New Articles

Increased Awareness of Personal Care & Hygiene to Spur the Usage of Spun Bond Nonwovens

nonwoven

Increased Awareness of Personal Care & Hygiene to Spur the Usage of Spun Bond Nonwovens

Spun bonding is a popular method of developing polymer-induced nonwovens. Spun bond nonwovens consist of filaments developed by an integrated process of web formation, bonding and fiber spinning. Spun bonds skip the intermediate steps like staple formation, making it the shortest way to develop fabrics from polymers. This helps in increasing the product whilst reducing its cost.

The process of spun bonding is complex, and it includes operational parameters like die and polymer temperatures, polymer throughput, quenches environment, etc. It also includes material parameters like molecular weight, type of polymer. All these factors together influence the fiber structure, fiber diameter, tensile performance, web lay down and physical performance properties of spun bond fabrics.

Spun bond method offers excellent tensile characteristics with respect to the fabric weight. Also, subtle modifications in the production process like changing the cross-section, crimp or degree of bonding helps in producing the necessary property balance to satisfy the requirements of end-users.

A wide range of applications across various industries to stimulate the demand for spun bond nonwovens

Spun bond fabrics are found useful in many sectors like civil engineering, carpet backing and diaper linings. Some other applications of spun bond nonwovens include roofing, packaging, agriculture, electronics, coating substrate, etc.

Characteristics like high chemical stability, high elasticity, high barrier quality and high liquid absorbance. They are used for producing protective apparel like surgical coats, masks, and aprons owing to their excellent barrier protection characteristics.

Fabrics like geotextiles are produced using staple fibers due to their flexibility in choosing the polymer type and greater latitude. Also, with excellent extensibility, these fabrics can obtain higher tear resistance.

Polypropylene – the go-to polymer for nonwoven production

Polypropylene is the most common polymer to be used for producing spun bond nonwovens. They have a high melting point which proves beneficial in processing these fabrics. Their fibers can be softened enough to form a bond with other fibers without compromising their fibrous properties. This has eliminated the necessity of using chemical binders. It also saves energy and is environment-friendly. Baby diapers and other similar products largely use thermally bonded cover stock which can increase the usability of polypropylene.

Asia Pacific to emerge as a lucrative hub

Increased disposable income along with rapid developments in the personal care and hygiene sector has boosted the usage of spun bond nonwovens in Asia Pacific. Also, the rising birth rate has increased the demand for baby care products, thus stimulating the usage of nonwoven fabrics in the region.

Many industry players are expanding their business operations and strengthening their market positions through strategies like collaborations, product launches, etc. For instance, Avgol Nonwovens are relocating their current spun melt line from Israel to India. This shift was executed as part of a strategic investment in the country. The company is strategizing to expand its service and presence not only across India but throughout South Asia. Such business expansions will bolster the usage of spun bond nonwovens.

t-shirt

The Pandemic Puts a Drag on the Global T-Shirt Market

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – T-Shirts – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

In 2019, the global t-shirt market decreased by -3.5% to $88.5B for the first time since 2016, thus ending a two-year rising trend. Overall, consumption, however, saw a relatively flat trend pattern. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2018 with an increase of 5.2% against the previous year. As a result, consumption reached the peak level of $91.7B, and then declined slightly in the following year.

The countries with the highest volumes of t-shirt consumption in 2019 were China (4.4B units), the U.S. (2.9B units) and India (1.8B units), together comprising 36% of global consumption. Japan, Pakistan, Indonesia, the UK, Nigeria, Bangladesh, Germany, Mexico, Ethiopia and Turkey lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 22% (IndexBox estimates).

In value terms, China ($12.9B) led the market, alone. The second position in the ranking was occupied by the U.S. ($6B). It was followed by India.

The countries with the highest levels of t-shirt per capita consumption in 2019 were the UK (9 units per person), the U.S. (9 units per person) and Germany (6 units per person).

T-shirts constitute one of the principal consumer goods from the category of apparel for daily use. Another impetus in the demand comes from sport and outdoor activity, from personal use to the equipment of professional teams. On the other hand, T-shirt consumption goes beyond just the essential need and depends on fashion trends and social life. Therefore, T-shirt consumption is to follow the growth of the global population and consumer incomes, which broadly depend on general economic development.

The growth drivers in T-shirt consumption vary widely in terms of region. In the U.S., for example, the fitness trend continues to impact T-shirt consumption: the need for athletic comfort becomes an important factor in the buying process. The current prevailing trend of using activewear and clothing as items of everyday attire is set to persist, and T-shirts that feature a blend of fashion and functionality will continue to perform well over the forecast period. Leading sportswear brands continue to launch and release new and appealing product ranges, aimed directly at consumers.

Consumer trend changes are also relevant for the EU T-shirt market: new variations and styles, as well as eco-fashion in different T-shirt categories, are being introduced. T-shirt consumption across Europe was expected to grow due to the rising fashion consciousness amongst consumers with regard to T-shirt products, and the increasing purchasing power of the young and teenage population.

The Asian T-shirt market was predicted to show strong growth: the number of consumers in the region is increasing every year. Lifestyle changes, combined with increased levels of disposable income and the current demand for trendy fashion items are all encouraging the rapid growth of Asia’s T-shirt market. Another major fundamental behind this growth is rapid urbanization accompanied by the rising popularity of Western lifestyles. Furthermore, due to their cheaper workforce, Asian countries remain key global centers of T-shirt production, thereby having T-shirts largely available.

Until 2020, the global economy has been developing steadily for five years, although at a slower pace than in the previous decade. In early 2020, however, the global economy entered a period of crisis caused by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. According to World Bank forecasts, despite the gradual relaxing of restrictive measures and unprecedented government support in countries that faced the pandemic in early 2020, the annual decline of global GDP could amount to -4.3%, which is the deepest global recession being seen over the past eight decades.

The consumer goods sector is vulnerable to the pandemic as due to quarantine measures, entire economic sectors and facilities were paused, and the drop in incomes makes the growth of end markets unfeasible, thereby hampering any expansion of consumer spending. Moreover, the pandemic led to a shutdown of the retail outlets and malls, which undermined the sales of apparel, T-shirts and other consumer goods outside of the most essential range.

Consequently, world manufacturing hubs in China and other Asian countries are facing a double challenge. Like other enterprises, T-shirt companies had to halt operations during the breakout of the pandemic. Afterward, when China started to ease the lockdown, the companies challenge the rising number of order cancellations from overseas clients which suffered their lockdown a month later and therefore are unable to sell or stockpile merchandise. This, in turn, may have led to the overstocking of the manufactures’ warehouses, which puts additional pressure on prices. Accordingly, when the growth of demand will resume, the recovery of production may be delayed until the stocks are sold, thereby putting a further drag on the post-pandemic market recovery.

Taking into account the above, it is expected that in 2020, global consumption of T-shirts declined somewhat against 2019. In the medium term, as the global economy recovers from the effects of the pandemic, the market is expected to grow gradually, driven by rising population, recovering incomes, and the replacement of outworn ones, together with the consumer intention to get something new after a period of limitations. Overall, market performance is forecast to pursue a slightly upward trend over the next decade, expanding with an anticipated CAGR of +1.1% (IndexBox estimates) for the period from 2019 to 2030, which is projected to bring the market volume to 29B units by the end of 2030.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

cotton yarn

Global Cotton Yarn Market Slipped Back Slightly to $77B

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Cotton Yarn – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

After two years of growth, the global cotton yarn market decreased by -2.8% to $77.2B in 2019. Overall, consumption continues to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2018 when the market value increased by 18% y-o-y. Global consumption peaked at $81B in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2019, consumption remained at a lower figure.

Consumption by Country

The countries with the highest volumes of cotton yarn consumption in 2019 were China (8.1M tonnes), India (4.3M tonnes), and Pakistan (3.2M tonnes), together comprising 74% of global consumption.

From 2013 to 2019, the biggest increases were in India, while cotton yarn consumption for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, China ($38.9B) led the market, alone. The second position in the ranking was occupied by India ($12.8B). It was followed by Pakistan.

The countries with the highest levels of cotton yarn per capita consumption in 2019 were Pakistan (16 kg per person), Turkey (16 kg per person) and South Korea (7.55 kg per person).

China remains the global leader in terms of cotton yarn production and consumption. The Chinese textile industry has experienced a rapid transformation over the last two decades. Thus, there was a boom in the synthetic yarn industry in China since the late 1990-s, while cotton yarn output remained relatively stable. This was driven by the strong development of the construction sector in China, particularly, infrastructure and urban construction, amid the strong growth of the economy and rapid urbanization. Rising construction required lots of non-woven synthetic fabrics used as geotextiles and as a component for the production of composite materials. Another impact comes from the increased availability of synthetic fibers due to the rising oil consumption, with the raw materials for fibers constituting a by-product of petroleum distillation.

Given those factors, the production of synthetic fiber apparel also grew. By contrast, cotton yarn output remained relatively stable because it is used only for human apparel, and it was pressured by the rising supply of synthetic fibers. This led to the fact that the share of cotton yarn in terms of the total yarn output in China contracted from near 50% in 2000 to near 22% in 2019. This, however, constitutes a tangible figure of 6.4M tonnes.

With this figure, China heads global cotton yarn production. Other countries with the highest volumes of cotton yarn production in 2019 include India (5.3M tonnes) and Pakistan (3.7M tonnes), with a combined 72% share of global production. Turkey, Viet Nam, the U.S. and Brazil lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 16% (IndexBox estimates).

From 2013 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of cotton yarn production, amongst the leading producing countries, was attained by Viet Nam (+24.2%), while cotton yarn production for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Imports

In 2019, approx. 4.5M tonnes of cotton yarn were imported worldwide; which is down by -3.1% compared with the year before. In general, imports, however, continue to indicate a relatively flat trend pattern. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2015 with an increase of 8.6% year-to-year. As a result, imports attained a peak of 4.8M tonnes. From 2016 to 2019, the growth of global imports remained at a somewhat lower figure. In value terms, cotton yarn imports dropped to $13.7B (IndexBox estimates) in 2019.

China was the key importer of cotton yarn in the world, with the volume of imports resulting at 2M tonnes, which was near 45% of total imports in 2019. Bangladesh (248K tonnes) held a 5.5% share (based on tonnes) of total imports, which put it in second place, followed by Honduras (5.3%) and Turkey (4.7%). Russia (171K tonnes), South Korea (142K tonnes), Portugal (106K tonnes), the Dominican Republic (106K tonnes), Hong Kong SAR (103K tonnes), Viet Nam (93K tonnes) and Egypt (92K tonnes) held a relatively small share of total imports.

China experienced a relatively flat trend pattern with regard to the volume of imports of cotton yarn. At the same time, the Dominican Republic (+13.7%), Viet Nam (+13.1%), Turkey (+8.4%), Russia (+5.8%), Egypt (+4.0%), Bangladesh (+3.9%), Portugal (+2.0%) and Honduras (+1.8%) displayed positive paces of growth. Moreover, the Dominican Republic emerged as the fastest-growing importer imported in the world, with a CAGR of +13.7% from 2013-2019. By contrast, South Korea (-2.8%) and Hong Kong SAR (-20.0%) illustrated a downward trend over the same period.

In value terms, China ($5.6B) constitutes the largest market for imported cotton yarn worldwide, comprising 41% of global imports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Bangladesh ($772M), with a 5.6% share of global imports. It was followed by Honduras, with a 5.4% share.

From 2013 to 2019, the average annual rate of growth in terms of value in China amounted to -1.3%. In the other countries, the average annual rates were as follows: Bangladesh (-1.6% per year) and Honduras (+3.0% per year).

Import Prices by Country

The average cotton yarn import price stood at $3,064 per tonne in 2019, with a decrease of -5.4% against the previous year. Over the period under review, the import price showed a perceptible setback. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2017 when the average import price increased by 4.1% y-o-y. Over the period under review, average import prices hit record highs at $3,660 per tonne in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2019, import prices remained at a lower figure.

Prices varied noticeably by the country of destination; the country with the highest price was Hong Kong SAR ($4,190 per tonne), while Russia ($1,901 per tonne) was amongst the lowest.

From 2013 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Honduras, while the other global leaders experienced a decline in the import price figures.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

girdle

The European Brassiere, Girdle and Corset Market Peaked at $3.2B

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Brassieres, Girdles And Corsets – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The EU brassiere, girdle and corset market expanded modestly to $3.2B in 2019, increasing by 3.5% against the previous year. This figure reflects the total revenues of producers and importers (excluding logistics costs, retail marketing costs, and retailers’ margins, which will be included in the final consumer price).

The market value increased at an average annual rate of +2.4% over the period from 2013 to 2019; the trend pattern remained relatively stable, with only minor fluctuations being recorded throughout the analyzed period. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2018 with an increase of 6.6% y-o-y. The level of consumption peaked in 2019 and is expected to retain growth in the near future.

Consumption by Country

The countries with the highest volumes of brassiere, girdle and corset consumption in 2019 were the UK (156M units), France (100M units) and Germany (99M units), with a combined 44% share of total consumption. These countries were followed by Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Poland, Ireland, Austria, the Czech Republic and Greece, which together accounted for a further 43%.

From 2013 to 2019, the biggest increases were in Ireland, while brassiere, girdle and corset consumption for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the largest brassiere, girdle and corset markets in the European Union were Germany ($525M), the UK ($491M) and France ($457M), with a combined 47% share of the total market. Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Austria, Ireland, Portugal, the Czech Republic and Greece lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 39%.

The countries with the highest levels of brassiere, girdle and corset per capita consumption in 2019 were Ireland (6 units per person), Portugal (3.44 units per person) and Austria (3.26 units per person).

Production in the EU

In 2019, brassiere, girdle and corset production in the European Union reduced to 56M units, shrinking by -14.5% against the previous year’s figure. Over the period under review, production attained the peak volume at 104M units in 2013; however, from 2014 to 2019, production failed to regain the momentum.

Production by Country

The countries with the highest volumes of brassiere, girdle and corset production in 2019 were Croatia (11M units), Spain (9.2M units) and Italy (8M units), with a combined 50% share of total production. These countries were followed by Romania, Poland, Latvia, Hungary, Sweden, Portugal, the Czech Republic, Cyprus and Austria, which together accounted for a further 42%.

From 2013 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of brassiere, girdle and corset production, amongst the leading producing countries, was attained by Sweden, while production for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Imports in the EU

In 2019, imports of brassieres, girdles and corsets in the European Union was estimated at 1.1B units, with an increase of 2% against the year before. The total import volume increased at an average annual rate of +4.4% over the period from 2013 to 2019; the trend pattern remained relatively stable, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations being observed throughout the analyzed period. In value terms, brassiere, girdle and corset imports declined slightly to $4.2B (IndexBox estimates) in 2019.

Imports by Country

In 2019, the UK (180M units), Germany (156M units) and France (140M units) was the main importer of brassieres, girdles and corsets in the European Union, constituting 43% of total import. Spain (90M units) ranks next in terms of the total imports with an 8.2% share, followed by Italy (6.9%), Austria (6.8%), the Netherlands (6.7%) and Poland (5.2%). Belgium (43M units), Portugal (36M units), Ireland (32M units) and the Czech Republic (25M units) followed a long way behind the leaders.

From 2013 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of purchases, amongst the key importing countries, was attained by Ireland, while imports for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the largest brassiere, girdle and corset importing markets in the European Union were Germany ($825M), France ($637M) and the UK ($557M), together accounting for 48% of total imports. Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Austria, Poland, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Portugal and Ireland lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 42%.

Import Prices by Country

The brassiere, girdle and corset import price in the European Union stood at $3.9 per unit in 2019, declining by -4.7% against the previous year. Over the period under review, the import price saw a perceptible decrease. The growth pace was the most rapid in 2014 an increase of 2.4% year-to-year. As a result, import price attained the peak level of $4.6 per unit. From 2015 to 2019, the growth in terms of import prices remained at a lower figure.

Prices varied noticeably by the country of destination; the country with the highest price was Germany ($5.3 per unit), while Ireland ($1.5 per unit) was amongst the lowest.

From 2013 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Italy, while the other leaders experienced a decline in the import price figures.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

Industrial Protective Fabrics

Top 3 Trends Influencing the Use of Industrial Protective Fabrics

Industrial protective fabrics are a key component in firemen and space suits, utility protective clothing, and healthcare as they offer resistance against superior cuts as well as chemical and hazardous aerosol. The materials are heat as well as flameproof resistant and offer enhanced employee protection and operational efficiency. Advancements in industrialization and increasing workplace accidents will drive the industry forecast over the coming years.

Milliken & Company, DowDupont, W. Barnet GmbH & Co. KG., TenCate Protective Fabrics, and Teijin Limited, are some of the key industrial protective fabric producers. Reportedly, the global industrial protective fabrics market size will reach close to USD 9 billion in remuneration annually, by 2025.

Preference for polyethylene and polypropylene materials

Polyethylene industrial protective fabrics market is expected to be valued at nearly USD 70 million up to 2025, considering its extensive use to manufacture bulletproof vests and add-on inserts, offer ballistic protection in helmets, vehicles, marine vessels, and aircraft armor panels. The demand for the products will be also driven owing to their high impact energy absorption damping as well as exterior properties.

There is a robust adoption of polypropylene fabrics across the medical and hygiene applications as well as protective clothing fabrics for patients and in surgeon drapes, referring to their anti-microbial properties. This can be owed to the provision of chemical, fatigue and heat resistance, along with translucence, semi-rigid toughness, integral hinge properties by the material.

Germany and China to outline the regional landscape

Germany industrial protective fabrics market is projected to hit a CAGR of 6.5% through 2025, taking into account the surge in construction projects resulting from increased expenditure on public infrastructure development and lower interest rate home loans. There is a consistent demand for personal protective clothing across the construction sector as the materials offer protection against falls, struck by an object, and electrical hazards.

China can be regarded as one of the leading consumers of industrial protective fabrics and the regional market is likely to record USD 950 million in yearly revenue by 2025. This is due to government support through initiatives like “Made in China 2025” that has led to increased manufacturing activities. Also, stringent norms such as the “Order no 70 by Law of The People’s Republic of China on Worker’s Safety” has mandated employee safety along with regulating safe manufacturing operations in the region.

Increased demand for safety and protection

Industrial protective fabrics market share from firemen suits is pegged at a 7.5% CAGR in the coming years, as the fabrics assist in air circulation, moisture resistance, and offer flame and chemical protection. Developments in urbanization and infrastructures have led to a higher demand for the firefighting systems.

For instance, Aramar can be touted as an industrial protective fabric specifically crafted for firefighters, forest firefighters, and safety corps. They are designed to provide utmost protection and comfort apart from rendering support in the form of insulation against heat, resistance to fire, wear, and tear.

Demand from cleanroom clothing application is estimated to bring a significant share in the coming years considering the role of the fabrics to limit the travel of particles such as dust, microbes, vapors, and aerosol from the industrial personnel to the external environment. There is a significant rise in R&D activities across the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors leading to the mounting demand for cleanroom facilities.

Directives like Regulation (EU) 2016/425 to provide personal protective equipment have ensured the efficient delivery of quality standards for PPE products across the European continent to offer superior protection against hazards. The products are finding extensive use in the present COVID-19 period. Implementation of OSHA general industry, as well as the construction PPE standards set by the U.S. government, have further driven employee safety.

fabric

The European Nonwoven Fabric Market Slows Down Near $7.6B

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Nonwoven Fabric – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The EU nonwoven fabric market declined slightly to $7.6B in 2019, stabilizing at the previous year. This figure reflects the total revenues of producers and importers (excluding logistics costs, retail marketing costs, and retailers’ margins, which will be included in the final consumer price). In general, consumption recorded a relatively flat trend pattern. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2016 with an increase of 4.1% against the previous year. Over the period under review, the market attained the maximum level at $7.6B in 2018, and then declined modestly in the following year.

Consumption by Country

Germany (384K tonnes) remains the largest nonwoven fabric consuming country in the European Union, accounting for 21% of total volume. Moreover, nonwoven fabric consumption in Germany exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest consumer, Poland (190K tonnes), twofold. Italy (182K tonnes) ranked third in terms of total consumption with a 10% share.

From 2014 to 2019, the average annual growth rate of volume in Germany stood at +4.2%. In the other countries, the average annual rates were as follows: Poland (+3.0% per year) and Italy (-8.2% per year).

In value terms, the largest nonwoven fabric markets in the European Union were Germany ($1.8B), Italy ($895M) and France ($685M), together comprising 44% of the total market. These countries were followed by Poland, the Czech Republic, the UK, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Austria and Romania, which together accounted for a further 45%.

In 2019, the highest levels of nonwoven fabric per capita consumption was registered in the Czech Republic (13 kg per person), followed by Belgium (5.42 kg per person), Poland (5 kg per person) and the Netherlands (4.92 kg per person), while the world average per capita consumption of nonwoven fabric was estimated at 3.52 kg per person.

Production in the EU

In 2019, production of nonwoven fabrics increased by 3.2% to 1.9M tonnes for the first time since 2016, thus ending a two-year declining trend. The total output volume increased at an average annual rate of +1.2% over the period from 2014 to 2019; the trend pattern remained consistent, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations being recorded in certain years. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2016 with an increase of 7.2% y-o-y. As a result, production attained the peak volume of 2.1M tonnes. From 2017 to 2019, production growth failed to regain the momentum.

Production by Country

The countries with the highest volumes of nonwoven fabric production in 2019 were Germany (517K tonnes), Italy (367K tonnes) and the Czech Republic (185K tonnes), together accounting for 55% of total production. France, Spain, Poland, Sweden, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, the UK, Denmark and Belgium lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 36%.

From 2014 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of nonwoven fabric production, amongst the main producing countries, was attained by the Netherlands, while nonwoven fabric production for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Imports in the EU

For the sixth year in a row, the European Union recorded growth in overseas purchases of nonwoven fabrics, which increased by 3.8% to 1.4M tonnes in 2019. The total import volume increased at an average annual rate of +3.4% from 2014 to 2019; the trend pattern remained relatively stable, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations being observed in certain years. In value terms, nonwoven fabric imports dropped to $5.9B (IndexBox estimates) in 2019.

Imports by Country

In 2019, Germany (253K tonnes), followed by Poland (164K tonnes), the UK (143K tonnes), France (116K tonnes), Italy (100K tonnes), Belgium (96K tonnes), the Czech Republic (94K tonnes), the Netherlands (80K tonnes) and Spain (78K tonnes) were the largest importers of nonwoven fabrics, together generating 78% of total imports. Austria (41K tonnes), Romania (38K tonnes) and Sweden (35K tonnes) occupied a little share of total imports.

From 2014 to 2019, the biggest increases were in Romania, while purchases for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Germany ($1.2B) constitutes the largest market for imported nonwoven fabrics in the European Union, comprising 19% of total imports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Poland ($553M), with a 9.3% share of total imports. It was followed by the UK, with a 8.3% share.

In Germany, nonwoven fabric imports remained relatively stable over the period from 2014-2019. The remaining importing countries recorded the following average annual rates of imports growth: Poland (+3.4% per year) and the UK (-2.8% per year).

Import Prices by Country

In 2019, the nonwoven fabric import price in the European Union amounted to $4,147 per tonne, dropping by -5.7% against the previous year. Overall, the import price showed a perceptible setback. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2018 an increase of 6% against the previous year. Over the period under review, import prices attained the peak figure at $4,635 per tonne in 2014; however, from 2015 to 2019, import prices failed to regain the momentum.

Average prices varied somewhat amongst the major importing countries. In 2019, major importing countries recorded the following prices: in Italy ($4,843 per tonne) and Romania ($4,811 per tonne), while Poland ($3,382 per tonne) and the UK ($3,438 per tonne) were amongst the lowest.

From 2014 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by the Czech Republic, while the other leaders experienced mixed trends in the import price figures.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

fashion

SEPTEMBER ISSUE: FASHION & TRADE IN A SHIFTING GLOBAL LANDSCAPE

As any devoted reader of Vogue knows, September is usually the time for a wardrobe refresh. This year, the new season may not be looking so good for the fashion industry which faces tariffs, changing consumer demand, and of course, fallout from the pandemic.

Going into 2020, fashion’s global leaders were already apprehensive about a difficult year ahead. They feared external economic shocks and were feeling pressure to adapt quickly to digitization and embrace the push for sustainability. Then, the COVID-19 pandemic upended their industry, cutting demand and disrupting supply chains. Meanwhile, escalating global tensions including the U.S.-China trade war added to the burden of trade barriers.

Though fashion can be seen as a luxury or even a hobby, the apparel industry is one of the largest in the world. Disruptions to this trillion dollar industry have meaningful impacts across the globe for the millions involved in making the world look good while clothing it.

The Big Players in the Global Fashion Trade

Fashion is a global business with global supply chains so tariffs, trade disputes, and transportation disruptions all play an important role in determining what we can buy and how much we pay for it. The global apparel market is valued at over one trillion U.S. dollars. The United States is currently the world’s biggest market for imports of apparel and footwear, importing around $85 billion worth of clothing, accessories and footwear in 2018.

“Knit apparel” is defined as any clothing made from the weaving of fibres. It’s the largest single apparel designation. The United States buys 18.95 percent of total knit apparel imports, twice that of the second-largest importer, Germany. Other top destinations for knit apparel around the globe include European countries such as Spain, the UK and France, and fashion-conscious Asian powerhouses like Japan and Hong Kong.

China remains at the top when it comes to exports of apparel. In 2018, China’s exports of knit apparel made up just shy of 31 percent of total world exports. Bangladesh and Vietnam take the number two and three spots, but with market shares of 7.52 and 5.66 percent respectively.

Top Ten Knit Apparel

A look at longer term trends reveals that China’s market share has been slipping. In 2012, China commanded 41 percent of total knit apparel exports, meaning in the past six years it has lost ten percent of its market share. The below graph shows this decline, as well as the increasing share claimed by rising South and Southeast Asian competitors Bangladesh, Vietnam, and Cambodia. This can be explained partially by the escalating trade war between the United States and China, prompting businesses to shift all or part of their production away from China and to neighboring Asian countries to avoid the Made in China label and the tariffs that come with it.

Asian country share of knit apparel exports v China (1)

An Industry at the Whims of International Policy – and Trends

Even before the pandemic hit, the industry was expecting a shake-up as both global relations and trends were shifting. Global value chains are morphing and new industrializing markets emerging. At the same time, e-commerce continues to accelerate; and expectations for brands to be sustainable and socially conscious are growing. The global pandemic, social movements and international relations of 2020 have forced the fashion industry to be more innovative than ever before to stay in business.

Trade Disputes & Barriers

The fashion industry has long suffered from tariffs — global average import tariff rates for clothing products stood at 17 percent in 2018, about twice as much as that for all other manufactured goods.

In the United States, tariffs are as high as 32 percent for clothing and 65 percent for footwear. In fact, around 75 percent of the total tariff burden on American households comes from apparel products. U.S. tariffs generally vary widely, but those on clothing tend to be higher than in almost any other category and affect a larger portion of U.S. imports, translating into higher prices paid by U.S. consumers.

Given China’s textile and apparel export dominance, it is unsurprising that tariffs on clothing originating in China have been significantly affected by the U.S.-China trade war. The United States levied tariffs ranging from 7 to 25 percent on knitted and non-knitted apparel; textiles including silk and cotton; fabrics such as lace and embroidery; and a whole host of other inputs the fashion industry relies on (like rubberized textiles). China retaliated with its own list of tariffs against American products, including U.S.-produced apparel. The existence of these tariffs, and the constant threat of more, make China a less appealing location for production. If they can find the right mix of cheap-but-skilled labor, manufacturers are likely to relocate factories. Those Made in China labels may instead read Made in VietnamBangladesh or Turkey.

COVID 19: Decreased Demand & Shaky Supply Chains

The COVID-19 pandemic dealt a major blow to the fashion industry worldwide. The one-two punch of disrupted supply chains and a global population reining in luxury expenses hit designers, manufacturers and retailers of clothing and footwear particularly hard.

While people self-quarantined at home, retailers who rely on sales at their brick-and-mortar stores were impacted immediately. During the first six months of 2020, the sales of clothing and accessories at stores in the United States were close to 40 percent lower than one year prior. Department store Nordstrom has suffered a 53 percent dip in sales, and many retailers, including household names like Brooks Brothers, JC Penney and Neiman Marcus, have filed for bankruptcy. Tangentially, a whole population staying home did not demand the same types of clothes as before. No vacation meant no new summer wardrobe. No special events cut down on the need for fancy outfits, causing demand to fall even further.

Resilient and nimble supply chains are vital to any fashion house, as they must be able to react quickly to changing trends and draw on skills and resources spread throughout the world. This resilience was put to the test during the coronavirus pandemic as major production and transportation faltered. The clothing retailers that seem to be weathering the storm best are online-focused stores in a position to pivot quickly to the stay-at-home demand for comfy clothes and “athleisure” wear.

For Some Countries, Fashion Means Everything

Fashion houses and retailers are obviously struggling. Unraveling the threads of trade in fashion reveals the much larger number of people involved in the global fashion industry who have been impacted worldwide. They include millions of people employed as manufacturers of apparel and footwear, as well as producers of textiles and other materials, and farmers who produce raw materials, as well as myriad designers, creators and marketers who are part of the innovative “orange economy”.

Many countries are involved in apparel production, but for some South and Southeast Asian countries it forms a significant part, even the vast majority, of their total revenue. For example, 44 percent of national export revenue in Sri Lanka comes from apparel. That number is even higher for Cambodia, at 58.45 percent. Apparel is also Vietnam’s third-largest export sector, bringing in over $36 billion annually and accounting for 16 percent of GDP.

And nowhere is the apparel industry more important than Bangladesh, where 83 percent of total export revenue comes from the garment industry. The apparel industry, and more specifically the ability to trade the clothing and accessories manufactured in Bangladesh, has been a huge driver of economic development in the country and has given many the opportunity to earn a living beyond subsistence farming. About 80 percent of jobs are held by women, providing not only employment but autonomy and education to one of the world’s poorest and most vulnerable populations.

However, this specialization comes at a cost. Although trade in apparel has brought much needed revenue into the country, the heavy reliance on a single industry has also been a source of concern. For example, worldwide orders dried up at the height of the coronavirus pandemic, risking millions of Bangladeshi jobs and even prompting fears of starvation.

Bangladesh Garment Sector (1)

Trends in Fashion and Trends in Trade – Where Next?

Trends rule in the world of fashion. In this especially uncertain time, who knows what will win out as new autumn fashion appears on our shelves (and in our feeds)?

Will the growing shift to more sustainable and ethical fashion continue with a slow down of “fast fashion” in favor of investing in long-lasting pieces with a low environmental footprint? If so, we might expect a shift away from clothing produced in far-flung destinations to cut down on carbon footprints or to trace the origin of clothing made with free and fair practices. Or, as the world opens up post-COVID will the return of traveling and social events spur a worldwide shopping-spree and a desire for more clothing, more quickly? In that case, suppliers who can utilize large and diverse – yet agile – supply chains will come out on top.

Two things are certain: fashion will continue to be a global industry and trade will continue to play a vital role in shaping what we wear.

_______________________________________________________________

Alice Calder

Alice Calder received her MA in Applied Economics at GMU. Originally from the UK, where she received her BA in Philosophy and Political Economy from the University of Exeter, living and working internationally sparked her interest in trade issues as well as the intersection of economics and culture.

This article originally appeared on TradeVistas.org. Republished with permission.

curtains

Affected by the Pandemic, the Global Curtain Market to Lose Growth Momentum

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Curtains And Interior Blinds – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The Growth of the Global Curtains Market Softened by 2020

The global curtains market was estimated at $15.3B in 2019 (IndexBox estimates), remaining constant against the previous year. This figure reflects the total revenues of producers and importers (excluding logistics costs, retail marketing costs, and retailers’ margins, which will be included in the final consumer price).

In 2019, the curtain and interior blind market increased to 2.2M tonnes, which remained relatively unchanged against the year before. Overall, there was an upward trend of curtain and interior blind consumption – the average annual growth rate stood at +1.0% per year from 2007-2019. After 2015, the growth of consumption accelerated amid lower prices for blind and shades and strong construction growth worldwide, particularly in the U.S. and Europe. In 2019, however, the market growth lost its previous strong momentum, hampered by a slowdown in the global economy and rising both political and trade tensions in the world.

China (338K tonnes) constituted the country with the largest volume of curtains consumption, accounting for 16% of total volume. Moreover, curtains consumption in China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest consumer, India (140K tonnes), twofold. The third position in this ranking was occupied by the U.S. (137K tonnes), with a 6.3% share.

From 2007 to 2019, the average annual growth rate of volume in China totaled +1.8%. In the other countries, the average annual rates were as follows: India (+1.6% per year) and the U.S. (-0.1% per year).

In value terms, China ($2.1B), the U.S. ($1.4B) and the UK ($1.3B) were the countries with the highest levels of market value in 2019, with a combined 31% share of the global market. These countries were followed by Japan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, India, Nigeria, Brazil, Ethiopia and Mexico, which together accounted for a further 20%.

The countries with the highest levels of curtains per capita consumption in 2019 were the UK (967 kg per 1000 persons), Japan (560 kg per 1000 persons) and the U.S. (416 kg per 1000 persons).

From 2007 to 2019, the most notable rate of growth in terms of curtains per capita consumption, amongst the key consuming countries, was attained by Brazil, while curtains per capita consumption for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

The Severe Effect of the COVID Pandemic Puts a Drag on the Market Growth

Fundamentally, curtain and interior blind consumption is to follow the growth of global construction and consumer incomes, which both more broadly depend on general economic development.

Until 2020, the global economy has been developing steadily for five years, although at a slower pace than in the previous decade. In early 2020, however, the global economy entered a period of the crisis caused by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. According to World Bank forecasts, despite the gradual relaxing of restrictive measures and unprecedented government support in countries that faced the pandemic in early 2020, the annual decline of global GDP could amount to -5.2%, which is the deepest global recession being seen over the past eight decades.

The construction sector is to suffer heavily from the pandemic as falling incomes make mortgage loans less affordable. On the other hand, many countries are taking unprecedented measures of state support for the economy and household income, which is to support the recovery of construction. In addition, prolonged isolation can cause people to change something in their home interiors, which can increase consumer interest in curtains.

Taking into account the above, it is expected that in 2020 the global consumption of curtains will stagnate at about the level of 2019. In the medium term, as the global economy recovers from the effects of the pandemic, the market is expected to grow gradually. Overall, market performance is forecast to pursue a slightly upward trend over the next decade, expanding with an anticipated CAGR of +0.3% for the period from 2019 to 2030, which is projected to bring the market volume to 2.2M tonnes by the end of 2030.

The U.S. Remains the Largest Market for Imported Curtain and Interior Blinds

In 2019, supplies from abroad of curtains and interior blinds decreased by -7.9% to 517K tonnes for the first time since 2012, thus ending a six-year rising trend. The total import volume increased at an average annual rate of +1.6% over the period from 2007 to 2019; however, the trend pattern indicated some noticeable fluctuations being recorded throughout the analyzed period. The pace of growth appeared the most rapid in 2010 when imports increased by 15% against the previous year. Over the period under review, global imports attained the peak figure at 562K tonnes in 2018, and then declined in the following year.

In value terms, curtains imports contracted to $4.6B (IndexBox estimates) in 2019. The total import value increased at an average annual rate of +1.8% from 2007 to 2019; however, the trend pattern remained relatively stable, with only minor fluctuations being recorded in certain years. The growth pace was the most rapid in 2010 with an increase of 13% against the previous year. Over the period under review, global imports reached the peak figure at $4.7B in 2018, and then declined in the following year.

In 2019, the U.S. (131K tonnes) was the key importer of curtains and interior blinds, making up 25% of total imports. It was distantly followed by Germany (45K tonnes), the UK (34K tonnes), Japan (28K tonnes) and France (25K tonnes), together generating a 25% share of total imports. The following importers – Belgium (14K tonnes), Canada (12K tonnes), Spain (10K tonnes), Russia (10K tonnes), the Philippines (9.6K tonnes), Italy (9.5K tonnes) and Sweden (9.4K tonnes) – together made up 15% of total imports.

The U.S. experienced a relatively flat trend pattern with regard to volume of imports of curtains and interior blinds. At the same time, the Philippines (+33.1%), Russia (+8.4%), Germany (+4.8%), Spain (+3.3%), Belgium (+2.6%), Canada (+1.8%), France (+1.5%) and Japan (+1.1%) displayed positive paces of growth. Moreover, the Philippines emerged as the fastest-growing importer imported in the world, with a CAGR of +33.1% from 2007-2019. Sweden experienced a relatively flat trend pattern. By contrast, the UK (-1.5%) and Italy (-1.6%) illustrated a downward trend over the same period.

In value terms, the U.S. ($1.4B) constitutes the largest market for imported curtains and interior blinds worldwide, comprising 30% of global imports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Germany ($485M), with a 11% share of global imports. It was followed by the UK, with a 5.6% share.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform

fashion

Post-COVID-19: Slowing Down Fast Fashion and the Retail Sector

As brands and retailers scramble to adapt to the post-COVID-19 world, one thing is clear – the fast fashion trend that has dominated the sector as we know it is no longer sustainable.

The race to get ahead of the competition has ended up distorting fashion’s seasonality – whereas once the bi-annual fashion shows were held 4-5 months ahead of the upcoming season in order to allow brands and buyers time to create forward-orders and produce stock, these days retailers rush the latest trends from the catwalk to the stores within a question of days. It’s no longer unusual to see Summer dresses on the shelves in February and Winter coats in the stores before August is out. And yet consumers, bombarded with the latest fashion trends at all hours of the day via social media influencers and celebrities, want fashion they can wear now, not in months’ time. So in order to stay relevant, retailers are pressured to buy stock months in advance of when it’s needed, and then end up having to sell it off at sale prices just as it’s coming into season so they can introduce the never-ending round of latest trends.

This problem has confounded the industry for some time, but there seemed to be no way out of it – nobody wanted to be the first to “slow down.” And yet here we are, after months of enforced factory lock-downs and store closures, with an unexpected opportunity to rethink the way the industry works.

Gucci announced in late March that it would lead the way into a more mindful future, abandoning “the worn-out ritual of seasonalities” by reducing their number of yearly shows from five to just two. Other major brands were quick to follow suit, with a focus on less season-influenced and gender-exclusive collections, creating more fluid styles designed to last for months and years as opposed to the buy-wear-throwaway designs that have taken such a toll on our environment. It’s not just the brands themselves who are calling for change, consumers are becoming more aware of the impact the fashion industry has on our planet and demand for sustainable fashion has never been higher.

However, sustainable fashion production itself is still in its infancy and there are still a limited number of brands that are wholly dedicated to reducing the social and environmental impact of clothing production. But by changing the way retailers buy and sell their products we may see a real change in the reduction of waste before the product even reaches the consumer, and help end the practice of brands destroying unsold stock in order to maintain a fabricated “exclusivity.” It’s a case of changing the industry mindset, from fast fashion to fast provisioning, in which retailers can react quickly to new trends and only buy what they actually need. Those retailers who have embraced this new “test and repeat” model are among the few to have come out of the crisis with increased profits, as they were able to respond almost immediately to the changing demands of the consumer and weren’t stuck trying to offload months’ worth of dead stock to a public for whom it was no longer relevant.

For small retailers, the benefits are obvious – purchasing small amounts of stock regularly based on customer demand frees up storage space, reduces forward investment, and minimizes financial risk. Plus, they are still able to offer regular stock updates and variety which continues to be a major attraction in a social media influenced society with a notoriously short attention span.

Wholesale brands are looking for new ways to reach their buyers, offering livestock that can be delivered in a matter of days. With TradeGala – the B2B online marketplace, B2B fashion is simplified for both brands and buyers, with a retail-like, user-friendly e-commerce platform that allows buyers to go from order to receipt in less than a week.

The Coronavirus has forced an entire industry to stop, take stock of its problems,, and start looking for solutions. Amid the suffering and struggle that undoubtedly still lays ahead for the industry, this crisis offers us an unprecedented opportunity to change, hopefully for the better.

textile

Nonwoven Textile Market in Asia Amounted to $16.1B

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘Asia – Nonwoven Textiles – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The revenue of the nonwoven textile market in Asia amounted to $16.1B in 2018, increasing by 3.9% against the previous year.

Consumption By Country in Asia

In value terms, China ($7.8B) led the market, alone. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Japan ($1.4B). It was followed by Indonesia.

The countries with the highest levels of nonwoven textile per capita consumption in 2018 were Saudi Arabia (4.28 square meters per person), South Korea (4.21 square meters per person) and Japan (3.37 square meters per person).

From 2014 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of nonwoven textile per capita consumption, amongst the main consuming countries, was attained by India, while nonwoven textile per capita consumption for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Market Forecast to 2019-2030

Driven by increasing demand for nonwoven textile in Asia, the market is expected to continue an upward consumption trend over the next decade. Market performance is forecast to decelerate, expanding with an anticipated CAGR of +1.1% for the period from 2018 to 2030, which is projected to bring the market volume to 5.3B square meters by the end of 2030.

Exports in Asia

In 2018, Asia’s nonwoven textile exports stood at $6.6B (IndexBox estimates). The total export value increased at an average annual rate of +5.5% from 2014 to 2018; however, the trend pattern remained consistent, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations over the period under review. The pace of growth was the most pronounced in 2018 with an increase of 13% y-o-y. In that year, nonwoven textile exports reached their peak and are likely to continue its growth in the immediate term.

Exports by Country

China represented the key exporter of nonwoven textiles in Asia, with the volume of exports resulting at 1B square meters, which was approx. 53% of total exports in 2018. Turkey (211M square meters) took the second position in the ranking, followed by Taiwan, Chinese (110M square meters). All these countries together held near 17% share of total exports. The following exporters – Thailand (81M square meters), Malaysia (75M square meters), Japan (71M square meters), Israel (71M square meters), Saudi Arabia (70M square meters), South Korea (60M square meters), China, Hong Kong SAR (55M square meters) and India (55M square meters) – together made up 28% of total exports.

Exports from China increased at an average annual rate of +11.9% from 2014 to 2018. At the same time, Saudi Arabia (+24.5%), Turkey (+17.6%), India (+15.6%), Thailand (+12.2%), Malaysia (+7.1%), China, Hong Kong SAR (+6.8%), Japan (+6.1%) and Taiwan, Chinese (+4.3%) displayed positive paces of growth. Moreover, Saudi Arabia emerged as the fastest-growing exporter exported in Asia, with a CAGR of +24.5% from 2014-2018. Israel experienced a relatively flat trend pattern. By contrast, South Korea (-5.4%) illustrated a downward trend over the same period. While the share of China (+19 p.p.), Turkey (+5.2 p.p.), Saudi Arabia (+2.1 p.p.) and Thailand (+1.5 p.p.) increased significantly, the shares of the other countries remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period.

In value terms, China ($3.1B) remains the largest nonwoven textile supplier in Asia, comprising 46% of total nonwoven textile exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Japan ($768M), with a 12% share of total exports. It was followed by Turkey, with a 9% share.

Export Prices by Country

The nonwoven textile export price in Asia stood at $3.4 per square meter in 2018, approximately mirroring the previous year.

There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major exporting countries. In 2018, the country with the highest price was Japan ($11 per square meter), while Saudi Arabia ($1.5 per square meter) was amongst the lowest.

From 2014 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Israel, while the other leaders experienced mixed trends in the export price figures.

Imports in Asia

Asia’s nonwoven textile imports amounted to $4.8B (IndexBox estimates) in 2018. The total import value increased at an average annual rate of +3.9% from 2014 to 2018; however, the trend pattern remained relatively stable, with somewhat noticeable fluctuations being recorded over the period under review. The most prominent rate of growth was recorded in 2018 with an increase of 8.8% against the previous year. In that year, nonwoven textile imports reached their peak and are likely to continue its growth in the immediate term.

Imports by Country

In 2018, Japan (268M square meters), distantly followed by China (144M square meters), South Korea (129M square meters), Viet Nam (122M square meters) and India (77M square meters) represented the largest importers of nonwoven textiles, together mixing up 62% of total imports. The following importers – Indonesia (53M square meters), Turkey (49M square meters), Pakistan (42M square meters), Thailand (37M square meters), Saudi Arabia (35M square meters), Malaysia (31M square meters) and Taiwan, Chinese (27M square meters) – together made up 23% of total imports.

From 2014 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of imports, amongst the main importing countries, was attained by Pakistan, while imports for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, China ($905M), Japan ($858M) and Viet Nam ($525M) constituted the countries with the highest levels of imports in 2018, with a combined 47% share of total imports. South Korea, Indonesia, India, Turkey, Thailand, Malaysia, Taiwan, Chinese, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 37%.

Import Prices by Country

The nonwoven textile import price in Asia stood at $4.1 per square meter in 2018, approximately mirroring the previous year.

Prices varied noticeably by the country of destination; the country with the highest price was China ($6.3 per square meter), while Pakistan ($1.9 per square meter) was amongst the lowest.

From 2014 to 2018, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Indonesia, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox AI Platform