New Articles

China Increases Caramel Imports Fivefold with Swelling Supplies from Asian Countries

caramel

China Increases Caramel Imports Fivefold with Swelling Supplies from Asian Countries

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘China – Caramel – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Last year, China recorded a sharp rise in caramel imports. The supplies into China grew from $80M in 2019 to $408M in 2020, or from 167K tonnes to 1.1M tonnes in physical terms. Thailand, Viet Nam and Myanmar remain the largest caramel suppliers, comprising 82% of Chinese imports. These three countries provided most of the increment in Chinese imports in 2020. The average caramel import price dropped by -21% y-o-y to $378 per tonne in 2020.

Chinese Caramel Imports by Country

In 2020, caramel imports into China skyrocketed from 167K tonnes in 2019 to 1.1M tonnes in 2020. In value terms, caramel imports surged from to $80M in 2019 to $408M (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

Thailand (506K tonnes), Viet Nam (272K tonnes) and Myanmar (109K tonnes) were the main suppliers of caramel imports to China, together comprising 82% of total imports. These countries were followed by Malaysia, the Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Indonesia, which together accounted for a further 16%.

In value terms, the largest caramel suppliers to China were Thailand ($190M), Viet Nam ($101M) and Malaysia ($39M), together accounting for 81% of total imports. Myanmar, Indonesia and Lao People’s Democratic Republic lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 12%.

Over the last year, China boosted the supplies from Thailand from $32M to $190M. Chinese imports from Viet Nam grew from $0.5M to $101M, while Myanmar’s exports to China rose from $1M to $26M. Among other countries, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Lao People’s Democratic Republic have also seen a rise in caramel shipments to China.

In China, the average caramel import price stood at $378 per tonne in 2020, decreasing by -21% against the previous year. Prices varied noticeably by the country of origin; the country with the highest price was Malaysia ($381 per tonne), while the price for Myanmar ($242 per tonne) was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Myanmar, while the prices for the other major suppliers experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox Platform

toothpaste

Despite Global Toothpaste Trade Slows Down, China Boosts Its Exports

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Toothpaste, Denture Cleaners And Other Dentifrices – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Global toothpaste imports reduced modestly to $4.1B in 2020. The U.S., Russia, and the UK constitute the largest dentifrice importers worldwide, while China leads global exports. China managed to increase its exports both in physical and value terms last year despite the drop in global trade. Russia remains the largest importer of toothpaste from China, accounting for nearly 14% of Chinese exports.

Global Toothpaste Imports by Country

Global toothpaste imports shrank to 928K tonnes in 2020, waning by -2% compared with the year before. In value terms, toothpaste imports reduced modestly to $4.1B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

The countries with the highest levels of toothpaste imports in 2020 were the U.S. (53K tonnes), Russia (46K tonnes), the UK (39K tonnes), Germany (36K tonnes), Canada (29K tonnes), Italy (28K tonnes), France (27K tonnes), China (27K tonnes), Malaysia (26K tonnes), Japan (26K tonnes), Poland (24K tonnes) and Hong Kong SAR (23K tonnes), together resulting at 41% of total import. The Netherlands (22K tonnes) followed a long way behind the leaders.

In value terms, the largest toothpaste importing markets worldwide were China ($223M), the U.S. ($200M) and Canada ($181M), with a combined 15% share of global imports. Germany, the UK, France, Russia, the Netherlands, Poland, Italy, Malaysia, Hong Kong SAR and Japan lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 29%. Malaysia emerged as the fastest-growing importer of dentifrices in 2020, ramping up the supplies from $95M to $101M over the last year.

The average toothpaste import price stood at $4,418 per tonne in 2020, remaining relatively unchanged against the previous year. There were significant differences in the average prices amongst the major importing countries. In 2020, the country with the highest price was China, while Japan was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Germany, while the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

World’s Largest Toothpaste Exporters

In 2020, China (213K tonnes), distantly followed by Poland (95K tonnes), Thailand (68K tonnes), Slovakia (67K tonnes), Germany (66K tonnes) and the UK (43K tonnes) represented the main exporters of toothpaste, denture cleaners and other dentifrices, together constituting 62% of total exports. Mexico (34K tonnes), France (25K tonnes), the U.S. (23K tonnes), India (23K tonnes), Guatemala (15K tonnes) and Viet Nam (14K tonnes) took a relatively small share of total exports.

In value terms, the largest toothpaste supplying countries worldwide were China ($415M), Germany ($385M) and Poland ($370M), together accounting for 31% of global exports. These countries were followed by Slovakia, the U.S., Thailand, the UK, Mexico, France, India, Guatemala and Viet Nam, which together accounted for a further 39%.

Despite last year drop in global toothpaste imports, China exceeded to boost its exports by +9.3 y-o-y in physical terms and by +5.7% y-o-y in value terms. Russia became the key destination for toothpaste exported from China, accounting for nearly 14% of Chinese exports.

Source: IndexBox Platform

guinea

Bauxite Prices in China Leap Up After Military Turmoil Took Hold in Guinea

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘China – Bauxite – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

In September, the price for Guinean bauxite in China reached its highest point in 18 months. The military coup in Guinea has caused concerns that shipments from the country will decrease and instigated the spike. Guinea is the world’s primary bauxite supplier, making up more than half of all exports. In case there is a decline in supply from Guinea, China may expand imports from Australia. An increase in bauxite prices could lead to costs for aluminum on China’s domestic market to grow as the country imports nearly 57% of the bauxite it consumes.

Key Trends and Insights

Prices for bauxite in China spiked due to concerns that the recent military coup in Guinea may cause shipments from the country to fall. Guinea is China’s main source of bauxite. In 2020, China imported 53M tonnes of the Guinean product making up 47% of all its bauxite imports.

In September, Guinean bauxite reached $50.50 per tonne on the Asian Metal exchange, its highest point since March 16 last year. Despite no information indicating an interruption in mining activities, the stock market responded to the political situation in Guinea with a spike in prices. Key players operating in Guinea´s bauxite industry, such as Compagnie des Bauxites de Guinee (CBG) and Société Minière de Boke (SMB), did not announce any possible suspension of works.

Guinea is the world’s largest source of bauxite accounting for 50% of global exports. A reduction in supply from Guinea would inevitably result in a deficit in the global market and increase bauxite prices from other countries.

If bauxite shipments from Guinea fall, then China is expected to expand imports from the two other main countries supplying it, Australia and Indonesia. Australia is the top bauxite producer in the world and would most likely grow exports to China. Together, Guinea, Australia and Indonesia supply 97% of all imported bauxite to China.

Bauxite is the main source of alumina or aluminum oxide, which is used to produce aluminum metal. China produces over 60% of the world’s aluminum and is the largest consumer of bauxite. The country’s bauxite imports account for 77% of the global total. An increase in bauxite prices will cause costs for Chinese aluminum products to rise as the country imports nearly 57% of the bauxite it consumes.

Bauxite Production in China

China ranks third in global bauxite production, following Australia and Guinea. China accounts for 16.2% of the world bauxite production.

In 2020, approx. 60M tonnes of bauxite were produced in China; with a decrease of -14.3% compared with the year before. In value terms, bauxite production dropped dramatically to $1.6B in 2020 estimated in export prices.

Bauxite Imports into China

In 2020, the amount of bauxite imported into China expanded sharply to 112M tonnes, picking up by +11% from the previous year’s figure. In value terms, bauxite imports reduced to $5.1B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

Guinea (53M tonnes), Australia (37M tonnes) and Indonesia (19M tonnes) were the main suppliers of bauxite imports to China, with a combined 97% share of total imports.

In value terms, the largest bauxite suppliers to China were Guinea ($2.5B), Australia ($1.5B) and Indonesia ($873M), together accounting for 96% of total imports.

Indonesia saw the highest growth rate of the value of imports (+29% y-o-y), among the main suppliers over the period under review, while purchases for the other leaders experienced a decline.

In 2020, the average bauxite import price amounted to $45 per tonne, reducing by -11.3% against the previous year. Average prices varied noticeably amongst the major supplying countries. In 2020, the country with the highest price was Indonesia ($47 per tonne), while the price for Australia ($42 per tonne) was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Indonesia, while the prices for the other major suppliers experienced a decline.

Source: IndexBox Platform

china

Biden Administration Shows Signs of Addressing China Trade Wars

On October 4, 2021, Ambassador Katherine Tai, the United States Trade Representative, addressed the state of U.S.- China trade relations and the upcoming plans for the Biden Administration to improve foreign trade policy. Since taking office in January, the Administration has spent time reviewing the trade policies put in place under the Trump Administration. There has been little movement until now as to the stance the Biden Administration would take, which created uncertainty regarding U.S. trade policy with China. Speculation grew as many questioned what would happen with the tariffs imposed on Chinese imports (under Section 301), how the administration would address the shortcomings of the “Phase 1” deal, and whether the product exclusion process would be re-instated.


Ambassador Tai’s announcement confirmed that the Biden administration plans to have direct communication with China to re-enforce the Phase 1 deal.

In her announcement, Ambassador Tai explained the history of failed attempts at a bilateral agreement with China and explained that this ultimately led to the U.S. taking a unilateral approach to trade with China by instituting the Section 301 tariffs in 2018. She emphasized that the U.S. is open to exploring all options and tools to enforce meaningful trade reform moving forward, but that a first step would be to hold China accountable for the commitments that it made to settle the Section 301 trade dispute. It is important to note that negotiations have just now re-commenced and that there is no concrete action that the U.S. has said it will take; therefore, any speculation in the media about increases in tariffs, any retaliatory action, etc. are just that – speculation. Husch Blackwell is monitoring these events and will provide regular updates.

The Administration plans to explore a targeted Section 301 exclusion process to provide tariff relief.

Ambassador Tai indicated that part of the next steps would be to consider new exclusion processes and other trade remedies to strengthen American competitiveness. In particular, USTR announced on October 5, 2021, that it is opening up an opportunity to comment on new exclusions for previously excluded items where the exclusions had expired. Comments can be filed between October 12, 2021 and December 1, 2021. Certain factors will be considered by USTR in deciding whether to reinstate the exclusion, such as:

-The product’s availability from other sources in the United States or other countries.

-Supply chain changes that have impacted certain products or industries since 2018.

-What efforts have been made by the importer since 2018 to obtain the product from the U.S. or other third countries.

-Capacity to produce the product domestically in the U.S.

-Whether any economic harm may result from reinstating the exclusion either directly to businesses, employers, or supply chains, and the impact of the exclusion overall.

There are ongoing discussions on opening the exclusion process to additional products, but any process for such exclusions has not yet been announced.

The Administration intends to address broader policy concerns.

A source of concern among American workers for years has been China’s use of subsidies and other non-market trade practices that create unfair competitive advantages. Ambassador Tai pointed out the impact of China’s harmful practices in the steel, agriculture, solar, and semiconductor industries, to name a few. Within the steel industry in particular, it was noted that China’s monthly production of steel exceeds the amount of steel produced in the U.S. for an entire year. In the solar supply chain industry, the Ambassador noted that China’s practices have led to it dominating 80% of global production in that arena. To address this, the Biden Administration plans to address issues such as overcapacity and create additional opportunities to discuss issues that were not included in the previous agreement. If the U.S. and China cannot reach some resolution, it could mean new trade measures to address these concerns in the future. For now, the Administration is focused on working with its allies and collaborating with the G7, G20, and the WTO.

_________________________________________________________________

Nithya Nagarajan is a Washington-based partner with the law firm Husch Blackwell LLP. She practices in the International Trade & Supply Chain group of the firm’s Technology, Manufacturing & Transportation industry team.

Jeffrey Neeley is a Washington-based partner with the law firm Husch Blackwell. He leads the firm’s International Trade Remedies team.

Jasmine Martel is an attorney in Husch Blackwell’s Houston office.

PVC

Chinese Exports of PVC Coverings Jump to $5.7B with Booming Demand from the U.S.

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘China – Floor, Wall Or Ceiling Coverings Of Plastics – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Chinese exports of PVC floor, wall and ceiling coverings spiked by +14.0% y-o-y to $5.7B, reaching the highest level over the past decade. From 2010 to 2020, exports of PVC coverings from China rose from 720M square meters to 5B square meters. China leads in global PVC coverings exports with a 75%-share of the total volume. The U.S. remains the key foreign market for  PVC covering exports from China, accounting for 59% of the exports. Canada and Germany follow the U.S. in this ranking. In 2020, the average export price for Chinese PVC coverings amounted to $1.1 per square meter, falling by -6.4% y-o-y. 

Chinese PVC Coverings Exports

In 2020, exports of PVC floor, wall and ceiling coverings from China soared to 5B square meters, picking up by +22% compared with 2019 figures. In value terms, exports of PVC floor, wall and ceiling coverings expanded by +14.0% y-o-y to $5.7B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

In physical terms, Chinese exports of PVC coverings rose from 720M square meters to 5B square meters over the past decade. China is the largest exporter of PVC coverings with a 75%-share of global exports.

The U.S. (2.9B square meters) was the main destination for exports of PVC floor, wall and ceiling coverings from China, accounting for a 59% share of total exports. Moreover, exports of PVC floor, wall and ceiling coverings to the U.S. exceeded the volume sent to the second major destination, Canada (328M square meters), eightfold. The third position in this ranking was occupied by Germany (178M square meters), with a 3.6% share.

In value terms, the U.S. ($3.2B) remains the key foreign market for PVC floor, wall and ceiling coverings exports from China, comprising 56% of total exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Canada ($339M), with a 6% share of total exports. It was followed by Germany, with a 3.4% share.

In 2020, the average annual rate of growth in terms of value to the U.S. amounted to +17.9%. Exports to the other major destinations recorded the following average annual rates of exports growth: Canada (+24.5% per year) and Germany (-3.0% per year).

In 2020, the average export price for PVC floor, wall and ceiling coverings amounted to $1.1 per square meter, with a decrease of -6.4% against the previous year. Average prices varied noticeably for the major foreign markets. In 2020, the countries with the highest prices were the UK ($1.2 per square meter) and Belgium ($1.2 per square meter), while the average price for exports to Canada ($1 per square meter) and the U.S. ($1.1 per square meter) were amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was recorded for supplies to Germany, while the prices for the other major destinations experienced a decline.

Source: IndexBox Platform

gypsum

Global Gypsum and Anhydrite Imports Shrink with Declined Purchases from the U.S. and India

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘World – Gypsum And Anhydrite – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Global gypsum and anhydrite imports fell from $991M in 2019 to $901M in 2020. The U.S., India, Japan, Indonesia and the UK constitute the largest importers of gypsum and anhydride worldwide. In 2020, these five countries saw significant drops in import volume. China, the Netherlands and Sweden were among the few countries that managed to increase their imports. In 2020, the average gypsum and anhydrite import price grew by +6% against the previous year.

Global Gypsum and Anhydrite Imports

In 2020, global gypsum and anhydrite imports fell to 30M tonnes, dropping by -14.2% on 2019. In value terms, gypsum and anhydrite imports dropped to $901M (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

In 2020, the U.S. (6M tonnes), distantly followed by India (5.0M tonnes), Japan (2.4M tonnes), Indonesia (2.0M tonnes) and the UK (1.6M tonnes) were the key importers of gypsum and anhydrite, together generating 52% of total imports. The United Arab Emirates (1,326K tonnes), Bangladesh (1,108K tonnes), Canada (933K tonnes), Belgium (758K tonnes), South Korea (673K tonnes), Viet Nam (653K tonnes), Israel (571K tonnes) and China (556K tonnes) followed a long way behind the leaders.

The world’s largest importers, U.S. (-2% y-o-y), India (-6.3% y-o-y), Japan, Indonesia and the UK, saw significant drops in the import volume. By contrast, China, the Netherlands and Sweden managed to boost their purchases from abroad.

In value terms, the largest gypsum and anhydrite importing markets worldwide were the U.S. ($141M), India ($89M) and Japan ($86M), together comprising 35% of global imports. These countries were followed by Indonesia, the UK, Canada, Viet Nam, China, Belgium, South Korea, Bangladesh, the United Arab Emirates and Israel, which together accounted for a further 32%.

In 2020, the average gypsum and anhydrite import price amounted to $30 per tonne, increasing by +6% against the previous year. Prices varied noticeably by the country of destination; the country with the highest price was China ($50 per tonne), while the United Arab Emirates ($11 per tonne) was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Canada, while the other global leaders experienced more modest paces of growth.

Source: IndexBox Platform

polypropylene

Indian Polypropylene Exports Swell Driven by Booming Demand from China

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘India – Polypropylene In Primary Forms – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends And Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Indian exports of primary polypropylene skyrocketed from 518K tonnes in 2019 to 794K tonnes in 2020 due to robust supplies to China, Turkey and Viet Nam. In value terms, exports reached $673M, rising by +22.5% y-o-y in 2020. China remains the largest importer, accounting for 44% of total polypropylene exports from India. Turkey and Viet Nam were distantly following China. Last year, China boosted its purchases from 130K tonnes in 2019 to 352K tonnes in 2020, while Turkey saw a 12%-growth. Viet Nam has also significantly increased the imports from India. In 2020, the average export price for primary polypropylene from India amounted to $847 per tonne, dropping by -20.1% y-o-y.

Indian Polypropylene Exports by Country

India’s polypropylene exports surged from 518K tonnes in 2019 to 794K tonnes in 2020. In value terms, polypropylene in primary forms exports soared to $673M (IndexBox estimates), rising by +22.5% y-o-y in 2020.

China (352K tonnes) was the main destination for polypropylene in primary forms exports from India, with a 44% share of total exports. Moreover, polypropylene in primary forms exports to China exceeded the volume sent to the second major destination, Turkey (102K tonnes), threefold. The third position in this ranking was occupied by Viet Nam (61K tonnes), with a 7.7% share.

China increased its imports from 130K tonnes in 2019 to 352K tonnes in 2020. Turkish purchases grew from 90K tonnes to 102K tonnes over the same period. Exports to Viet Nam rose from 37K tonnes in 2019 to 61K tonnes in 2020.

In value terms, China ($279M) remains the key foreign market for polypropylene in primary forms exports from India, comprising 41% of total exports. The second position in the ranking was occupied by Turkey ($90M), with a 13% share of total exports. It was followed by Viet Nam, with a 7.8% share.

In 2020, the average polypropylene in primary forms export price amounted to $847 per tonne, shrinking by -20.1% against the previous year. Average prices varied noticeably for the major external markets. In 2020, the countries with the highest prices were Nepal ($935 per tonne) and Italy ($909 per tonne), while the average price for exports to China ($791 per tonne) and Portugal ($860 per tonne) were amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable growth rate in terms of prices was recorded for supplies to Bangladesh, while the prices for the other major destinations experienced a decline.

Source: IndexBox Platform

Afghanistan

China Is Unlikely to Tap into Afghanistan’s Resources to Strengthen Its Position in the Global Lithium Market

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘China – Lithium Carbonate – Market Analysis, Forecast, Size, Trends and Insights’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

Although China is the second-largest importer of lithium carbonate in the world, it dominates globally in exports for lithium oxide and lithium hydroxide. With moderate lithium deposits, the country will need to find ways to expand its resource reserves to support the rapid development of its electric car and electronics industries. It is widely viewed that China will construct lithium mining facilities in Afghanistan, but this is very unlikely in the near future due to the difficult military and political situation there.

Key Trends and Insights

China remains the second-largest importer of lithium carbonate worldwide but dominates globally in lithium oxide and hydroxide exports. According to IndexBox, in 2020, China’s market share consisted of 57K tonnes or 67% of worldwide exports. South Korea and Japan were the main importers of Chinese lithium.

Lithium production in China grew from 10.8K tonnes of lithium content in 2019 to 14K tonnes in 2020. According to USGS estimates, China stands in fourth place globally for lithium reserves (1.5M tonnes of lithium content), behind Chile (9.2M tonnes), Australia (4.7M tonnes) and Argentina (1.9 M tonnes).

The rapidly developing electric car and electronics industries in China will require enlarging their resource reserves to meet production needs. Alternative methods to increase their mineral reserves could include expanding domestic excavation, building mining facilities abroad or expanding lithium imports.

Recently in China, there have been discussions about creating a mining facility in Afghanistan for rare earth metals to provide one means of expanding their resource reserves. Implementation of such a project in the near future is highly unlikely, mostly due to the difficult military and political situation in the country. Mes Aynak in Afghanistan, one of the world’s largest copper deposits, serves as a precedent, where China invested in mining operations. In 2008, the Chinese Company MCC-JCL Aynak Minerals (MJAM) received a permit to rent and develop the ore, but to this day they haven’t begun to extract nor smelt the ore. Currently, the project remains within an exploration phase. The main reasons for the facility’s stalled construction are threats of armed conflict in Afghanistan and a shortage of necessary resources such as coal and phosphate.

There are no reliable sources of data about Afghanistan’s lithium deposits. According to estimates from the Afghanistan Ministry of Mines and Petroleum, there are 1.4M metric tonnes of rare earth elements in the country. There is no open-source information detailing whether those minerals are accessible for the extraction or whether they are contaminated by radioactive elements. At the moment, there are no active mining operations for lithium in Afghanistan. The mining industry is significantly under-developed there, and due to a low GDP, the only method to stimulate growth is foreign investment.

Currently, the Belt and Road Initiative should enable China to strengthen its leading position in the global lithium export market. The initiative’s main goal is to construct a unified large market among countries in Asia Pacific, Africa as well as Central and Eastern Europe. It should help China increase exports of lithium as well as increase imports of crude ores when necessary. Within the Belt and Road Initiative, China has invested in transport and logistics infrastructure in Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Afghanistan.

Lithium Carbonate Imports into China

In value terms, lithium carbonate imports expanded sharply by +8.5% to $261M (IndexBox estimates) in 2020. In physical terms, lithium carbonate imports into China reached 50K last year.

Chile (37K tonnes) constituted the largest lithium carbonate supplier to China, with a 74% share of total imports in 2020. Moreover, lithium carbonate imports from Chile exceeded the figures recorded by the second-largest supplier, Argentina (13K tonnes), threefold.

The average lithium carbonate import price stood at $5,208 per tonne in 2020, falling by -36.5% against the previous year. Average prices varied noticeably amongst the major supplying countries. In 2020, the country with the highest price was Argentina ($5,922 per tonne), while the price for Chile stood at $4,889 per tonne. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Argentina.

Lithium Oxide and Hydroxide Exports from China

In value terms, South Korea ($357M) and Japan ($313M) constituted the largest markets for lithium oxide and hydroxide exported from China worldwide.

Lithium oxide and hydroxide exports from China skyrocketed to 57K tonnes in 2020, picking up by +16% against the previous year. In value terms, lithium oxide and hydroxide exports declined slightly to $688M (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

South Korea (29K tonnes) and Japan (26K tonnes) were the main destinations of lithium oxide and hydroxide exports from China. In 2020, the most notable growth rate regarding the volume of shipments, amongst the main countries of destination, was attained by South Korea (+68% y-o-y).

The average lithium oxide and hydroxide export price stood at $12,120 per tonne in 2020, which is down by -15.2% against the previous year. Average prices varied noticeably for the major overseas markets. In 2020, the country with the highest price was South Korea ($12,491 per tonne), while the average price for exports to Japan totaled $11,968 per tonne. In 2020, the most notable growth rate in terms of prices was recorded for supplies to Japan.

Source: IndexBox Platform

global trade import handling

Asia Takes the Lead For Recovery and Regional Growth For Global Trade

As global trade rebounds, the economies from East Asian and Pacific countries are increasing at a faster pace than their Western counterparts. China is fully expected to be the leader of this rise.

While part of this is because China is the largest economy in the region, another perhaps lesser-known reason is the fact that China (as well as other East Asian nations such as Vietnam) has not suffered from lockdowns and economic restrictions due to Covid to the same degree that Western countries have. 

In this article, we’ll dive into the increase in trade during the first half of 2021 from Asia in comparison to their Western counterparts. We will also talk about whether China has a stronger grip on world trade than ever before due to the pandemic…or if the evidence alternatively suggests that China’s position as a trade leader may be nearing its peak instead.

A Return to Normal Trade Levels in Asia

Businesses based out of East Asian countries have good reason to be optimistic as global trade starts to return to pre-pandemic levels. It’s clear that Asian economies have not been hit to the same level as countries in the rest of the world have. 

According to research conducted by the East Asia Forum, the digital economy is projected to add over $1 trillion to the Asian economy over the next decade, the most of any region in the world. And it’s not just projections about the future that are favorable to Asia. The results already speak for themselves. 

For instance, total export volumes from East Asian countries for the first quarter of 2021 were actually up 15.4% more than what they were in the first quarter of 2019. Meanwhile, exports have collapsed amongst nations in other regions of the world. Europe has reported a 2.9% decline in exports when compared to two years ago, with an even sharper decline of 11.2% and 19.9% for Africa and the Middle East respectively. 

There are two significant reasons why East Asian economies have rebounded so quickly in comparison to the rest of the world. The first is because they have largely followed China’s lead. The World Bank has forecasted that China’s economy will expand by 8.1% by the end of this year, which has helped carry an increase of 4.4% for other closely-tied countries in the East Asian and Pacific region as a whole. 

Then there’s the fact that Asian nations, including China, did not have to endure lockdowns and economic restrictions to the same level that the United States or Europe did. In the summer of 2020, for instance, it was widely reported how a massive pool party was held in none other than Wuhan while Western countries remained under strict lockdowns that were tightly enforced. 

This year, Western countries like the United States continue to feel the negative effects of the imposed economic restrictions in the form of a lower participation rate in the labor force, severe non-labor shortages (such as in the form of lumber and semiconductors), higher inflation, and costlier prices for basic goods.

This naturally begs the question:

Has The West Truly Fallen Behind?

In Western countries like the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, small businesses are perhaps the worst affected of all. Small businesses are responsible for a majority of private-sector employment and have also been the most severely hit. 

According to the Business Resiliency During Covid-19 study conducted by Freshbooks, 77% of surveyed business owners stated that they were either not confident or only somewhat confident in the state of their businesses. Among the reasons cited included a loss of income, reduced cash flow, and not having enough staff or resources to keep operations up and running.   

Of course, only time will tell if Western economies have truly fallen behind their Western counterparts. The United States has long been a leader in the global economy and even now remains the world’s largest economy when measured by nominal GDP…though China is now in a close second.

It’s also concerning that many businesses do not appear to have the appropriate financial security measures in place in the event of further financial or personal disaster. For example, in the same Business Resiliency survey, nearly a quarter of surveyed business owners indicated that they did not have any kind of an insurance policy in place.

Business owners who have taken out large business loans or a line of credit, for instance, would benefit strongly from a comprehensive insurance plan that covers most or all of the financial damages in the event of defaulting on the debt from a lack of incoming cash flow, or worse, in their death that would essentially transfer the liabilities to their family members. 

When you combine the fact that most business owners do not have an insurance policy as a cushion in place with the realities that many of those same owners have burnt through their emergency funds during the lockdown and that Covid relief packages from the Federal government are set to expire (or have already), it’s easy to see how the situation is a bit dire.

In the short term at least, it’s clear that the economies of East Asian countries, spearheaded by China, have emerged out of the pandemic more favorably than the countries of the West. 

But is China’s rise set to last? And if not, what does this mean for the rest of East Asia?

Has China’s Grip Over World Trade Peaked?

China has been the largest exporter of goods worldwide since 2009, and it became the world’s largest trading nation in 2013. Both of these positions had previously been held by the United States.

In other words, China as a trading leader on the world stage is nothing new, and this is also why the faster recovery of Asian economies versus Western countries should not be surprising. More than half of all e-commerce transactions in the world are now coming out of China, which likewise has borne well for the Asian market.

But there are many who believe that China is nearing the peak of its current economic capacity, and with it, perhaps the rest of Asia as well. A report last spring by UNCTAD (the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) argued that while China is almost certain to remain as the leading exporter in the world for the next few years, there are several inherent vulnerabilities that threaten to cut its rise a bit short.

Among the reasons cited for this include simmering geopolitical tensions that hinder social development, rising labor costs that could lead to production processes either being automated or transferred elsewhere, increased tariffs on Chinese exports from the U.S. and EU, and major companies pulling the production of their products out of China completely. 

As an example of the last mentioned reason, electronics conglomerate Samsung announced last year that they would cease manufacturing computers and phones in China in favor of other Asian countries like Vietnam and India. This decision was made in the face of both rising costs to manufacture in China and increasing international tensions. 

Each of the aforementioned factors means that China could become more dependent on domestic rather than international demand, and therefore stands to chip away at China’s competitiveness on the global scale if those factors don’t change. 

And the spread of the Delta variant has also spurred new lockdowns in China and other Asian countries, which means it’s almost certain that we will see new disruption to Asian supply chains, and particularly in regards to consumer goods and high tech equipment. 

In other words, even though East Asia may have taken the lead in economic recovery and trade growth for now, it’s still far from certain that this will last over the long term. 

Conclusion

Has the pandemic truly created a major economic realignment to global trade and the world order, or are the shifts we are seeing now temporary?

The evidence is clear that the economies of East Asian companies have recovered from the pandemic faster than the United States, Canada, or Europe. But those economies have also largely followed the lead set by China’s current dominance as a world trade leader, and vulnerabilities in China’s economy mean it’s easily possible the country’s grip over world trade could start to slip.

aluminium

American Imports of Aluminium Plates, Sheets and Strips Drop to $2.5B

IndexBox has just published a new report: ‘U.S. Aluminum Sheet, Plate, And Foil Market. Analysis And Forecast to 2025’. Here is a summary of the report’s key findings.

In 2020, American imports of aluminium plates, sheets and strips slumped to 836K tonnes, reducing by -35.6% y-o-y. In value terms, they shrank from $4.2B to $2.5B over the last year. Canada, China and Saudi Arabia remain the largest suppliers of aluminium plates, sheets and strips to the U.S. In 2020, Thailand, Saudi Arabia and Canada managed to boost shipments to the American market, while other exporting countries experienced significant drops in supplies. The average import price for aluminium plates, sheets and strips in the U.S. decreased by -6% y-o-y to near $3,000 per tonne.


 

American Imports of Aluminium Plates, Sheets and Strips

In 2020, the amount of aluminium plates, sheets and strips of a thickness exceeding 0.2 mm imported into the U.S. shrank markedly to 836K tonnes, dropping by -35.6% compared with the previous year. In value terms, imports of aluminium plates, sheets and strips dropped remarkably from $4.2B to $2.5B (IndexBox estimates) in 2020.

Canada (131K tonnes), China (113K tonnes) and Saudi Arabia (93K tonnes) were the main suppliers of imports of aluminium plates, sheets and strips to the U.S., together comprising 40% of total imports. Oman, Germany, South Africa, Thailand, Turkey, South Korea, Austria, Taiwan (Chinese), the UK and Spain lagged somewhat behind, together accounting for a further 38%.

In 2020, amongst the key exporters, Thailand (+47% y-o-y), Saudi Arabia (+9.8% y-o-y), and Canada (+2.1% y-o-y) featured the most notable growth rate of supplies to the U.S. in physical terms, while imports from other countries went down.

In value terms, the largest aluminium plates, sheets and strips suppliers to the U.S. were Canada ($387M), China ($325M) and Saudi Arabia ($255M), with a combined 38% share of total imports. Germany, Oman, Austria, South Africa, Thailand, South Korea, Turkey, the UK, Taiwan (Chinese) and Spain lagged somewhat behind, together comprising a further 38%.

In 2020, the average import price for aluminium plates, sheets and strips amounted to $3,009 per tonne, falling by -6% against the previous year. Prices varied noticeably by the country of origin; the country with the highest price was Austria ($4,416 per tonne), while the price for Oman ($2,437 per tonne) was amongst the lowest. In 2020, the most notable rate of growth in terms of prices was attained by Thailand, while the prices for the other major suppliers experienced mixed trend patterns.

Source: IndexBox Platform