Logistics Companies Settle False Claims Allegations for $1 Million | Global Trade Magazine
Ocean Carriers
  August 3rd, 2016 | Written by

Logistics Companies Settle False Claims Allegations for $1 Million

Case Was Related to the Delivery of Humanitarian Food Aid

Sharelines

  • Logistics companies cough up $1 million to settle false claims case.
  • Allegation: Jacintoport charged ocean carriers more than permitted under contract to deliver humanitarian aid.
  • DOJ official: “The Justice Department will hold accountable those who seek to abuse this important program.”

Jacintoport International LLC and Seaboard Marine Ltd. have agreed to pay $1.075 million to settle a lawsuit alleging that the companies violated the False Claims Act in connection with a warehousing and logistics contract for the storage and delivery of humanitarian food aid.

Jacintoport is a cargo handling and stevedoring firm headquartered in Houston, Texas, and Seaboard Marine, an affiliate of Jacintoport, is an ocean transportation company headquartered in Miami, Florida.

In its lawsuit, the United States government alleged that Jacintoport executed in 2007 a warehousing and logistics contract with the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for the storage and redelivery of emergency humanitarian food aid. The contract contained caps on the rates Jacintoport could charge ocean carriers to load humanitarian food aid onto ships bound for crisis areas around the world. The complaint alleges that in 2008 and 2009, Jacintoport, under the supervision and control of Seaboard, charged ocean carriers more for stevedoring than permitted. These inflated stevedoring charges were subsequently lumped into other costs for delivering humanitarian food aid and passed on to the United States government.

“USAID’s humanitarian food aid program provides critical assistance to starving people all over the world,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “The Justice Department will hold accountable those who seek to abuse this important program.”

“It is unacceptable for companies that do business with the federal government to inflate their costs,” said U.S. Attorney Channing D. Phillips for the District of Columbia. “This settlement demonstrates our determination to protect the taxpayers’ dollars and humanitarian programs from abuse.”

The allegations resolved by this settlement were initially brought in a lawsuit filed under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act by John Raggio, a shipping contractor who allegedly received an invoice from Jacintoport that contained the excessive stevedoring charge. Under the act’s provisions, a private citizen can sue on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery. The United States is permitted to intervene in the lawsuit, as it did here. Raggio will receive $215,000.

Need a Logistics Provider?

Compare over 100 Instantly



Videos

Sponsored Content

Download the FREE Global Trade Magazine APP!

Get My App