New Articles

European Desktop Computer Exports Are on Sharp Rise

Computer

European Desktop Computer Exports Are on Sharp Rise

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Desktop Pcs – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

European desktop computer exports jumped by +36% y-o-y to 6.7M units, reaching $3.8B in value terms. Last year, the Czech Republic was the leading desktop computer supplier in the EU, comprising 37% of total exports. The Netherlands and Germany followed Czechia regarding the value of exported products. In 2020, the desktop computer export price in the EU decreased by -15% compared to the figures of the previous year. 


 

Desktop Computer Exports in the EU

In 2020, the amount of desktop computers exported in the EU surged to 6.7M units, jumping by +36% on 2019 figures. In value terms, desktop computer exports skyrocketed by +15.6% y-o-y to $3.8B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

In value terms, the Czech Republic ($1.4B) remains the largest desktop computer supplier in the EU, comprising 37% of total exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by the Netherlands ($577M), with a 15% share of total exports. It was followed by Germany, with a 14% share.

The biggest shipments were from Belgium (1,424K units), the Netherlands (988K units), Germany (830K units), the Czech Republic (763K units), Poland (727K units) and France (686K units), together resulting at 81% of total export. Romania (223K units) followed a long way behind the leaders.

In 2020, the average annual growth rate of value in the Czech Republic stood at +33.8%. The remaining exporting countries recorded the following average annual rates of exports growth: the Netherlands (+20.5% per year) and Germany (+0.1% per year).

In 2020, the desktop computer export price in the EU amounted to $573 per unit, declining by -15% against the previous year. Last year, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Poland, while the other leaders experienced a decline in the export price figures.

Source: IndexBox Platform

lumber

Lumber Prices Decrease in the U.S. but Stay High in Other Countries, Causing Significant Upheaval in the Global Market

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Sawnwood – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

American lumber prices have decreased threefold, closing in on pre-COVID levels, which should drive global prices down. The change in lumber prices is largely influenced by slumping demand for real estate which became more expensive from diminished access. In Russia, the world’s largest supplier, a sharp increase in lumber exports led to a shortage in the domestic market. Attempting to hold the price growth instigated by that, the Russian government implemented 10% export duties on lumber until the end of 2021. Due to this, the main importers of Russian goods may opt for other suppliers.


 

Key Trends and Insights

Lumber prices in the U.S. are plummeting and nearing pre-COVID figures while pulling global prices down with them. After reaching a peak above $1600 per board foot in May 2021, lumber futures on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange in August dropped below $500 per board foot.

The main reason for the decrease in prices is the slumping demand for timber-based materials in the construction sector. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in June, new home sales dropped by 6.6% in the U.S. compared with May and consisted of 676k units. The average selling price for new homes increased from $418.6k in January to $437k in April where it peaked. In May the average selling price for new homes began to fall and in June was $428.7k. An increase in the interest rate in the U.S. and a decrease in mortgage credit availability along with growing costs of new housing have hampered the demand for real estate. Besides this, as tourism recovers, people are beginning to spend more on vacations rather than renovations and purchasing real estate.

While prices are starting to trend downward in the U.S., other countries are still acutely feeling the effects of the sharp increase in global prices for lumber. In Russia, the world’s largest exporter, lumber prices on the domestic market skyrocketed in the second quarter of this year and reached their highest value in June. This increase was caused by a shortage of lumber within the country due to rapid growth in exports, particularly to China. Based on figures from Russia’s Federal Customs Service, IndexBox calculates that from January through May 2021, exports of rough sawnwood from Russia grew from 963k tonnes to 2.2M tonnes. Within that period, shipments to China only grew from 569k tonnes to 1.3M tonnes.

To hold back prices on the domestic market, the Russian government implemented 10% export duties on sawn softwood and raw hardwood from July through December 2021. This could cause exports from the country to drop. Russia makes up 52% of lumber imports to China and approximately 21% of shipments to Egypt. As a result of the new regulations, alternative suppliers may strengthen their position in Russia’s key foreign markets.

Global Sawnwood Production by Country

In 2020, approx. 503M cubic meters of sawnwood were produced worldwide; with an increase of +2.3% compared with 2019 figures. In value terms, sawnwood production reached $187B in 2020 estimated in export prices. The total output value increased at an average annual rate of +5.0% from 2012 to 2020.

The countries with the highest volumes of sawnwood production in 2020 were China (99M cubic meters), the U.S. (82M cubic meters) and Russia (46M cubic meters), with a combined 45% share of global production. In 2020, the biggest increases were in China, while sawnwood production for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Global Sawnwood Exports by Country

In 2020, global exports of sawnwood were estimated at 177M cubic meters, stabilizing at 2019 figures. In value terms, sawnwood exports reduced modestly to $37.4B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

In 2020, Russia (35M cubic meters) and Canada (31M cubic meters) were the largest exporters of sawnwood in the world, together constituting 38% of total exports. Sweden (16M cubic meters) took the next position in the ranking, followed by Germany (12M cubic meters) and Finland (8.7M cubic meters). All these countries together held approx. 21% share of total exports. The following exporters – Austria (7.4M cubic meters), the U.S. (6.5M cubic meters), Belarus (5.8M cubic meters), Latvia (4.5M cubic meters), Thailand (4.2M cubic meters), Ukraine (4.2M cubic meters), Brazil (3.6M cubic meters) and Chile (3.3M cubic meters) – together made up 22% of total exports.

In value terms, the largest sawnwood supplying countries worldwide were Canada ($7.8B), Russia ($4.8B) and Sweden ($3.4B), together accounting for 43% of global exports. The U.S., Germany, Finland, Austria, Thailand, Latvia, Brazil, Chile, Ukraine and Belarus lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 34%.

The average sawnwood export price stood at $211 per cubic meter in 2020, reducing by -1.9% against the previous year. Prices varied noticeably by the country of origin; the country with the highest price was the U.S. ($396 per cubic meter), while Belarus ($102 per cubic meter) was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by the U.S., while the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox Platform

chicken meat

Chicken Meat Prices Skyrocket Due to Restored Demand in the HoReCa, a Flash of the Bird Flu and Increasing Costs for Grains

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Chicken Meat – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Since the start of 2021, prices in the global chicken meat market shot up as a result of high demand, rising costs for feed grain and food as well as a decreasing rate of chicken slaughter in the EU, South Korea and Japan. Heightened costs for shipping containers are additionally driving the growth in export prices. As of year-end 2021, worldwide production and exports of chicken meat are forecast to remain at the previous year’s level. Demand for chicken meat in China is dropping while the pig population in the country is recovering and hog prices are decreasing. Saudi Arabia’s ban on imports of chicken products from Brazil may lead to diminished exports from that country.


 

Key Trends and Insights

All around the world this year, prices for chicken meat are growing at a fast pace. According to FAO, export prices for chicken cuts and edible offal from the U.S. spiked from $977 per ton in January 2021 to $1138 per ton in June 2021. The price for broiler meat in the EU during the 29th week of 2021 was at 204.5 euros for 100kg or 10% higher than the same period of the previous year. The price increase is caused by demand growth from the HoReCa sector and retail in western countries, particularly the U.S., high costs for poultry feed and a slow production pace in the EU following a flash of the bird flu. Rising rates for shipping containers is also adding to the increased export prices.

Based on USDA figures, IndexBox calculates that at year-end 2021 chicken meat production globally will remain at 123M tonnes, the same level as the previous year. Falling demand for chicken meat in China is the main factor holding back production growth. China is intensively recovering its hog population after widespread disease led to a major decline in numbers. As a result, prices for swine are decreasing and boosting pork consumption. The high cost for feed grain and lingering impacts of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in the EU, South Korea and Japan are also hindering expansion in the poultry industry.

In 2021, chicken meat exports globally will remain at the previous year’s levels. Drops in meat shipments from the EU and Brazil will be offset by an increase in supply from the U.S. and China. The U.S. is the second world’s largest exporter of chicken meat with a 24% market share of global exports. The country will ramp up deliveries by +1% y-o-y to 3.5M tonnes. Chinese exports are projected to grow by 10% y-o-y to 176K tonnes.

Chicken meat exports from Brazil, the largest supplier in the world, will decrease by 3% y-o-y to 3.7M tonnes as a consequence of Saudia Arabia’s ban on imports going into effect in May 2021. The ban specifically focuses on 11 poultry processing plants in Brazil. Saudia Arabia is one of the largest importers of Brazilian chicken meat, but this year, the country will aggressively develop its domestic production and offset the drop in imports from Brazil with shipments from China, Cuba and Angola.

Global Chicken Meat Production by Country

In 2020, the amount of chicken meat produced worldwide rose by +4% to 123M tonnes, growing compared with 2019. In value terms, chicken meat production reached $192.4B in 2020 estimated in export prices.

The countries with the highest volumes of chicken meat production in 2020 were the U.S. (20M tonnes), China (15M tonnes) and Brazil (14M tonnes), together comprising 40% of global production. These countries were followed by Russia, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Japan, Iran, Argentina, Poland, Turkey and Peru, which together accounted for a further 25%.

Global Chicken Meat Exports by Country

In 2020, the amount of chicken meat exported worldwide rose slightly to 15M tonnes, growing by +3.9% compared with the previous year’s figure. In value terms, chicken meat exports contracted slightly to $21.6B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

Brazil (3.9M tonnes) and the U.S. (3.5M tonnes) represented roughly 49% of total exports of chicken meat in 2020. It was distantly followed by the Netherlands (1.4M tonnes) and Poland (1.2M tonnes), together creating a 17% share of total exports. The following exporters – Turkey (516K tonnes), Belgium (439K tonnes), Ukraine (430K tonnes), the UK (427K tonnes), Thailand (341K tonnes), Germany (295K tonnes) and France (228K tonnes) – together made up 18% of total exports.

In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of shipments, amongst the main exporting countries, was attained by Turkey (+68.0% per year), while exports for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the largest chicken meat supplying countries worldwide were Brazil ($5.5B), the U.S. ($3.4B) and the Netherlands ($2.5B), together accounting for 53% of global exports. These countries were followed by Poland, Thailand, Belgium, Ukraine, Germany, Turkey, France and the UK, which together accounted for a further 28%.

The average chicken meat export price stood at $1,451 per tonne in 2020, declining by -8.3% against the previous year. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by the U.S., while the other global leaders experienced a decline in the export price figures.

Source: IndexBox Platform

carrier

A ROUNDUP OF RECENT MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS THAT ARE SHAPING AND DEFINING THE CARRIER INDUSTRY

There is no denying that the past 18 months have been a tumultuous period for the global maritime industry. 

According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), sea-based trade plunged by 4.1% in 2020 due to the unprecedented disruption caused by COVID-19. 

The pandemic has sent shockwaves through supply chains, shipping networks and ports, leading to plummeting cargo volumes and foiling growth prospects, not helped by the enormous uncertainty that accompanies the world’s efforts to emerge out of the pandemic. 

Despite the gloom, UNCTAD expects maritime trade growth to return to positive territory and expand by 4.8% in 2021, assuming world economic output recovers. However, the organization highlights the need for the maritime transport industry to brace for change and be well prepared for a transformed post-COVID-19 world.

Looking at the commercial and strategic activities of major shipping lines is often a good sign of the health of the industry more widely. 

As we progress through 2021, mergers and acquisitions are giving mixed signals, and clearly paint a picture of fluctuating fortunes. 

Damco and Diamond S Shipping dissolve 

In September 2020, industry leaders Maersk announced that it would be integrating Damco’s air and ocean less-than-container-load shipping into its wider business, thus dissolving the brand it merged with Maersk Line at the beginning of 2019. 

The move was part of series of strategic plays by CEO Soren Skou that are geared toward a central goal of becoming an integrated logistics company that provides end-to-end solutions for its customers. 

Shipping commentators regard the Damco internalization as a blurring of the lines between forwarders and carriers. 

For forwarders, alarm bells could start ringing as Maersk now provides direct competition to these companies. DB Schenker reacted quickly to the announcement, offering a so-called stability package to Damco customers that matched the previous terms they were operating under. 

It has created a fascinating dynamic, as many forwarders rely on Maersk as a supplier of carrier services. 

And Damco has not been the only casualty of the Danish company’s reshuffling. Maersk has also spun off lines that include its once-formidable oil drilling business, instead focusing its efforts on acquiring businesses that fit into its core purpose. This includes those specializing in customs and warehousing, as well as numerous digital tools. 

Another well-known brand that has fallen away is America’s Diamond S Shipping, which in March announced it was merging with New York-based International Seaways, the latter keeping its brand as part of the all-stock transaction deal. 

Post-merger, International Seaways will own a fleet of 100 tankers that between them have a capacity of 11.3 million deadweight tons, assets which give it an implied market capitalization of around $1 billion. The fleet split will be approximately 70-30 between crude tankers and product tankers respectively.

Diamond S Shipping went public after it merged with Capital Product Partners in early 2019, this after failing with an IPO attempt five years earlier.

Speaking at the time of the latest merger announcement, Nadim Qureshi, chairman of the Board of Directors of Diamond S Shipping, commented: “We are pleased to enter into a transaction that will both create near-term value for our shareholders and create a superior, scale vehicle that enables investors to gain exposure in both the crude and product tanker markets with strong fundamentals. Importantly, since the focus of the management teams of both Diamond S and INSW are similar, we see further value from synergies in the combined company.”

The combined company will be home to 2,200 employees and carry a market value of around $2 billion. 

K-Alliance and Hapag-Lloyd show brighter prospects 

In South Korea, a huge code-sharing agreement in the form of the K-Alliance looks set to strengthen a series of shipping firms’ competitiveness in Southeast Asia. 

The move sees several enterprises joining forces–HMM, SM Line, Pan Ocean and the recently merged Sinokor Merchant Marine and Heung-A Line–with the intention of reducing operating costs and increasing quality of services.

It is thought that the alliance represents around 40% of South Korea’s container volumes in the region, which stands at approximately 480,000 TEUs. It is hoped that this consortium will help to stave off international competition that is threatening to take a greater market share. 

K-Alliance is the brainchild of South Korea’s Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, which oversaw the signing of the agreement via video conferencing toward the end of 2020. As an extra incentive, it is offering alliance members preferential interest rates for new vessel orders. 

On announcing the move, the ministry hinted that more activity could be in store. 

“It’s the first attempt to form a service alliance consisting of only South Korean carriers to reap economies of scale,” read the announcement. “Other operators are welcome to join in at any time, in consultation with existing member companies.”

Korea’s shipping industry, having hit rock bottom, is starting to show signs of a rebound, the K-Alliance being another indication that the sector is on its way to a substantive recovery. 

The activity of German firm Hapag-Lloyd also sheds some light on the general direction of travel for the global shipping industry. In announcing the acquisition of NileDutch in March 2021, it has signaled its intent to expand its operations in the booming African market. 

With over 40 years of expertise, NileDutch is one the most prominent providers of container services from and to West Africa. The company is present in 85 locations across the world and has 16 offices spread across the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Singapore, China, Angola, Congo and Cameroon. 

With 10 liner services, around 35,000 TEUs of transport capacity and a container fleet of around 80,000 TEU, the company connects Europe, Asia and Latin America with West and South Africa. 

Rolf Habben Jansen, CEO of Hapag-Lloyd, outlined the firm’s faith in the African market when news broke of the NileDutch transaction.

“Africa is an important strategic growth market for Hapag-Lloyd,” Jansen said. “The acquisition of NileDutch strengthens our position in West Africa and will be an excellent addition to our existing activities on the continent. Our combined customer base will benefit from a denser network from and to Africa as well as from a much higher frequency of sailings.”

Indeed, as the world begins to emerge from its cocoon and vaccination programs extend their reach, it will be with great interest to observe where the dust settles in relation to the makeup of the global ocean carrier industry. 

Some big names have disappeared while others have strengthened–a new status quo that has revealed key trends which could shape the sector moving forward.

Whether it is the move by giants such as Maersk to combine forwarding and carrier services, or the clear vote of confidence shown by Hapag-Lloyd in the African market, the dice are starting to be rolled after the standstill period brought about by COVID-19. 

chloride

Canadian Potassium Chloride Exports Rise Due to Burgeoning Supplies to Asia

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘Canada – Potassium Chloride (MOP) – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Canada dominates the global exports of potassium chloride, providing 42% of its total volume. In 2020, Canadian potassium chloride exports grew by +8.8% y-o-y to 21M tonnes. The U.S., Brazil and China remain the key importers of Canadian potassium chloride. Last year, supplies to India, Indonesia and Brazil saw the most prominent growth rate among other trade partners. The average export price for Canadian potassium chloride dropped by -16.1% compared to the figures of the previous year. 

Potassium Chloride Exports from Canada

Canada remains the largest potassium chloride (MOP) exporter worldwide. The supplies from Canada account for 42% of the global potassium chloride exports.

Potassium chloride exports from Canada reached 21M tonnes in 2020, growing by +8.8% on 2019 figures. In value terms, potassium chloride exports dropped to $4.5B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

The U.S. (10M tonnes) was the main destination for potassium chloride exports from Canada, accounting for a 48% share of total exports. Moreover, supplies to the U.S. exceeded the volume sent to the second major destination, Brazil (3.4M tonnes), threefold. China (2.4M tonnes) ranked third in terms of total exports with a 11% share.

In 2020, the average annual growth rate of volume to the U.S. stood at +3.8%. Exports to the other major destinations recorded the following average annual rates of exports growth: Brazil (+19.9% per year) and China (-3.6% per year).

Last year, supplies from Canada to India, Indonesia and Brazil saw the highest growth rate among other destinations. Exports to India grew by +40% y-o-y to 1.8M tonnes, while supplies to Indonesia and Brazil rose by +45% y-o-y to 1.3M tonnes and +20% y-o-y to 3.4M tonnes respectively.

In value terms, the U.S. ($2.2B) remains the key foreign market for potassium chloride exports from Canada, comprising 48% of total exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Brazil ($698M), with a 15% share of total exports. It was followed by China, with an 11% share.

The average potassium chloride (MOP) export price stood at $212 per tonne in 2020, shrinking by -16.1% against the previous year. Average prices varied noticeably for the major foreign markets. In 2020, the destinations with the highest prices were the U.S. ($214 per tonne) and China ($214 per tonne), while the average prices for exports to India ($207 per tonne) and Brazil ($208 per tonne) were amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was recorded for supplies to the U.S., while the prices for the other major destinations experienced a decline.

Source: IndexBox Platform

fructose imports

Global Fructose Imports Spike with Exploding Demand from China

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Fructose And Fructose Syrup – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Global imports of fructose and fructose syrup rose by +8.6% y-o-y to 4M tonnes in 2020. China has extraordinarily increased fructose purchases sixfold, driving out the leading importer, Mexico, from the first to the second place in the global import ranking. Thailand, Viet Nam and Myanmar remain the key suppliers of fructose to China. Outside these countries, Indonesia saw the highest growth rate in terms of supplies to China. 

Global Imports of Fructose and Fructose Syrup

In 2020, global imports of fructose and fructose syrup amounted to 4M tonnes, growing by +8.6% against 2019. In value terms, fructose imports amounted to $2.8B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

China (1,096K tonnes) and Mexico (825K tonnes) represented the major importers of fructose and fructose syrup in 2020, amounting to approx. 27% and 21% of total imports, respectively. Germany (203K tonnes) held the next position in the ranking, followed by the U.S. (202K tonnes). All these countries together held approx. 10% share of total imports. Indonesia (163K tonnes), the Netherlands (127K tonnes), Canada (107K tonnes), France (92K tonnes), South Korea (87K tonnes), the UK (77K tonnes), Thailand (73K tonnes) and Malaysia (70K tonnes) held a relatively small share of total imports.

In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of purchases, amongst the leading importing countries, was attained by China, while imports for the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, the largest fructose importing markets worldwide were China ($422M), Mexico ($333M) and the U.S. ($230M), with a combined 36% share of global imports.

In 2020, the average fructose import price amounted to $693 per tonne, dropping by -7.9% against the previous year. Last year, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Canada, while the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Imports of Fructose and Fructose Syrup into China

The volume of fructose and fructose syrup imported into China surged from 173K tonnes in 2019 to 1.1M tonnes in 2020. In value terms, fructose imports skyrocketed from $89M in 2019 to $422M in 2020.

Thailand (507K tonnes), Viet Nam (272K tonnes) and Myanmar (112K tonnes) were the main suppliers of fructose imports to China, with a combined 81% share of total imports. These countries were followed by Malaysia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Indonesia, which together accounted for a further 16%.

In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of purchases, amongst the main suppliers, was attained by Indonesia and Thailand, while imports for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Thailand ($191M), Viet Nam ($101M) and Malaysia ($39M) constituted the largest fructose suppliers to China, together accounting for 78% of total imports.

Source: IndexBox Platform

earth

New Rare Earth Mining Projects to Weaken China’s Leading Market Hold

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Rare Earth Metals – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

The global demand for rare earths is continuing to increase. Countries remain reliant on China, which currently provides approx. 55% of global rare earth production. Future projects to develop mining facilities in Russia, the U.S., Japan and Australia may yet weaken China’s leading market hold. The rare earth mineral market is to accelerate on robustly increasing demand from the microelectronics, electric vehicle, wind power and high-tech industries.

Key Trends and Insights

Global rare earth mineral output continues to increase. According to USGS data, global production in 2020 reached 240К tonnes (+9% y-o-y). China leads the output of rare earth minerals, with a figure of 140К tonnes in 2020 (+6% y-o-y). In addition, China boasts the largest confirmed rare earth mineral reserves in the world (44М tonnes). Output is also on the rise in the U.S. (+35.7% y-o-y), Brazil (+40.8% y-o-y), Myanmar (+20% y-o-y), Burundi (+150% y-o-y), India (+3.4% y-o-y), and Madagascar (+100% y-o-y).

The substantial dependence on China, which accounts for 55% of global rare earth production, makes other countries strategically vulnerable: these minerals are widely used in the semiconductor industry, nuclear engineering, mechanical engineering, the chemical industry and metallurgy. China’s decision to restrict exports of rare earth minerals to any particular country could have a serious impact, particularly in terms of their hi-tech industries.

The planned construction of new facilities in several countries worldwide should alleviate the global reliance on Chinese exports. The most significant confirmed reserves are recognized in Vietnam (22М tonnes), Brazil (21М tonnes), Russia (12М tonnes), India (6.9М tonnes), Australia (4.1М tonnes), the U.S. (1.5М tonnes) and Greenland (1.5М tonnes). Given these considerable resources, a shortage of rare earth minerals is not envisaged in the medium term, but it will require tangible investments to make the substantial increase in production feasible.

The Russian government intends to increase its share of production on the global market from 1.3% to 10% by 2030. Investment currently stands at $1.5В and is being directed into 11 rare earth development projects; mining taxes and loan interest rates for involved businesses are being cut.

The U.S., Sweden, Japan, Tanzania, Namibia, Angola, South Africa, South Korea and Australia have also announced plans to establish new production facilities. The construction of a mining facility at one of the world’s largest deposits in Greenland could impact significantly on the global rare earths market. Despite the extensive potential, the resistance from residents regarding the possible threat to the environment has prevented the project from moving forward.

In 2021, Canada launched its first rare earth mining enterprise. The projected output of the Canadian plant is set to reach 5K tonnes of contained rare earth oxides by 2025.

The rare earth metal market is forecast to expand to 313K tonnes by 2030. Demand for rare earth magnets from expanding electric vehicle, electronic and wind power industries will be the main market driver. The use of these metals in low-carbon technologies should further stimulate their consumption.

Global Rare Earth Metal Production

In 2020, global rare earth metal production expanded modestly to 252K tonnes, growing by +2.9% against the previous year. In value terms, rare earth metal production fell to $10.6B in 2020 estimated at export prices.

China (140K tonnes) remains the largest rare earth metal producing country worldwide, accounting for 55% of total volume. Moreover, rare earth metal production in China exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest producer, Australia (38K tonnes), fourfold. Myanmar (30K tonnes) ranked third in terms of total production with a 12% share.

In 2020, the average annual rate of growth in terms of volume in China stood at +6.1%. The remaining producing countries recorded the following average annual rates of production growth: Australia (-6.5% per year) and Myanmar (+20.0% per year).

Global Rare Earth Metal Imports

In 2020, the amount of rare earth metals imported worldwide shrank to 12K tonnes, waning by -14.1% compared with the previous year’s figure. In value terms, rare earth metal imports reduced sharply to $286M (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

Japan dominates rare earth metal import structure, amounting to 6.8K tonnes, which was approx. 59% of total imports in 2020. Viet Nam (839 tonnes) held the second position in the ranking, followed by Austria (729 tonnes) and Norway (559 tonnes). All these countries together held approx. 18% share of total imports. Thailand (513 tonnes), India (423 tonnes), the U.S. (301 tonnes), Spain (217 tonnes) and Germany (195 tonnes) followed a long way behind the leaders.

In value terms, Japan ($202M) constitutes the largest market for imported rare earth metals worldwide, comprising 70% of global imports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Thailand ($22M), with a 7.7% share of global imports. It was followed by Viet Nam, with a 4.4% share.

The average rare earth metal import price stood at $24,706 per tonne in 2020, shrinking by -3.7% against the previous year. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by the U.S., while the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox Platform

european imports

European Imports of Mandarins, Tangerines and Clementines Reach Record $2.2B

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘EU – Mandarin and Clementine – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

In 2020, European imports of tangerines, mandarins, clementines and satsumas boosted by +19.7% y-o-y to $2.2B, remaining relatively unchanged in physical terms. Rising prices became the main reason for this spike in the value of imports. In 2020, the average import price in the EU jumped by +19% against the figures of 2019. Germany and France were the major importers of tangerines, mandarins, clementines, satsumas last year, accounting for 44% of the European imports.

Imports in the EU by Country

In 2020, the volume of tangerines, mandarins, clementines, satsumas imported in the EU totaled 1.8M tonnes, remaining relatively stable against 2019 figures. In value terms, mandarin and clementine imports skyrocketed by +19.7% to $2.2B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

In 2020, the mandarin and clementine import price in the EU amounted to $1,216 per tonne, jumping by +19% against the previous year. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Germany, while the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Germany (388K tonnes) and France (359K tonnes) represented the major importers of tangerines, mandarins, clementines, satsumas in 2020, amounting to near 22% and 20% of total imports, respectively. The Netherlands (194K tonnes) held the next position in the ranking, followed by Poland (156K tonnes) and Italy (99K tonnes). All these countries together held near 25% share of total imports. Romania (67K tonnes), Belgium (59K tonnes), Sweden (53K tonnes), the Czech Republic (49K tonnes), Finland (49K tonnes), Austria (38K tonnes), Portugal (36K tonnes) and Bulgaria (32K tonnes) followed a long way behind the leaders. In 2020, the biggest increases in import volume were in Finland, while purchases for the other leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

In value terms, Germany ($527M), France ($503M) and the Netherlands ($239M) constituted the countries with the highest levels of imports in 2020, together comprising 59% of total imports. These countries were followed by Poland, Italy, Belgium, Sweden, Austria, Finland, the Czech Republic, Romania, Portugal and Bulgaria, which together accounted for a further 31%.

Source: IndexBox Platform

agricultural

The Best-Paying Cities for Agricultural Workers

Agriculture has been and remains one of the most important industries for the U.S. economy. In addition to directly providing food for the population in the form of produce and livestock, the broader agricultural sector—which includes farming, fishing, and forestry—provides raw materials that form the foundation of other industries like food service, construction, and textile manufacturing. Further, the U.S. is the world’s leading exporter of food and other agricultural products, which contributes to its global economic and political influence.

While agriculture’s role in the U.S. economy remains significant, the industry’s future in the U.S. faces many challenges. Global climate change has produced warmer temperatures and more frequent severe weather events like droughts and fires, threatening an increasing number of crops, livestock, and forests. Agricultural exports have been negatively impacted by recent trade disputes with other countries, and imports on agricultural equipment have become more expensive. And on top of these more recent challenges, agriculture has been undergoing a long-term decline as a share of the economy: farms alone represented more than 3% of GDP in the early 1960s but only account for less than 1% of U.S. GDP today.

Another indicator of agriculture’s shifting role in the economy is its employment numbers. Since the end of World War II, the total number of workers in agriculture and related industries has been on a steady decline over time. In the late 1950s, the U.S. economy had more than 8 million workers supporting agriculture. That figure had been cut in half within two decades, and today, agricultural-related employment hovers around 2.3 million, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

One of the major reasons for this decline is agricultural and mechanical innovations that have reduced the need for manual labor. Simultaneously, other sectors of the economy have grown, offering new and more appealing opportunities in different fields and professions. Working conditions for agricultural workers are also some of the most difficult and hazardous of any profession, and these workers face some of the lowest wages of any profession in the U.S. According to BLS data, the median pay for farming, fishing, and forestry occupations is less than $30,000 per year, or about 30% below the median of $41,950 across all occupations.

However, certain states offer far better pay than others, especially after adjusting for cost-of-living differences. Despite above-average living costs, Alaska stands out as the best-paying state for these workers, where the typical agricultural worker earns an adjusted wage of more than $43,000 annually. Outside of Alaska, states in the Central U.S. offer the most competitive wages. At the other end of the spectrum, the list of lowest-paying states includes Florida, California, and New Jersey, where workers earn an adjusted wage of approximately $25,000 or less.

At the metro level, the Central U.S. is also well-represented on the list of best-paying U.S. locations for agricultural workers. Among large metropolitan areas, these include Indianapolis, Oklahoma City, Columbus, and St. Louis.

To find the best-paying locations for agricultural workers, researchers at Commodity.com analyzed data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Researchers calculated the median annual earnings for farming, fishing, and forestry occupations, which were adjusted for cost-of-living differences. Only metropolitan areas with at least 100,000 residents were included.

Here are the best-paying large metros for agricultural workers.

Metro Rank        Median annual earnings   for agricultural workers (adjusted) Median annual earnings for agricultural workers (unadjusted) Number of agricultural workers Cost of living (compared to national average)

 

Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN 1 $42,854 $39,040 300 -8.9%
Oklahoma City, OK 2 $40,122 $36,030 680 -10.2%
New Orleans-Metairie, LA 3 $39,044 $36,350 500 -6.9%
Columbus, OH 4 $37,707 $34,540 940 -8.4%
Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY 5 $37,598 $35,530 70 -5.5%
Pittsburgh, PA 6 $37,500 $34,650 550 -7.6%
Richmond, VA 7 $36,138 $34,620 690 -4.2%
Salt Lake City, UT 8 $35,507 $35,010 210 -1.4%
St. Louis, MO-IL 9 $34,573 $31,150 1,390 -9.9%
Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 10 $34,191 $32,960 760 -3.6%
Birmingham-Hoover, AL 11 $33,873 $29,910 630 -11.7%
Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 12 $33,795 $30,280 520 -10.4%
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD 13 $33,393 $35,330 1,700 +5.8%
Cleveland-Elyria, OH 14 $33,382 $30,010 270 -10.1%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 15 $33,294 $34,260 1,350 +2.9%
United States $29,670 $29,670 478,770 N/A

 

For more information, a detailed methodology, and complete results, you can find the original report on Commodity.com’s website: https://commodity.com/blog/agricultural-wages/

counterfeit

HOW DUBAI CUSTOMS STOPS COUNTERFEIT PRODUCTS FROM ENTERING THE SUPPLY CHAIN

Dubai Customs continues to position itself as a leader in countering illicit product transport, with regular reports showcasing the efforts and successes throughout each year. Dubai Customs remains one of the leading organizations in halting counterfeit imports in the supply chain. Additionally, the organization continues to lead efforts in sustainable solutions for discarding seized products. In 2020, the organization recycled 1,906 counterfeit items ranging from computers to athletic shoes and mobile headphones.

In this exclusive Q&A with His Excellency (HE) Ahmed Mahboob Musabih, director general of Dubai Customs, we get a behind-the-scenes peek at how the organization continues protecting consumers and the environment from counterfeit products and the international supply chain from illicit trade.

Global Trade (GT): Please discuss how Dubai Customs has successfully stopped counterfeit products from entering the supply chain.

HE Musabih: Dubai Customs works to perform all UAE obligations under international trade regulations and agreements and pays great attention to the protection of intellectual property [IP] rights. These efforts have led the United States to a decision to remove the UAE from the Watch List for Intellectual Property, according to the annual report of the Office of the United States Trade Representative [USTR], an affiliate of the U.S. federal government, on the Intellectual Property Protection. 

The total number of IP disputes resolved by the department in the first quarter of 2021 was around 81 disputes, with an estimated value of AED [Emirati dirham] 11.3 million. In 2020, 255 IP disputes were resolved, with an estimated value of AED 62.2 million.

One of the most prominent seizures carried out by the department was the foiling of the smuggling of 58 counterfeit goods of oil and gas pipes based on a complaint received by the department from [Middle Eastern IP consultancy] Cedar White Bradley regarding counterfeit goods loaded in four containers coming from an Asian country to Dubai. The goods were to be brought to the UAE as original goods of oil transport pipes bearing the Vallourec trademark. These pipes posed significant risks to the environment as they were not capable of withstanding high pressure that the original pipes of that trademark were designed to withstand. This could have caused serious environmental damage if the counterfeit pipes reached the country of origin and were used for oil and gas projects.

Our efforts to combat counterfeit goods have resulted in the application of a series of measures and steps adopted by the department to resolve IP disputes relating to trademark counterfeiting goods. These measures and three steps are as follows:

1. Customs inspectors in our customs checkpoints suspect counterfeit goods through inspection activities.

2. Counterfeit goods are pre-monitored by the Smart Risk Engine System developed by the department to identify risks in commercial shipments prior to their arrival to our customs checkpoints.

3. A trademark infringement complaint is filed by the trademark owner or its legal representative.

GT: What role does technology play in halting counterfeit trade? 

HE Musabih: Advanced electronic systems and applications effectively contribute to countering attempts to smuggle counterfeit goods through pre-monitoring of risks in commercial shipments. Dubai Customs has developed the Smart Risk Engine System to manage and analyze customs risks efficiently to determine risk levels in future shipments and track prohibited, restricted goods and counterfeit goods before they reach customs posts of Dubai. This process is completed by inspection and detection by highly skilled customs inspectors. 

Last year, the department organized 10 workshops that were attended by 309 participants to familiarize customs inspectors and officials with how to distinguish between counterfeit and original goods. In the first quarter of 2021, two workshops were organized, which were attended by 68 participants.

The technology used in risk management has enabled us to control counterfeit goods. For example, the Customs Intelligence Department and Air Customs checkpoints management inspectors worked in coordination with the IPR Department to successfully thwart an attempt to bring a shipment bearing the “Vaseline” counterfeit trademark in the quantity of 17,280 packages coming from an Asian country via air freight, with a market value of about AED 400,000. 

GT: What are some best practices Dubai Customs recommends for preventing counterfeit/illicit trade?

HE Musabih: Prevention of illicit trade of counterfeit goods is an integrated process that should include thwarting the smuggling of goods across borders through cooperation between customs departments, border control and partnerships with the private sector represented by trademark owners. This requires development of the technologies used in inspection activities and improvement of the performance of customs inspectors through continuous training while raising awareness among consumers of the dangers of counterfeit goods.

The IPR Department, through the Awareness and Education Division, contributes to raising awareness about the importance of implementing the IPR Policy internally and externally, so that internal awareness activities target customs officials and inspectors while external awareness events organized by the department target all groups of society. The number of awareness events organized by the department in the first quarter of 2021 to inform customers, partners and the public of the importance of protecting intellectual property rights, reached 12 awareness events. There were 1,394 beneficiaries of these events, including inspectors, government department staff and school students. In 2020, about 46 awareness events were organized with 2,358 beneficiaries from these categories.

The department applies environmental sustainability standards in combating counterfeit goods to achieve the UAE Agenda for Sustainable Development by stopping shipments containing counterfeit goods while avoiding environmental damage resulting from their destruction, through recycling of counterfeit goods. Through these operations, Dubai Customs prohibits the re-export of counterfeit goods to limit the trade of these goods in the world. The department has recycled about 510, 000 pieces of counterfeit goods of 26 trademarks during the first quarter of 2021. In 2020, about 161,800 counterfeit goods of 60 trademarks were recycled.

GT: How does Dubai Customs ensure the security of the supply chain?

HE Musabih: Dubai Customs is making its best efforts to prevent counterfeit goods, having allocated substantial budget to develop its system of procedures through smart devices and innovations launched by the department with a view to improving its ability to counter smuggling attempts, most notably high-capacity scanners [X-ray]. Goods within containers are detected with six scanners operating under the Advanced Container Scanning System in Jebel Ali, with a capacity of scanning 900 containers per hour. These are supported by the operating room, which follows up on operations in customs checkpoints in addition to the Early Trademark Information System and the Smart Risk Engine System targeting risk shipments.

We have an intelligence-led approach to preventing illicit trade, which relies on effective data collection and analysis, risk profiling and targeting. The comprehensive system uses technology to support public awareness, detection, enforcement and sector-specific intelligence around illicit trade and smuggling activities that pose risk for the economy and the society. But when it comes to tackling illicit trade in counterfeits, we believe that improved IP enforcement and regulatory compliance are key, but this alone will not be enough without engaging all stakeholders and consumers through enhanced consumer protection and public awareness initiatives to ensure demand for counterfeit products is reduced. 

Learn more: 

https://www.dubaicustoms.gov.ae

https://www.wfmj.com/story/42253899/counterfeit-vallourec-tubes-seized-in-dubai

https://gulfnews.com/uae/crime/dubai-customs-foil-bid-to-smuggle-fake-vaseline-worth-dh400000-1.79303481