In response to the escalating Red Sea crisis, leading online container logistics platform Container xChange released a comprehensive report detailing the far-reaching effects on container trading and leasing rates worldwide. The report explores the intricate dynamics of the crisis, shedding light on the unprecedented surge in container prices and leasing rates, as well as the ripple effect on global trade routes.
Read also: Red Sea Global Trade Disruptions: How to Overcome the Chaos
1. IMPACT OF RED SEA ATTACKS ON CONTAINER PRICES
As container vessels take longer routes, capacity constraints contribute to a revival in container rates. The China-to-Europe trade lane has witnessed significant surges, with trading spot rates soaring in key Chinese ports. The disruptions are not confined to China; leasing rates bound for Hamburg, Germany, have doubled since Jan 1.
To provide context on the current state of average container prices in Shanghai, China, in comparison to the peak demand period during the COVID-19 pandemic (2021), we present a chart illustrating the price trends from 2020 to Jan. 29, 2024. The container prices skyrocketed to historic levels in 2021 due to the pent-up demand post COVID, reaching a peak of $6,171 in the last week of September 2021, and falling since then until December 2023 (keeping aside minor seasonal hikes). However, container prices have experienced a significant increase since the beginning of January 2024.
Weekly China-Europe Trading spot rates continue to shoot up: Trading spot rates for 40-foot-high cube cargo-worthy containers have witnessed a significant surge in key Chinese ports. Noticeable week-on-week increases have been recorded in Xiamen (23%), Shekou (19%), Guangzhou (10%), Huangpu (8%), and Nansha (8%). These disruptions are not confined to China; leasing rates bound for Hamburg have doubled since Jan. 1.
“Since the beginning of the Houthi situation, the trading prices for 40-foot-high cube units in China significantly increased because there is expected tightness around equipment availability in Chinese main ports ahead of Chinese New Year because the loop around Africa soaks up capacity and delays the return of empty equipment to China,” commented Christian Roeloffs, cofounder and CEO of Container xChange.
“At present, there is still surplus in the market. However, the challenge lies in securing space on vessels, and the PUCs (pickup charges) are considerably high. The suppliers are hesitant to reposition their containers to locations with elevated storage fees, and if they do, they often seek to offset these costs by demanding higher PUC.”
A Container xChange customer from India added, “Storage charges in India are inexpensive. Consequently, some NVOCC [non-vessel operating common carriers] opt to utilize containers from other companies rather than moving their own.”
Container xChange’s research indicates a global impact on container trading prices, with the top 10 locations experiencing substantial month-on-month percentage increases. European ports like Le Havre, France, and Duisburg, Germany, witnessed significant decreases, while ports in North America showed mixed results. Meanwhile, Asian ports, including Shanghai, China, and Xiamen, China, saw an increase in average container prices, indicating adaptation to disruptions.
Shown above are the top 10 locations with biggest percentage increase in average monthly container prices across the world.
There are varying degrees of impact on container prices across different regions. Some regions experienced a decrease in prices, while others saw an increase.
2. CONTAINER LEASING RATES CONTINUE TO RISE
Container leasing spot rates have mirrored the spikes observed in trading prices, especially in the China-to-Europe route. Rates have steadily increased, reaching notable highs. The expected continuation of disruptions indicates a prolonged period of challenges, requiring industries to adapt to structural imbalances in supply and demand.
“We’ve witnessed a continuous surge in leasing rates since around August-September 2023, starting at a low of approximately $200 for a one-way move from Ningbo or Shanghai to Hamburg, often referred to as pickup charges,” says Roeloffs.
“This escalation is primarily driven by two key factors. Firstly, the widening price gap in trading prices has played a pivotal role, and secondly, there’s a notable equipment scarcity across China. As the price gap widens and equipment availability tightens, the spike has become more evident since the beginning of 2024. It’s clear that the attacks in the Red Sea are not merely a passing phenomenon; they have substantial implications on the routing of container vessels, causing delays in their return trips to China. We have witnessed this surge to top at $800 for a one-way move, marking a fourfold increase.”
The Container xChange co-founder and CEO continues, “We do expect that after Chinese New Year the situation will decelerate and ease up owing to the drop in demand, carriers will be able to reconfigure their network and adjust to the longer transit times around the cape of good hope and are supposed to have a structural supply demand imbalance with a significance supply overhang.”
He concludes, “The situation is expected to persist for a longer than expected period of time and hence, we will probably have to live with this for a long time.”
Top trade routes with highest month-on-month rate hikes: In the period from Jan. 1-30, 2024, leasing rates for routes bound to Hamburg showed a substantial increase. For example, Qingdao to Hamburg rates surged from $260 on Jan. 1 to $1,060 by Jan. 30. Similarly, Shenzhen to Hamburg rates rose from $500 on Jan. 1 to $750 by Jan. 30. These figures highlight a significant upward trend in leasing rates during the specified timeframe, illustrating the impactful changes in the market.
Below is the list of the highest spikes noticed month on month from December 2023 to January 2024 across trade routes. The prices are the average leasing terms for SOCs (shipper owned containers) as observed on the Insights platform of Container xChange.
European ports experience substantial increases: Routes connecting Shanghai to European ports, such as Le Havre, Budapest, and Munich, witnessed some of the highest percentage increases. Le Havre recorded an extraordinary surge of 323.08%. This indicates potential challenges in the European supply chain, possibly due to the longer alternative route and increased shipping costs.
Impact on trans-Pacific routes: Routes to the West Coast of the United States, including Oakland, Los Angeles, and Long Beach, all in California, experienced notable increases (ranging from 30.94% to 51.71%). The rise in leasing rates suggests that vessels rerouting around the Cape of Good Hope are facing higher costs, potentially due to increased travel distances and fuel consumption.
Significant impact on transatlantic routes: Routes connecting Shanghai to key North American cities like New York, New York, and Cleveland, Ohio, witnessed considerable percentage increases. This indicates that the disruption is affecting the traditional transatlantic trade routes, with potential repercussions for industries relying on timely deliveries between Asia and North America.
Mixed impact on Asian routes: While routes to Chennai, India, experienced a substantial increase (73.33%), routes to Minsk, Belarus, showed a comparatively lower percentage rise (19.17%). This suggests variations in how disruptions affect different regions, possibly influenced by the nature of trade and supply chain dynamics.
3. INDUSTRIES IMPACTED BY RED SEA TURMOIL
The longer disruptions at the Red Sea trade route pose a significant threat to various industries, including automobiles, electronics, chemicals, consumer goods, machinery, and pharmaceuticals. Delays in the supply chain could lead to production interruptions, impacting global value chains.
“Effectively navigating this critical period requires enhanced predictive analysis, meticulous demand forecasting, and increased collaboration within the industry,” says Roeloffs. “By employing advanced planning techniques and maintaining agility in response to evolving situations, the manufacturing sector can not only overcome immediate challenges but also strategically position itself for long-term success. Adapting to the new normal will involve holding increased inventory, accounting for extended transit times, and acknowledging higher container rates as integral components of the evolving landscape.”
The impact extends beyond individual industries to the broader economy, emphasizing the vulnerability of just-in-time manufacturing processes to disruptions. Businesses across sectors will need to closely monitor and adapt to evolving circumstances to ensure the continued flow of goods through alternative routes if necessary.
A remarkably positive outlook on container price development: In January, the Container Price Sentiment Index (xCPSI), a proprietary container price sentiment tool by Container xChange, consistently maintained historically elevated levels, reflecting a widespread belief that container prices would continue to soar due to the ongoing Red Sea crisis. The industry anticipates sustained high prices, highlighting the profound impact of the crisis on global trade.
The industry’s expectation for container prices to remain exceptionally high in the foreseeable future urges businesses to stay agile and vigilant in their planning amidst evolving global trade dynamics.
The Container Price Sentiment Index (xCPSI) serves as a valuable metric for assessing the prevailing market sentiments among supply chain professionals on the anticipated trajectory of container prices in the upcoming weeks.
Container xChange serves as a global online platform facilitating container leasing and trading, connecting container users with owners. The platform streamlines the process of finding and exchanging containers, optimizing fleet management, and fostering collaboration across the shipping industry. Currently, 1,500+ vetted container logistics companies trust xChange with their business.