New Articles

Maersk Line goes live with CargoSphere digital rate distribution

Software helps manage rates for ocean shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

Maersk Line goes live with CargoSphere digital rate distribution

CargoSphere, a neutral rate network for container shipping, has announced that Maersk Line has gone live with digital, fully-automated distribution of its contract rates and amendments.

Maersk Line, the world’s largest container shipping company, is now digitally distributing its rates to shipper, freight forwarder and NVOCC customers using CargoSphere eSUDS (electronic Smart Upload and Diagnostics Solution) and the CargoSphere Rate Mesh, a  powerful solution that is complementary to Maersk’s online quoting solutions.

Benefits to customers of 100-percent digital rate distribution include time and cost savings, improved data accuracy, online access to timely rates for better decision making, faster reconciliation of invoices and faster quoting to customers for freight forwarders and NVOCCs.

Carsten Frank Olsen, a senior director at Maersk Line, noted that digital rate distribution on CargoSphere will “improve rate management efficiency to the industry.” “This move is part of the Maersk Line digital transformation and helps us to offer advanced, industry-leading digital solutions that improve the customer experience,” Olsen added. “Our customers require a faster and simpler way to manage freight rates and CargoSphere is delivering the advanced technology to achieve this.”

“Digital ocean rate distribution removes many of the manual processes that have acted as a drag on rates management for many years,” said Neil Barni, Managing Director of CargoSphere. “Having Maersk Line go live on the CargoSphere platform is a big signal of its intent to transform its own key processes and the industry solutions it takes to market. This is a win for productivity and the customer experience.”

Founded in 1999, CargoSphere provides contract and rate management solutions and the Rate Mesh connected network to hundreds of customers including Kuehne + Nagel, Dachser, SEKO Logistics, M+R Spedag and Livingston International. Rate Mesh offers shipping partners immediate, confidential rate collaboration to simplify rate communication and provides a faster, more effective way to receive and distribute ocean freight rates. CargoSphere is a part of the WiseTech Global group, a developer and provider of software solutions to the global logistics execution industry.

August saw fewer shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

Setback in world trade

The gKNi World Trade Indicator powered by LogIndex—the data company of Kuehne + Nagel Group—stood at 139.7 at the end of August, a 1.3-percent drop compared to the previous month. The index is up 7.5 percent year over year. The drop in August is the largest monthly contraction reported in 2018.

The prospect of escalating trade wars has been weighing on investors, as recent data from Bank of America has shown that pressures on the institutions of global trade are viewed as the biggest risk for the world economy.

While most advanced economies are experiencing steady growth, Japan and emerging markets have lost considerable momentum. This trend will continue in September according to LogIndex forecasts. Foreign trade will reach negative territory year over year in South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. Exports are expected to fall strongly in South Korea (-11.8 percent), Japan (-10.2 percent), India (-9.8 percent), Taiwan (-8.0 percent), and Brazil (-4.8 percent). Chinese exports growth year over year is expected to slow down from +12.2 percent in July to +7.0 percent in August. LogIndex sees this trend continuing through September.

This trend is in line with the latest manufacturing output forecasts: In September, the global industrial production will reach the lowest monthly increase since July 2015, according to LogIndex AG. The gKNi World Industrial Production (WIP) provides a real-time assessment of the activity in the manufacturing and mining sector around the globe. The seasonally and inflation-adjusted indicator is expressed in month over month percentage changes.

Trump has imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

Tennessee manufacturers to Trump: Rescind Section 232 steel tariffs

Manufacturers in Dickson County, Tennessee, recently sent a letter to President Donald Trump detailing their opposition to the president’s Section 232 steel tariffs. The tariffs were first imposed on steel imports in April on the grounds that the shipments pose a national security threat to the United States.

Following are excerpts from the letter:

“Today, our companies are facing a rapid increase in steel costs that threatens our ability to compete. All steel prices, whether produced domestically or imported, are the highest they have been since 2008 and 43 percent higher than this time last year. Domestic steel prices are 68 percent higher than the average world export price and 88 percent higher than steel costs in China.

“We find it difficult to pass on these cost increases either due to contractual obligations or competitive pressures. Even where we can pass on price increases, we face the clear long-term risk of losing market share to lower priced foreign competition, who do not face government-imposed import restrictions which artificially drive up steel costs. Foreign competitors have strategic material cost advantages and their manufactured products freely flow into the US with little or no tariffs.

“All of us source our steel from domestic steel mills and share your interest in maintaining a strong steel industry. Fortunately, the US steel mills are financially quite strong. In 2017, before the tariffs went into effect, the US steel industries had their best financial year since 2008. Moreover, their earnings in 2018 far exceed last year.

“Unfortunately, companies like ours that consume steel are facing significant headwinds. The 25-percent tariffs are effective in reducing the flow of raw steel crossing our boarders into the US, but result in the importation of steel components and finished goods in their stead. This not only will negatively impact our companies, but also US consumers who will be faced with higher prices. Ultimately, the domestic steel mills will feel the consequences as their customer base shrink.”

Commerce Department has imposed antidumping and countervailing duties on shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

US slaps AD and CVD duties on imports from India

The US Department of Commerce has announced the affirmative final determinations in the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) investigations of imports of stainless steel flanges from India.

Commerce determined that exporters from India have sold stainless steel flanges in the United States at 19.16 to 145.25 percent less than fair value. Commerce also determined that India is providing countervailable subsidies to its producers of stainless steel flanges at rates ranging from 4.92 to 256.16 percent.

In 2017, imports of stainless steel flanges from India were valued at an estimated $44 million.

The petitioners in the case were the Coalition of American Flange Producers and its individual members: Core Pipe Products, Inc. of Carol Stream, Illinois and Maass Flange Corporation of Houston, Texas.

Antidumping duty and countervailing duty laws provide American businesses and workers with an internationally accepted mechanism to seek relief from the harmful effects of the unfair pricing of imports into the United States. Commerce currently maintains 456 antidumping and countervailing duty orders which provide relief to American companies and industries impacted by unfair trade.

Foreign companies that price their products in the US market below the cost of production or below prices in their home markets are subject to antidumping duties.  Foreign companies that receive financial assistance from foreign governments that benefits the production of goods from foreign companies and is limited to specific enterprises or industries, or is contingent either upon export performance or upon the use of domestic goods over imported goods, are subject to countervailing duties. Since the beginning of the current Administration, Commerce has initiated 120 new AD and CVD investigations, a 216 percent increase from the comparable period in the previous administration.

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) is currently scheduled to make its final injury determinations on September 24, 2018.  If the ITC makes affirmative final injury determinations, Commerce will issue AD and CVD orders.  If the ITC makes negative final determinations of injury, the investigations will be terminated and no orders will be issued.

Commerce Department has imposed countervailing duties on shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

US issues preliminary determinations on welded pipe from four countries

The US Department of Commerce announced the affirmative preliminary determinations in the countervailing duty (CVD) investigations of imports of large diameter welded pipe from China, India, Korea, and Turkey. Commerce’s investigation found that exporters in those countries received countervailable subsidies at the following rates: China – 198.49 percent; India – 541.15 percent; Korea – 0.01 to 3.31 percent; and Turkey – 1.08 to 3.76 percent.

Imports from companies that receive unfair subsidies from their governments in the form of grants, loans, equity infusions, tax breaks, and production inputs are subject to countervailing duties aimed at directly countering those subsidies.

Commerce instructed US Customs and Border Protection to collect cash deposits from importers of large diameter welded pipe from China, India, Korea, and Turkey based on all preliminary rates that are above de minimis.

In 2017, imports of large diameter welded pipe from China, India, Korea, and Turkey were valued at an estimated $29.2 million, $294.7 million, $150.9 million, and $57.3 million, respectively.

The petitioners in the case were American Cast Iron Pipe Company of Birmingham, Alabama; Berg Steel Pipe Corp., Panama City, Florida; Berg Spiral Pipe Corp., Mobile, Alabama; Dura-Bond Industries, Steelton, Pennsylvania; Greens Bayou Pipe Mill, Houston, Texas; JSW Steel (USA), Baytown, Texas; Skyline Steel, Parsippany, New Jersey; Stupp Corporation, Baton Rouge, Louisiana; and Trinity Products, Fallon, Missouri.

Countervailing duty laws provide US businesses and workers with an internationally accepted mechanism to seek relief from the harmful effects of unfair subsidization of imports into the United States.  Commerce currently maintains 449 antidumping and countervailing duty orders which provide relief to American companies and industries impacted by unfair trade. Commerce is currently scheduled to announce its final CVD determinations on or about November 6, 2018.

Since the beginning of the current Administration, Commerce has initiated 118 new antidumping and countervailing duty investigations.

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) is currently scheduled to make its final injury determinations on December 20, 2018.  If Commerce makes affirmative final determinations and the ITC makes affirmative final injury determinations, Commerce will issue CVD orders.  If Commerce makes negative final determinations or the ITC makes negative final determinations of injury, the investigations will be terminated and no orders will be issued.

Trump has imposed tariffs on Chinese shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

Managing US-China competition

Despite positive public comments from presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, the US-China relationship has deteriorated on a sharper downward slope since official ties between the two countries were established 39 years ago. Each country points fingers at the other and the other to be responsible for reversing the negative course of the relationship.

According to a recent Brookings report, “Barring presidential-level intervention to change course, the relationship likely will continue to deteriorate and, in so doing, increase the risk of future confrontation or conflict.”

Ryan Hass, the report’s author believes that the trick is not to eliminate competition, “but rather to build guardrails around the relationship so that competition could occur within accepted bounds. This, in turn, would create conditions more conducive for both sides candidly to address concerns about the actions of the other.”

Among the steps Hass suggests is to “develop a shared narrative for the relationship,” to accept the practice of using presidential summits “to deliver impactful outcomes and understandings, and not just as pageants of pomp and circumstance.” The two presidents could also revive the practice of not surprising each other with measures that risk the bilateral relationship and which heighten the danger of a misinterpreting each other’s intentions. There are also risk reduction workstreams that could be revised, which, if successful, could lower the probability of the occurrence of unintended incidents and rapid escalation of conflicts. They could also engage on acute problems, such as trade, cyber issues, Taiwan, and North Korea, “so that areas of friction do not overtake the relationship…”

“The record of the past 18 months does not lend itself to optimism that leaders in either capital will take steps necessary to put the relationship on a firmer foundation,” the report concluded. “If both leaders opt instead to score points at the expense of the other, they will fuel mutual suspicions, and perceptions will harden about the inevitability of confrontation, and possibly conflict. But this outcome would be a choice, not an unavoidable result.”

Sshipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade are important to business startups.

Twelve best economies to start a business 2018

New data suggests the global business regulatory environment has changed dramatically in recent years. Per the World Bank Group, 119 of the 190 economies measured in the report Doing Business 2018 have enacted at least one business regulation reform in the past year. Of these, 79.8 percent implemented at least one reform for a second consecutive year and 64.7 percent have done so for a third.

Why is business regulation important? It can encourage entrepreneurs to enter an economy where the rules governing start-ups are accessible, transparent and predictable. This, in turn, benefits the economy, boosts capital investment and job creation, and generates more choice for consumers.

Online marketeers Reboot Digital Agency delved into research to discover the best economies to start a business in 2018, in the hope it will offer insight to both budding entrepreneurs and seasoned businessmen/women. To accomplish the research, Reboot utilized data from the World Bank Group. Data considered included the paid-in minimum capital requirement, the number of procedures required—such as obtaining all necessary licenses and permits and completing any required notifications, verifications or inscriptions—and the time and cost for a small to medium-sized limited liability company to start up and formally operate in economy’s largest business city.

Reboot Digital Agency found New Zealand to be the number one economy to start a business in, with a Distance to Frontier (DTF) rating of 99.96. Though New Zealand’s rating has decreased by 0.18 percent on 2017 figures, it still presents the strongest case in starting a business in 2018. In fact, it would take just one procedure, half a day and less than one percent of income per capita to start a business in Auckland.

DTF measures the distance of an economy to the “frontier,” which represents the very best performance across all economies and years included since 2005. An economy’s distance to frontier is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the lowest performance and 100 the frontier.

Other economies that rank in the top five for starting a business include Canada (DTF: 98.23), Hong Kong (DTF: 98.14), and Georgia, with a distance to frontier score of 97.84 supported by an increase of 2.12 percent on 2017 figures. Jamaica lands in fifth place with a DTF of 97.3.

Economies that continue to rank in the top 12 but present no change on 2017 figures, include Australia (DTF: 96.47) and South Korea, with a distance to frontier score of 95.83.

Comparably, two economies which have experienced positive change are Kosovo (DTF: 95.67) and Uzbekistan (DTF: 95.54) with vibrant growth of 4.98 percent and 4.46 percent respectively, on 2017 figures.

Missing out on the top 12, the United States ranks in 49th place, with a distance to frontier score of 91.23; presenting no change on figures in 2017. On American shores, it would take six procedures and four days to start a business in New York City, a stark contrast to New Zealand’s Auckland which takes the number one spot.

“It’s encouraging to observe populist countries, like Georgia, Kosovo and Uzbekistan experiencing vibrant growth,” said Shai Aharony, managing director of Reboot Digital Agency. “It hints we are heading toward a rich, multicultural time in business, which will no doubt encourage us to venture to areas anew, to start-up or network. Some may even argue it will become essential to do so. I’m sure we will see continued change in the sector as businesses reform and push beyond old boundaries.”

Infrastructure helps move shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

Infrastructure spending—which states fare worst?

Which are the worst US states for infrastructure? According to a new ranking of US states was published recently by USA Today, here are the bottom ten: (1) Rhode Island, (2) Hawaii, (3) West Virginia, (4) Pennsylvania, (5) California, (6) Alaska, (7) New Jersey, (8) Massachusetts, (9) Iowa, and (10) Connecticut.

The article notes that “about seven out of every 100 miles of roadway nationwide are in poor condition; nine percent of bridges nationwide are structurally deficient… and 17 percent of dams in the country have a high hazard potential.”

Nonpartisan Common Good has also recently released an update of its report “Two Years, Not Ten Years,” revealing that the cost of delay in rebuilding America’s infrastructure has grown in five years from about $3.7 trillion to nearly $3.9 trillion. The total includes direct costs associated with construction delays plus economic and environmental costs of failing to upgrade America’s dilapidated infrastructure. It approaches the size of the US infrastructure backlog of $4.6 trillion.

The USA Today article also notes that, while 75 percent of Americans support more spending on infrastructure, “funding the project has proven to be a political challenge.”

Among the states performing worst in the infrastructure front, Massachusetts and New Jersey were found to have over 17 percent of their roads to be in poor condition, while in Alaska that figure was 18.9 percent and in California, 16.9 percent. Over 20 percent of bridges in Iowa are deficient, while Rhode Island topped that list at 23.3 percent.

When it comes to dams at high hazard risk, Pennsylvania is at 53.0 percent, West Virginia is at 71.0 percent, while Hawaii comes in at a whopping 93.2 percent.

Easier permitting could yield more US LNG shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

What will fuel US energy exports to Europe?

President Donald Trump held out the hope, after his July 25 meeting with European Commission President Jean-Claude Junker, of new and increased US liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports to Europe. Europe has been working to diversify its energy sources, and, in early August, the EU Commission reiterated support for US-EU trade in natural gas, urging the United States to ease LNG export regulations.

Currently, Europe mostly imports piped gas from Russia, Norway, and Algeria. LNG is a secondary source, accounting for 12 percent of European gas demand in 2017, although it is significant in some markets, such as Spain. The EU pipeline imports is less expensive that US LNG. But, as noted in a recent report from the Atlantic Council, “a shift in the US regulatory framework can help reduce costs of US imports and can build confidence in the overall trade relationship,” and report urges US policymakers to take steps in that direction. Negotiations in that direction between the US and EU have already taken place within the framework of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), which has been dormant since even before Trump took office.

One measure urged on the US by the Atlantic Council is to remove what the EU considers a non-tariff barrier to US LNG exports: the requirement of export licenses—a measure that dates back to the passage of the Natural Gas Act of 1938. Under that scheme export permits must be issued by both the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the Department of Energy (DoE). FERC also acquires input from the US Coast Guard, the Department of Transportation, and the Maritime Administration. The DoE must also separately determine that exports are “in the national interest.” Regulatory changes in 2014 actually lengthened the permit process.

The Atlantic Council report urges the US to amend the Natural Gas Act of 1938 by eliminating the national interest determination and otherwise streamlining the LNG export permitting process. “These rule changes,” the report says, “if proposed in the autumn of 2018, could be finalized in early 2019 following formal notice and comment process in the United States. Importantly, these reforms do not require lengthy trade treaty negotiations.”

These measures, according to the report, would “support more US LNG exports to the EU” and “help counterbalance Russian influence on the European continent.” It will be difficult to compete with Russian gas on price, the report noted, although increased supplies of US LNG may bring those prices down and “some Europeans may buy US LNG at somewhat higher prices just to have another reliable supplier.” It is also necessary on the European side to upgrade LNG infrastructures.

However, increased European demand for LNG is not a foregone conclusion. A new paper from the Columbia University Energy Policy Center finds that a renaissance of natural gas in the EU-28 electricity sector looks unlikely, with only modest room for fuel switching and growth. According to the report, “Fuel prices, carbon prices, and interest rates will be critical factors in determining whether demand for natural gas increases or declines.”

Commerce Department has imposed countervailing duties on shipments of export cargo and import cargo in international trade.

US hits imports of rubber bands from China with preliminary CVD duties

The United States Department of Commerce has announced the affirmative preliminary determination in the countervailing duty (CVD) investigation of imports of rubber bands from China. The investigation found that exporters received countervailable subsidies of 125.77 percent.

The department also announced a negative preliminary determination in the CVD investigation of imports of rubber bands from Thailand, finding that exporters received de minimis subsidies of 0.23 and 0.37 percent.

Commerce will instruct US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect cash deposits from importers of rubber bands from China based on these preliminary rates.  Because the subsidy rates calculated in the Thailand investigation are de minimis, Commerce will not instruct CBP to require cash deposits from importers of rubber bands from Thailand.

In 2017, imports of rubber bands from China and Thailand were valued at an estimated $4.9 million and $12.1 million, respectively. The petitioner in the cases was Alliance Rubber Company of Arkansas.

Countervailing duty laws provide American businesses and workers with an internationally accepted mechanism to seek relief from the harmful effects of the unfair subsidization of imports into the United States.  Imports from companies that receive unfair subsidies from their governments in the form of grants, loans, equity infusions, tax breaks and production inputs are subject to countervailing duties aimed at directly countering those subsidies. Since the beginning of the current administration, Commerce has initiated 118 new antidumping (AD) and CVD investigations, 30 percent more than the 91 initiations in the last 529 days of the previous administration. Commerce currently maintains 448 AD and CVD orders which provide relief to American companies and industries impacted by unfair trade.

Commerce is currently scheduled to issue its final CVD determinations on or about November 13, 2018. If Commerce makes affirmative final determinations, the US International Trade Commission (ITC) will be scheduled to make its final injury determinations on or about December 28, 2018.  If Commerce makes affirmative final determinations in these investigations and the ITC makes affirmative final injury determinations, Commerce will issue CVD orders.  If Commerce makes negative final determinations or the ITC makes negative final determinations of injury, the investigations will be terminated and no orders will be issued.