New Articles

Fire not the only Danger with Lithium-ion Batteries

lithium-ion batteries transportation

Fire not the only Danger with Lithium-ion Batteries

TT Club, the specialist international freight insurance provider is seeking greater emphasis on the critical dangers of toxic gas emissions associated with lithium-ion battery fires.  The failure of such batteries has the potential to occur with no prior warning, or with such speed that there is typically no time to react to any warning signs.

Devastating consequences of rapidly spreading, and often challenging to extinguish fires involving the batteries particularly in electric vehicles (EV) on board ships, and other parts of the supply chain have been well-documented in recent months.  There is however less awareness of the highly toxic combustion products that are released and their respective impact to the health and wellbeing of those exposed to the gases.

Based on the evidence of past fires the time between the initiation of a failed battery igniting to a discharge of toxic vapor can be measured in seconds rather than minutes. This is due to a process known as thermal runaway.  The rapid sequence of events typically occurs where an internal electrical short within one of the battery cells generates heat; this breaks down the internal structure of the battery, increasing the rate of the reaction in an ever-increasing cycle.  There is often a dramatic release of energy in the form of heat and a significant emission of toxic gases.

Potential vapor volume production
Source: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 80 (2022)

The toxicity of gases given off from any given lithium-ion battery differ from that of a typical fire and can themselves vary but all remain either poisonous or combustible, or both.  They can feature high percentages of hydrogen, and compounds of hydrogen, including hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride and hydrogen cyanide, as well as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide and methane among other dangerous chemicals.

In terms of hazards to the wellbeing of those in the vicinity of such an incident, one particularly problematic component is hydrogen fluoride (HF). Although HF is lighter than air and would disperse when released, a cloud of vapor and aerosol that is heavier than air may be formed (EPA 1993). On exposure to skin or by inhaling, HF can result in skin burns and lung damage that can take time (hours to weeks) to develop following exposure. HF will be quickly absorbed by the body via skin and lungs depleting vital calcium and magnesium levels in tissues, which can result in severe and possibly fatal systemic effects. The hydrogen content of the released gases can give rise to vapor cloud explosion risks which have the potential to cause significant damage.

TT advocates a range of measures to mitigate the risks. A prudent starting point would be to perform a fire risk assessment, considering the specific hazards presented by lithium-ion batteries.

Risk mitigation considerations thereafter could include providing operatives with certified full-face self-contained breathing apparatus, chemical-resistant boots among other protective equipment, as well as drench showers for post-response decontamination. Strategic positioning of fire-fighting equipment should also be a key consideration.

Early detection of such an incident can also be pivotal in managing the response, camera and thermal imaging could enable an expedient response. Such equipment might have already become commonplace for some modes, however conducting a thorough risk assessment for example when cargo is stored in warehouses would be prudent.

Consideration should also be given to the location of any incident that might include clean up and entry. The gases produced potentially leave toxic deposits on all surfaces and in the atmosphere. Therefore, once the incident is under control, potential hazards remain.

lithium-ion batteries transportation

De-risking the Carriage of Lithium-ion Batteries

At the heart of efforts to draw attention to the hazards inherent in transporting lithium-ion batteries, specialist freight insurer TT Club now urges debate leading to a balanced, yet realistic awareness of the dangers, and a united approach to enhancing their safe carriage. Improved regulatory clarity is required and auto manufacturers need to address transport safety issues more thoroughly.

Rapid development of battery technology and the uncertainties created by these developments, particularly concerning safety when the energy packs are being transported require the logistics industry to have a clear understanding of the dangers which can include fire, explosions and toxic gas emissions.  Moreover, there needs to be increased efforts to minimize the risks, and if necessary, make sure there is an effective response to any catastrophic event.

Alarmist reports in the media can overstate the number of incidents involving electric vehicles.  Indeed Peregrine Storrs-Fox, Risk Management Director at insurance mutual TT Club points out that “Lithium-ion (li-ion) battery fires are not an everyday occurrence.  But when thermal runaway does happen, the result is release of toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide, a very high temperature fire and can spread very fast.”

The release of toxic fumes may be the first alert, but fire with temperatures higher than 1,000degs centigrade can be reached in a matter of seconds and, as the mix of chemicals and metals ignites, devastation can ensue.

In keeping with its mission to extend awareness and achieve a united front, TT Club was delighted to be part of a forum of interested parties which was held recently in London.  Much was revealed by the speakers and valuable debate ensued.  “Supply chain players including ship owners, carriers, forwarders, terminal and port operators and insurers are engaged with these debates. Indeed, the maritime regulator IMO (International Maritime Organization) has its guidance for carriage of these batteries under serious review,” says Storrs-Fox.  “But we need to bring manufacturers of EVs and the batteries that power them actively into the debate.  Their ambitions for the development of more powerful, lighter and diverse battery cells must not be allowed to outstrip prioritizing safety concerns surrounding their future transportation around the globe.”

Such concerns regarding the battery packs within electric vehicles (EVs) have been raised in the US and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has carried out a study.  The forum heard that EVs were reported to have incurred fewer fire incidents than internal combustion engine (ICE) cars. However, there are a few provisos to be highlighted here – not least that there are far fewer electric cars on the road than ICE vehicles.

Secondly it is understood that newer batteries are less likely to ignite or explode than used batteries, effectively the older the li-ion unit, the greater the chance of an incident. As a result, it is not clear how the batteries will perform through the intended life, given that the switch to EV’s is only now gathering pace and most battery packs are new.

Regarding the rapid spread of fire, Eva Mckiernan, the technical director at firefighting consultancy Jensen Hughes highlighted the dangers of thermal runaway as the most pressing issue after ignition.  She explained that these energy packs are thermo-dynamically unstable.  When the batteries are damaged, they can release hot and poisonous gases into containers or onto car decks of ro-ro ships and other vehicle carriers within seconds.  When the batteries explode those extraordinary temperatures can be reached.

Of course, EVs are just one use for li-ion batteries, which can be found in a variety of goods including e-bikes and scooters, as well as computers and mobile phones.  All of these goods are transported with batteries in containers. Whilst transported as new, it may be reasonable to expect appropriate packaging, although state of charge is variable, used and damaged batteries present considerable uncertainty for the transport supply chain.

About TT Club

TT Club is the established market-leading independent provider of mutual insurance and related risk management services to the international transport and logistics industry. TT Club’s primary objective is to help make the industry safer and more secure. Founded in 1968, the Club has more than 1100 Members, spanning container owners and operators, ports and terminals, and logistics companies, working across maritime, road, rail, and air. TT Club is renowned for its high-quality service, in-depth industry knowledge and enduring Member loyalty. It retains more than 97% of its Members with a third of its entire membership having chosen to insure with the Club for 20 years or more.

electric vehicles

Electric Vehicles and the Supply Chain Industry: Top 3 Emerging Trends

Technology keeps evolving and impacting lives. It is changing how things happen in various industries worldwide. One of the most impacted industries is the supply chain industry, mainly because electric vehicles are becoming more popular now than ever before.

Research shows that by 2025, 30% of all vehicle sales will be hybrid electric vehicles and EVs. Vehicle manufacturers are doing their best to keep up with the demand for electric cars. This has been a result of carriers in the supply chain industry opting for clean-running vehicles.

It is vital to know how electric vehicles are set to transform the supply chain industry. This includes companies that offer car transportation services. In this article, you will learn about emerging electric vehicle trends. It will also look into how the trends will impact the supply chain industry.


 

Read on to find out more.

New Challenges for Automotive Companies

As mentioned earlier, technology has had a massive impact on automotive companies. Supply chain companies are looking for modern cars and trucks. Automotive manufacturers now have new challenges. The materials and parts used in making these cars are different from regular automobiles.

For instance, the designs have substantially changed in modern cars. In addition, the manufacturing process has also changed. Manufacturers have introduced different electronic components. Besides, other pieces of technology like sensors and microchips have also gained popularity in the industry.

Besides these changes, regulations have also become a challenge for automobile manufacturers. Every tiny part used in making modern cars needs to meet regulatory requirements. This hasn’t been an easy thing for car manufacturers worldwide. It has made it a challenge to meet the soaring demand for cars.

The challenges automotive manufacturers experience affects the supply chain industry significantly. It may delay the planned shift to more efficient cars and trucks. But so far, a gradual change has been possible. The reality is that a complete transformation to an energy-efficient industry is still far.

Increasing Demand for Electric Vehicles

The demand for electric vehicles in the supply chain industry doesn’t seem to slow down. For instance, most car shippers have already started changing their fleets. It could happen quicker if automobile manufacturers could produce as many modern cars and trucks as traditional ones.

However, three vital trends are emerging in this industry of late. These trends will impact many things including the costs of shipping cars. This comes as vehicle transporters plan to have more clean-running trucks in their fleets. EVs will reduce the car shipping operating costs and promote a cleaner environment.

This section will take a more in-depth look at the trends impacting vehicle shipping and the supply chain industry.

Here’s the first trend that you should look out for today.

1. Limited Lithium

Lithium-ion batteries power modern electric cars. But then, there have been concerns of whether there’s enough lithium to support their manufacture. This is because of the ever-growing market of lithium-ion batteries. Well, there have been reports that lithium is running out worldwide.

This hasn’t been good news to an already booming electric vehicle industry. It is even worse for the supply chain industry, especially auto car transporters. The planned shift to more efficient trucks to boost their car shipping business may not be achieved as soon as expected.

Predictions already show that at today’s prices, lithium could run out by 2025. However, the good news is that electric vehicles may reach cost parity with regular cars by 2024. That will make it easy for car transporters to shift to electric cars. It will also lead to an overall reduction in car shipping costs.

2. Lower Consumption

Consumption has been a concern for vehicle transporters worldwide. It is the consumption of shipping trucks that pushes car shipping costs high. But then, shipping a car will cost less when motor carriers change their fleets to include more energy-efficient trucks and some electric vehicles.

For energy-efficient trucks, it will be about low gas consumption and less pollution. This will mean well for the environment and also mitigate pollution-related diseases. The good news is that electric cars will take efficiency to a whole new level. They will also mean little or no pollutants into the environment.

This is what companies offering car hauling services want to achieve. They want to contribute to a cleaner environment. Besides, it will also help them keep up with regulations. This will, however, be achieved once electric cars become mainstream and cheaper.

3. Interdependent Supply Chains

There’s a lot more waiting to change in the supply chain industry. This is because changing car shipping fleets alone won’t be enough to achieve a sustainable energy revolution. Chargers and electrical grids will also have to convert to clean energy to achieve this transformation.

Another trend that you’ll see is an increase in the production of more efficient gas-powered cars. Car shippers will have both energy-efficient gas-powered and electric vehicles in their fleets. Thus, the production of gas-powered engines won’t decline like many people could be thinking.

This means that car suppliers will focus both on gas and electric-powered cars. Even if the prices of electric-powered vehicles drop in the future, they may remain relatively expensive. To be precise, the industry will have to wait at least 20 more years before seeing a complete shift in fleets.

Conclusion

The supply chain industry is one of the biggest industries in the world. It is also one of those set to get transformed by the mainstreaming of electric vehicles. This industry has been anticipating a change in trucks for a while. The primary aim has been to reduce consumption and costs as well as be compliant.

This has seemed to happen in recent years as more electric vehicles are getting produced. But it hasn’t meant anything for car transportation companies as they can’t replace entire fleets yet. The supply of electric cars remains low while the demand keeps rising every day.

However, the future remains bright as car manufacturers push for more production. The availability of raw materials like lithium will determine how soon this happens. Meanwhile, stakeholders in the supply chain industry, especially vehicle transporters, will have to be patient.

batteries

Is There a Shortage of Lithium-Ion Batteries?

The wider availability of electric vehicles has played a major role in getting more people interested in them. However, analysts warn that a lack of lithium-ion batteries could stifle the surge in electric vehicle adoption.

Here’s a closer look at the matter and some details about the possible associated issues that could affect fleet owners.

Rising Electric Vehicle Usage Causes Elevated Materials Demand

The electric vehicle has experienced recent success that seems unlikely to wane. For example, a global electric vehicle report confirmed there were 2.1 million electric vehicles sold in 2019, which surpassed the previous year’s numbers by 6%.

However, the interest in those automobiles has been far more long-term. The report clarified that there were only 17,000 of them on the world’s roads in 2010. The total soared to 7.2 million by 2019.

Another section of the report goes into the materials required to make batteries for electric cars. The cars sold in 2019 required an estimated 65 kilotons of nickel, 22 kilotons of manganese, 19 kilotons of cobalt, and 17 kilotons of lithium.

However, the report estimates those amounts will rise substantially by 2030 due to ongoing interest in electric vehicles. More specifically, it could increase to at least 925 kilotons of class I nickel, 185 kilotons of lithium per year, 180 kilotons of cobalt, and 177 kilotons of manganese.

A Heavy Dependence on Imports

Most analysts agree that there is not an immediate shortage of lithium-ion batteries, but concerned parties should respond quickly to mitigate the possible effects. One reality is that many nations, including the United States, rely heavily on China to supply battery materials.

A February 2021 executive order from The White House involves looking at current supply chain risks in the United States, then exploring measures to tackle those issues. Batteries were not the only goods mentioned in the document, but the content specified examining concerns associated with critical metals.

Estimates suggest that China accounts for between 70% and 77% of the world’s rare earth elements. Moreover, that country owns most of the processing facilities, even if the source material comes from other places.

As recently as 2019, people became particularly concerned about those realities when tensions rose between the U.S. and China due to a trade war. Experts suggest that building more battery factories in the U.S. is an actionable strategy for lessening the nation’s need for Chinese exports.

That approach would also mean the batteries could travel shorter distances. Shipping the batteries from overseas requires the appropriate risk mitigation strategies, such as transporting them in explosion-proof refrigerated containers.

Domestic manufacturing makes sense, but it’s also not a quick strategy. Since the anticipated lithium-ion battery shortage hasn’t happened yet, there’s still time to figure out what to do when it does. Building factories will likely become part of a multipronged strategy.

Electric Vehicles Make Sense for Fleet Owners, Study Suggests

Outside of the threat of a battery shortage, other factors may cause commercial fleet owners to balk at the prospect of upgrading to all-electric models. However, a recent Berkeley Lab study illustrated some of the potential payoffs.

For example, researchers used current battery cost data and calculated that an electric long-haul truck gives a 13% per-mile decrease in ownership costs compared to the same kind of vehicle that uses diesel. The team also confirmed that electric fleet owners could achieve a net savings of $200,000 over a truck’s lifespan.

They confirmed that aspects like battery price drops and more aerodynamic designs for commercial trucks could slash the per-mile ownership costs by as much as 50% by 2030. The researchers believe that a significant shift from diesel to electric-powered fleets would cause a major reduction in greenhouse gas and particulate matter associated with the transportation sector.

A Battery Shortage Could Increase Buyer Costs

Electric commercial vehicles are still in the minority. It could take a while before that changes, but adoption rates should rise as more decision-makers see examples of successful electric commercial vehicle usage.

Analysts point out that electric vehicles could become about $1,500 more expensive if nickel prices eventually reach a historic high of $50,000 per tonne, though. That possibility could discourage fleet owners if they don’t take overall cost reductions into account.

Elsewhere, a 2019 study of American adults found that 60% cited high upfront costs as a negative aspect of electric vehicle purchase. Relatedly, 84% did not know whether their state offers incentives to offset those buying decisions. Promoting the availability of such programs could make electric vehicles more attractive.

Manufacturers Grapple With Assorted Supply Chain Challenges

Recent coverage also indicates that dealing with lithium-ion battery shortages could be more complicated than it first seems. Contrary to popular belief, there is not a lithium shortage, but rather a surplus. More specifically, Australia, which is among the top producers of lithium, has approximately double the number of mines now as in 2015.

However, certain places — such as the United States — have a lithium shortage compared to other nations. While the U.S. has small lithium deposits in California, they’re much smaller than those in South America and Australia.

A cobalt shortage is a more pressing concern, especially since most of it comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Cobalt is one of the most expensive components in an electric vehicle battery, and research suggests there’s not enough mining and processing capability to meet growing demands for it. This example shows that a cobalt shortage could relate more to the capacity required to reach the resource rather than the scarcity of the material itself.

A Dramatic Scaling of Resources

Celina Mikolajczak, vice president of battery technology at Panasonic Energy of North America, noted that lithium-ion battery technology features in numerous consumer devices. However, it’s not at the level required for electric vehicles.

She pointed out that whereas a laptop battery has a dozen cells, one for an electric vehicle has thousands. “How do you quickly scale an industry by 100 times?” she asked, before clarifying, “You need more raw materials, the skilled talent, and machines to extract the raw materials, the factories to process the raw materials into cell components, and then the factories to turn those components into cells.”

A related issue is that the parts required for a car with an internal combustion engine are not the same as those for an electric automobile. Electric vehicles have fewer parts, and the differences mean that a manufacturer could not swiftly pivot to making them after formerly producing autos with engines.

A strategy deployed by companies like BMW and Volkswagen is to invest in battery technology companies. Doing that could give them better access to emerging technologies compared to competitors that didn’t provide such support. That could prove crucial for business models concerning batteries made with more widely available resources. Tesla took another approach by entering long-term agreements with suppliers. Such arrangements allow better pricing.

A Complex Matter

A lithium-ion battery shortage could affect consumers and manufacturers alike, albeit in different ways. The main takeaway for the present is that it’s not a current crisis but a looming one. Plus, there’s no single, straightforward way to tackle it.

Thus, fleet owners who are interested in future electric vehicle investments should plan for the possibility of increasing their budgets to accommodate increased upfront costs. Relatedly, it’s wise for them to stay abreast of the manufacturers that have taken proactive steps to cope with a future battery shortage. Planning now should reduce the possible ramifications later.

______________________________________________________________

Emily Newton is an industrial journalist. As Editor-in-Chief of Revolutionized, she regularly covers how technology is changing the industry.