highest spike in veterinary vaccine exports during the last year, with the volume of supplies rising from 2.1K to 2.4K tonnes.

In value terms, France ($515M), Spain ($336M) and Belgium ($226M) appeared to be the countries with the highest levels of exports in 2020, with a combined 63 percent share of total exports. These countries were followed by Germany, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Italy, which accounted for a further 25 percent.

Source: IndexBox Platform

carbon

Rising Demand for Water Purification Drives U.S. Activated Carbon Trade

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘U.S. – Activated Carbon – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

From January to September 2021, the U.S. activated carbon imports amounted to $166.3M, 13.2% more than in the same period a year earlier. In 2020 imports totalled $194M (-15.3% y-o-y), declining for the first time over the last three years due to lockdowns and supply chain disruptions. The activated carbon supplies will grow gradually over the next decade due to the increased need for water filtration, incl. wastewater treatment and capturing greenhouse emissions. 

U.S. Activated Carbon Imports

From January to September 2021, the U.S. imported activated carbon worth $166.3M, 13.2% more than in the same period a year earlier. In 2020, after three years of growth, there was a significant decline in overseas purchases, when their volume decreased by 12.5% to 84K tonnes. In value terms, activated carbon imports fell notably to $194M in 2020, 15.3% less than the year before. Due to quarantine restrictions during the Covid-19 pandemic, supply chains were disrupted, and production plants were locked down in many countries, leading to decreased activated carbon consumption and a slowdown in trade.

The activated carbon imports are expected to pursue an upward trend over the next decade. The growing need for activated carbon for water filtration is the primary driver in the medium term. With growing urbanization, rising construction rate and expanding chemical production, the amount of wastewater requiring treatment rise steadily. The enhancing manufacturing of filters for water purification will stimulate the activated carbon demand.

Global decarbonization should also become a powerful stimulus for trade development, as activated carbon can capture and collect greenhouse emissions. The medical need for activated carbon will also increase in the face of an increasing population, but intense competition from synthetic absorbents will hold back the trade growth.

India (17K tonnes), Sri Lanka (15K tonnes) and Australia (10K tonnes) were the leading suppliers of activated carbon imports to the U.S., with a combined 51% share of total imports. From 2007 to 2020, the most significant increases were in Australia (+64.3% per year), while purchases for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, India ($37M), Sri Lanka ($35M) and the Philippines ($17M) constituted the largest activated carbon suppliers to the U.S., with a combined 46% share of total imports. These countries were followed by China, Australia, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico and Germany, which together accounted for a further 35%.

In 2020, the average activated carbon import price amounted to $2,318 per tonne, declining by -3.2% against the previous year. There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major supplying countries. In 2020, the country with the highest price was Canada ($2,764 per tonne), while the price for Mexico ($1,355 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

U.S. Activated Carbon Exports

Exports of activated carbon from the U.S. for nine months of 2021 amounted to $227.3M, 12.5% higher than in the same period a year earlier. A year earlier, exports were characterized by negative dynamics, decreasing from $308.2M in 2019 to $273.7M in 2020. In physical terms, exports fell by 2.4% to 69K tons (according to IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

Belgium (13K tonnes), Canada (12K tonnes) and Mexico (9.6K tonnes) were the main destinations of activated carbon exports from the U.S., together accounting for 51% of total exports. China, South Korea, Japan, the UK, the Netherlands, Singapore, Malaysia, Italy, India and Brazil lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 46%.

In value terms, the largest markets for activated carbon exported from the U.S. were Mexico ($71M), Canada ($38M) and Belgium ($27M), with a combined 50% share of total exports. These countries were followed by China, Japan, South Korea, the UK, Singapore, India, the Netherlands, Brazil, Malaysia and Italy, which together accounted for a further 35%.

China saw the highest growth rate of the value of purchases from the U.S. over the period under review, while shipments for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In 2020, the average activated carbon export price amounted to $3,968 per tonne, waning by -9% against the previous year. Prices varied noticeably by the country of destination; the country with the highest price was Mexico ($7,444 per tonne), while the average price for exports to Italy ($838 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

Source: IndexBox Platform

aluminium

U.S. Imports of Aluminium Doors and Windows Rise Sharply to $870M

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘U.S. – Aluminium Doors, Thresholds For Doors And Windows – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

American imports of aluminium doors and windows spiked from $819M in 2019 to $870M in 2020. In physical terms, imports rose by +11% y-o-y to 143K tonnes. Colombia ($225M), Canada ($197M) and China ($178M) became the most significant suppliers regarding the value of exports to the U.S. In 2020, imports of aluminium doors and windows from Colombia and China soared by +10% y-o-y and +20% y-o-y, respectively, while shipments from Canada fell by -12% y-o-y. Thailand emerged as the fastest-growing supplier in 2020, increasing its shipments threefold against the previous year to $27.5M. 

American Imports of Aluminium Doors and Windows

In 2020, the quantity of aluminium doors, thresholds for doors and windows imported into the U.S. rose markedly to 143K tonnes, growing by +11% against the previous year. In value terms, aluminium window and door imports grew by +6.2% y-o-y to $870M (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

In 2020, China (54K tonnes) constituted the largest aluminium window and door supplier to the U.S., with a 38% share of total imports. Moreover, aluminium window and door imports from China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest supplier, Colombia (27K tonnes), twofold. Canada (21K tonnes) ranked third in terms of total imports with a 15% share.

In value terms, the largest aluminium window and door suppliers to the U.S. were Colombia ($225M), Canada ($197M) and China ($178M), together comprising 69% of total imports. These countries were followed by Italy, Mexico, Thailand, Malaysia and Viet Nam, which together accounted for a further 17%.

The purchases from Colombia rose by +10% y-o-y in value terms, while imports from China increased by +20% y-o-y. The supplies from Canada dropped by -12% y-o-y in value terms. Among the leading suppliers, Thailand recorded the highest growth rate of the value of imports, while purchases for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth. Imports from Thailand increased from $8.5M in 2019 to $27.5M in 2020.

In 2020, the average aluminium window and door import price amounted to $6,072 per tonne, dropping by -4.3% against the previous year. Prices varied noticeably by the country of origin; the country with the highest price was Italy ($11,744 per tonne), while the price for Viet Nam ($3,031 per tonne) was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Italy, while the prices for the other significant suppliers experienced mixed trend patterns.

Source: IndexBox Platform

baby food

Growing Demand from China and Russia Drives Netherlands’ Baby Food Exports

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘Netherlands – Food Preparations For Infants – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Last year, baby food exports from the Netherlands grew by +5.7% y-o-y in physical terms, driven primarily by rising demand from China and Russia. In 2020, the Netherlands supplied abroad 237K tonnes of baby food worth $2.7B. China and Russia constitute the largest importers, accounting for 54% of the total export volume.

Baby Food Exports from the Netherlands

In 2020, the amount of food preparations for infants exported from the Netherlands rose remarkably to 237K tonnes, with an increase of +5.7% compared with the year before. In value terms, baby food exports rose by +7.8% y-o-y to $2.7B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

China (129K tonnes) was the leading destination for baby food exports from the Netherlands, accounting for 54% of total exports. Moreover, baby food exports to China exceeded the volume sent to the second major destination, Hong Kong SAR (15K tonnes), eightfold. Russia (11K tonnes) occupied the third position in this ranking, with a 4.5% share.

In value terms, China ($1.7B) remains the key foreign market for baby food exports from the Netherlands, comprising 64% of total exports. Hong Kong SAR ($277M) occupied the second position in the ranking, with a 10% share of total exports, followed by Russia, with a 2.7% share.

In 2020, the value of supplies to China and Russia increased by +19.2% y-o-y and +4.1% y-o-y, respectively. By contrast, exports to Hong Kong SAR dropped by -32.3% y-o-y.

The average baby food export price stood at $11,318 per tonne in 2020, surging by +2% against the previous year. Prices varied noticeably by the country of destination; the country with the highest price was Hong Kong SAR, while the average price for exports to Greece was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable growth rate in terms of prices was recorded for supplies to Poland, while the prices for the other significant destinations experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox Platform

ethanol

U.S. Ethanol Market: Prices Are Soaring, Bioethanol Displaces Synthetic Alcohol

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘U.S. – Ethyl Alcohol – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights.‘ Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

In November 2021, U.S. ethanol prices hit over $3.2 per gallon, doubling against the same period in 2020. Despite this, the last factory in the U.S. producing synthetic ethanol announced ceasing operations because it cannot compete with bioethanol in terms of costs. Government investments worth $26M will drive U.S. biofuel infrastructure development. A conflict between biofuel producers and the Environmental Protection Agency is coming to a head because the agency delayed issuing the 2022 Renewable Volume Obligation (RVO). This document was expected to propel the bioethanol market by elevating the standards for the biofuel percentage used in blends with traditional gasoline and diesel.

Key Trend and Insights

According to the USDA, the Eastern Cornbelt average ethanol price grew from $1.4 per gallon in January to more than $3.2 per gallon in November 2021. The most significant gains were seen past month when prices for the alcohol leapt up by more than 30%.

In the U.S., ethanol fuel production has rebounded since its downturn the previous year. According to the EIA, throughout the first eight months of 2021, there were 3.9M barrels of ethyl alcohol produced. In the same period of 2020 and 2019, 3.7M barrels and 4.0M barrels were manufactured, respectively.

Global demand for American ethanol is growing. In the first nine months of 2021, U.S. exports of ethyl alcohol consisted of $1.83B, which is 5.8% more than the same period in 2020. During the twelfth Ministerial-level meeting of the India-U.S. Trade Policy Forum, the Indian side expressed interest in obtaining a massive supply of the alcohol from the US. India’s national goals call for increasing the amount of ethanol blended with petrol to 20% by 2025.

Even though the growth in demand and increased prices are beneficial for U.S. ethanol producers, the last synthetic ethanol facility in the U.S., Tuscola Plant, owned by petrochemical giant LyondellBasell, announced that it would close at the end of 2021. Faced with rapidly increasing costs for resources and energy, specifically ethylene and natural gas, synthetic ethanol cannot compete with bioethanol. Meanwhile, prices for corn, which is widely used to produce the alcohol, have gone down this year: Eastern Cornbelt average corn price decreased from $7.60 per bushel in May to $5.60 in November.

Government policies will stimulate development in the bioethanol market. The U.S. Agriculture Department announced that it would invest $26M into building biofuel infrastructure in 23 states as part of the ‘Higher Blends’ program. The subsidies will stimulate replacing old-style fuel pumps and storage tanks with blended pumps and tanks suitable for E15 and E85 fuels, as well as biodiesel. The USDA projects that the grants will help increase potential sales for biofuels by 822M gallons per year.

The relationship between biofuel producers and government bodies worsens, threatening to become a severe conflict. Growth Energy, the leading American trade association advancing biofuel usage, submitted a notice of intent to sue the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for failing to issue on time the 2022 Renewable Volume Obligation (RVO), which regulates the blending standards of biofuels with traditional automotive fuels. By retaining the status quo for the RVO, current standards won’t be reevaluated to increase the percentage of green energy sources used and thus hinder growth in the biofuel market.

U.S. Ethyl Alcohol Exports

In 2020, exports of ethyl alcohol from the U.S. reduced to 6.5B litres, falling by -7.7% against the year before. In value terms, ethanol exports contracted to $2.4B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

Canada (1.5B litres), Brazil (946M litres) and India (898M litres) were the main destinations of ethanol exports from the U.S., together comprising 52% of total exports. South Korea, Mexico, the Netherlands, Colombia, the Philippines, Peru, Nigeria, the UK and China lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 37%.

In value terms, Canada ($596M), Brazil ($318M) and India ($312M) appeared to be the largest markets for ethanol exported from the U.S. worldwide, with a combined 51% share of total exports. South Korea, the Netherlands, Mexico, Colombia, Peru, the Philippines, Nigeria, the UK and China lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 37%.

In 2020, the average ethanol export price amounted to $0.4 per litre, rising by 6.1% against the previous year. Prices varied noticeably by the country of destination; the country with the highest price was the Netherlands ($0.5 per litre), while the average price for exports to the Philippines ($0.3 per litre) was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was recorded for supplies to the Netherlands, while the prices for the other significant destinations experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox Platform 

leather

China’s Leather Imports Post Solid Gains This Year

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘China – Leather – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

From January to July 2021, China’s leather imports totalled $1.3B, an increase of 34% over the same period last year. Brazil and Italy are the leading suppliers, comprising more than half of China’s leather imports. Over the past year, Italy (+34% y-o-y) significantly increased shipments to China, while supplies from Brazil (-24% y-o-y) declined. The average import price was $4,028 per tonne in 2020, rising by 19% over the previous year.

Imports into China

From January to July 2021, Chinese leather imports totalled $1.3B, exceeding by +34% the value of the same period in 2020. Last year, leather imports increased to $2.6B (IndexBox estimates), growing by +5.5% y-o-y. In physical terms, leather imports in China fell slightly to 650K tonnes, declining by 11.4% on the previous year’s figure. Over the last decade, imports attained the peak figure at 858K tonnes in 2014; however, from 2015 to 2020, they failed to regain momentum.

Chinese leather imports are expected to continue rebounding robustly, driven by the increased consumer demand worldwide. A downside risk comes from pandemic-related supply chain disruptions. Last year, many orders for leather production were cancelled or postponed, which put pressure on the manufacturing factories.

This year, regular shipments are deteriorated by the lack of shipping containers and the limited capacity of Asian ports that partially cease operations when COVID cases are found there. The uncertainty associated with possible pandemic outbreaks due to the emergence of new strains also poses a threat to the leather market and the global economy overall.

Imports by Country

In 2020, Brazil (204K tonnes), Italy (131K tonnes) and Viet Nam (55K tonnes) were the leading suppliers of leather imports to China, with a combined 60% share of total imports. These countries were followed by the U.S., Thailand, Argentina, Taiwan (Chinese), South Korea and Uzbekistan, which together accounted for a further 22%.

From 2007 to 2020, the most significant increases were in shipments from Uzbekistan (+66.1% per year), while purchases for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Brazil ($338M), Italy ($250M) and Thailand ($135M) constituted the largest leather suppliers to China, together comprising 28% of total imports. South Korea, the U.S., Viet Nam, Argentina, Taiwan (Chinese) and Uzbekistan lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 18%.

In terms of the leading suppliers, Uzbekistan (+69.3% per year) recorded the highest growth rate of the value of imports over the period under review, while purchases for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Import Prices by Country

The average leather import price stood at $4,028 per tonne in 2020, growing by 19% against the previous year. Overall, the import price, however, showed a pronounced curtailment. Over the period under review, average import prices attained the maximum at $6,374 per tonne in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2020, import prices remained at a lower figure.

Prices varied noticeably by the country of origin; the country with the highest price was South Korea ($10,291 per tonne), while the price for Brazil ($1,657 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

From 2007 to 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Uzbekistan, while the prices for the other significant suppliers experienced a decline.

Source: IndexBox Platform

fertilizer

Fertilizer Prices Spike and Will Continue Rallying Next Year

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Fertilizers – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Fertilizer prices continue to ramp up due to a shortage in supply caused by lower output in EU countries. High natural gas costs shape that growth because gas accounts for up to 80% of variable costs in nitrogen fertilizer production. Urea prices spiked exceptionally high to $900 per tonne in November 2021, gaining 30% against the previous month. Phosphate rock price rose by 4%, while diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate were both up by 8%. Next year, fertilizer prices are projected to climb further due to a continued shortage in supply, but if costs for natural gas maintain their downward trend, they will hold the price increases back.

Key Trends and Insights

Fertilizer prices are continuing to rise. According to the December data from the World Bank, the urea price shot upward by 30% in November compared to the previous month, reaching $900.5 per tonne. This is already the second significant gain seen this year. Phosphate rock has also become more expensive by +4% up to $153 per tonne, while diammonium phosphate and triple superphosphate each increased by +8% to $727 and $665 per tonne, respectively.

The key factors driving fertilizer prices up were a supply shortage on the global market and the growing costs of natural gas, which account for up to 80% of variable costs in producing nitrogen fertilizers. Faced with more expensive energy resources, many European producers had to stop production as they couldn’t compete with counterparts in Russia, countries in the Persian Gulf and northern Africa. As a result, the global supply of fertilizer decreased and led to subsequent price increases.

According to the World Bank, in November, the prices for natural gas in the U.S. decreased by -8% to $5.02 per MMBtu, and by -11% in Europe to $27.6 per MMBtu, but despite that, they are still at record highs. If the cost for natural gas declines, it may reduce the rate of price increases in the upcoming months. However, this will not eliminate the long-term upward trend in fertilizer prices as there will still be a shortage in supply.

Global Fertilizer Exports by Country

In 2020, global fertilizer exports amounted to 204M tonnes, increasing by 2% from the previous year’s figure. In value terms, exports dropped to $52.7B (IndexBox estimates)

The largest fertilizer supplying countries worldwide were Russia ($7B), China ($6.3B) and Canada ($5.1B), together comprising 35% of global exports. These countries were followed by the U.S., Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Belarus, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Israel, Oman and Algeria, which together accounted for a further 38%. The shipments of the three major exporters of fertilizers, namely Russia, China and Canada, represented more than a third of total export in physical terms.

Top Largest Importers Worldwide

Brazil (34M tonnes), India (25M tonnes) and the U.S. (23M tonnes) represented roughly 37% of total imports of fertilizers in 2020. It was distantly followed by China (10M tonnes), generating a 4.8% share of total imports. France (7.4M tonnes), Indonesia (6.2M tonnes), Australia (5.2M tonnes), Thailand (5M tonnes), Canada (4.4M tonnes), Turkey (4.3M tonnes), Germany (4.1M tonnes), Argentina (4M tonnes) and Belgium (3.9M tonnes) held small shares of total imports.

In value terms, the largest fertilizer importing markets worldwide were Brazil ($8.6B), India ($7.1B) and the U.S. ($5.6B), together accounting for 36% of global imports. These countries were followed by China, France, Australia, Thailand, Canada, Indonesia, Argentina, Turkey, Germany and Belgium, which together accounted for a further 24%.

Source: IndexBox Platform

watch

China Emerges as Fastest-Growing Importer of Swiss Watches Over Past Decade

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘Switzerland – Watches – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights‘. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

China ($2.5B) emerges as the largest and fastest-growing importer of Swiss watches, ramping up its purchases by +9.1% per year on average over the past decade. Despite the Covid crisis, it increased imports by 31%, while the rest of Switzerland’s trade partners decreased supplies. The U.S. ($2B) and Hong Kong SAR ($1.7B) followed China in the top importer ranking. 

Switzerland’s Watch Exports

Watch exports shrank markedly from $20.6B to $17.2B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020. The total export value increased at an average annual rate of +1.7% over the past decade.

China ($2.5B), the U.S. ($2B) and Hong Kong SAR ($1.7B) were the largest markets for watches exported from Switzerland, with a combined 36% share of total exports. Japan, the UK, Germany, the United Arab Emirates, Italy, South Korea, France, Spain, the Netherlands and Russia lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 37%.

China (+9.1% per year) became the fastest-growing importer of watches among Switzerland’s ten largest trade partners in the last decade. In 2020, China significantly ramped up its Swiss watch purchases from $1.9B to $2.5B, while most other countries reduced their imports.

Top Watch Importers Worldwide

Hong Kong SAR ($5.1B), the U.S. ($3.7B) and China ($3.5B) constituted the countries with the highest levels of watch purchases in 2020, with a combined 40% share of global imports (this includes not only Swiss watches but refers to the total figures). China (+32.5%) saw the highest growth rate of the value of imports over the last year, while purchases for the other global leaders experienced a decline in the imports figures.

Source: IndexBox Platform