New Articles

Malaysia Sees Trade as Vehicle to Forge Closer Bilateral Ties with US

Malaysia Sees Trade as Vehicle to Forge Closer Bilateral Ties with US

Malaysia Sees Trade as Vehicle to Forge Closer Bilateral Ties with US

Two newly arrived Malaysian diplomats in New York underscore the importance of forging closer ties with the US, and underscore the importance of trade in promoting bilateral ties. 

Amir Farid Abu Hasan, the new Malaysian consul general in New York, who was transferred from the Malaysian High Commission in Dhaka, Bangladesh, says that trade and business would lead to greater cooperation between the two countries. 

Amir, who says that “New York is a different terrain altogether”, sees the crucial role the business-oriented Malaysian diaspora in the US can play in fostering closer bilateral ties. .  

“We work closely with the Malaysian diaspora … there are about 21,000 Malaysians residing in the 17 state jurisdiction served by our consulate general and about 45,000 in the United States.  The diaspora performs an important role in promoting Malaysia’s interests through people-to-people contacts, business and professional relations, etc.  Since many Malaysians in the U.S. are engaged in business and trade, they help forge close business and trade relations with the US which is an important trading partner for us,” the envoy said in an interview with Global Trade Magazine

The diaspora’s significance was also evident during the visit of the then Malaysian Prime Minister Ismail Sabri bin Yaakob to New York in Septemer, when a dinner was hosted for the large diaspora in the U.S. with many guests coming from across the United States. 

Besides providing consular services to Malaysian nationals in the country, the consulate general promotes Malaysia’s economic interests, and coordinates with the offices of dedicated agencies in New York like the Malaysian External Trade Corp. (MATRADE) and the Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA). “We cooperate with each other in various ways, including at the federal, state and city council levels,” the consul general said. 

The U.S. which has, traditionally, been one of the top three trading partners of Malaysia, is viewed as a key market for the export-oriented economies of Malaysia and other Southeast Asian countries.  “With uncertainties characterizing the Chinese market, which has been very lucrative for most Southeast Asian countries, the current thinking is not to put all your eggs in the China basket … the mantra is diversification,” explains Thomas Lee, a Chinese-Malaysian businessman who participates in US trade fairs for his company based in Sabah in the Borneo region. 

Indeed, at the networking luncheon he hosted for his counterparts from other Asian countries on Dec. 6 at Malaysia’s permanent UN mission in New York, Amir reinforced Malaysia’s “keen interest” to intensify trading and business ties with the United States. Edward Mermelstein, the commissioner in the New York Mayor’s Office for International Affairs, and his deputy Dilip Chauhan, were among the invited guests. 

Amir’s resolve to improve US-Malaysian bilateral trade and economic ties is also shared by the newly appointed Malaysian trade commissioner, Nyaee Ayup, at the MATRADE office in New York. 

The new trade commissioner worked at MATRADE’s head office in Kuala Lumpur before she was assigned to New York.  Prior to that, she had served as Malaysia’s trade commissioner in the Philippines from 2014-2018.  Nyaee has intimate knowledge of major industries that drive Malaysia’s exports, including electrical and electronics, information technology, green technology, etc. 

A product of the National University of Malaysia, where she studied statistics, Nyaee has come at a time when the U.S. economy is facing a slowdown accompanied by high inflation, prompting many economists and pundits to believe that America may be headed towards a recession.

Nyaee acknowledged in an interview in her office that the US slowdown could pose a challenge “as it may possibly affect our overall exports to the US which is our third largest trading partner”.

But, as she put it, “you can also find opportunity in a critical situation”. Malaysia’s forte lies in having a strong base in such crucial industries as the electrical and electronic industry. The semiconductors product category is an area where Malaysia can use its existing presence in the US to further strengthen its market position, particularly since many American companies are seeking to diversify their supply chains. “This could open up new opportunities for Malaysia in the US market.” 

Another industry in which Malaysia can flex its muscles is healthcare, with international buyers from around the world, including the US, showing interest in Malaysia’s medical devices, as is evident at the annual MEDICA trade fair, the world’s leading event for medical devices held in Dusseldorf, Germany, which attracts large Malaysian exhibitor contingents. 

The Covid pandemic has led to an unprecedented demand not only for PPE products but also for scientific and medical devices.  “The Covid has also aroused interest in many parts of the world, including the US, for medical devices produced In Malaysia,” Nyaee said, adding that the healthcare sector is inherent with strong business potential for healthcare products.  

Nyaee said that trade fairs and exhibitions provided an excellent platform to showcase products; Malaysian companies, she said, were already participating in a number of industry-related trade fairs. 

According to trade figures provided by MATRADE, Malaysia’s 2021 exports to the US amounted to US$ 34.31 billion, up from US$ 26.03 billion in 2020; imports from the US in 2021 amounted to $ 18.02 billion up from $ 16.60 billion in 2020. Malaysia’s exports during the first ten months (Jan-Oct) of 2022 amounted to $ 31.39 billion, up from $ 27.79 billion during the year earlier period, while imports in the Jan.-Oct. 2022 period amounted to $ 19.37 billion over $ 14.81 billion in the previous year’s corresponding period. 

Malaysia’s major exports to the US consist of electrical and electronic products, rubber products, optical and scientific equipment, wood products, etc., while imports from the US consist of electrical and electronic products, chemicals and chemical products, machinery equipment and parts, optical and scientific equipment, etc.

Author’s Bio

Manik Mehta, a New York based journalist, writes extensively on foreign affairs/diplomacy, United Nations, U.S. bilateral relations, global markets, business/trade, shipping/logistics, etc.

 

mexico

Mexico, Canada Win Trade Panel’s Nod over US on Car-Content Rules

Mexico and Canada won a trade dispute with the US over cars shipped across regional borders, potentially giving manufacturers more incentive to make auto parts in those nations.

The dispute-resolution panel set up under the 2020 US-Mexico-Canada Agreement made a preliminary ruling on Nov. 14, according to people familiar with the decision who declined to be identified because the report hasn’t yet been made public. The nations have an opportunity to give feedback on the report before a final version is issued within 30 days.

Mexico first sought the panel’s help in resolving the conflict in January. The dispute focuses on the nations’ differences over how to calculate the percentage of a vehicle that comes collectively from the three countries under the USMCA, which replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement, also known as Nafta.

The ruling could potentially benefit consumers and carmakers alike because it would allow the manufacturers to build more components — such as high-cost batteries — and assemble more cars in Mexico, where workers’ wages are a fraction of their US counterparts, said Sam Fiorani, vice president of global vehicle forecasting and a supply-chain specialist with AutoForecast Solutions LLC in Chester Springs, Pennsylvania.

Lower Prices

“Providing this amount of wiggle room in the calculations has the potential to lower prices for end-product and increase profitability as automakers seek out lower costs on some components,” Fiorani said in an interview. “Instead of lowering prices, the new rules increased the pricing of North American vehicles, as reaching the set domestic-content levels would be very difficult.”

Mexico’s economy ministry and the US Trade Representative didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

A spokesperson for Canadian Trade Minister Mary Ng declined to comment until after the ruling is published. General Motors Co. and Ford Motor Co, which each have significant operations in Mexico and Canada, said the same.

Both Mexico and Canada believe the USMCA stipulates that more regionally produced parts should count toward duty-free shipping than the US wants to allow. Motor vehicles are the top manufactured product traded between the three countries.

The US had insisted on a stricter method than its neighbors say they agreed in order to tally the origin of core parts including engines in the overall calculation. That makes it harder for plants in Mexico and Canada to meet the new threshold of 75% regional content, up from 62.5% under Nafta, in order to trade duty-free.

For example, if a core part uses 75% regional content, and thus qualifies under that requirement for duty-free treatment, Mexico and Canada argued that the USMCA allows them to round the number up to 100% for the purposes of meeting a second, broader requirement for an entire car’s overall regional content. The US, however, didn’t want to permit rounding up, making it tougher to reach the duty-free threshold for the overall vehicle.

Cars are at the heart of the USMCA — with tens of billions of dollars traded each year — and Mexico viewed the US demand by the Biden administration as an attempt to renegotiate a key aspect of the deal.

russia u.s global trade

OFAC Sanctions Four Ukrainian Officials for Acting on Russia’s Behalf; Additional Russia Sanctions Could Follow

As tensions run high between Washington and Moscow over a possibly imminent Russian invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) designated today four (4) current and former Ukrainian officials under Executive Order (“EO”) 14024 dated April 15, 2021. In a press release issued earlier today, OFAC asserted the Russian Federal Security Service (“FSB”) “recruit[s] Ukrainian citizens in key positions to gain access to sensitive information, threaten the sovereignty of Ukraine, and then leverage these Ukrainian officials to create instability in advance of a potential Russian invasion.” OFAC also noted that Russian agents have sought to influence U.S. elections since at least 2016.

In today’s action, OFAC added two (2) current Ukrainian Members of Parliament – Taras Kozak and Oleh Voloshyn – to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (“SDN List”) and labeled them FSB “pawns”. OFAC accused Kozak of amplifying false narratives regarding the 2020 U.S. elections and Voloshyn of undermining Ukrainian government officials and advocating Russian interests. OFAC also added two (2) former Ukrainian officials to the SDN List – Volodymyr Oliynyk and Vladimir Sivkovich. OFAC asserts Oliynyk gathered information about Ukraine’s critical infrastructure for the FSB and Sivkovich engaged in influence and disinformation campaigns targeting both the Ukraine and the U.S.

All four (4) SDN designations were made pursuant to EO 14024, which authorizes OFAC to impose sanctions on persons who act or purport to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, the Government of the Russian Federation. As a result of the designations, all property and interests in property of these persons in the U.S. or controlled by U.S. persons must be blocked and reported to OFAC. U.S. persons are prohibited from sending or receiving any provision of funds, goods, or services to/from these newly designated SDNs. According to OFAC’s “50% Ownership Rule,” these sanctions also extend to any entities in which these SDNs directly or indirectly hold, either individually or in the aggregate with other SDNs, an ownership interest of 50% or more.

The U.S. has also recently signaled its readiness to impose additional sanctions if Russia proceeds with an invasion of Ukraine, but has not shared many details of its plans. On January 21, 2022, Deputy Secretary of the Treasury Wally Adeyemo in a conversation with Ukraine Minister of Finance Serhiy Marchenko “emphasized that the United States and its allies and partners are prepared to inflict significant costs on the Russian economy if Russia further invades Ukraine.” Some news reports have forecasted that restrictions on semiconductor exports to Russia, sanctions against Russian financial institutions, and controls on foreign-produced goods going to Russia are among the options under consideration by the White House. However, any additional sanctions beyond the four (4) SDN designations reported in this post are purely speculative at this time.

Husch Blackwell’s Export Controls and Economic Sanctions Team continues to monitor U.S. sanctions and export controls against Russia and will provide further updates if additional developments occur.

__________________________________________________________________

Tony Busch is an attorney in Husch Blackwell LLP’s Washington, D.C. office and is a member of the firm’s International Trade & Supply Chain practice team.

Cortney O’Toole Morgan is a Washington D.C.-based partner with the law firm Husch Blackwell LLP. She leads the firm’s International Trade & Supply Chain group.

Grant Leach is an Omaha-based partner with the law firm Husch Blackwell LLP focusing on international trade, export controls, trade sanctions and anti-corruption compliance.