New Articles

The Fastest-Growing Metropolitan Areas in the U.S.

fastest-growing

The Fastest-Growing Metropolitan Areas in the U.S.

It’s no secret that America’s most popular cities from a century ago, like New York and Chicago, have actually been shrinking in recent years, but even newer destinations like Los Angeles are also falling from their peak populations. Instead, U.S. residents are flocking to up-and-coming hotspots in the South and West.

A hundred years ago, U.S. Census figures show that 91.3% of the nation lived outside the Western states, but now the West is more populous than both the Midwest and Northeast. Meanwhile, the South is currently the fastest-growing region of the country after stagnating for much of the last century. Census figures for 2020 show the composition of the current U.S. population to be 38.1% in the South, 23.7% in the West, 20.8% in the Midwest, and 17.4% in the Northeast.

More plentiful and higher-quality job opportunities have been among the driving forces for the move south and west. Seattle has been a prime example of the renaissance in tech jobs out west, and Austin’s growth as a new high-tech hub in Texas has earned it the nickname of the “new Silicon Valley.” Outdoor recreational opportunities and more favorable weather have also factored in strongly, as well as lower costs of living.

Even more recently, new migration trends have dispersed residents from traditional western destinations like Los Angeles and San Francisco to other places, particularly neighboring states. Over the last decade, California stands out as a notable exception in the fast-growing West; people are leaving California in droves and heading to Idaho, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona. In fact, 6 of the 10 fastest-growing states benefited most from California residents, according to Census data that identified the most common origin for recent movers.

In the South, the primary beneficiaries of recent growth have been Florida, Texas, and the Carolinas. On the other end of the spectrum, the Midwest has become less popular, led by an exodus from Illinois. Outside of moves to neighboring states, which is by far the most common phenomenon for domestic migration, lots of movers also went from New York to Florida, California to Texas, Florida to Tennessee, and New York to California.

To pinpoint which metropolitan areas across the country are growing the fastest, researchers at Inspection Support Network compiled U.S. Census Bureau statistics from 2015 and 2020, then compared the difference in population. The results are right in line with state-level trends. Idaho has several leading midsize and small metros on the lists, Las Vegas and Phoenix are in the top five, and cities in Florida and Texas are commonplace throughout.

Here are the fastest-growing large metropolitan areas in the U.S.

Metro Rank Percentage change in population (2015–2020) Total change in population (2015–2020) Population 2020                                                                               Most common origin for recent movers
Austin-Round Rock, TX    1     14.6% 292,489 2,295,303 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX
Raleigh, NC    2     11.7% 148,708 1,420,376 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC
Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ    3     10.5% 479,564 5,059,909 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL    4     10.5% 249,797 2,639,374 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV    5     10.4% 218,131 2,315,963 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
Jacksonville, FL    6     9.8% 142,273 1,587,892 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC    7     9.6% 234,770 2,684,276 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX    8     9.3% 651,816 7,694,138 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX
San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX    9     8.9% 211,375 2,590,732 Austin-Round Rock, TX
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL    10     8.7% 258,488 3,243,963 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA
Nashville-Davidson–Murfreesboro–Franklin, TN    11     8.6% 155,244 1,961,232 Knoxville, TN
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA    12     7.4% 276,887 4,018,598 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX    13     7.3% 483,675 7,154,478 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA    14     7.0% 399,179 6,087,762 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA
Salt Lake City, UT    15     6.4% 74,663 1,240,029 Provo-Orem, UT
United States    –     2.7% 8,745,129 329,484,123 N/A

 

For more information, a detailed methodology, and complete results, you can find the original report on Inspection Support Network’s website: https://www.inspectionsupport.com/resources/the-fastest-growing-metropolitan-areas-in-the-u-s/

density

The Top-Paying Low-Density Cities in the United States

The COVID-19 pandemic has precipitated a mass exodus of people from dense, expensive cities to less crowded, affordable areas. A recent survey conducted by The Harris Poll found that 39 percent of urban Americans are considering moving to a less crowded location as a result of the pandemic. This shift in attitude follows a long period of urbanization that began during the Industrial Revolution and continued through the beginning of 2020.

Despite most Americans living in high-density areas, the overall population density in the U.S. is relatively low, at under 100 people per square mile. In fact, only about 5 percent of U.S. counties have a population density that exceeds 1,000 people per square mile. Most of these high-density counties are located in coastal states such as Virginia, New Jersey, New York, and California. Low-density areas are scattered throughout the country, with the lowest population densities observed in the North Central and Mountain regions.

While rural living might be attractive for some, many Americans are simply looking for less crowded alternatives to some of the most densely populated areas like New York City (27,954 per square mile), San Francisco (18,828 per square mile), and Boston (14,396 per square mile). For reference, the median population density of America’s 324 largest cities with over 100,000 residents is just 3,419 per square mile, about 80 percent less crowded than New York City.

For families seeking a less crowded place for health and safety reasons, but also wanting to maintain a comparable salary, there are several locations to consider, especially in the South and the Midwest. To find which low-density cities pay the best, researchers at Roofstock, a real estate investment platform, analyzed data from the U.S. Census Bureau for cities with over 100,000 residents.

The researchers first identified cities with population densities that fell below the median of 3,419 people per square mile. Then the researchers ranked the remaining cities by their respective median annual earnings for full-time workers. In the event of a tie, the city with the higher median earnings for all workers was ranked higher. To improve relevance, cities were further grouped into the following cohorts based on population size: small (100,000–149,999), midsize (150,000-349,999), and large (350,000 or more).

Here are the top-paying large U.S. cities with low population densities.

For more information, a detailed methodology, and complete results, you can find the original report on Roofstock’s website: https://learn.roofstock.com/blog/best-paying-low-density-cities