New Articles

U.S. Steel Producers Win Preliminary Ruling From U.S. International Trade Commission

U.S. Steel Producers Win Preliminary Ruling From U.S. International Trade Commission

The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) made a unanimous preliminary determination that corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) produced in five foreign countries is causing injury to AK Steel and the domestic steel industry. The preliminary injury determination means that cases against CORE producers in the five named countries will proceed.

AK Steel of West Chester, Ohio and other domestic steel producers filed petitions with the ITC and the United States Department of Commerce last month, charging that unfairly traded imports of CORE from China, India, Italy, South Korea and Taiwan were causing material injury to the domestic industry. Anti-dumping cases and countervailing duty cases were filed against all five countries.

The cases now move to the Commerce Department for determinations as to whether foreign producers are violating U.S. anti-dumping law by selling their products at less than fair value in the United States, and violating U.S. countervailing duty law covering government subsidies.

“We applaud the ITC’s preliminary ruling that unfairly traded imports of corrosion-resistant steel have caused injury to AK Steel and other domestic steel producers,” said James L. Wainscott, AK Steel’s CEO. “This decision is an important step forward in the process to fight dumped and subsidized CORE imports that have significantly impacted pricing in the U.S. market.”

CORE is sheet or coiled steel product that has been coated or plated with a corrosion-or heat-resistant metal to prevent corrosion and thereby extend the service life of the products made from the steel. CORE is widely used in roofing, siding, hardware, roof and bridge decks, guard rails, and culverts and in the manufacture of cars, trucks, appliances, industrial equipment, and agricultural equipment.

As the cases proceed, the Commerce Department will calculate anti-dumping margins, which are designed to offset the amount by which the product is sold at less than fair value, and subsidy rates, which are designed to offset the amount by which the product benefits from unfair government subsidies.

Estimated countervailing and anti-dumping duties will be collected from importers as of the date of the Commerce Department’s preliminary determinations, expected toward the end of August and in mid-November, respectively. Foreign producers that attempt to make massive shipments into the U.S. market before the preliminary determinations can be hit with retroactive anti-dumping and countervailing duties.

Database of Companies Doing Business in Occupied Territories Launched

The EIRIS Foundation announced the release last week of a new online database of companies doing business in Crimea and Palestine. The database provides businesses, investors, and others with comprehensive information about corporate operations in these two territories.

This new project—research into corporate activity in Crimea and Palestine—puts to use expertise gained by studying the interplay between corporate activity and conflict in Sudan and Burma/Myanmar. The EIRIS Foundation is a UK-based charity working in the area of responsible investment.

“The EIRIS Foundation has a history of empowering responsible investors and others with the provision of independent data on a wide variety of company activities,” said Kathy Mulvey, director of EIRIS Conflict Risk Network. “With the release of our analysis and database of corporate activity in Crimea and Palestine, we expand on that expertise.

“Until now,” she added, “investors have had little access to objective information about corporate presence and operations in the occupied territories of Crimea and Palestine. Publication of this database of companies active in these regions has begun to address this lack of access.”

Access to such objective and independent research increases transparency, empowers investors, and enhances global knowledge and understanding about investment in occupied territories, according to Mulvey. The databases are presented in the context of information and analysis about the territories’ economic sectors and international trade policies.

“Our research focuses on corporate activities, which is of great interest to those seeking to avoid fostering or promoting violence in conflict zones,” said Mulvey. “This information was not publicly available until now.”

Over the past six months, EIRIS has conducted research in five languages, English, Hebrew, Arabic, Russian and Ukrainian. Companies included in the database meet two criteria: public exposure through stocks and/or bonds, and local presence in either Crimea or Palestine.

In Crimea, the database contains 27 publicly-listed companies that are open for business, 20 that have closed due to international sanctions, and 25 that have been nationalized since the occupation.

In Palestine, the database contains 80 publicly-listed companies in settlements and 70 publicly-listed companies in non-settlement areas.

There are 22 companies in the Global Fortune 500 and 16 companies in the U.S. Fortune 500 in the database. Eight companies in the U.S. Fortune 500 are also in the Global Fortune 500, so the database contains a total of 30 of the largest global or U.S. companies, Mulvey noted.

Of these 30 companies, 18 are in Palestine and 14 are in Crimea, of which six are open and eight are closed.

Countries in the European Union, Russia and the United States, have the largest numbers of open companies in Crimea. Two-thirds of closed businesses in Crimea were U.S.-based; one U.S. company in Crimea has been nationalized. Among Ukrainian companies previously in Crimea, all but one have either left or been nationalized.

The Coca-Cola Company, Daimler, Expedia, Hewlett-Packard, Priceline Group and Yum! Brands are the only six companies active in both settlement and non-settlement areas of Palestine. Fourteen foreign companies are active in Israeli settlements, while 12 foreign companies are in Palestinian towns. Six companies operate in both settlement and non-settlement areas of Palestine.

Ramallah has the largest number of publicly-listed companies, while Ma’ale Adumim, an Israeli settlement, has the largest number of publicly-listed companies in the settlements.

Chassis Pool Plan Stumbles at Port of New York and New Jersey

In an effort to ease port congestion, the ports of New York and New Jersey initiated a “gray chassis pool” on July 1. The pool represented a collection of chassis that could be rented by any trucker.

But the scheme got off to a rough start right from the beginning. Waterfront unions claimed the exclusive right to maintain and repair chassis, an argument disputed by trucking interests.

Later, one of the participants in the pool, Direct ChassisLink Inc., announced it would penalize truckers $200 if they used Direct’s chassis to haul containers other than those belonging to Maersk Line, Mediterranean Shipping Co. or Hamburg Sud. The company later rescinded the measure but asked truckers to voluntarily use Direct chassis to service those three lines only.

Direct ChassisLink claimed the penalty was only a temporary measure until chassis pool arrangements started running smoothly. The pentalties were to become effective on July 24.

Ocean carriers used to own the chassis, but sold them in 2009 to private leasing companies. Truckers who don’t return chassis on time are subject to a demurrage fee or penalty.

Direct ChassisLink, along with TRAC Intermodal, Inc. and Flexi-Van Leasing Inc. lease most of the chasssis at U.S. and Canadian ports, charging between $17 to $25 per chassis per day.

Truckers and ports alike are preparing for especially bad congestion at U.S. ports as container chassis are proving hard to come by. The ports expect peak pre-holiday retail shipments to start ratcheting up soon. The ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach also instituted a chassis sharing plan recently.

A recent report from the Federal Maritime Commission found that chassis shortages are the main cause for port congestion across the country. Chassis availability has increased by only 2.7 percent in the last year, while container throughput at ports grew by 11 percent.

Implant Sciences Ships $1.2 Million in Trace Detection Systems

Implant Sciences Corporation announced that it recently shipped $1.2 million of its explosives trace detectors to customers around the world. The sales were comprised of its QS-B220 desktop explosives and drugs trace detector and its QS-H150 handheld explosives trace detector. These systems were sold across four continents to be deployed in a variety of applications including mass transportation, cargo screening, infrastructure protection, and aviation security.

Implant is a manufacturer of explosives trace detection (ETD) and drugs trace detection solutions for homeland security applications. Its QS-B220 uses Ion Mobility Spectrometry (IMS) to detect and identify trace amounts of a wide variety of military, commercial, and homemade explosives. The QS-H150 also utilizes IMS technology and has been proven to perform well in a variety of temperatures and challenging environments, from jungles to deserts.

“We continue to win additional orders, fueled by our wins from the TSA and international airports across the EU,” said Bill McGann, Implant Sciences’ CEO. “Our ability to successfully build and ship these additional units to other customers is due to our ramped up manufacturing capacity, which enables us to execute on more orders than ever before.”

In November 2014, the U.S. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) ordered 1,170 QS-B220 Desktop Explosive Trace Detectors from Implant. The TSA deployed the equipment at multiple airports across the U.S.

“As we have executed upon the flurry of ETD sales opportunities in the European Union, we have not relented in our market penetration in other parts of the world,” added Darryl Jones, Implant Sciences’ Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing. “The demand for our technology continues to grow globally for numerous applications, and as an ETD market leader in both technology and sales, we are gratified and fully prepared to support this demand.”

Implant Sciences’ ETDs have received approvals and certifications from several international regulatory agencies in the U.S., European Union, China, Russia, France, and Germany. Implant Sciences products are recognized as Qualified Anti-Terrorism Technologies by the Department of Homeland Security.

CargoSmart Launches Free Sailing Search Platform

CargoSmart Limited has announced last week the availability of Big Schedules, a new sailing schedule search platform that helps shippers and logistics service providers manage and visualize their ocean routes.

Big Schedules sources ocean carriers‘ published sailing schedules and live vessel location data to provide personalized search results for faster and greater insights to improve shipment planning. The new, free sailing schedule search engine is available at www.bigschedules.com.

According to CargoSmart, a global shipment management software provider, shippers struggled to obtain the latest sailing schedules, to make bookings, and to communicate updates to receiving parties during the U.S. West Coast severe port congestion that occurred over the last year.

“Despite port congestion improving,” said Lionel Louie, chief commercial officer of CargoSmart, “over five million sailing schedule changes around the globe occurred in the month of May 2015 alone. Not having the latest schedules can have a costly impact including inaccurate bookings, increased demurrage charges, and missed container cut-off times.”

The new sailing schedule search platform leverages big data sources, noted Louie. “By gathering data from multiple sources and using new technologies to streamline the search process,” he explained, “Big Schedules empowers shippers and logistics service providers to search for the latest schedule information, faster, and to gain insights for planning.”

Big Schedules delivers up-to-date sailing schedules by retrieving schedule data from multiple sources and displaying it in a flexible platform. The product’s scope includes 30 major ocean carriers, over 46,000 port pairs, and nearly 5,000 vessel services, covering 90 percent of the world’s container capacity.

The new sailing schedule platform helps shipment parties link sailing schedules with vessel, service, and shipment information to provide a single view of their ocean schedules and to visualize shipment routes. Schedule data is updated continuously and search results display the vessel’s current location on a map for users to see if a vessel is on track to meet its schedule and to improve planning.

The platform remembers users’ recent searches, saved favorite searches, and the overall top port-pair searches to make recommendations to search faster and save time. Users can also look up schedule reliability percentages and average delay deviations by carrier for five popular port-pairs to gauge the chances of on-time arrivals.

Neptune Orient Lines is Up For Sale

Temasek Holdings is putting its 65 percent stake in Neptune Orient Lines (NOL) on the market.

Temasek, the Singapore sovereign wealth fund, estimates that the Singapore-based NOL is worth $2.6 billion, meaning it intends to collect $1.7 billion from any NOL sale.

NOL, through its operating brand, the container carrier APL, has had its share of financial problems in recent years. Revenue is down from $9.4 billion in 2010 to $8.6 billion in 2014. 2010 was the last year the company showed a profit, at $461 million. Last year it lost $260 million.

In May, NOL Group reported a first quarter 2015 net loss of $11 million, much better tha the $98- million net loss in the same period last year. The group posted a positive first quarter 2015 Core EBIT (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes and Non-Recurring Items) of $30 million, compared to a $65 million loss last year. NOL attributed the positive core EBIT to cost savings of $155 million and lower fuel costs.

At the same time NOL’s revenues declined 13 percent to $2 billion in the quarter. The company attributed the revenue shortfall to freight rate erosion, capacity cuts in unprofitable lanes, and the adverse impact from U.S. West Coast port congestion.

APL, NOL’s container shipping business, reported a positive first quaerter EBIT of $13 million on revenuer of $1.6 billion, compared to a loss of $82 million over the same period last year. First quarter year-on-year volume fell 15 percent, and APL’s average freight rates dipped 8 percent versus the same quarter last year.

Last May, Temasek sold its logistics division APL Logistics to Japanese Kinetsu World Express for $1.2 billion. Oberservers speculated that the NOL and APL Logistics transactions were separated in order to derive greater value for the shareholders.

Temasek reports a net portfolio value at of $194 billion, having more than doubled in the last decade from $75 million.

Industry observers note that Hapag-Lloyd AG and Orient Overseas International are the most likely buyers of NOL. Hapag-Lloyd’s recent announcement of an initial public offering, some say, means the carrier is gearing up to bid on NOL.

Will FMC Regulate Terminal, Carrier Penalties?

The U.S. Federal Maritime Commission has signaled that will take up the regulation of demurrage and per-diem detention fees.

The starting point of such a process wold be the formation of an industry advisory committee. In a recently-released summary of four FMC hearings, the commission hinted that it may convene such a council to discuss port congestion.

Demurrage and per-diem fees are penalties shippers have to pay to marine terminal operators if their shipments are not picked up on time and to ocean carriers if their equipment is turned in late.

Industry groups have been lobbying the FMC for relief, saying shippers should not have to pay the charges if the delays are caused by port congestion.

The FMC report noted: “The lack of chassis availability emerged…as being by far the most pressing problem needing to be solved and, arguably, the biggest single cause of chronic congestion in many container terminals.”

The World Shipping Council, which represents most containers lines, opposes new regulation, saying port congestion is caused by several different factors.

“The commission is exploring whether it should establish such an advisory committee,” the FMC report said. A national council on intermodal efficiency, the commision said, could help resolve “issues of national importance that are affecting…the U.S. intermodal system.”

Such an advisory committee could suggest that the FMC regulate marine terminals’ and ocean carriers’ penalties. The council could also, said the FMC report, assess “ocean carrier, port, terminal, rail, drayage, and equipment provisioning systems and procedures and suggest how 21st century methods and technologies could be adopted to enhance container velocity through these systems.”

U.S. Transportation Funding Bill Hung Up in Congress

The prospects of the U.S. Congress passing a comprehensive, multi-year highway package in the immediate future appear dim at this point.

The U.S. House of Representatives recently approved a short-term transportation bill to prevent money for state highway and infrastructure projects from drying up at the end of July. The $8 billion measure represents a five-month band aid which will keep money flowing through mid-December. The bill passed 312-119.

Some Democrats opposed the bill because they want a long-term measure. They also want the bill to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank, which is in danger of expiring if Congress does not act.

In the Senate, Republicans are fielding multi-year legislation which would provide $250 billion for transportation over several years and renew the Export-Import Bank. The bill would boost funding for freight corridors, among other infrastructure investments.

The Department of Transportation needs renewed authority and an infusion of cash to maintain the Highway Trust Fund before July 31. Although traditionally a longer-term measure, often covering six years of funding, Congress has failed to pass a comprehensive transportation package since before 2009, instead adopting 34 short-term bills to fund transportation programs.

The chances of the Senate passing a comprehensive bill by the end of the month are slim, despite the desire of some of the leadership to do so, because of some thorny issues that still need to be hammered out. That makes it more likely that the Senate will pass a short-term measure like the House, leaving the harder work until after the August recess.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) has threatened to filibuster the Senate bill if it reauthorizes the Ex-Im Bank.

Besides the Ex-Im issue, other hangups to passing the comprehensive Senate package include its funding formula, which would not distribute funds to states on a performance basis.

Another obstacle is how to raise the money to pay for the measure. Fuel taxes have traditionally funded the Highway Trust Fund, but they haven’t been raised since 1993, and raising the tax is not politically expedient. The fact that Americans are now driving fewer miles and operating more fuel-efficient cars has contributed to the fiscal shortfall.

 

Peter Buxbaum is web editor of Global Trade.

Container Shipping Will be Lucky to Break Even in 2015

A mixture of overcapacity, weak demand and aggressive pricing is threatening liner shipping industry profitability for the rest of 2015, according to Drewry, the London-based shipping consultancy.

The conclusion is a departure from Drewry’s earlier forecast that container shipping carriers would collectively generate profits of $8 billion in 2015.

“This means that some lines will be back in the red by the end of 2015,” said Neil Dekker, Drewry’s director of container shipping research. “The only way to address this is for carriers to take much more radical action to address overcapacity which is now plaguing virtually all major trade routes.”

During the first quarter of 2015, industry cost savings brought on by falling oil prices were passed onto shippers by carriers in the form of much lower freight rates. But going forward, said Dekker, “shipping lines will struggle to continue reducing unit costs in line with the expected erosion in freight rates, given stabilising bunker costs.”

Drewry estimates that this year average global freight rates will decline at their fastest pace since 2011, when the fall in industry unit revenue was 10 percent. Second quarter spot rates in the four main East-West trades fell by 32 percent year-on-year.

The recent decision by three container lines to remove four percent of the capacity in the Asia-North Europe trade should push rates up, Dekker noted, but is “only a very temporary solution. As many as 129 ships of 8,000 teu and above still need to find homes across a number of trades in the second half of 2015.” Each quarter 10 to 15 ultra-large vessels enter the market, he added.

The average global head-haul utilization fell to 83 percent during the first quarter of 2015. The perceived weakness in the market pushed many lines into a rate war mode across a number of trade routes.

“Ocean carriers need to be thinking of average head haul trade route fill factors of 80 to 85 percent as the norm, rather than 90 percent or more,” said Dekker. “They cannot keep adding capacity and expect there to be no substantial impact on unit revenues.”

The Westbound Transatlantic and Asia-to-Middle East trades are currently the bright spots in an otherwise gloomy picture for carriers. “Rarely have we seen so many major routes performing so poorly all at once,” said Dekker. “Spot freight rates have reached historical lows on the Asia-to-Europe and Asia-to-East Coast South America trades. Carriers’ emphasis on ordering so many big ships is starting to backfire and virtually all major head haul trades are plagued by overcapacity.”

Iran’s Maritime Sector: Sanctions Relief

Iranian shipping interests have been removed from the United States list of companies designated for sanctions and assets freeze.

The Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) and Tidewater Middle East Maritime Company, the country’s biggest ports operator, are among the companies receiving relief in the wake of nuclear deal struck between Iran and the P5+1 countries on July 14.

Also delisted were 16 shipping executives, including IRISL managing director Mohammad Hossein Dajmar. The relief from the sanctions will allow Iran to recover trade volumes and re-establish itself as a maritime player.

A statement by Tidewater said all sanctions against Tidewater had been formally abolished, adding it would soon begin “serious” talks for new business.

“From now on, Tidewater is ready to participate with all power and capacity in financing various ports projects along with other Iranian maritime companies,” the statement said.

Tidewater handled more than 90 percent of container operations at the main ports in Iran before the sanctions were imposed. The U.S. sanctions prohibited all payments to Tidewater, which impaired commercial maritime traffic.

International shipping lines are already stepping up port calls to Iran, according to published reports. The port of Shahid Rajaee, Iran’s biggest container port located at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz, received calls from seven major shipping lines.