New Articles

How to Survive the Coming Data Privacy Tsunami

How to Survive the Coming Data Privacy Tsunami

Just as we have gotten used to the idea that the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a fact of life and have made modifications in our data collection procedures, the Brazil General Data Protection Law (LGDP), the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), and waves of proposed new data privacy laws are swirling in the calm forewarning of a privacy tsunami heading our way. In the middle of such deep acronym swirls, it could be easy to be overwhelmed. However, all the privacy regulations share a number of commonalities and by addressing these now, you will be on high ground as the waves begin to pound.

The compliance life raft

While you will need to pay attention to the details of individual data regulations as they arise, whether already adopted, pending adoption, or only proposed, all the regulations share certain commonalities that you should consider addressing as part of ongoing operations.

1. Accountability and governance

At the heart of data privacy requirements is the aim to have organizations develop a plan to self-manage data in a way that respects end users. To address accountability and governance requirements in your organization, consider, have you:

-Reviewed the applicability and risk to the organization from data privacy issues, and considered alternatives, including insurance, in case you are fined?

-Mandated that data privacy become part of the policy program, including staff training, measurement, and compliance reporting?

-Clearly documented roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines to embed privacy compliance?

2. Consent and processing

A fundamental privacy regulation concept is that end users are aware when and why their data is collected, and what happens to it once it’s given. To address these requirements, ask yourself whether you have:

-Reviewed that the data being collected and used is necessary and for the benefit of completing a desired action by the user?

-Identified sensitive data and ensured it is treated as such through the use of special encryption or by validating vendor storage practices for sensitive data, etc.?

-Confirmed that user consent for data collection is clearly captured and documented, and that user data can be modified or erased?

3. Notifications and data rights

Gone are the days of legalese or simply taking data from users because we can. Data privacy regulations require transparency, user awareness, and forthright behavior by businesses. To ensure you get this right, ask yourself whether the organization has:

-Written user notices clearly so they can be easily understood—properly targeted to children where relevant—and are reflective of specific data collection and usage purposes?

-Updated the internal organization’s data privacy policy to clearly state the rights of prospects and customers regarding the collection and processing of their personal data?

-Created and tested processes to correct and delete all user data if needed?

Developed a solution to give users their data in a portable electronic format?

4. Privacy design

Organizations that treat privacy as a core design principle will always be in alignment with data privacy regulations. In my consulting experience, I see many self-disciplined organizations that have historically had good privacy practices and have little to address with each new law. To get to that state, ask whether you have:

-Created or updated the policy and associated process to embed privacy into all technology and digital projects, including those outsourced to vendors and partners?

5. Data breach notification

For many organizations, the question nowadays isn’t whether the organization will have a breach, but rather when will it happen and how will they respond. To address regulatory breach aspects, ask whether the organization has:

-Created (or reviewed and updated an existing) data breach policy and response plan to reflect detection, notification, and the actions to mitigate loss?

-Considered and obtained insurance for a possible data breach and regulatory penalties that the organization may face but not be able to handle on its own?

-Incorporated data breach terms and requirements into all vendor and third-party contracts?

6. Data localization

New data privacy regulations state where data physically must be stored, and if transferred to another country, what are the requirements for doing so. Your organization will be well positioned to meet this requirement if it can answer:

-Have we identified and updated all cross-border data flows from the country where the data is collected, and reviewed data export for on-premise and cloud solutions?

7. Children’s online privacy considerations

Data privacy regulations are concerned with end users, but  are even more strict about children and their online data protection and rights. It is best to get ahead of these issues by asking whether the organization has:

-Defined what data it collects from children, whether as a business practice or through efforts like “take your child to work day”?

-Are user notifications and online privacy statements written in a way that a child could understand them, and do they state that parental consent is required?

8. Contracting and procurement

Most businesses may struggle to understand exactly what personal user data is collected via websites, mobile applications, and other digital platforms, especially through third-party software solutions and vendors. To make sure that your organization isn’t caught out, ask whether you have:

-Reviewed and ensured that all vendors, customers, and third-party agreements reflect data regulatory requirements?

-Defined procurement processes such that privacy is integrated into all products and services the organization buys, including regarding data minimization, the visibility of onward data flows, and data ownership?

The bottom line

After years of collecting as much data as we could, we are starting to realize that all of that data has an evil twin: risk. In addition, consumers have become more aware that their data is a valuable resource, and they’re asking more questions about how it’s used and who has access to it. Governments, too, are starting to pay attention. Make sure that you get ahead of the coming data privacy regulatory waves before it becomes an unimaginable problem.

KRISTINA PODNAR is a digital policy innovator. For over two decades, she has worked with some of the most high-profile companies in the world and has helped them see policies as opportunities to free the organization from uncertainty, risk, and internal chaos. Podnar’s approach brings in marketing, human resources, IT, legal, compliance, security, and procurement to create digital policies and practices that comply with regulations, unlock opportunity, strengthen the brand and liberate employees.

Podnar speaks regularly at industry conferences, contributes articles to publications, and delivers masterclasses on digital policy. Podnar is the Principal of NativeTrust Consulting, LLC. She has a BA in international studies and an MBA in international business from the Dominican University of California and is certified as both a Change Management Practitioner (APMG International) and a Project Management Professional (Project Management Institute).

The Power of Digital Policy: A practical guide to minimizing risk and maximizing opportunity for your organization is available on Amazon and through other fine booksellers. For more information, visit Kristina @ www.kpodnar.com and on LinkedIn and Twitter.

Descartes Air Cargo Advance Screening Solutions Provides Compliance Technology

Nippon Cargo Airlines confirmed this week the implementation of the Descartes Air Cargo Advance Screening Program to support efforts towards compliance for air cargo imports to the U.S. The announcement confirmed with the mandatory advanced security filings taking place, the company will rely heavily on the required ACAS to meet compliance requirements.

“Compliance with regulations, such as ACAS, is essential to ensuring safe and secure operations for our customers and NCA,” said Keita Sataka, Senior Vice President at NCA. “Descartes has a strong history of providing NCA and the air cargo industry with customs and security filing technology, and their ACAS solution provides a proven, reliable, cost effective way to meet data collection and submission requirements.”

The functionality of the ACAS requires pre-loading data to be submitted, following mandatory data requirements for air forwarders and carriers. The Descartes Global Logistics Network streamlines  the validation process by managing the flow of master and house bill information with automation.

“We’re pleased to help NCA comply with ACAS requirements,” said Scott Sangster, VP Global Logistics Network at Descartes. “Air cargo transportation is a vital part of the growing international logistics market, and Descartes’ solutions help carriers, like NCA, and other stakeholders in the air cargo community accelerate the movement of freight while meeting important security initiatives worldwide.”

Source: Descartes

Shipping Compliance Primary Focus in Labelmaster Partnership

In an effort to support globally compliant shipping of dangerous goods while advocating for safety within the global supply chain, Labelmaster has entered into a strategic partnership with partners from both The Dangerous Goods Office Limited and Viking Packing. All three companies share a similar background in handling dangerous goods and providing packing and shipping logistics solutions.

Dangerous goods shipping is complex and challenging, making it important for shippers to have the right resources and processes in place,” said Leach. “The partnership of The Dangerous Goods Office and Viking Packing with Labelmaster presents a tremendous opportunity to help companies shipping dangerous goods establish safe and compliant practices and identify process gaps that put their global supply chain at risk.”

Geoff Leach, principal of United Kingdom-based The Dangerous Goods Office Limited, brings with him over 30 years of experience including his position as head of the CAA’s Dangerous Goods Office. Dave Weilert, president of Viking Packing, brings with him industry knowledge and matchless leadership skills that boast a historical partnership with Leach in the past leading to the formation of The Dangerous Goods Office Ltd.

“In addition to the consulting support and industry expertise Geoff will provide, Viking Packing will work to supplement Labelmaster’s packaging solutions to deliver even greater value to its customers.”

Labelmaster President Alan Schoen concluded:

“The risk associated with shipping and handling dangerous goods is greater than ever; unfortunately, many organizations put their company’s operational efficiency, competitive agility, reputation and bottom line at risk by not having the necessary knowledge, infrastructure and training to ensure compliance across the supply chain. Partnering with The Dangerous Goods Office Ltd and Viking Packing supports our commitment to helping our customers simplify the complexities of DG transport by offering the industry’s best packaging, services and guidance to handle and ship hazmat in a safe, compliant and efficient manner.”

Source: Labelmaster

Reducing Emissions

Connecticut shipping company Eagle Bulk continues moving forward to meet its anticipated January 2020 completion date for the installation of fleet scrubbers. The initiative, which was originally announced by the company back in September, will comprise of implementing 34 fleet scrubbers during the set date for the launch of the new sulphur emissions cap regulation by the International Maritime Organization.

With the topic of fleet scrubbers becoming increasingly discussed, not all players in the industry are convinced it’s a solution that will prove longevity for the sector in maintaining compliance efforts. Additionally, the recent spike in demand for the installation of these scrubbers provides a challenge for manufacturers to keep up and provide the industry demands.

Other companies that have jumped on board with the scrubbers include Scorpio Group, Star Bulk, International Seaways, DHT, and of course, Eagle Bulk. Star Bulk plans to equip its entire fleet with the scrubbers while Frontline recently increased the goal to 40 percent of its fleets.

With roughly one year until the emissions cap regulation is launched, fleet scrubbers will continue to be of discussion while for some the demand will continue to increase.

Source: Hellenic Shipping News, West, Reuters, Eagle Bulk

 

 

USTR: China Must “Allow Market Forces to Operate”

Washington, D.C. – If China is going to deal successfully with its economic challenges at home, “it must allow market forces to operate, which requires altering the role of the state in planning the economy,” according to the latest Report to Congress on China’s WTO Compliance compiled by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR).

The country, the report added, likewise “must reform state-owned enterprises, eliminate preferences for domestic national champions and remove market access barriers currently confronting foreign goods and services.”

The report cited a “dramatic expansion in trade and investment” among China and its many trading partners since the country acceded to the WTO in December 2001.

U.S. exports of goods to China totaled $122 billion in 2013, representing an increase of 535 percent since 2001 and positioning China as the U.S.’ largest goods export market outside of North America, while U.S. services exports reached $38 billion in 2013, representing an increase of 603 percent since 2001.

Services supplied through majority U.S.-invested companies in China also have been increasing dramatically, totaling an additional $39 billion in 2012, the latest year for which data is available.

“Despite these results, however, the overall picture currently presented by China’s WTO membership remains complex, largely due to the Chinese government’s interventionist policies and practices and the large role of state-owned enterprises and other national champions in China’s economy,” the report said.

In 2014, as in past years, when trade frictions have arisen, the U.S. “pursued dialogue with China to resolve them,” it said.

But, when dialogue with China “has not led to the resolution of key trade issues, the United States has not hesitated to invoke the WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism.”

Since China’s accession to the WTO, the U.S. has brought 15 WTO cases against China, more than twice as many WTO cases as any other WTO member has brought against China, according to data supplied by the Geneva-headquartered global trade group.

In doing so, “the United States has placed a strong emphasis on the need for China to adhere to WTO rules, holding China fully accountable as a mature participant in, and a major beneficiary of, the WTO’s global trading system,” the USTR report said.

“The United States views economic reform in China as a win-win for the United States and China,” the report concludes “not only because the Chinese government’s interventionist policies and practices and the large role of state-owned enterprises in China’s economy are principal drivers of trade frictions, but also because a sustainable Chinese economy will lead to increased U.S. exports and a more balanced U.S.-China trade and investment relationship will help drive global economic growth.”

12/31/2014