New Articles

LNG: The Perfect Alternative Fuel for Your Business?

global trade lng fuel

LNG: The Perfect Alternative Fuel for Your Business?

In an era dominated by discussions around electric and hydrogen-fueled vehicles, fleet managers and business owners find themselves at the crossroads of deciding on the most efficient and sustainable fuel option for their operations. 

Among the abovementioned, there’s another contender making waves on the market – Liquefied Natural Gas (“LNG”). 

Read also: AI Power Surge Fuels Demand for US Natural Gas

Joost Jansen, Business Development Manager at Dover Fueling Solutions® (“DFS”) commented: “Ultimately, consumers seek energy that is affordable, reliable, available and environmentally friendly. LNG meets these criteria, and its competitive costs make it a promising choice for commercial transportation.”

DFS takes a closer look at LNG as a compelling alternative fuel and delves into its environmental, cost, and business impacts to determine if it could be the perfect solution for your fleet fueling business.

Environmental impact

As supply concerns are fading away across the continent, buyers and governments are now refocusing their efforts on lowering CO2 emissions to meet decarbonization goals.

LNG is a natural gas that has been reduced to a liquid state through a process of cooling, and it is the cleanest burning fossil fuel. It produces 40% less carbon dioxide than coal and 30% less than oil.

Its primary component is methane (85-89%), which releases fewer pollutants during combustion, making it a sustainable choice that improves air quality.

Another key player on the market is Bio-LNG, which emits 85% less CO2 than diesel and is a key solution in minimizing emissions from the heavy goods vehicle (“HGV”) sector.

LNG fuel station deployment comes with a challenge in the race to net zero. During the storage  of LNG, Boil-Off Gas (“BOG”), continuously evaporates, which causes the pressure inside the LNG storage tank to rise. However, venting BOG into the atmosphere is costly and become illegal as part of the Europe (Green) Deal. In order to manage this, and to illustrate a real world example, Gasrec implemented DFS’s patented LIQAL BTU Boil-off Gas Treatment Unit (the “BTU”) that converts BOG back into liquid form, avoiding venting and preserving LNG stock, thus reducing losses – both financial and environmental.

Moreover, the LIQAL BTU offers unlimited holding time for LNG with no need for active management of LNG tank storage pressure, posing a significant opportunity for the reduction of operational costs.

A cost-effective solution

Fuel poverty is a real problem, and providing affordable energy is critical. LNG emerges as a cost-efficient solution, thanks to the ample supply of natural gas resources and the steadiness of its prices, in contrast to the fluctuations observed in the oil market. 

During the first half of 2023, LNG imports into Europe were predominantly led by nations located in East Asia and Europe. China, Japan, and South Korea emerged as the top three global importers, followed by the UK, France, and Spain, where the majority of European regasification capacity is housed.

Access to a diversity of suppliers can not only reduce prices but can also afford DFS the flexibility to move to more reliable shippers or avoid geopolitically sensitive markets.

The affordability of vehicles powered by LNG is on the rise, supported by an expanding infrastructure catering to specific fueling fleet requirements.

Furthermore, LNG engines typically incur lower maintenance costs, yielding long-term savings for businesses. Unlike electric vehicles, which often demand substantial upfront investments in charging infrastructure, LNG presents a more gradual transition without the necessity for a massive initial financial commitment.

A recent study has highlighted the effects of ongoing advancements in liquefaction and shipping technologies on the reduction in production, transportation, and regasification costs, fueling the swift expansion of the global LNG industry. The purification and liquefaction costs of natural gas have seen a decrease of 35%–50%, while the transportation cost per unit of LNG has declined by 40%, making LNG a price-competitive solution for today and for the future.

“Businesses have the opportunity to invest in LNG fuel technology and LNG dispensers that provide truck drivers with an intuitive refueling experience and exceptional uptime. When paired with the LIQAL BTU to ensure consistent performance, businesses can upgrade their fuel sites with a low total cost of ownership while embracing the latest clean fuel technology,” commented Joost Jansen, Business Development Manager at DFS.

Positive business impact

Transitioning to LNG can positively impact businesses in several ways. Firstly, LNG engines often boast a longer lifespan than traditional diesel engines, enhancing the overall durability of a fleet. The gas is also readily available, with a growing network of LNG refueling stations worldwide, ensuring  operations are less likely to face disruptions due to fuel shortages.

“LNG infrastructure may be embryonic, but it is fast growing. There are around 713 LNG stations on the continent, with the bulk concentrated in Western Europe, and its cost-competitive benefits mean it has strong potential for commercial transport,” said Lise-Lotte Nordholm, Vice President and General Manager of Clean Energy and Global Platforms at DFS, in an interview for Fuel Oil News.

As of July 2022, the majority of LNG stations in Europe are in Germany (128), followed by Italy (125) and Spain (88).

LNG is especially well-suited for long-distance road freight transport, given the limited availability of alternatives to diesel in this case. Moreover, its familiar refueling method and speed should appeal to drivers. With the emergence of reliable and convenient LNG refueling units, such as the compact LIQAL LNG Mobile Refueling Unit that Gasrec incorporated to suit numerous locations, it becomes easier for fuel retailers to implement clean energies with minimal work or additional costs – this can even be in addition to conventional fuel dispensers at larger service stations, covering a multitude of drivers

Increasing demand for LNG

As the UK expects a colder winter and, in lieu of the paradigm shift in gas imports due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, we see a subsequent increase in LNG imports as the primary fuel supply.

“LNG, especially BioLNG, is not only a cost-effective solution, but it also has the ability to reduce emissions, and that’s highly attractive to the heavy-duty transport industry and other adjacent carbon-intensive sectors.”

According to the European Commission, LNG development into a global commodity can improve the security of energy supply in general by boosting the use of natural gas as fuel for transport. LNG provides a long-term solution, as The International Energy Agency predicts  there are enough resources to last 230 years if consumption remains at current levels.

Conclusion

“With its environmental advantages, cost-effectiveness, availability and positive business impacts, LNG is on the way to becoming one of the most in-demand fuels globally for heavy-duty transport. It can contribute to future energy security measures and help facilitate the worldwide transition to decarbonize major carbon-emitting economies. We’re witnessing the evolution of the consumer experience in fueling and convenience retail,” concluded ____, _____ at DFS.

Sources

https://www.doverfuelingsolutions.com/customersuccess/the-liqal-%7C-dfs-boil-off-gas-management-solution

https://www.cornwall-insight.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/The-shifting-sands-of-Liquified-Natural-Gas-in-Europe-Oct-2023.pdf?utm_source=website&utm_medium=website#:~:text=The%20role%20of%20LNG%20in%20decarbonisation&text=LNG%20produces%2040%25%20less%20CO2,harmful%20to%20the%20earth’s%20atmosphere.

https://fueloilnews.co.uk/2023/09/greening-the-sector-dover-fueling-solutions-considers-the-future-for-fuels/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1251785/number-of-lng-refueling-stations-in-europe-by-country/

https://www.doverfuelingsolutions.com/customersuccess/reliable-bio-lng-refueling-for-gasrec

https://alternative-fuels-observatory.ec.europa.eu/general-information/alternative-fuels

global trade investment

Hydrogen: Why Your Investment Isn’t Up in the Air 

It’s clear that hydrogen remains a central pillar on the road to net zero with the fuel source predicted to make up 22% of final energy demand globally by 2050.

Read also: The Growing Green Hydrogen Market: A Sustainable Energy Revolution

Hydrogen is particularly effective in parts of the economy difficult to decarbonize such as long-haul transport with its natural abundance and easy nozzle-to-pump filling dispensation.

With the global fuel cell electric vehicle market expected to be worth 428.7 billion by 2032, forecourt owners are wise to invest in dedicated hydrogen pumps to help future-proof their businesses.

However, the investment also demonstrates a significant financial contribution. fueling company, Dover Fueling Solutions explain why this is a sound decision which will pay off in the long run.

How is hydrogen distributed and at what cost?  

The distribution of hydrogen is via three main channels: pipelines, high-pressure tube trailers and liquefied hydrogen tankers.

At present, pipes typically remain the least expensive way to deliver large volumes of hydrogen, with 4,300km of pipeline currently in place across the continent and 23,365km predicted by 2030.

Another option is tube trailers which transport compressed hydrogen gas by truck, rail or sea. This is typically an expensive method and is used for shorter distances of 200 miles or less.

Liquefied hydrogen tankers are another method used to cool hydrogen to temperatures where it becomes a liquid. This is also typically expensive but can be transported more efficiently and over longer distances too.

In addition to these different logistic methods, the dispensing mechanism is more complicated too due to the various temperatures hydrogen needs to be stored and dispensed at.

As a gas, hydrogen requires storage in high-pressure tanks of around 350-700 bar or 5000 – 10,000 psi. Liquid storage, meanwhile, requires cryogenic temperatures of -252.8 degrees. Both of these can be costly procedures with an estimated $10 per kWh of stored hydrogen capacity.

You may be wondering whether all of this is worth it, especially with the challenges surrounding distribution, storage and converting hydrogen.

So, is all of this expense worth it?

Clearly then, championing hydrogen fuel pumps demonstrates a significant investment for forecourts but that isn’t to say it doesn’t make shrewd business sense, particularly given hydrogen’s stratospheric potential.

The International Energy Agency notes that the move towards hydrogen is enjoying “unprecedented momentum” around the world as it finally presents itself as a longstanding clean energy solution.

In Europe, the ‘Basque Hydrogen Corridor’ has seen 200 million investments alone in various projects with the market expected to swell to $428 billion globally by 2032.

Of course, to facilitate all of this demand and growth, the sector will need a fully scaled infrastructure which caters to the needs of drivers, be they commercial or consumer. To accommodate, hydrogen refuelling stations are expected to grow by 17% with North America leading the growth.

The hope is that as hydrogen becomes more widely adopted, the cost of hydrogen adoption will fall dramatically. This will be in part due to technological improvements across the sector including renewable energy generation and declining costs of hydrogen electrolysis. Forecasters predict that the costs of hydrogen production could decline as much as 50% by 2023 and 70% by 2050.

In fact, stock market analysts Motley Fool believe that hydrogen is one of the best alternative fuel investments to make right now. Given its potential to decarbonize heavy industry, the fuel is likely to see an abundance of private investment which should improve infrastructure across the continent. The website estimates that it could well become a multi-trillion industry of the future.

Conclusion 

While the initial financial outlay may be daunting for some station owners, the hydrogen market demonstrates enough growth to merit the investment.

LEZ global trade

Going Green: The Effects of LEZs across European Cities

DFS explores the impact o Low Emission Zones (LEZ) on the fueling topography of the continent in years to come.

Read also: Lessons For Ports: How To Seek $3 Billion In U.S. Grants For Zero-Emission Moves

Signs bearing the latest Low Emission Zone (LEZ) guidelines have become a familiar sight in European urban areas, with 320 LEZs now in play across the continent and 500 expected by 2025.

The system has been praised for improving air quality in cities, while reducing overall road traffic and boosting the local economies in which they operate.

According to the latest statistics, Italy is blazing a trail with 172 LEZs across the country, followed by Germany with 78. Most other countries meanwhile remain in their infancy with each boasting fewer than 20.

But is this set to change in future?

Fueling company, Dover Fueling Solutions (DFS), explore their impact and explain how Low Emission Zones (LEZ) may change the fueling topography of the continent in years to come.

Why are Low Emission Zones important?

The Clean Cities Report in 2022 cited the twin challenges of toxic air pollution and climate change as reasons for implementing LEZs.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), air pollution is the biggest environmental risk to health, causing 300,000 premature deaths per year in the EU alone.

Starkly, EU air quality limits are reportedly being breached in over 100 cities across the continent. This places those living in urban areas at significant risk, meaning it is imperative that anti-pollution measures are taken.

Burning fossil fuels is the main cause of air pollution which includes emissions from factories, power plans and vehicles. Agriculture and its accompanying bi-products, methane and ammonia, are another leading cause while volcanoes, dust, pollen and wild fires are more natural contributors.

This not only pertains to physical health. The mental health benefits have also been corroborated.

Research demonstrates that small increases in air pollution are linked to rises in depression and anxiety amongst the urban populace. Cleaner air also means an improvement in intelligence and a lower risk of dementia too.

Looking ahead, expect to see LEZs supplanted by Zero Emission Zones. These have been trialled in European cities including Milan, Paris, Brussels, Madrid and Warsaw, with much success.

What are the recorded effects of LEZs across Europe?

This is all well and good in principle, but do LEZs bring positive effects in practice?

Well, the Clean Cities Campaign points to an average reduction in nitrogen dioxide emissions of around 20% across all LEZ areas. Further results were as follows:

London – 40%

Brussels – 33%

Paris – 24%

Lisbon – 22% 

London’s (ultra) LEZ makes for an interesting case study. A study from Bath University established that less nitrogen dioxide pollution contributed to a 4.5% reduction in long-term health problems, in addition to an 8% drop in respiratory illness.

The healthcare cost savings in dealing with this are estimated at £963 million in the Greater London area alone. Experts also predict that London’s ULEZ has helped reduce anxiety by 6%. This can be explained by the positive neurological impacts of cleaner air added to the enhanced conditions for physical exercise.

In the light-duty vehicle arena, Rotterdam’s LEZ has reduced the number of severely polluting cars by half, with an accompanying 20-30% reduction in soot.

The benefits of LEZ schemes extend beyond cleaner air too. This includes more stable traffic flows with little recorded negative business impacts. 

How is LEZ affecting clean fuel adoption?

It could also be said that LEZ are changing the face of refueling across the continent.

In the European Commission’s 2050 long-term strategy, alternative fuel sources such as electricity, Hydrogen, LNG / CNG and biofuels were outlined as cleaner alternatives to traditional liquid fuels within the transport sector.

Because these power sources avoid the use of diesel and gasoline, they can in turn, help to reduce air pollution, particularly in urban areas with a higher volume of traffic.

As a result, electric vehicle (EV) adoption, and therefore EV charging infrastructure, has been concentrated around cities – particularly those with an LEZ in place. For example, areas with an LEZ (or a planned LEZ) in operation, reached remarkably higher levels of EV penetration than their national averages.

89% of new vehicle registrations in Oslo, for instance, were Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV) or Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV), followed by Amsterdam (31%), London (22%) and Paris (20%).

Across other alternative fuels, there is a correlation too. While liquified natural gas (LNG) refueling stations tend to lie outside the bandwidth of LEZ boundaries, there’s a notably higher concentration of LNG stations within countries that have implemented LEZ and ULEZ.

This certainly shows that LEZs are having a positive impact on clean fuel adoption.

Whether this means that traditional city centre refueling stations will become a thing of the past remains up for debate, especially with the sale of ICE vehicles still permitted – in some countries – beyond 2030. One possibility, however, is that given the rise of LEZs, petrol and diesel stations may be pushed further and further out of the city and along motorway infrastructure.

Conclusion

The growth of LEZ and ULEZ across the continent has been a defining feature of recent years and looks set to continue in future.

This has brought some impressive benefits from cleaner air to better physical and mental health and reduced congestion.

There certainly appears to be a positive correlation between these zones and cleaner transport adoption, with motorists looking to combat daily charges and embrace more sustainable driving practices.

This may mean that those in more urban and metropolitan areas transition quicker than those in more rural areas, but the long-term effects remain to be seen.