New Articles

Maritime Challenges – Fires, Economic Uncertainty, and “Dark” Tanker Fleets 

cargo ECS Weship tanker

Maritime Challenges – Fires, Economic Uncertainty, and “Dark” Tanker Fleets 

While shipping losses were at a record low in 2022, cargo and hull fires, economic uncertainty, and “dark” tanker fleets are safety challenges on the horizon for the maritime sector. Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (AGCS) is a corporate insurance carrier providing risk consultancy and insurance solutions worldwide. The company’s annual Safety & Shipping Review looks at loss trends and risks for the maritime sector and the 2023 version is officially out. 

The most notable headline of the report is the continued decline in shipping losses. Thirty years ago it was common for 200-plus vessels to go missing every year. It has been six years since triple-digit losses have been registered and last year there were fewer than 40. The “loss hotspot,” however, continues to be South China, Indonesia, Indochina, and the Philippines. Congested ports, extreme weather, and older fleets are the primary loss culprits. 

While losses are down, cargo and hull fires are a growing concern. Decarbonization efforts have introduced new types of cargo. Battery-powered goods featuring lithium-ion (Li-ion) are highly flammable and represent a concerning risk for carriers. Electric vehicle (EV) sales are increasing and the overall battery market is expected to grow by 30% annually between now and 2035. 

Decarbonization has also led to larger vessels and carriers seeking greater efficiencies. While larger vessels may prove more efficient, higher container cargo exposure and accumulation have led to more fires. Li-ion battery fires are additionally very difficult to extinguish. An AGCS analysis concluded that fire is the most expensive cause of loss – eating up approximately 18% of the value of the total claims. 

“Dark” tanker fleets, also known as “shadow” or “ghost” fleets, are unregistered tankers that slip through regulatory controls. Oil sanctions, as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, have resulted in Russia and some of its allies to implement dark tanker fleets to transport and sell Russian oil. Energy embargos are difficult to enforce, and according to Tanker Trackers, of the 900 ultra-large tankers at the global level, roughly one-fifth were breaking sanctions with Venezuela, Iran, and Russia. An uninsured dark tanker exploded in Southeast Asia in May killing crew. Tanker explosions result not only in loss of life but also environmentally toxic oil spills.   

Finally, the report is especially concerned with economic uncertainty. The sector is suffering from lower demand and depressed freight rates where shipping a container between Asia and the US in April 2023 costs roughly 80% less than at the same time in 2022. Commodity prices are up as are labor costs, and the price of steel is crippling manufacturing budgets. Between 2020 and 2022 some estimates point to an 18% + increase in ship repair costs alone. 

Inflated prices have been baked into the present figures based on the global inflation figure of 8.8% in 2022. The inflation outlook still remains uncertain adding to some very real challenges over the remaining four months of 2023.    

EV

US Electric Vehicle Sales still have a lot to do with China

The United States wants to lessen its reliance on China when it comes to electric vehicle (EV) production. A proposed $7,500 tax credit set to kick in come 2024 is held by most to be the key to increasing EV sales stateside. Yet, US law dictates the credit cannot be used to purchase cars with battery components that come from a “foreign entity of concern.” The interpretation of that phrase will likely dictate the future of the US EV rollout. 

At the heart of this struggle are Ford and General Motors (GM). While there are other EV manufacturers to be certain, Ford has caught the eye of lawmakers and members of Congress with its proposed plans for a $3.5 billion battery factory. The Michigan plant would be one-of-a-kind, but it would also depend heavily on the Chinese firm Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd (CATL). Ford is interested in CATL’s technology to make lithium-iron-phosphate batteries. At an industrial scale, these batteries are cheaper than the alternatives and would greatly reduce production costs. Yet, an agreement like this would likely run against the “foreign entity of concern” clause. 

Meanwhile, crosstown rival GM does not have any planned partnerships with Chinese battery firms and is making this position known. Should Ford be able to move ahead and offer EVs with the $7,500 tax credit, the automaker would gain a relevant technological and cost advantage over GM. Understandably, GM is calling for a strict adherence to the “foreign entity of concern” rule while Ford is positioning its deal with CATL as a licensing agreement and not a joint venture. This means the subsidiary that operates the Michigan plant would be owned by Ford and they would then pay CATL royalties for the use of their technology. 

China is a prominent player in the lithium-ion battery supply chain. Last year roughly 65% of all graphite mined in the world (key raw material for batteries) was from China. In terms of chemical refining and production, all spherical graphite and nearly all manganese refining occur in China, and the Asian giant controls 70% of battery-cell production. Ford defends its position by citing that a deal with CATL could bring substantial advanced technology knowledge to the US and that cutting the US off completely to Chinese partnerships could set the domestic battery market back for decades. 

On the other end, should Ford be allowed to move forward as planned, some in Congress fear this will simply push GM and others to form similar partnerships with other Chinese firms thus further integrating the two nations. Both Democrats and Republicans have enough folks on both sides of the aisle that agree on ridding the US of excess Chinese reliance. But without the $7,500 tax credit bridging the gap between a new EV and a new gas-powered car, a gas-powered option will likely win out for most consumers.    

diesel crude production

A Sour Outlook for Q4: Crude Supply Cuts and Refinery Challenges

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its allies are tightening the crude oil supply. This follows OPEC’s 2022 strategy and will likely continue through the fourth quarter of 2023. The US sectors most heavily affected are farmers, construction companies, and transportation businesses. 

The benchmark Brent crude price surpassed $90 a barrel for the first time in September while 1.3 million of estimated barrels have been cut daily. Crude prices are at a 10-month high and the heavy refined fuels that ships, planes, and trucks rely upon have skyrocketed in price. Diesel is up 41% while jet fuel registered a 24% increase (year over year). The latter has been rising steadily since May and Spirit Airlines, American Airlines, and Delta Air Lines all suffered a slide in their respective stock prices. The US Global Jets exchange-traded fund also declined 19% over the last three months. 

OPEC crude oil production is at its lowest since August 2021. Global economic contraction had led to slumping oil prices prompting OPEC’s (and its allies) response as one of aggressive supply restraint. On the other end, output increases by Venezuela and Iran have been notable. Iranian production reached a nearly 6-year high at 2.76 million barrels per day and Venezuela hit a 5-year peak at 810,000 barrels per day. Relaxed US sanctions post the Russian invasion of Ukraine were the likely catalyst behind the production uptick. 

Apart from supply, the world’s capacity to make diesel is also driving prices northward. Refineries are the engine and the Middle East and Africa have experienced delayed refinery startups while European refiners are struggling to make enough trucking fuel. One sector that is thriving is US refiners. Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum, and Valero Energy are trading at near-record highs. Healthy refining environments are in excellent condition based on tight supply and ever-increasing demand. 

At a macro level rising energy prices pose serious risks for consumer inflation. Everything from meal deliveries to everyday goods and services is affected. Contracting inventories will likely maintain crude oil prices elevated until 2024 and the surplus that was enjoyed in the first quarter of 2023 is expected to reverse.  

 

      

lithium-ion batteries transportation

A Game-Changing Energy Discovery

Many of the world’s largest economies are betting on batteries. While the challenges become clearer by the day, if batteries will bolster the move toward a reliable alternative energy source, lithium is critical. Up until recently the largest lithium reserves were relatively known, but a recent discovery of an ancient supervolcano in Nevada just might be the world’s largest lithium deposit to date. 

Chile is currently home to the world’s largest lithium reserves and the South American country is the world’s second-largest producer. Australia follows with Argentina, China, and the US rounding out the top five. This new discovery will potentially nudge the US up the list and radically alter the supply landscape. Last year, the average battery-grade lithium carbonate price was $37,000 per metric ton. Some estimates point to the supervolcano’s potential worth just shy of $1.50 trillion. 

The Nevada supervolcano was believed to have formed roughly 19 million years ago. Previous eruptions are thought to have pushed minerals to the surface via faults and fractures leaving lithium-rich smectite clay. In nearby Thacker Pass, the firm Lithium Americas had drilled 13.7 million tons of lithium carbonate, previously thought to be the largest US deposit. The supervolcano’s deposit is estimated to be in the range of 40 million tons. 

China is a dominant player in lithium refinement with approximately 90% of the metal mined at a global scale refined in the Asian superpower. If the US could move to refining its own deposits this has the potential to change the dynamics from a supply, price, and geopolitical perspective. The US currently imports hundreds of millions of lithium-ion batteries every year with China, South Korea, and Japan as the principal suppliers. Since 2020 the total import value of batteries has tripled, numbering $13.9 billion in 2023. 

As with most extractive industries, there are environmental concerns. The Bannock, Paiute, and Shoshone people are protesting what they deem would be “100 acres of disturbance” on sacred Native American land on the Nevada/Oregon border. Another group, the People of the Red Mountain, claim upwards of 91 cultural sites in the proposed drilling area and are concerned over the longer-term effects of lithium extraction. Extraction entails the use of 500,000 + liters of water per ton of lithium and the digging of up to 30 million tons of earth. 

In Argentina, environmental groups complain of contaminated streams near the lithium operation Salar de Hombre Muerto while the Chilean landscape is littered with mountains of discarded canals and salt that have resulted in an odd, unnatural blue hue. The upcoming battles will likely be regulatory in nature.  

 

     

employment supply

Top 7 Supply Chain Management M.B.A. Programs

U.S. News & World Report is out with another best Supply Chain Management M.B.A. Programs edition for 2023. Graduates go on to work in sectors as varied as food production to health care and these are the top 7 programs in the nation: 

  • Michigan State University (Broad)

The Eli Broad Graduate School of Management at Michigan State leads the nation in graduate degrees in supply chain management. The school is located in close proximity to an automotive hub – Detroit – and takes plenty advantage of the physical resources, expertise, and brain power at Fiat Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors. 

  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Sloan)

One of the most impressive facts from the Sloan School of Management is that 83.8% of graduates upon graduation are employed. The supply chain management/logistics program prepares graduates for a career not just locally, but abroad as well. MIT is known for its global focus so if a career abroad is of interest, Sloan is a wise choice. 

  • Arizona State University (W.P. Carey) 

Out west the W.P. Carey School of Business at Arizona State comes in number three. Carey is one of the largest business schools in the country with nearly 2,000 graduate students and 300 faculty. Within supply chain management/logistics, students can choose to pursue an M.B.A. either part or full-time as well as evening, executive, and online tracks. 

  • University of Tennessee – Knoxville (Haslam) 

While Haslam’s overall business offers are fewer than others on this list, the M.B.A. program leans heavily into supply chain management/logistics. Outside of the classroom students have access to organizations such as the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals, industry-specific boot camps as well as case competitions. There is also an executive M.B.A. specialization available in Global Supply Chain.  

  • Ohio State University (Fisher)

The Max M. Fisher College of Business is one of the more affordable in-state options in the country for an M.B.A. with a concentration in supply chain management/logistics. Ohio State offers a full and part-time program as well their popular executive program. By graduation, approximately 77% of graduates of the full-time program are gainfully employed. 

  • Carnegie Mellon University (Tepper)

The mini-semester system was pioneered at the Tepper School of Business – four quarters of 6.5-week classes. Not only is a production/operations management concentration available, but students can also earn a joint M.B.A./JD through the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.  

  • Pennsylvania State University – University Park (Smeal)

Rounding out the top 7 is another Pennsylvania school – the Smeal College of Business. Penn State is a large school with its pros and cons. The supply chain management/logistics concentration counts on a firm network of private sector partners state-wide and does a great job placing graduates in attractive positions upon graduation.  

IoT AB5 yellow

The Continued Fall-Out from Demise of Yellow Trucking

The US trucking industry recently bid adieu to one of the sector’s oldest firms – Yellow. On the heels of turning 100, Yellow shut down in July and at the time was the third-largest US carrier in the less-than-truckload (LTL) market. LTL firms like Yellow work with terminal networks to haul in freight pallets, transfer the merchandise onto trailers, and push the products out to their final destinations. 

Terminals are highly valued as they are generally close to cities to help speed the delivery process to regional businesses. Yellow owned a network of approximately 170 terminals, estimated to be worth roughly $1.5 billion. As the nearly 100-year-old behemoth was dismantled, a host of rivals lined up to consider the purchase of said terminals. Rival trucker Estes Express Lines came in with an initial offer of $1.3 billion. Old Dominion Freight Line followed with $1.5 billion. 

A bankruptcy court-supervised auction is slated for October 18th. While Old Dominion is the likely buyer there will be plenty of bids from rival trucking firms as well as the industrial real-estate sector. The sheer quantity of ready-to-operate facilities that will be available is quite rare. Trucking terminals are expensive to build and the space, especially in large cities, is scant. 

Earlier this summer Yellow sold a Compton, California single terminal for $80 million. The terminal was situated in a high-demand area – close to two of the country’s busiest seaports as well as Los Angeles City. The hefty price tag had to do with the population density. Terminals in less densely populated areas are much cheaper. 

Yellow will be seeking to repay its largest creditors. One of those is the US government to the tune of approximately $700 million. Yellow holds $1.92 billion in total liabilities and the company’s lawyers have let the bankruptcy courts know that they expect to raise the funds necessary to repay all creditors. The rumored real estate value of Yellow’s portfolio is $1.1 billion coupled with $900 million worth of trucks (11,700) and trailers (36,000).    

It is more than likely that one buyer ends up with all the terminals. Yellow will want to find the quickest and easiest transaction as opposed to negotiating with smaller, regional carriers on separate terminals. Some industry analysts are not confident Yellow will receive the appraised value of its equipment. Yellow’s fleet of newer trucks could go for as much as $100,000 but the models with high mileage will see suppressed offers. Used trailer and truck values skyrocketed during the pandemic but lagging freight volumes have suppressed the demand for trucks since midway through 2022. 

farmers

Why aren’t US Farmers Adopting Smart Technology?

Farmers who use precision agriculture technologies achieve greater yields than their counterparts who do not. This is according to the US Department of Agriculture and begs the question – if agtech tools are revolutionizing how farmers farm, why has the uptake been so slow? 

A survey by McKinsey of US farmers found less than half were using farm management software. Only 25% had implemented precision agriculture hardware and/or remote sensing, and a paltry 3% indicated they have plans on adopting AI-enabled software moving forward. 

Many of the developed world’s farmers already went through the first generation of digital farming tools. They were clunky, complex, a pain to manage, and the uptake was poor. Over the past couple of years Amazon, Google, and Microsoft have jumped into the arena, tailoring their artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud-computing to the larger industry. Bayer (now owner of Monsanto) has partnered with Microsoft and is rolling out what promises to be the most user-friendly service tying agribusiness to a cloud provider. 

Venture capital funding for sensing, Internet-of-Things, and farm management software increased by 35% last year. Relying on GPS, sensors, and AI, precision agriculture is posited to be the next big wave in farm innovation. Yet, high implementation costs, uncooperative weather, disease, and an aging demographic of farmers are proving to be the prickly thorns hindering uptake. 

American farmers are older than the average in most professions. At 58 years of age, a slower shift to technology is understandable. Most farmers rely on the guidance of agronomists and advisers as opposed to apps. The other concern of this demographic is data privacy. With age comes an increased reluctance to share farm-specific data. Compared to younger farmers, this is an area that significantly divides the two cohorts. 

Large farms and farming operations have been gobbling up market share over the past two decades. Bigger players use technology more efficiently and also pay the upfront costs necessary to implement efficiency-saving tools. Farmers who have opted for precision agriculture technologies with corn, cotton, soybeans, and winter wheat reap impressive yields compared to those who choose to remain with the status quo. 

A deluge of data is something that is certainly hindering widespread adoption. Yet, this generation’s apps are infinitely more user-friendly than the clunky options first rolled out two decades ago. Memories of unpleasant, first-generation technologies should not keep wide swaths of America’s farmers stuck in the past.  

vector artificial intelligence robotics market refurbished AI

The Introductory Phase of Generative AI and Industrial Supply Chains

Logistics firms are seeking to capitalize on the generative artificial intelligence (AI) revolution. Vast networks and significant revenue hangs in the balance. Yet, many are choosing to proceed cautiously as the chatbots common in the consumer products world have the sector wary of error rates and the potential fallout. 

There is a big difference between a chatbot fouling up a t-shirt order compared to botching the delivery of millions of dollars worth of goods. For big freight brokers such as RXO, the logistics provider Phlo Systems, and trucking firm XPO, intrigue in advancing with generative AI is there but relegated for the time being to more mundane and less risky tasks such as declaring imports, booking loads, and tracking shipments. 

In November of last year, OpenAI launched its ChatGPT bot. Everyone from law firms to retailers jumped at the opportunity to integrate a technology capable of sifting through massive amounts of information, calling out patterns, and then making predictions in minutes. For law firms this was a no-brainer, allowing the firm to save human resources time on tasks like performing legal research, analyzing contracts, and drafting documents. Retailers capitalized by using generative AI to scrutinize customer search queries and then route them to similar products according to the customer’s profile and purchasing history. 

For many in logistics, however, the stakes are high when you’re relying on generative AI to make supply-chain decisions across dozens of partners along the chain. The data behind aiding manufacturers and retailers to move shipments over air, ground, and sea is fast-changing, proprietary, and very complicated. If something goes awry the last “person” you want to be relying on is a chatbot. 

The previously mentioned RXO is analyzing the automation of customer support for only small and medium-sized firms. This could lessen the burden on sales so they can focus their efforts on new business development. Yet, at the same time RXO understands that a human option will always need to be present in the event something goes wrong – the risk is too great. In the business world being 80% to 90% accurate is not an option, so a hybrid approach is a given. 

From a trucking perspective, XPO is planning a bot to provide customers the ability to receive rate quotes, create pick-up requests, and track their freight. Meanwhile, Phlo Systems works with customs declarations and a chatbot to answer frequently asked questions. There are all introductory steps with a heavy, and appropriate, dose of caution.  

 

 

lithium

Arkansas could be the Future of US Lithium Production

Exxon Mobile is bullish on Arkansas. But neither oil nor gas is a driving factor. The southwest region of Arkansas is rich in saltwater brine. Once a thorn in the side of oil companies, saltwater brine is now highly sought-after principally due to what can be extracted from it – lithium. 

When a lithium-rich brine aquifer is discovered, the salty water is pumped to the surface (roughly 8,000 feet) where the lithium is then separated from the brine. This results in a lithium concentrate solution that is crystalized into lithium hydroxide, a battery-grade product for electric vehicle batteries. In May Exxon Mobile purchased 120,000 gross acres in southwest Arkansas for north of $100 million. The Texas giant is now rumored to be constructing one of the world’s largest lithium processing facilities close to Magnolia, a town of just 12,000 inhabitants. The facility would have the capacity to produce up to 100,000 metric tons of lithium per year, the equivalent of approximately 15% of the finished lithium produced globally last year. 

The Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico was a boon for US oil. Some are positing that Southwest Arkansas has the potential to be even more favorable in terms of the expected lithium output. In general, drilling for lithium is cleaner than traditional mining and this should result in fewer regulatory snafus. Yet, companies like Exxon must invest heavily in the technology used to siphon lithium from brine and the costs are significant. 

One firm estimates it would cost in the neighborhood of $1.5 billion to construct 25,000 metric tons of capacity. Standard Lithium is analyzing a proposal to build the first commercial lithium extraction facility in the US. The capacity would be 6,000 metric tons per year and they’ve proposed a 30,000-ton plant near Magnolia. 

Small-town mayors like Mr. Parnell Vann of Magnolia are fervent seekers of job creators. What Exxon Mobile and others could bring is significant, especially since the 1980s oil bust and a host of mill closures had decimated the region. Yet, some feel the town isn’t ready, citing the disrepair of water and sewage systems, a shortage of new homes, and limited roads. Estimates point to a potential of 6,000 jobs and roughly 1,600 trucks by 2028. An influx of this size would expand the city considerably. 

Exxon has been diligently preparing for a gasoline-light future. They have been in conversations with EV and battery manufacturers and approximate demand for EVs and hybrids powered by fuel cells to reach over 50% of new auto sales by 2050. 

 

  

 

growers edge bill

The Upcoming US Farm Bill is Likely the Most Expensive Yet

Congress is enacting a multiyear farm bill, the 20th of its kind since 1933. Farm bills are normally passed every five years and shape not only what kind of food domestic farmers grow, but also how they raise said food and how it ultimately arrives on the consumer’s plate. 

Farm bills 50 years ago were focused narrowly on farmers and ancillary suppliers/providers. The farm bill that will likely be enacted come 2025 is expected to cover a dizzying array of interest groups that range from helping towns purchase police cars to broadband access. Conservation and environmental groups are omnipresent, keeping a close eye on sustainable farming practices and land use, while rural counties especially have their own integrated market of providers (bankers, insurance agencies, hunters and anglers, and local governmental agencies). 

The Price

As with most new bills, interest groups will argue that more money is needed. If more cash is pumped into this bill, projected spending would dwarf all previous bills – $1.5 trillion over 10 years. In terms of food aid, nearly 80% of the bill is proposed to go to nutrition via the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). This is the largest federal nutrition assistance program providing benefits to eligible low-income families and individuals. From there, crop insurance, commodities, and conservation are slated to receive the rest. 

Reformers are pushing for capping payments to farmers. They argue it is not the smaller farmers who reap the subsidy benefits, but rather the large farms concentrated on churning out commodity crops such as corn, soybeans, rice, and wheat.  

Inexperience is Everywhere

While the price tag will certainly be an issue, the inexperience of roughly one-third of current members of Congress will challenge the process. For this one-third (elected after the 2018 farm bill), this will be their first go-around with a farm bill cycle and the learning curve is steep. 

The American Farm Bureau Federation as well as leading commodity groups have the support of some of the more senior members of Congress. The new members will likely follow their lead, although a fierce back-and-forth between Democrats and Republicans is expected. 

It would appear for those who were expecting a more diverse and potentially progressive bill, this won’t be the time. Pundits expect the entrenched interests to maintain control as in previous bills.