New Articles

Where do People Travel for Business?

business

Where do People Travel for Business?

When it comes to global business, the right transportation is essential. Getting talent from one side of the globe to another matters as much as ever it has – and perhaps even more so. But which cities are the most attractive for modern business? This is a question whose answers have remained more or less the same over the last four or five years, despite the fact that global business flights have more than doubled.

New York

The Big Apple leads the pack when it comes to inbound business flight, and it has done since 2014. This is largely thanks to its status as a centre of global finance, but it’s also because New York is among the most business-friendly states in the US, with a range of tax incentives offered to startups. Buzzfeed and WebMD originated here. Whether you’re taking a private jet or a commercial airliner, New York remains the world’s premier destination for business travellers.

London

London has consistently run a close second, despite the uncertainty still lingering over Brexit. Among the biggest draws of the capital is the English language, which remains the second most widely-spoken language in the world (and probably claims the top spot when we count only the customers of international airports). London contains around 15 businesses per hundred residents; the figure for the rest of the UK is around 10.

Paris

Paris is something of a fast-climber, experiencing around twenty-per cent growth over the two-year spell from 2016-2018. It’s easy to see why a business might locate here; Paris has an enormous amount of culture and history to offer, and thus it’s easy to persuade would-be staff to settle here. While France might have something of a reputation for overbearing bureaucracy (the word, is, after all, derived from a French one), the business environment is competitive enough to tempt many international businesses and skilled employees looking to sample life on the continent.

Shanghai

With China having established itself as a global power, it’s probably no surprise that its busiest airport is so attractive to international business customers. While the city isn’t quite as attractive to western travellers as the other entries to this list, it’s a location that no globalised business can afford to neglect – and this is reflected in its rapid rise as a centre of international air traffic. 

Among the more interesting trends in global air traffic generally has been an increased spread between different continents, with five of the seven listed in the top twenty destinations. There is perhaps no better example of this than that of Shanghai.

Toronto

Toronto outranks many US cities, including San Francisco, Houston and LA. As with New York, there is a range of incentives to businesses looking to grow here. The combined rate of corporate and income tax sits at around 26.5%, which is lower than the US average by around thirteen percentage points.

Singapore

Like Dubai, Singapore claims a great deal of air travel thanks to its popularity as a stop-off for long-haul flights between Europe and Australia. But there’s more to Singapore than that. The country is widely regarded as an ideal place from which to tap into Asia’s emerging markets. The location is strategically attractive, the workforce is competitive and the economic policy is explicitly favourable to business. It’s also emerging as serious competition for Hong Kong’s financial centres. For the world’s business travellers, there’s no shortage of reasons to pay this part of the world a visit.

EU Files Boeing 777X Tax Incentive Dispute With WTO

Los Angeles, CA – The European Union (EU) has filed a dispute with the WTO Secretariat in Geneva against the U.S. regarding “conditional tax incentives” offered by the state of Washington to “commercial airplane manufacturers.”

The EU asserts in the dispute – a not-so-veiled slap at Boeing and its new 777X commercial jetliner – that the “vastly expanded tax incentives are conditioned on local content requirements prohibited by the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.”

The request for consultations was made, the European Commission (EC) said, in response to a decision by the state of Washington in November 2013, to extend to 2040 subsidies to Boeing that were originally granted through 2024.

The EC is charging that the broadened subsidies were contrary to the WTO rules, “because they require the beneficiary to use domestic goods rather than imported ones.”

“The subsidies scheme extension is estimated to be worth $8.7 billion and will be the largest subsidy for the civil aerospace industry in U.S. history,” according to a Commission statement.

The 777X is a new version of Boeing’s successful 777 twin-engine wide-body jet. It’s scheduled to go into service in 2020. The company has reportedly received orders amounting to billions of dollars for the aircraft from a number of air carriers.

The EU’s request Friday for consultations is the first step in a dispute within the WTO’s Dispute Settlement System.

WTO rules call for Washington, D.C. to respond to the request within 10 days, but due to the Christmas holidays, the EU has agreed to extend the deadline until January 7.

The consultations will give the U.S. and the EU the opportunity to discuss the dispute and reach a solution without proceeding to litigation. The talks must begin within 30 days and generally cannot last longer than two months.

If both parties fail to reach an agreement, the EU can request that a “panel of experts” be commissioned to study the dispute and reach a verdict.

12/23/2014

FDI Tax Breaks, Incentives Slammed in New Report

Washington, DC – The use of tax breaks and other incentives by state and local governments and economic development agencies across the country to attract foreign businesses has come under fire in a study just released by The Brookings Institution.

Calling the practice “deeply flawed,” the economic think tank states that “mergers and acquisitions are driving foreign investment in the US, not the opening of new establishments.”

Civic leaders, it said, “would accomplish far more by bolstering industrial amenities to retain overseas companies than by offering rich subsidies designed to attract new ones.”

According to Devashree Saha, a senior policy analyst at Brookings and lead author of the report, “Policies that narrowly focus on new business openings are probably not going to give you a big bang for your buck.”

In 2011, only 26 percent of all jobs at US locations of foreign companies were created by the opening of a new factory, office or store, while nearly a third were generated by foreign takeovers of US companies, he said, adding that over the past 20 years, 84 percent of foreign companies that came to the US did so through an acquisition.

“Federal, state and local governments “should invest more to build strong industry clusters by ensuring an adequate supply of skilled workers, modernizing US infrastructure and increasing investment in research and development, among other initiatives,” the study found.

While the US is still the global leader in attracting FDI, the US share of global foreign direct investment (FDI) shrank from 37 percent in 2002 to 17 percent in 2012 with China and other developing economies grabbing a growing share of foreign business, according to data from the Washington, DC-headquartered Organization for International Investment (OFII).

“Outsize Benefits” Generated

Foreign-owned companies employ about 5.6 million workers in the US, or about 5 percent of private payrolls, according to the Brookings study. Their employment grew steadily from 1991 to 2000, but has stagnated since.

“Yet, the firms generate outsize benefits, accounting for a fifth of US goods exports and 15.4% of all private R&D in 2011,” the study said. “Foreign owners of US operations also pay higher wages than US companies — $77,000 vs. $60,000, on average.”

The report also ranks states and “metro areas” based on their share of jobs at foreign-owned establishments.

In 2011, Delaware led with 8.5 percent of all private-sector jobs at foreign-owned locations, particularly in the pharmaceutical, medicine, manufacturing and insurance sectors, followed by South Carolina with 7.5 percent of its private jobs at foreign-owned companies, largely in the auto industry.

Bridgeport, Connecticut, led among US “metro areas” with foreign firms accounting for 13.6 percent of private payrolls, particularly in the computer systems design and brokerage fields.

Greensboro, North Carolina, ranked second with 9 percent – primarily retail grocery stores, auto manufacturing, and pharmaceuticals). Worcester, Massachusetts tied for second place with most of its foreign-owned employers in the power generation, electrical products and insurance sectors.

In the 20 metro areas analyzed for the Brookings study, FDI made up more than half of all jobs in the largest industries active in Dayton, Ohio; Chattanooga, Tennessee, and Charleston, South Carolina, and San Jose, California.

07/03/2014