New Articles

Asia–Europe Container Rates Slide as Iran Conflict Impact Fades

container china u.s rate port high-tech global trade dock tariffs market shipping

Asia–Europe Container Rates Slide as Iran Conflict Impact Fades

Container freight rates on the key Asia–Europe lanes are retreating back to pre-conflict levels, as supply chains stabilize and seasonal demand softens following the initial disruption tied to tensions in Iran.

Read also; March U.S. Container Imports Climb as Global Supply Chain Pressures Mount

Latest data from Drewry shows spot rates on the Shanghai–Rotterdam route fell 4% week-on-week to $2,147 per 40ft container, while the Shanghai–Genoa corridor dropped 8% to $3,071 per 40ft. Both lanes are now broadly in line with levels seen before the conflict escalated in late February.

The pullback reflects a combination of weaker seasonal demand and excess vessel capacity, according to analysts.

Shipping intelligence platform Xeneta reports a similar trend, noting that carriers have now adjusted to new routing patterns and redeployed capacity after the initial shock. Average spot rates from the Far East have declined over the past month, down 6% to North Europe and 13% to the Mediterranean.

With the immediate disruption priced out, attention is shifting to how carriers manage supply in the coming weeks.

So far, capacity discipline appears limited. Only a handful of sailings have been canceled, and planned early May rate increases are already losing momentum. Analysts suggest these hikes may struggle to gain traction, especially after some carriers opted to extend existing rate levels into May.

Major liners including Hapag-Lloyd and CMA CGM have announced new mid-May rate targets, but their success will largely depend on whether carriers tighten capacity.

There are early signs of that happening. Data shows capacity on several key east-west trades has declined this week, including a notable drop on the Far East–North Europe route. Analysts say this mix of controlled supply and lingering congestion is helping to keep rates from falling too sharply.

On the transpacific, the strategy appears to be working more effectively. Rates from Shanghai to Los Angeles edged up 4% this week, while the Shanghai–New York route held steady.

Carriers are also holding firm on pricing ahead of the 1 May contract negotiation deadline, wary of weakening their position during annual rate talks.

Short-term demand has been supported by seasonal factors, including holiday-driven shipping activity across Southeast Asia. However, expectations for post-holiday volumes remain subdued, which could limit any near-term rate increases.

Forwarders say underlying demand remains fragile. Some large shippers have already secured discounted rates into the U.S. West Coast, well below official price levels. At the same time, reduced sailings are creating volatility, with more cargo being rolled to later departures.

Schedules are also becoming less reliable, with some sailings disappearing altogether and being pushed into later weeks.

If demand fails to rebound in May, industry players warn that the gap between discounted deals and official rates could widen further—potentially forcing another market correction.

operations global trade supply chain container shipping red sea panama canal

Container Shipping Rates Rise as Asian Exports Recover, Hormuz Tensions Add Uncertainty

Global container freight rates moved higher this week as export activity across Asia began recovering after the Lunar New Year slowdown. However, escalating tensions in the Middle East, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz are raising concerns that geopolitical risks could soon disrupt the fragile market rebound.

Read also: Shipping Disruptions in Strait of Hormuz Impact Global Steel Trade

According to the latest update from the Drewry World Container Index, the global benchmark for container spot rates increased 3% to $1,958 per 40-foot container in the week ending March 5. The rise marks the first weekly gain after seven consecutive weeks of declining rates.

The improvement comes as manufacturing activity across Asia gradually returns to normal following the holiday break. With factories restarting operations, shipping lines have begun reducing blank sailings and restoring vessel capacity across key trade routes.

Rates on the transpacific corridor recorded some of the strongest gains. Freight prices from Shanghai to Los Angeles climbed 10% to $2,402 per forty-foot container, while Shanghai to New York increased 7% to $2,977.

In contrast, Asia–Europe routes continued to face softer demand. Rates from Shanghai to Rotterdam slipped 2% to $2,052, while shipments from Shanghai to Genoa rose only slightly, increasing 1% to $2,844. Despite the modest performance, analysts expect cargo volumes on these routes to strengthen through March as production across Asia fully resumes.

Drewry noted that carriers are already preparing to restore capacity on the Asia–Europe and Mediterranean trades. Only four cancelled sailings have been scheduled for the next two weeks, suggesting that services are gradually returning to normal levels.

A similar trend is emerging on the transpacific routes. Drewry’s Container Capacity Insight reported just four blank sailings planned for the upcoming week on both U.S. East Coast and West Coast services, significantly fewer than earlier in the year.

However, the improving demand outlook is now being overshadowed by rising geopolitical risk. Commercial shipping in the Persian Gulf has slowed sharply following coordinated military strikes by the United States and Israel against Iran, raising fears of further disruption around the Strait of Hormuz.

The waterway is one of the world’s most critical energy chokepoints, handling roughly 20% of global oil supply. As tensions rise, energy markets have already reacted, with crude prices climbing on concerns over potential supply interruptions.

Drewry warned that higher fuel costs, increased war-risk insurance premiums, and potential operational disruptions could translate into higher freight rates for container shipping.

Although container vessels have relatively limited direct exposure to Gulf routes compared with oil tankers and LNG carriers, the indirect effects could still be significant. Rising bunker fuel prices, longer diversions, and elevated insurance costs could all push carriers to increase rates.

According to Drewry’s analysis, about 158 container ships, representing approximately 691,000 TEU, or roughly 2.1% of global container capacity, were operating in the Gulf region when the crisis began. This limits immediate operational exposure, but prolonged instability could still reshape global shipping patterns.

One key risk is that renewed security concerns could delay plans by some carriers to return vessels to the Suez Canal after months of diversions caused by the Red Sea crisis. If that happens, effective fleet capacity could remain constrained, potentially supporting higher freight rates.

For now, the container shipping market is balancing two opposing forces: improving seasonal demand from Asia and mounting geopolitical uncertainty. If export volumes continue to recover while energy costs climb, the recent rise in freight rates could mark the beginning of another period of disruption-driven volatility for global shipping.

operations global trade supply chain container shipping red sea panama canal

Container Rates Slide as Carriers Cautiously Reintroduce Suez Capacity, Drewry Says

Global container freight rates extended their decline for a second consecutive week as carriers grappled with softening demand and mixed strategies on returning capacity to the Suez Canal, according to Drewry.

Read also: Drewry Launches OnDemand Service for Container Shipping Intelligence

The Drewry World Container Index fell 10% to $2,212 per 40-foot container, weighed down by sharp drops across Transpacific and Asia–Europe trade lanes following the post–Chinese New Year slowdown. Drewry said rates are expected to continue trending lower in the weeks ahead.

Transpacific routes recorded some of the steepest declines. Spot rates from Shanghai to New York fell 11% week over week to $3,191 per container, while Shanghai–Los Angeles rates dropped 12% to $2,546.

Drewry noted that carriers stepped up blank sailings in response to weakening demand after the seasonal cargo rush. The cancellation of scheduled sailings remains a key lever for lines seeking to manage capacity and slow the pace of rate erosion.

Conflicting Suez Strategies Fuel Volatility

Rate pressure is being compounded by uncertainty over carrier routing decisions through the Red Sea. While some lines are cautiously resuming Suez Canal transits after nearly two years of diversions, others are retreating, resulting in what Drewry describes as a “drip-feed” return of capacity to the market.

Asia–Europe lanes reflected this volatility. Rates from Shanghai to Rotterdam slid 9% to $2,510 per container, while Shanghai–Genoa fell 8% to $3,520.

Operational decisions remain split. CMA CGM has opted to reroute three Asia–Europe services back around the Cape of Good Hope, while Maersk plans to restart scheduled Suez transits on its India–U.S. East Coast service beginning January 26.

Drewry said the lack of coordination among carriers suggests capacity will be reintroduced gradually rather than in a single wave—an approach that could help avoid what it termed a “catastrophic collapse in spot rates.”

Capacity Still Constrained—For Now

Despite recent declines, global capacity remains artificially tight. Ongoing diversions around the Cape of Good Hope continue to absorb an estimated 2 million TEUs of container shipping capacity, contributing to an effective reduction of roughly 8% in global supply.

“The return to the Suez Canal is one of this year’s key swing factors for capacity, freight rates and transit times,” Drewry analyst Philip Damas said, noting that carriers are closely monitoring insurance costs, competitor behavior, and the risk of port congestion before committing to permanent route changes.

Industry analysts have warned that freight rates could fall by as much as 25% globally in 2026—even if conditions in the Red Sea do not materially worsen—leaving carriers walking a narrow line between restoring networks and preserving pricing power.

rate TT club terminal operations global trade shipping trade red sea houthi Hapag-Lloyd shipping leasing season ammonia shippers import shipping u.s rates

Container Shipping Anchors Alternative-Fuel Demand in 2025

Container shipping remained the main driver of alternative-fuel vessel orders in 2025, even as global newbuilding activity fell sharply, according to new data from DNV.

Read also: International Maritime Organization’s Zero Net Framework

Alternative-fuelled ships accounted for 38% of gross tonnage in the global orderbook, despite total newbuild orders dropping to 2,403 vessels from 4,405 in 2024. The resilience came largely from container shipping, where orders rose year over year to 547 vessels.

Container ships represented 68% of all alternative-fuel newbuilds in 2025 and nearly half of total gross tonnage on order. LNG dominated fuel choices within the segment, accounting for 58% of tonnage, followed by conventional fuels at 36% and methanol at 6%.

“The strength of the alternative-fuel orderbook is being driven by cargo owners maintaining emissions targets despite market and regulatory uncertainty,” said Jason Stefanatos, DNV’s global decarbonization director.

Outside the container segment, ordering activity weakened significantly. Orders for LPG and ethane carriers fell 73%, while car carrier contracting dropped 90%. Bulk and tanker segments also saw sharp declines as owners focused on cost control.

Across all vessel types, LNG-fuelled ships led with 188 orders, while methanol-fuelled newbuilds fell sharply year over year. Infrastructure investment continued, with 22 LNG bunker vessels added to the orderbook, supporting continued adoption.

The data underscores a market split between resilient container-led decarbonization investment and broader hesitation amid regulatory and market uncertainty.

operations global trade supply chain container shipping red sea panama canal

Container Shipping Faces Oversupply Risk Amid Record Ship Orders

The global container shipping sector is heading toward potential market turbulence as the orderbook hits 11.61 million TEU, or 34.8% of the current fleet, far exceeding routine fleet replacement needs, according to maritime intelligence firm Linerlytica.

Read also: Container Rates Fall on Asia-U.S. Routes as Supply Outpaces Demand

The surge follows a record-breaking 2025, with carriers ordering 633 new ships totaling 5.08 million TEU, surpassing previous highs in 2021 and 2024. Key players such as COSCO and Hapag-Lloyd pushed the year’s total beyond 4.77 million TEU ordered in 2024. Linerlytica warns this expansion could trigger over-supply over the next four years, raising concerns about whether cargo demand can keep pace with the influx of new capacity through 2029.

Chinese shipyards remain dominant, taking 79% of orders (497 ships) and 72% of capacity (3.66 million TEU). Meanwhile, South Korean yards increased their share from 11% in 2024 to 27% in 2025, adding 1.35 million TEU.

Market volatility persists. After failed attempts to raise rates earlier in December, carriers launched a second round of hikes mid-month with limited success. Although the Shanghai Containerized Freight Index briefly surged 7.8%, much of the increase was quickly rolled back.

Looking ahead to 2026, the Premier Alliance plans to add two Transpacific PSW services and upgrade its Asia–North Europe string in April, maintaining routing via the Cape of Good Hope instead of the Suez Canal due to security concerns.

With record ordering, uncertain demand, and rising competition, the industry faces a crucial challenge: whether it can absorb the new capacity without triggering a prolonged period of depressed freight rates.

global trade

Hapag-Lloyd Orders Eight Methanol-Powered Container Ships for 2028-2029 Delivery

Hapag-Lloyd has signed a contract with the Chinese shipyard CIMC Raffles for the construction of eight new container ships. This information was reported by Hellenic Shipping News.

Read also: Hapag-Lloyd Delivers Strong H1 2025 Results Amid Global Shipping Challenges

The ordered units will each have a capacity of 4,500 TEU and are scheduled for delivery in 2028 and 2029. The investment volume amounts to more than USD 500 million.

The new ships will be equipped with state-of-the-art dual-fuel methanol engines. They will be up to 30 percent more efficient than older generations of ships in the same size class and will be able to save up to 350,000 metric tons of CO2e per year when using methanol propulsion. The ships, which are part of Hapag-Lloyds first newbuild project involving this sustainable propulsion technology, will complement the growing portfolio of dual-fuel container ships in the companys fleet: At present, a total of 37 dual-fuel liquefied natural gas (LNG) units that can also operate using biomethane are in operation or planned.

In addition, in April 2024, Hapag-Lloyd had already agreed with Seaspan Corporation to have five 10,100 TEU container ships converted to dual-fuel methanol propulsion in 2026 and 2027. Moreover, in November 2024, Hapag-Lloyd had concluded an agreement with the Chinese energy producer Goldwind for the supply of 250,000 metric tons of green methanol per year. The green methanol, which will consist of a mixture of biomethanol and e-methanol, will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 70 percent and thereby comply with all current sustainability certifications.

Furthermore, it was decided that another 14 newbuildings in the size classes 1,800 TEU (4 units), 3,500 TEU (6 units) and 4,500 TEU (4 units) will be chartered on a long-term basis. The ships will be delivered between 2027 and 2029. As previously announced on November 13, 2025, Hapag-Lloyd is thus investing in a total of 22 new vessels in the segment with a capacity of less than 5,000 TEU.

“Continuously modernizing our fleet is firmly anchored in our Strategy 2030. The new ships will help replace older tonnage, further decarbonize the Hapag-Lloyd fleet, and reduce our dependence on the charter market. Whats more, operating these state-of-the-art ships will be much more cost-efficient,” said Rolf Habben Jansen, CEO of Hapag-Lloyd AG.

Hapag-Lloyd remains committed to its goal of being a driver of sustainability in container shipping and to the gradual decarbonization of its fleet. By 2030, the company plans to reduce the absolute greenhouse gas emissions of its fleet operations by around one third compared to 2022. Net-zero fleet operations are to be achieved by 2045.

Source: IndexBox Market Intelligence Platform

global trade DHL rate

Container Shipping Rates Rise Again After Three-Week Drop

Global container shipping rates rose 7% this week to $1,927 per FEU, marking the first increase in nearly a month after spot prices slid to their lowest point since January 2025, according to the latest Drewry World Container Index. The rebound was led by stronger pricing on the Transpacific and Asia-Europe corridors, where carriers have adopted a more tactical approach to managing rates.

Read also: Container Shipping Prices Fall After Holidays, but Red Sea Risks Still Worry Industry

On the Transpacific, spot rates from Shanghai to Los Angeles climbed 8% to $2,256 per FEU, while Shanghai to New York rates advanced 6% to $2,895. The uptick reflects a significant shift in pricing strategy: instead of relying on traditional biweekly General Rate Increases (GRIs) that often fade quickly, several carriers are now implementing smaller, weekly adjustments to maintain steady upward pressure. Drewry notes that this new cadence has helped stabilize the market, with analysts expecting rate levels to hold in the coming week.

Asia-Europe routes recorded even stronger gains. Shanghai to Genoa jumped 15% to $2,648 per FEU, while Shanghai to Rotterdam rose 4% to $2,241. Unlike the Transpacific, these lanes have sustained consistent pricing for three consecutive weeks. Carriers are leaning on Freight All Kinds (FAK) increases to reinforce spot rates ahead of the upcoming annual contract season.

However, the broader outlook remains clouded by uncertainty around the Suez Canal. While carriers still view the canal as the preferred East-West passage, a full restoration of transits would reintroduce substantial capacity into the market. That shift could ultimately place downward pressure on rates, though any impact would unfold gradually as ports adjust to network realignments.

The latest rate recovery comes as the industry juggles multiple variables—from capacity discipline and seasonal demand cycles to geopolitical disruptions and the lingering effects of early-year front-loading. For now, weekly rate increases appear to be giving carriers the stability they’ve been struggling to achieve in recent months.

tariff flexport trade port cargo distribution spot freight rate SATS christmas port DHL maersk rates air cargo freight shipping rail tesla china rates packaging trucking walmart port C.H robinson inflation truck freight traffic court gold u.s bitcoin oil china market openai Droege county tesla job texas china government china supply china UK price global trade india freight U.S swiss tariff economy trump trillion tesla economic data framework oil musk spot container growth AI global IMO black taiwan shipbuilding ship holiday cargo rail china tariff rail supply spot truck trade

U.S. Container Import Bookings Lag Behind 2024 Pace

According to data from FreightWaves SONAR, bookings for containers bound for the United States, measured by the Inbound Ocean TEUs Volume Index, have been notably weaker this fall, averaging roughly 11% below 2024 levels since September.

Read also: Container Shipping Prices Fall After Holidays, but Red Sea Risks Still Worry Industry

The index, however, remains more than 30% higher than 2019, a year which also featured concerns about escalating U.S.-China trade tensions. In May 2019, tariffs were raised from 10% to 25% on $200 billion of Chinese goods, with another round levied in August, though some were later rolled back. These actions resulted in a modest increase in orders but did not spark the panic buying seen in more recent years.

The COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 triggered the most extreme surge in container imports in history. From mid-2020 through the first half of 2022, shippers shifted inventory management from “just in time” to “just in case.” As goods consumption cooled, many companies were left with excess inventory.

Companies then reduced orders below restocking levels for about a year before resuming imports at a robust pace in late 2023. The next major disruption occurred in October 2023 with the Hamas attack on Israel, which ultimately forced vessels to divert from the Suez Canal. This diversion constrained maritime capacity and pushed trans-Pacific spot rates for 40-foot containers above $7,000 in the summer of 2024, the highest levels since 2022. The disruptions pushed some shippers back toward a “just in case” strategy, though not to pandemic-era extremes.

As Middle East conflict concerns eased in late 2024, tariffs became the primary driver of import-volume volatility in 2025. Erratic implementations and pauses disrupted import seasonality, contributing to an unusually early peak in orders in June and July and a mid-year surge in spot rates.

As a result of this early ordering, container import demand has fallen back to levels consistent with slight inventory reduction rather than restocking. The latest Logistics Managers’ Index inventory reading of 49.5 in October, indicating a slight contraction, supports this notion.

Source: IndexBox Market Intelligence Platform  

challenge global trade ship lines red sea

Red Sea Shipping: How Fast Will Lines Return And At What Cost?

As global carriers assess the possibility of resuming Red Sea transits, Supal Shah, CEO of Sarjak Container Lines, says the real question is not whether the industry will return, but how quickly. The speed of that return will define whether the market experiences rate crashes or a more orderly stabilisation.

Read also: Suez Canal Eyes Mega-Containership Comeback Amid Red Sea Security Improvements

Sarjak Container Lines operates services in and out of the region, providing firsthand visibility into conditions on the ground and the evolving sentiment among vessel operators.

A Temporary Pause Does Not Ensure Lasting Stability

While reports of reduced attacks are encouraging, Shah notes that the situation remains fragile and highly conditional. Previous pauses have been short-lived and current insurance evaluations reflect continuing risk.

“From our operating experience, a temporary reduction in incidents does not yet equate to a safe and reliable passage. The region has not demonstrated the sustained stability that crews, insurers and operators require,” Shah said.

War-risk premiums remain significantly elevated. Until risk classifications change, an immediate, industry-wide return is unlikely.

If Shipping Lines Return Quickly: A Market Shock Is Possible

A rapid return to the Suez route would shorten voyage distances abruptly, putting large volumes of capacity back into the global system. According to Shah, such a sudden shift could trigger:

  • A spike in surplus tonnage across major east–west trades
  • Rapid downward pressure on freight and charter rates
  • Increased risk of blank sailings, idling and slow steaming
  • Potential schedule disruptions as networks adjust too quickly

“The industry is entering a period where supply already exceeds demand,” Shah said. “A fast return could accelerate rate erosion and destabilise markets just as they are seeking balance.”

If the Return Happens Gradually: A More Stable Pathway

In contrast, a phased return, guided by consistent security improvements, lower war-risk premiums and operational planning, would allow the system to rebalance in a controlled manner.

Such a scenario would enable operators to:

  • Restore Suez routings in stages, avoiding sudden capacity shocks
  • Smoothly recalibrate feeder networks and port rotations
  • Protect charter markets from abrupt rate swings
  • Maintain more predictable equipment flows for shippers

“A measured, well-sequenced return supports stability across the supply chain,” Shah said. “It gives carriers, ports and customers time to adapt rather than react.”

Operational Structures Cannot Shift Overnight

Shah emphasised that global networks have been reconfigured for nearly a year. Alliance loops, bunkering strategies and transshipment patterns have been redesigned around the Cape of Good Hope.

“Even if conditions improved tomorrow, the industry would still need weeks or months to unwind the emergency networks now in place,” he said. “Operators need durable certainty before making another major structural shift.”

Shah likened the situation to a crucial bridge that has been unsafe for an extended period:

“If engineers declare a damaged bridge ‘temporarily safe,’ most drivers do not rush back immediately. They wait for reinforced inspections, for weight limits to be lifted, for the structure to be proven. Otherwise, the risk of another closure outweighs the benefit of convenience. The Red Sea corridor is no different, returning too quickly could create new vulnerabilities if stability is not assured.”

Conclusion: Not “If” But “How Fast”

Shah concluded that the Red Sea’s importance to global trade ensures its eventual full reopening. The question now is the pace and the consequences that pace will carry.

“The Red Sea will reopen to large-scale traffic, of that there is no doubt. But the speed of return will determine whether the industry experiences renewed volatility or a more balanced adjustment. A fast return risks intensifying the emerging oversupply cycle. A phased return provides a healthier, more commercially sustainable path.”

“Based on what we see through our operations in the region, decisions continue to be guided by caution. Demonstrated, lasting stability will ultimately dictate the speed of the industry’s comeback.”

About Sarjak Container Lines

Sarjak Container Lines Pvt. Ltd. is a global project logistics specialist founded in 2003, delivering ODC, OOG, breakbulk, heavylift and freight-forwarding solutions through a dedicated equipment fleet and its own multipurpose vessel, SCL Mercury.

With a strong international network spanning 84+ countries and 275+ port cities, the company ensures safe, efficient and end-to-end handling of complex cargo worldwide. Known for its technical expertise, customer-centricity and future-focused mindset, Sarjak Container Lines continues to deliver reliable, scalable and high-performance logistics solutions for sectors such as renewable energy, oil & gas, engineering, infrastructure, power, manufacturing and other diverse industries across global markets.

System tracks container shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

CMA CGM Sees Weak Q3 Results but Continues Global Expansion

CMA CGM reported a mixed third quarter for 2025 as geopolitical tensions, volatile trade flows, and ongoing Red Sea disruptions continued to pressure profitability. Despite the headwinds, the French shipping group pressed ahead with major global investments aimed at boosting long-term competitiveness.

Read also: CMA CGM Sees Surge in China–U.S. Cargo as Tariff Truce Sparks Trade Rebound

The company recorded revenue of $14.0 billion, down 11.3% from Q3 2024, while EBITDA fell 40.5% to $3.0 billion, bringing its margin to 21%, a drop of more than 10 points year-over-year.

Chairman and CEO Rodolphe Saadé acknowledged the turbulent backdrop but highlighted the group’s resilience. “In a global environment that remains highly uncertain, our Group continues to demonstrate resilience and discipline,” he said, noting steady performance across shipping, terminals, air freight, and logistics.

CMA CGM handled 6.2 million TEUs in the quarter—up 2.3% year-over-year—despite what it described as “stop-and-go” swings in China–U.S. trade. However, maritime revenue slid 17.4% to $9.0 billion, with average revenue per TEU falling 19.2% to $1,452 amid weaker freight rates.

The logistics unit also faced pressure from a struggling automotive market in Europe, posting revenue of $4.6 billion and EBITDA of $428 million, slightly below last year’s performance.

A standout came from the group’s terminals and air cargo operations. Revenue surged 55% to $1.2 billion, while EBITDA nearly doubled to $299 million, buoyed by the integration of Santos Brasil and broader network growth.

Even as market conditions soften, CMA CGM is accelerating expansion. The company will register ten 24,000 TEU LNG-powered megaships under the French flag beginning next year—part of a strategy Saadé described as prioritizing stability and competitiveness.

In India, the group has committed to building six 1,700 TEU LNG vessels for delivery starting in 2029, marking the foundation of an India-flagged fleet. CMA CGM plans to hire 1,000 Indian seafarers by end-2025, plus another 500 in 2026.

The company is also deepening its Middle East footprint through a joint venture with Red Sea Gateway Terminal to build and operate Terminal 4 in Jeddah, which will add 2.6 million TEU of capacity and support Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 ambitions.

In Europe, CMA CGM moved to acquire a 20% stake in Eurogate Container Terminal Hamburg and announced the purchase of Freightliner UK Intermodal Logistics, one of Britain’s largest rail freight operators. The Freightliner deal is expected to close in early 2026, pending regulatory approval.

Looking ahead, Saadé warned that rising industry capacity and softening demand could weigh on performance. Still, he emphasized that CMA CGM will remain agile, maintain strict cost controls, and continue investing where opportunities align with its long-term vision.